SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"The Senate must pass the PFAS Action Act of 2019, without any weakening amendments. Our country deserves clean water. Nothing less," said Food & Water Action's Mary Grant.
(Photo: Shutterstock)
GOP-Controlled Senate Urged to Pass Measure to Curtail Toxic 'Forever Chemicals'
The legislation would require the federal government to test for health effects of PFAS.
Jan 09, 2020
Public health advocates urged the U.S. Senate to pass legislation regarding so-called "forever chemicals" after the measure's passage Friday in the House.
The bipartisan PFAS Action Act of 2019, which addresses per-and polyfluorinated substances known as PFAS, passed in a 247-159 vote, largely along party lines.
PFAS chemicals--used to give products nonstick and heat-resistant properties--have been linked to numerous adverse health effects including kidney disease and cancer. They've also been implicated in a "contamination crisis." According to Environmental Working Group (EWG), PFAS contamination affects over 600 sites in 43 states, including public water systems.
The measure from lead sponsor Rep. Dingell, Debbie (D-Mich.), as the Detroit Free Press summed up, would
- Require PFAS be listed as hazardous substances under the Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund program within a year.
- Require the EPA set a drinking water standard that would force agencies to react if it were violated. Currently, there is a standard of 70 parts per trillion used to advise water systems but it does not require enforcement.
- Require the federal government to test for health effects of PFAS.
MarketWatch also reported Friday:
If a "hazardous substances" designation becomes a reality, companies like 3M, DuPont DD, and Chemours CC, "could be on the hook for billions of dollars in cleanup fees," analysts at Beacon Policy Advisors said in a note on Thursday. In a similar vein, Height's analysts said the PFAS Action Act "would increase liabilities for PFAS manufacturers like 3M and Chemours, while benefiting water remediation companies like Evoqua AQUA."
The White House said in statement (pdf) Tuesday that President Donald Trump would veto the bill if it reaches his desk. A number of advocacy groups, meanwhile, welcomed Friday's development.
"We applaud the House of Representatives for taking action on PFAS toxic chemical pollution; it has been a long-time coming," said Food & Water Action Public Water for All campaign director Mary Grant. "There is no wiggle room when it comes to enacting a thorough plan to remove these chemicals from our drinking water with enforceable regulations and ensure the biggest polluters are held accountable for cleaning up the worst contamination."
"As more and more communities suffer the health consequences of exposure to these highly toxic chemicals in the water they drink, the food they eat, and the furniture in their homes, Congress is getting a clear message that they must take action," said Safer Chemicals Healthy Families director Liz Hitchcock.
According to EWG senior vice president for government affairs Scott Faber, the legislation has the power to force action on an issue the Environmental Protection Agency has been dragging its feet. "EPA's failure to protect us from PFAS has become legendary," he said.
"If EPA will not do its job, it's up to Congress to do its job," said Faber.
That means the upper chamber needs to do right by the American public, said Food & Water Action's Grant.
"The Senate must not compromise when it comes to protecting Americans from the possibility of cancer-causing chemicals in their water. The Senate must pass the PFAS Action Act of 2019, without any weakening amendments. Our country deserves clean water. Nothing less," she said.
Dingell, for her part, said in a statement Friday that the act's passage in the House marks "a beginning, but this won't help communities or people unless it's passed by the Senate and signed into law by the president."
"We all must work together to protect human health and our environment," she continued. "Further inaction only means more people continue to be poisoned and contamination spreads further."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
environmentenvironmental working groupfood & water watchpollutionpublic healthus houseus senatewaterpfasforever chemicals
Public health advocates urged the U.S. Senate to pass legislation regarding so-called "forever chemicals" after the measure's passage Friday in the House.
The bipartisan PFAS Action Act of 2019, which addresses per-and polyfluorinated substances known as PFAS, passed in a 247-159 vote, largely along party lines.
PFAS chemicals--used to give products nonstick and heat-resistant properties--have been linked to numerous adverse health effects including kidney disease and cancer. They've also been implicated in a "contamination crisis." According to Environmental Working Group (EWG), PFAS contamination affects over 600 sites in 43 states, including public water systems.
The measure from lead sponsor Rep. Dingell, Debbie (D-Mich.), as the Detroit Free Press summed up, would
- Require PFAS be listed as hazardous substances under the Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund program within a year.
- Require the EPA set a drinking water standard that would force agencies to react if it were violated. Currently, there is a standard of 70 parts per trillion used to advise water systems but it does not require enforcement.
- Require the federal government to test for health effects of PFAS.
MarketWatch also reported Friday:
If a "hazardous substances" designation becomes a reality, companies like 3M, DuPont DD, and Chemours CC, "could be on the hook for billions of dollars in cleanup fees," analysts at Beacon Policy Advisors said in a note on Thursday. In a similar vein, Height's analysts said the PFAS Action Act "would increase liabilities for PFAS manufacturers like 3M and Chemours, while benefiting water remediation companies like Evoqua AQUA."
