SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Vermont senator and presidential candidate Bernie Sanders campaigns at the University of New Hampshire in Durham. (Photo: Preston Ehrler/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Enjoying a national upswing this week--including a return to second place in the Real Clear Politics poll average and in a new poll out Wednesday--Sen. Bernie Sanders also now leads in the key early state of New Hampshire, according to a new state survey.
According to the Emerson poll released Tuesday, Sanders is now in first place with 26% followed by South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg in second with 22%, and former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren tied for third with 14% each.
\u201cNH POLL: @BernieSanders leads #NewHampshire primary, followed by @PeteButtigieg \n\nhttps://t.co/CpRJCGRgBG\u201d— Emerson College Polling (@Emerson College Polling) 1574820000
Dramatic in the results of the tracking poll was the swing among the top four candidates since it was last conducted in September, with Sanders up 13 points and Buttigieg up 11 points, while Warren and Biden dropped 6 and 10 points respectively.
Spencer Kimball, director of Emerson Polling, said "the Democratic voters have taken a look at Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren and they appear unsatisfied at this time which brought some voters back to Bernie Sanders while others are now moving to a fresh face in Pete Buttigieg, this demonstrates the fluidity of the race."
According to Emerson:
Sanders has retaken a strong lead among those under 50 in New Hampshire, now leading with 38% support among that group. Following him among younger voters is Warren at 16%, Buttigieg at 12% and Biden at 8%. Buttigieg leads with those 50 and over with 32% support, followed by Biden with 19%, Sanders with 15% and Warren with 11%.
Sanders holds a stronger lead among registered Democrats as he garners 31% support among this group, followed by Buttigieg and Biden with 17%, and Warren with 15%. Among independents, Buttigieg leads with 29% support, followed by Sanders with 21%, Warren with 12% and Biden with 10%.
Looking within ideology, Sanders leads within those who are very liberal with 47% support, followed by Warren with 18%, Buttigieg with 12%, and Biden with 7%. Among those self-described as somewhat liberal, Buttigieg leads with 28% support, followed by Sanders with 25%, Warren with 18% and Biden with 12%. Among moderate/conservative voters, Buttigieg leads with 23% support, followed by Biden with 18%, Sanders with 17% and Gabbard with 11%.
As members of the Sanders campaign noted, the Emerson poll emerged just one day after the New York Times ran a headline--titled "Did New Hampshire Fall Out of Love With Bernie Sanders?"--that strongly suggested the senator's star was falling in the early voting New England state. Campaign speechwriter David Sirota tweeted:
And Mike Casca, the campaign's communication director, said wryly: "I read somewhere recently that New Hampshire fell out of love with Bernie."
Meanwhile, on the national level, the Real Clear Politics poll average showed Sanders had returned to second place behind Biden, pushing Warren back to third place with Buttigieg still at a distant fourth. The average, which incorporates national polls taken up through Nov. 25th, showed Biden leading nationally with 28.2%; followed by Sanders with 17.8%; Warren with 16.7%; and Buttigieg with 10.5%.
\u201cFor the first time in months, @BernieSanders is back in second place in the @RealClearNews average of recent polls. This is a significant improvement in position for Sanders, who has been rising steadily in recent weeks.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1574745777
Following that trend, a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS released Wednesday showed Biden in the lead with 28% followed by Sanders in second place with 17% percent of support among registered Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents. Warren holds the third spot with 14% while Buttigieg comes in last among the top tier with 11%.
Notably, as CNN points out, Sanders enjoys the trust of most voters when it comes to the key issues of the climate crisis and healthcare:
On health care, 28% say Sanders--an advocate of "Medicare for All" and the elimination of private health insurance--would best handle the issue. That's about even with the 26% who choose Biden, who has argued against moving to a completely government-run system. Another 19% say they prefer Warren's approach, which ultimately results in government health coverage for all, while 7% choose Buttigieg, and no other candidate has the backing of more than 3% on the issue.
Sanders leads the way more clearly on handling the climate crisis: 27% favor his approach, followed by 21% who prefer Biden and 15% Warren.
In an edition of the Sanders campaign's Bern Notice newsletter sent Tuesday, Sirota noted that his candidate is now surging nationally but also pointed to the early voting states where, in addition to New Hampshire, Sanders is gaining ground.
