SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Brian Hook, the U.S. Special Representative for Iran, testifies before a House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East, North Africa, and International Terrorism hearing at the Capitol in Washington, D.C. on June 19, 2019. (Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images)
Threatening Food and Medicines, Trump Admin Accused of Putting Iranian People in 'Cross-Hairs of Its Ongoing Economic War'
The new designation under Section 311, the adminstration was warned, would mean foreign banks no longer processing humanitarian-related transactions.
Oct 25, 2019
The Trump administration was accused of sounding "the death knell for humanitarian trade with Iran" on Friday after the State and Treasury Departments announced new measures targeting the sanctions-hit country.
"Through its action today," said National Iranian American Council (NIAC) president Jamal Abdi, "the administration has made clear that the Iranian people are in the cross-hairs of their ongoing economic war against Iran and that the deliberate targeting of food and medicine to the Iranian people is fair game."
In a press statement, the departments announced two restrictions. The first was a mechanism the administration asserted would "help the international community perform enhanced due diligence on humanitarian trade to ensure that funds associated with permissible trade in support of the Iranian people are not diverted by the Iranian regime to develop ballistic missiles, support terrorism, or finance other malign activities." The second was to assert its authority under Section 311 of the PATRIOT Act and classify Iran as a jurisdiction of primary money laundering concern.
The latter action, said Abdi, "severed what limited remaining ties Iran has to the global financial system."
"Foreign banks have warned the U.S. Treasury Department that Iran's designation under Section 311 will force them to stop processing humanitarian-related transactions in the future," Abdi said. "Yet, the Trump administration has accepted, if not deliberately encouraged, those consequences."
The so-called "humanitarian mechanism" the administration announced demands foreign governments and financial institutions "conduct enhanced due diligence and provide to Treasury a substantial and unprecedented amount of information." Brian Hook, the State Department's Special Envoy to Iran, claimed the "channel will make it easier for foreign governments, financial institutions, and private companies to engage in legitimate humanitarian trade on behalf of the Iranian people while reducing the risk that money ends up in the wrong hands. The U.S. will continue to stand with the Iranian people."
NIAC's Abdi, however, countered that framing.
This "humanitarian channel functions more like a sanctions wall, erecting stringent conditions on foreign bank participation in humanitarian trade with Iran," he said. "Let's be clear: There is unlikely to be a single banker in the world that will accept these conditions and participate in the trade. The Trump administration is surely aware of this fact, and its humanitarian channel should be viewed as nothing more than farce."
"Today's announcement does nothing to alleviate the real challenges sanctions pose to humanitarian trade," Abdi continued, "and in fact add new burdens apparently intended to end the provision of life-saving medicine to Iran."
The new development, Abdi said, "makes the United States the equivalent of human rights violators that similarly target humanitarian goods in order to achieve their political objectives."
Abdi wasn't alone in his criticism, as Laura Rozen reported for Al-Monitor.
Tyler Cullis, an attorney with Ferrari & Associates U.S. economics sanctions, told the outlet the chances of financial institutions being willing to comply with the humanitarian mechanism's required monthly reporting of "enhanced due diligence" were slim.
"Not a single banker in the world will look at that and say, 'yeah, we will do that.' Not a single one," Cullis told Al-Monitor.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Trump administration was accused of sounding "the death knell for humanitarian trade with Iran" on Friday after the State and Treasury Departments announced new measures targeting the sanctions-hit country.
"Through its action today," said National Iranian American Council (NIAC) president Jamal Abdi, "the administration has made clear that the Iranian people are in the cross-hairs of their ongoing economic war against Iran and that the deliberate targeting of food and medicine to the Iranian people is fair game."
In a press statement, the departments announced two restrictions. The first was a mechanism the administration asserted would "help the international community perform enhanced due diligence on humanitarian trade to ensure that funds associated with permissible trade in support of the Iranian people are not diverted by the Iranian regime to develop ballistic missiles, support terrorism, or finance other malign activities." The second was to assert its authority under Section 311 of the PATRIOT Act and classify Iran as a jurisdiction of primary money laundering concern.
The latter action, said Abdi, "severed what limited remaining ties Iran has to the global financial system."
"Foreign banks have warned the U.S. Treasury Department that Iran's designation under Section 311 will force them to stop processing humanitarian-related transactions in the future," Abdi said. "Yet, the Trump administration has accepted, if not deliberately encouraged, those consequences."
