Published on

Trump EPA Sued for Putting Millions of Lives at Risk With Rollback of Chemical Safety Rules

"We are fighting for the lives and safety of our families and workers. Our lives are more valuable than the bottom line of a few chemical barons."

A chemical plant of TPC Group is shrouded by smoke as the fire continues in Port Neches, Texas on Nov. 27, 2019. (Photo: Steven Song/Xinhua via Getty Images)

A coalition of more than a dozen environmental groups on Thursday sued the Trump administration for rolling back chemical disaster prevention regulations, a move they say has endangered millions of lives.

"By killing these critical protections, millions of people living near chemical facilities in the United States are put in harm's way," said the coalition represented by environmental advocacy organization Earthjustice. "We are fighting for the lives and safety of our families and workers. Our lives are more valuable than the bottom line of a few chemical barons."

The rollback of the Obama-era Chemical Disaster Rule was finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last month despite urgent warnings that the decision would put the health and safety of people who live near chemical plants at risk. The EPA's new rule, which the environmental coalition said is illegal, took effect Thursday morning.

Last month, just a week after the rollback was announced, a TPC Group chemical plant in Port Neches, Texas exploded and spewed toxic gas into the air, prompting authorities to issue an order urging 50,000 city residents to evacuate. Environmentalists cited the incident as evidence of the dangers of deregulation and the need for stronger disaster prevention rules.


Never Miss a Beat.

Get our best delivered to your inbox.

"Rolling back the Chemical Disaster Rule is a death sentence for many people in the Port Arthur/Port Neches area of Texas, and beyond," Hilton Kelley, founder and executive director of the Community In-Power and Development Association, said in a statement. "The TPC disaster in Port Neches/Grove is a prime example of why we need the Chemical Disaster Rule in place."

According to Earthjustice, "nearly 180 million Americans live in the worst-case scenario zones for a chemical disaster" and "at least one in three children go to a school near a hazardous chemical facility."

Emma Cheuse, an attorney with Earthjustice, said the coalition had "no choice" but to take the Trump administration to court.

"The EPA's rollback of life-saving components of the Chemical Disaster Rule is not just unlawful, it is irresponsible," said Cheuse. "Instead, EPA should do its job and ensure that chemical companies do everything in their power to keep surrounding communities safe, and avoid a worst-case scenario."

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Share This Article