"A new poll shows that since early October, Bernie has gained a whopping 9 points in the early primary and caucus states that could play a pivotal role in the 2020 election," Sirota wrote. "As of today, Bernie is at 23 percent--and just 3 points behind Joe Biden--in Morning Consult's tracking poll of Democratic voters in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada."
In Iowa on Tuesday, the campaign released a new ad focused on the state that featured a new rallying cry for the campaign: "Big Us."
\u201cYou\u2019ve heard of Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Money. \n\nNone of them stand a chance against #BigUs \n\u201d— Abshir Omar (@Abshir Omar) 1574784838
"Bernie is in the pocket of #BigUs," supporters online were saying as they shared the ad and the message on social media. "Pass it on."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Enjoying a national upswing this week--including a return to second place in the Real Clear Politics poll average and in a new poll out Wednesday--Sen. Bernie Sanders also now leads in the key early state of New Hampshire, according to a new state survey.
According to the Emerson poll released Tuesday, Sanders is now in first place with 26% followed by South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg in second with 22%, and former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren tied for third with 14% each.
\u201cNH POLL: @BernieSanders leads #NewHampshire primary, followed by @PeteButtigieg \n\nhttps://t.co/CpRJCGRgBG\u201d— Emerson College Polling (@Emerson College Polling) 1574820000
Dramatic in the results of the tracking poll was the swing among the top four candidates since it was last conducted in September, with Sanders up 13 points and Buttigieg up 11 points, while Warren and Biden dropped 6 and 10 points respectively.
Spencer Kimball, director of Emerson Polling, said "the Democratic voters have taken a look at Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren and they appear unsatisfied at this time which brought some voters back to Bernie Sanders while others are now moving to a fresh face in Pete Buttigieg, this demonstrates the fluidity of the race."
According to Emerson:
Sanders has retaken a strong lead among those under 50 in New Hampshire, now leading with 38% support among that group. Following him among younger voters is Warren at 16%, Buttigieg at 12% and Biden at 8%. Buttigieg leads with those 50 and over with 32% support, followed by Biden with 19%, Sanders with 15% and Warren with 11%.
Sanders holds a stronger lead among registered Democrats as he garners 31% support among this group, followed by Buttigieg and Biden with 17%, and Warren with 15%. Among independents, Buttigieg leads with 29% support, followed by Sanders with 21%, Warren with 12% and Biden with 10%.
Looking within ideology, Sanders leads within those who are very liberal with 47% support, followed by Warren with 18%, Buttigieg with 12%, and Biden with 7%. Among those self-described as somewhat liberal, Buttigieg leads with 28% support, followed by Sanders with 25%, Warren with 18% and Biden with 12%. Among moderate/conservative voters, Buttigieg leads with 23% support, followed by Biden with 18%, Sanders with 17% and Gabbard with 11%.
As members of the Sanders campaign noted, the Emerson poll emerged just one day after the New York Times ran a headline--titled "Did New Hampshire Fall Out of Love With Bernie Sanders?"--that strongly suggested the senator's star was falling in the early voting New England state. Campaign speechwriter David Sirota tweeted:
And Mike Casca, the campaign's communication director, said wryly: "I read somewhere recently that New Hampshire fell out of love with Bernie."
Meanwhile, on the national level, the Real Clear Politics poll average showed Sanders had returned to second place behind Biden, pushing Warren back to third place with Buttigieg still at a distant fourth. The average, which incorporates national polls taken up through Nov. 25th, showed Biden leading nationally with 28.2%; followed by Sanders with 17.8%; Warren with 16.7%; and Buttigieg with 10.5%.
\u201cFor the first time in months, @BernieSanders is back in second place in the @RealClearNews average of recent polls. This is a significant improvement in position for Sanders, who has been rising steadily in recent weeks.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1574745777
Following that trend, a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS released Wednesday showed Biden in the lead with 28% followed by Sanders in second place with 17% percent of support among registered Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents. Warren holds the third spot with 14% while Buttigieg comes in last among the top tier with 11%.