The so-called "humanitarian mechanism" the administration announced demands foreign governments and financial institutions "conduct enhanced due diligence and provide to Treasury a substantial and unprecedented amount of information." Brian Hook, the State Department's Special Envoy to Iran, claimed the "channel will make it easier for foreign governments, financial institutions, and private companies to engage in legitimate humanitarian trade on behalf of the Iranian people while reducing the risk that money ends up in the wrong hands. The U.S. will continue to stand with the Iranian people."
NIAC's Abdi, however, countered that framing.
This "humanitarian channel functions more like a sanctions wall, erecting stringent conditions on foreign bank participation in humanitarian trade with Iran," he said. "Let's be clear: There is unlikely to be a single banker in the world that will accept these conditions and participate in the trade. The Trump administration is surely aware of this fact, and its humanitarian channel should be viewed as nothing more than farce."
"Today's announcement does nothing to alleviate the real challenges sanctions pose to humanitarian trade," Abdi continued, "and in fact add new burdens apparently intended to end the provision of life-saving medicine to Iran."
The new development, Abdi said, "makes the United States the equivalent of human rights violators that similarly target humanitarian goods in order to achieve their political objectives."
Abdi wasn't alone in his criticism, as Laura Rozen reported for Al-Monitor.
Tyler Cullis, an attorney with Ferrari & Associates U.S. economics sanctions, told the outlet the chances of financial institutions being willing to comply with the humanitarian mechanism's required monthly reporting of "enhanced due diligence" were slim.
"Not a single banker in the world will look at that and say, 'yeah, we will do that.' Not a single one," Cullis told Al-Monitor.
The Trump administration was accused of sounding "the death knell for humanitarian trade with Iran" on Friday after the State and Treasury Departments announced new measures targeting the sanctions-hit country.
"Through its action today," said National Iranian American Council (NIAC) president Jamal Abdi, "the administration has made clear that the Iranian people are in the cross-hairs of their ongoing economic war against Iran and that the deliberate targeting of food and medicine to the Iranian people is fair game."
In a press statement, the departments announced two restrictions. The first was a mechanism the administration asserted would "help the international community perform enhanced due diligence on humanitarian trade to ensure that funds associated with permissible trade in support of the Iranian people are not diverted by the Iranian regime to develop ballistic missiles, support terrorism, or finance other malign activities." The second was to assert its authority under Section 311 of the PATRIOT Act and classify Iran as a jurisdiction of primary money laundering concern.
The latter action, said Abdi, "severed what limited remaining ties Iran has to the global financial system."
"Foreign banks have warned the U.S. Treasury Department that Iran's designation under Section 311 will force them to stop processing humanitarian-related transactions in the future," Abdi said. "Yet, the Trump administration has accepted, if not deliberately encouraged, those consequences."
The so-called "humanitarian mechanism" the administration announced demands foreign governments and financial institutions "conduct enhanced due diligence and provide to Treasury a substantial and unprecedented amount of information." Brian Hook, the State Department's Special Envoy to Iran, claimed the "channel will make it easier for foreign governments, financial institutions, and private companies to engage in legitimate humanitarian trade on behalf of the Iranian people while reducing the risk that money ends up in the wrong hands. The U.S. will continue to stand with the Iranian people."
NIAC's Abdi, however, countered that framing.
This "humanitarian channel functions more like a sanctions wall, erecting stringent conditions on foreign bank participation in humanitarian trade with Iran," he said. "Let's be clear: There is unlikely to be a single banker in the world that will accept these conditions and participate in the trade. The Trump administration is surely aware of this fact, and its humanitarian channel should be viewed as nothing more than farce."
"Today's announcement does nothing to alleviate the real challenges sanctions pose to humanitarian trade," Abdi continued, "and in fact add new burdens apparently intended to end the provision of life-saving medicine to Iran."
The new development, Abdi said, "makes the United States the equivalent of human rights violators that similarly target humanitarian goods in order to achieve their political objectives."
Abdi wasn't alone in his criticism, as Laura Rozen reported for Al-Monitor.
Tyler Cullis, an attorney with Ferrari & Associates U.S. economics sanctions, told the outlet the chances of financial institutions being willing to comply with the humanitarian mechanism's required monthly reporting of "enhanced due diligence" were slim.
"Not a single banker in the world will look at that and say, 'yeah, we will do that.' Not a single one," Cullis told Al-Monitor.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.