

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

A chemical plant of TPC Group is shrouded by smoke as the fire continues in Port Neches, Texas on Nov. 27, 2019. (Photo: Steven Song/Xinhua via Getty Images)
A coalition of more than a dozen environmental groups on Thursday sued the Trump administration for rolling back chemical disaster prevention regulations, a move they say has endangered millions of lives.
"By killing these critical protections, millions of people living near chemical facilities in the United States are put in harm's way," said the coalition represented by environmental advocacy organization Earthjustice. "We are fighting for the lives and safety of our families and workers. Our lives are more valuable than the bottom line of a few chemical barons."
The rollback of the Obama-era Chemical Disaster Rule was finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last month despite urgent warnings that the decision would put the health and safety of people who live near chemical plants at risk. The EPA's new rule, which the environmental coalition said is illegal, took effect Thursday morning.
Last month, just a week after the rollback was announced, a TPC Group chemical plant in Port Neches, Texas exploded and spewed toxic gas into the air, prompting authorities to issue an order urging 50,000 city residents to evacuate. Environmentalists cited the incident as evidence of the dangers of deregulation and the need for stronger disaster prevention rules.
"Rolling back the Chemical Disaster Rule is a death sentence for many people in the Port Arthur/Port Neches area of Texas, and beyond," Hilton Kelley, founder and executive director of the Community In-Power and Development Association, said in a statement. "The TPC disaster in Port Neches/Grove is a prime example of why we need the Chemical Disaster Rule in place."
According to Earthjustice, "nearly 180 million Americans live in the worst-case scenario zones for a chemical disaster" and "at least one in three children go to a school near a hazardous chemical facility."
Emma Cheuse, an attorney with Earthjustice, said the coalition had "no choice" but to take the Trump administration to court.
"The EPA's rollback of life-saving components of the Chemical Disaster Rule is not just unlawful, it is irresponsible," said Cheuse. "Instead, EPA should do its job and ensure that chemical companies do everything in their power to keep surrounding communities safe, and avoid a worst-case scenario."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A coalition of more than a dozen environmental groups on Thursday sued the Trump administration for rolling back chemical disaster prevention regulations, a move they say has endangered millions of lives.
"By killing these critical protections, millions of people living near chemical facilities in the United States are put in harm's way," said the coalition represented by environmental advocacy organization Earthjustice. "We are fighting for the lives and safety of our families and workers. Our lives are more valuable than the bottom line of a few chemical barons."
The rollback of the Obama-era Chemical Disaster Rule was finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last month despite urgent warnings that the decision would put the health and safety of people who live near chemical plants at risk. The EPA's new rule, which the environmental coalition said is illegal, took effect Thursday morning.
Last month, just a week after the rollback was announced, a TPC Group chemical plant in Port Neches, Texas exploded and spewed toxic gas into the air, prompting authorities to issue an order urging 50,000 city residents to evacuate. Environmentalists cited the incident as evidence of the dangers of deregulation and the need for stronger disaster prevention rules.
"Rolling back the Chemical Disaster Rule is a death sentence for many people in the Port Arthur/Port Neches area of Texas, and beyond," Hilton Kelley, founder and executive director of the Community In-Power and Development Association, said in a statement. "The TPC disaster in Port Neches/Grove is a prime example of why we need the Chemical Disaster Rule in place."
According to Earthjustice, "nearly 180 million Americans live in the worst-case scenario zones for a chemical disaster" and "at least one in three children go to a school near a hazardous chemical facility."
Emma Cheuse, an attorney with Earthjustice, said the coalition had "no choice" but to take the Trump administration to court.
"The EPA's rollback of life-saving components of the Chemical Disaster Rule is not just unlawful, it is irresponsible," said Cheuse. "Instead, EPA should do its job and ensure that chemical companies do everything in their power to keep surrounding communities safe, and avoid a worst-case scenario."
A coalition of more than a dozen environmental groups on Thursday sued the Trump administration for rolling back chemical disaster prevention regulations, a move they say has endangered millions of lives.
"By killing these critical protections, millions of people living near chemical facilities in the United States are put in harm's way," said the coalition represented by environmental advocacy organization Earthjustice. "We are fighting for the lives and safety of our families and workers. Our lives are more valuable than the bottom line of a few chemical barons."
The rollback of the Obama-era Chemical Disaster Rule was finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last month despite urgent warnings that the decision would put the health and safety of people who live near chemical plants at risk. The EPA's new rule, which the environmental coalition said is illegal, took effect Thursday morning.
Last month, just a week after the rollback was announced, a TPC Group chemical plant in Port Neches, Texas exploded and spewed toxic gas into the air, prompting authorities to issue an order urging 50,000 city residents to evacuate. Environmentalists cited the incident as evidence of the dangers of deregulation and the need for stronger disaster prevention rules.
"Rolling back the Chemical Disaster Rule is a death sentence for many people in the Port Arthur/Port Neches area of Texas, and beyond," Hilton Kelley, founder and executive director of the Community In-Power and Development Association, said in a statement. "The TPC disaster in Port Neches/Grove is a prime example of why we need the Chemical Disaster Rule in place."
According to Earthjustice, "nearly 180 million Americans live in the worst-case scenario zones for a chemical disaster" and "at least one in three children go to a school near a hazardous chemical facility."
Emma Cheuse, an attorney with Earthjustice, said the coalition had "no choice" but to take the Trump administration to court.
"The EPA's rollback of life-saving components of the Chemical Disaster Rule is not just unlawful, it is irresponsible," said Cheuse. "Instead, EPA should do its job and ensure that chemical companies do everything in their power to keep surrounding communities safe, and avoid a worst-case scenario."