Notably, as CNN points out, Sanders enjoys the trust of most voters when it comes to the key issues of the climate crisis and healthcare:
On health care, 28% say Sanders--an advocate of "Medicare for All" and the elimination of private health insurance--would best handle the issue. That's about even with the 26% who choose Biden, who has argued against moving to a completely government-run system. Another 19% say they prefer Warren's approach, which ultimately results in government health coverage for all, while 7% choose Buttigieg, and no other candidate has the backing of more than 3% on the issue.
Sanders leads the way more clearly on handling the climate crisis: 27% favor his approach, followed by 21% who prefer Biden and 15% Warren.
In an edition of the Sanders campaign's Bern Notice newsletter sent Tuesday, Sirota noted that his candidate is now surging nationally but also pointed to the early voting states where, in addition to New Hampshire, Sanders is gaining ground.
"A new poll shows that since early October, Bernie has gained a whopping 9 points in the early primary and caucus states that could play a pivotal role in the 2020 election," Sirota wrote. "As of today, Bernie is at 23 percent--and just 3 points behind Joe Biden--in Morning Consult's tracking poll of Democratic voters in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada."
In Iowa on Tuesday, the campaign released a new ad focused on the state that featured a new rallying cry for the campaign: "Big Us."
\u201cYou\u2019ve heard of Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Money. \n\nNone of them stand a chance against #BigUs \n\u201d— Abshir Omar (@Abshir Omar) 1574784838
"Bernie is in the pocket of #BigUs," supporters online were saying as they shared the ad and the message on social media. "Pass it on."
Enjoying a national upswing this week--including a return to second place in the Real Clear Politics poll average and in a new poll out Wednesday--Sen. Bernie Sanders also now leads in the key early state of New Hampshire, according to a new state survey.
According to the Emerson poll released Tuesday, Sanders is now in first place with 26% followed by South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg in second with 22%, and former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren tied for third with 14% each.
\u201cNH POLL: @BernieSanders leads #NewHampshire primary, followed by @PeteButtigieg \n\nhttps://t.co/CpRJCGRgBG\u201d— Emerson College Polling (@Emerson College Polling) 1574820000
Dramatic in the results of the tracking poll was the swing among the top four candidates since it was last conducted in September, with Sanders up 13 points and Buttigieg up 11 points, while Warren and Biden dropped 6 and 10 points respectively.
Spencer Kimball, director of Emerson Polling, said "the Democratic voters have taken a look at Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren and they appear unsatisfied at this time which brought some voters back to Bernie Sanders while others are now moving to a fresh face in Pete Buttigieg, this demonstrates the fluidity of the race."
According to Emerson:
Sanders has retaken a strong lead among those under 50 in New Hampshire, now leading with 38% support among that group. Following him among younger voters is Warren at 16%, Buttigieg at 12% and Biden at 8%. Buttigieg leads with those 50 and over with 32% support, followed by Biden with 19%, Sanders with 15% and Warren with 11%.
Sanders holds a stronger lead among registered Democrats as he garners 31% support among this group, followed by Buttigieg and Biden with 17%, and Warren with 15%. Among independents, Buttigieg leads with 29% support, followed by Sanders with 21%, Warren with 12% and Biden with 10%.
Looking within ideology, Sanders leads within those who are very liberal with 47% support, followed by Warren with 18%, Buttigieg with 12%, and Biden with 7%. Among those self-described as somewhat liberal, Buttigieg leads with 28% support, followed by Sanders with 25%, Warren with 18% and Biden with 12%. Among moderate/conservative voters, Buttigieg leads with 23% support, followed by Biden with 18%, Sanders with 17% and Gabbard with 11%.
As members of the Sanders campaign noted, the Emerson poll emerged just one day after the New York Times ran a headline--titled "Did New Hampshire Fall Out of Love With Bernie Sanders?"--that strongly suggested the senator's star was falling in the early voting New England state. Campaign speechwriter David Sirota tweeted:
And Mike Casca, the campaign's communication director, said wryly: "I read somewhere recently that New Hampshire fell out of love with Bernie."
Meanwhile, on the national level, the Real Clear Politics poll average showed Sanders had returned to second place behind Biden, pushing Warren back to third place with Buttigieg still at a distant fourth. The average, which incorporates national polls taken up through Nov. 25th, showed Biden leading nationally with 28.2%; followed by Sanders with 17.8%; Warren with 16.7%; and Buttigieg with 10.5%.