The White House said in statement (pdf) Tuesday that President Donald Trump would veto the bill if it reaches his desk. A number of advocacy groups, meanwhile, welcomed Friday's development.
"We applaud the House of Representatives for taking action on PFAS toxic chemical pollution; it has been a long-time coming," said Food & Water Action Public Water for All campaign director Mary Grant. "There is no wiggle room when it comes to enacting a thorough plan to remove these chemicals from our drinking water with enforceable regulations and ensure the biggest polluters are held accountable for cleaning up the worst contamination."
"As more and more communities suffer the health consequences of exposure to these highly toxic chemicals in the water they drink, the food they eat, and the furniture in their homes, Congress is getting a clear message that they must take action," said Safer Chemicals Healthy Families director Liz Hitchcock.
According to EWG senior vice president for government affairs Scott Faber, the legislation has the power to force action on an issue the Environmental Protection Agency has been dragging its feet. "EPA's failure to protect us from PFAS has become legendary," he said.
"If EPA will not do its job, it's up to Congress to do its job," said Faber.
That means the upper chamber needs to do right by the American public, said Food & Water Action's Grant.
"The Senate must not compromise when it comes to protecting Americans from the possibility of cancer-causing chemicals in their water. The Senate must pass the PFAS Action Act of 2019, without any weakening amendments. Our country deserves clean water. Nothing less," she said.
Dingell, for her part, said in a statement Friday that the act's passage in the House marks "a beginning, but this won't help communities or people unless it's passed by the Senate and signed into law by the president."
"We all must work together to protect human health and our environment," she continued. "Further inaction only means more people continue to be poisoned and contamination spreads further."
Public health advocates urged the U.S. Senate to pass legislation regarding so-called "forever chemicals" after the measure's passage Friday in the House.
The bipartisan PFAS Action Act of 2019, which addresses per-and polyfluorinated substances known as PFAS, passed in a 247-159 vote, largely along party lines.
PFAS chemicals--used to give products nonstick and heat-resistant properties--have been linked to numerous adverse health effects including kidney disease and cancer. They've also been implicated in a "contamination crisis." According to Environmental Working Group (EWG), PFAS contamination affects over 600 sites in 43 states, including public water systems.
The measure from lead sponsor Rep. Dingell, Debbie (D-Mich.), as the Detroit Free Press summed up, would
- Require PFAS be listed as hazardous substances under the Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund program within a year.
- Require the EPA set a drinking water standard that would force agencies to react if it were violated. Currently, there is a standard of 70 parts per trillion used to advise water systems but it does not require enforcement.
- Require the federal government to test for health effects of PFAS.
MarketWatch also reported Friday:
If a "hazardous substances" designation becomes a reality, companies like 3M, DuPont DD, and Chemours CC, "could be on the hook for billions of dollars in cleanup fees," analysts at Beacon Policy Advisors said in a note on Thursday. In a similar vein, Height's analysts said the PFAS Action Act "would increase liabilities for PFAS manufacturers like 3M and Chemours, while benefiting water remediation companies like Evoqua AQUA."
The White House said in statement (pdf) Tuesday that President Donald Trump would veto the bill if it reaches his desk. A number of advocacy groups, meanwhile, welcomed Friday's development.
"We applaud the House of Representatives for taking action on PFAS toxic chemical pollution; it has been a long-time coming," said Food & Water Action Public Water for All campaign director Mary Grant. "There is no wiggle room when it comes to enacting a thorough plan to remove these chemicals from our drinking water with enforceable regulations and ensure the biggest polluters are held accountable for cleaning up the worst contamination."
"As more and more communities suffer the health consequences of exposure to these highly toxic chemicals in the water they drink, the food they eat, and the furniture in their homes, Congress is getting a clear message that they must take action," said Safer Chemicals Healthy Families director Liz Hitchcock.
According to EWG senior vice president for government affairs Scott Faber, the legislation has the power to force action on an issue the Environmental Protection Agency has been dragging its feet. "EPA's failure to protect us from PFAS has become legendary," he said.
"If EPA will not do its job, it's up to Congress to do its job," said Faber.
That means the upper chamber needs to do right by the American public, said Food & Water Action's Grant.
"The Senate must not compromise when it comes to protecting Americans from the possibility of cancer-causing chemicals in their water. The Senate must pass the PFAS Action Act of 2019, without any weakening amendments. Our country deserves clean water. Nothing less," she said.
Dingell, for her part, said in a statement Friday that the act's passage in the House marks "a beginning, but this won't help communities or people unless it's passed by the Senate and signed into law by the president."
"We all must work together to protect human health and our environment," she continued. "Further inaction only means more people continue to be poisoned and contamination spreads further."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.