\u201cFor the first time in months, @BernieSanders is back in second place in the @RealClearNews average of recent polls. This is a significant improvement in position for Sanders, who has been rising steadily in recent weeks.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1574745777
Following that trend, a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS released Wednesday showed Biden in the lead with 28% followed by Sanders in second place with 17% percent of support among registered Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents. Warren holds the third spot with 14% while Buttigieg comes in last among the top tier with 11%.
Notably, as CNN points out, Sanders enjoys the trust of most voters when it comes to the key issues of the climate crisis and healthcare:
On health care, 28% say Sanders--an advocate of "Medicare for All" and the elimination of private health insurance--would best handle the issue. That's about even with the 26% who choose Biden, who has argued against moving to a completely government-run system. Another 19% say they prefer Warren's approach, which ultimately results in government health coverage for all, while 7% choose Buttigieg, and no other candidate has the backing of more than 3% on the issue.
Sanders leads the way more clearly on handling the climate crisis: 27% favor his approach, followed by 21% who prefer Biden and 15% Warren.
In an edition of the Sanders campaign's Bern Notice newsletter sent Tuesday, Sirota noted that his candidate is now surging nationally but also pointed to the early voting states where, in addition to New Hampshire, Sanders is gaining ground.
"A new poll shows that since early October, Bernie has gained a whopping 9 points in the early primary and caucus states that could play a pivotal role in the 2020 election," Sirota wrote. "As of today, Bernie is at 23 percent--and just 3 points behind Joe Biden--in Morning Consult's tracking poll of Democratic voters in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada."
In Iowa on Tuesday, the campaign released a new ad focused on the state that featured a new rallying cry for the campaign: "Big Us."
\u201cYou\u2019ve heard of Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Money. \n\nNone of them stand a chance against #BigUs \n\u201d— Abshir Omar (@Abshir Omar) 1574784838
"Bernie is in the pocket of #BigUs," supporters online were saying as they shared the ad and the message on social media. "Pass it on."
The Council on American-Islamic Relations says the Muslim groups being targeted "were smeared as 'Hamas-aligned'... because of their opposition to Israeli human rights abuses."
The Department of Homeland Security announced Wednesday that it has suspended more than $8 million in grants to Muslim organizations it claims have "alleged terror ties" following a report from a notorious anti-Muslim group.
The money comes from FEMA's Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP), which provides aid to religious groups at risk of hate-based terrorist attacks, including security alarms, cameras, and armed guards.
DHS said it made the decision following a report from the Middle East Forum (MEF), a pro-Israel group, which alleged that DHS had given $25 million to "terror-linked groups" between 2013 and 2023. According to DHS, it has already suspended the funds to 49 different projects based on this report.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) describes MEF as an "anti-Palestinian and anti-Muslim hate group" and its leader, Daniel Pipes, as "racist."
The foreign policy commentator was nominated to the board of the United States Institute of Peace by former President George W. Bush in 2003 despite a long history of anti-Muslim rhetoric.
This has included referring to Muslims as "brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and maintaining different standards of hygiene" and blaming the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, which was committed by a US-born white supremacist, on Muslim "fundamentalists."
In 2004, after being nominated to the position, Pipes said he did "support the internment of Japanese Americans in World War II," and suggested it as a model for dealing with Muslims.
In the report, MEF described CAIR, which it says received $250,000 from FEMA, as a "Hamas-aligned" group. But the only evidence it cites is the organization's naming as an "unindicted co-conspirator" in the 2007 trial of the Holy Land Foundation for allegedly funnelling money to Hamas.
CAIR was never charged with a crime, but that case has nevertheless been used to tie it and many other Muslim nonprofits to terror groups with little to no evidence of wrongdoing.
MEF also singled out other organizations like the Islamic Society of Baltimore, merely because it was once "previously under FBI surveillance."
Others MEF singled out for their harsh rhetoric towards Israel. For instance, it described Michigan's Islamic Institute of Knowledge as an "outpost for Iran's revolutionary brand of Shi'a Islamism" because its leaders have allegedly "echoed Iranian regime rhetoric regarding Israel, including comparing Israel to the Nazis and blaming it for October 7."
It also suggested that other mosques and organizations have terrorist affiliations because leaders have family members who were, at some point, Iranian clerics or government officials.
According to DHS, merely "alleged" terrorist ties are enough for funding to be pulled, and that includes the allegations made by the MEF.
While DHS said it is conducting its own review to determine which groups to strip funding from, it told Fox News: "We take the results of the MEF report very seriously and are thankful for the work of conservative watchdog groups."
MEF previously told the New York Post that it is working with DHS to "rescind grants to extremist groups."
CAIR says the groups being targeted "were smeared as 'Hamas-aligned' by MEF because of their opposition to Israeli human rights abuses."
During his second term, Trump and congressional Republicans have aggressively targeted nonprofit organizations that criticize his policies, particularly those critical of Israel.
Trump has attempted to coerce universities, including Harvard, into cracking down on pro-Palestinian speech by students by threatening their nonprofit status.
In May, Republicans also snuck a provision into their giant reconciliation bill that would have given the treasury secretary unilateral authority to strip the nonprofit status of any organization he deemed to be supportive of a terrorist organization, which, to the Trump administration, often simply means voicing solidarity with Palestinians. However, that "nonprofit killer" measure was struck from the final version of the law.
This month, DHS updated its terms for providing grants to nonprofits. One new section now requires nonprofits to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Another requires them to swear off boycotts of Israel, which CAIR describes as "a political test targeting supporters of Palestinian rights."
"Our civil rights organization has no active federal grants that the Department could eliminate or cut," a CAIR spokesperson told Fox. "The government cannot ban American organizations from receiving federal grants based on their religious affiliation or their criticism of Israel's genocide in Gaza."
CAIR also condemned DHS Secretary Kristi Noem for "making decisions based on the ravings of the Middle East Forum, an Israel First hate website."
"Private equity comes in, squeezes the life out of hospitals and doctor's offices, and then leaves patients and communities in the lurch," says a report from Sen. Chris Murphy.
A US senator on Wednesday released a report that detailed how private equity firms have ruined hospitals in his home state and across the country.
The report from Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) documented what happened when three Connecticut hospitals—Waterbury Hospital, Rockville General, and Manchester Memorial—were bought by Prospect Medical Holdings, a private equity-backed healthcare firm.
Interviews conducted with staff members of these hospitals told a consistent story about how Prospect cut corners in nearly every conceivable aspect and worsened the care patients received at the hospitals.
Ramona, an operating room assistant at Waterbury Hospital cited in the report, explained how Prospect went to extreme lengths to avoid spending money. She explained to Murphy that Prospect at one point stopped paying vendors, which resulted in supplies eventually growing "so scarce patients were sometimes left on the operating table while staff scrambled" to find the necessary equipment.
Staff members eventually started buying supplies themselves, with some even going so far as to buy food for their patients to ensure that they did not go hungry.
A nurse named Anne-Marie, who has worked at Manchester Memorial for over three decades, told Murphy's staff that it was only through the dedication of staff members that her hospital was able to continue functioning at all.
"You know, I'm very fortunate where I work that we still care and patients can't believe what a good job we do despite all of the obstacles and hurdles we've been given," she said. "We still show up every day and we're committed to our communities, thankfully."
Prospect didn't just skimp on buying supplies for the hospitals but also on maintaining the buildings themselves. A unit secretary at Waterbury Hospital named Carmen told Murphy's staff of two instances where the ceiling at the building literally fell down due to years of neglect.
"We were lucky enough that the patient had already been discharged and where it fell, it would have missed the stretcher and the patient," she said of the first instance. "The other time it fell in the trauma room, it was only on top of the computers... so we called maintenance, and they came and fixed it, [which means] putting a little hose where the water is and putting buckets to catch the water…it's happened a lot."
The deterioration of patient care at Waterbury became obvious by 2019, when the report noted that it "recorded the highest rates of patient readmission in the state."
Things got even worse for the hospitals when Leonard Green & Partners, the private equity firm that at the time owned Prospect, decided to sell the land where the hospitals reside to a real estate investment firm that then leased the land back at high rates. The final blow came when Leonard Green sold off its stake in Prospect, which the report says left "nothing but debt and destruction" in its wake.
"After Leonard Green's exit, Rockville Hospital was losing so much money, they cut all but emergency and outpatient mental health services without the required state authorization, leaving many patients with no full-service hospital nearby," the report stated.
Prospect itself filed for bankruptcy earlier this year, and the fate of all three hospitals is now "in the hands of a bankruptcy judge in Texas," the report added.
Murphy's report also emphasized that the story of private equity stripping hospitals for parts is not unique to his state.
"The story of these three Connecticut hospitals is playing out in healthcare systems all over the country," it said. "Private equity comes in, squeezes the life out of hospitals and doctor's offices, and then leaves patients and communities in the lurch."
"People might want us to just shut up and play, turn to look the other way, but we don't believe that is right."
The Italian Association of Football Coaches on Tuesday formally called on soccer's international and European governing bodies to suspend Israel over its "genocidal" annihilation of Gaza, a move that came ahead of next month's FIFA World Cup qualifying matches between the Azzurri and the Skyblue-and-Whites.
"Can a football match, preceded by the national anthems, be considered only a football match? Can what is happening in the Gaza Strip, with heavy reverberations in the West Bank and Lebanon, simply be counted as one of the 56 active conflicts in the world?" the AIAC National Board of Directors wrote in a letter.
"Can the Hamas terrorist massacre on October 7, 2023, with over a thousand innocent Israeli victims plus the taking of 250 hostages, justify Israel's ferocious genocidal retaliation, which has claimed tens of thousands of Palestinian civilian deaths?" the letter asks.
"These are all questions that the Italian Association of Football Coaches has asked itself and that it now asks the other federation components and the [Italian Football Federation] in light of the upcoming matches that will see the Italian national team, on September 8 and October 14, play the Israeli one," the coaches said.
The letter was commended by Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, who is Italian.The AIAC directors said they "unanimously believe that, faced with daily massacres, which have caused hundreds of deaths" of Gazan athletes and coaches, "including the Palestinian football star Suleiman al-Obeid," that "it is legitimate, necessary, and indeed dutiful" to ask the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) and the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) to temporarily suspend Israel, "because the pain of the past cannot obscure any consciousness and humanity."
AIAC president Renzo Ulivieri said in a statement that "this must not be just a symbolic gesture, but a necessary choice, which responds to a moral imperative, shared by the entire directorial board."
Giancarlo Camolese, AIAC's vice president, told the Italian news agency ANSA, "People might want us to just shut up and play, turn to look the other way, but we don't believe that is right."
Last week, UEFA president Aleksander Čeferin said that it is "legitimate" to question why the organization banned Russia over its invasion and occupation of Ukraine but not Israel for its genocidal annihilation of Gaza. This, after UEFA invited refugee children including Gazans to unfurl a banner reading "STOP KILLING CHILDREN" and "STOP KILLING CIVILIANS" on the pitch before a Super Cup match between Paris Saint-Germain and Tottenham Hotspur in Udine, Italy.
UEFA was criticized for not specifying who is killing children and civilians, just as it faced backlash for a tribute omitting who killed al-Obeid—known as the "Pelé of Palestinian football"—after he was slain by Israeli forces while trying to obtain food aid amid a growing forced famine in Gaza.
Israeli forces have killed hundreds of footballers in Gaza, where more than 62,000 Palestinians—mostly women and children, with the actual toll likely far higher—have been slain since October 2023 in a war for which Israel is facing a genocide case currently before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and for which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for alleged crimes against humanity.
Israeli forces have also used sporting sites including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children, many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
As they did before last year's Olympic Games in Paris, critics of Israel's obliteration of Gaza have called for the country's suspension from not only UEFA matches but also from next year's FIFA World Cup in Canada, Mexico, and the United States.
Unlike a growing number of countries in Europe and around the world, Italy has not signaled that it will recognize Palestinian statehood or support international efforts to hold Israel accountable for its crimes, most notably by supporting the ICJ genocide case. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government has also joined her counterparts in France and Germany in granting Netanyahu immunity from enforcement of the ICC arrest warrant.