

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Members of the United Auto Workers (UAW) and supporters picket outside of General Motors Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly in Detroit, Michigan, as they strike on September 22, 2019. (Photo: Jeff Kowalsky/AFP/Getty Images)
Workers' rights supporters celebrated Thursday after General Motors caved to pressure and agreed to continue paying healthcare premiums for thousands of striking workers.
The company moved to fund its employees' benefits after its earlier announcement that United Auto Workers (UAW) would have to fund workers' healthcare during the strike was met with scorn from labor leaders and lawmakers.
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, applauded UAW workers for forcing GM to reinstate their coverage.
GM said it would cut off employees' health coverage last week, two days into a strike over stagnant wages. The move was condemned by Medicare for All and labor advocates who said the "intimidation" tactic was "heartless and unconscionable."
As Negin Owliaei of the Institute for Policy Studies wrote at Common Dreams on Thursday, GM's move threatening the wellbeing of its workers and their families served to illustrate the need for Medicare for All--under which companies would no longer be able to use employer-sponsored healthcare as a bargaining chip, keeping workers' wages low.
"As GM showed, our current system turns health coverage into leverage for employers," wrote Owliaei. "What could unions fight for if they didn't have to constantly play defense against employers trying to gut their health care?"
"If we already had Medicare for All," she added, "the United Auto Workers could be using their collective power to fight for higher wages and better benefits."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has made his decades-long fight for Medicare for All a central theme of his 2020 presidential campaign, agreed.
"Your health care should never be in the hands of greedy corporations who can take it away to punish workers," Sanders tweeted after GM's announcement on Thursday.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Workers' rights supporters celebrated Thursday after General Motors caved to pressure and agreed to continue paying healthcare premiums for thousands of striking workers.
The company moved to fund its employees' benefits after its earlier announcement that United Auto Workers (UAW) would have to fund workers' healthcare during the strike was met with scorn from labor leaders and lawmakers.
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, applauded UAW workers for forcing GM to reinstate their coverage.
GM said it would cut off employees' health coverage last week, two days into a strike over stagnant wages. The move was condemned by Medicare for All and labor advocates who said the "intimidation" tactic was "heartless and unconscionable."
As Negin Owliaei of the Institute for Policy Studies wrote at Common Dreams on Thursday, GM's move threatening the wellbeing of its workers and their families served to illustrate the need for Medicare for All--under which companies would no longer be able to use employer-sponsored healthcare as a bargaining chip, keeping workers' wages low.
"As GM showed, our current system turns health coverage into leverage for employers," wrote Owliaei. "What could unions fight for if they didn't have to constantly play defense against employers trying to gut their health care?"
"If we already had Medicare for All," she added, "the United Auto Workers could be using their collective power to fight for higher wages and better benefits."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has made his decades-long fight for Medicare for All a central theme of his 2020 presidential campaign, agreed.
"Your health care should never be in the hands of greedy corporations who can take it away to punish workers," Sanders tweeted after GM's announcement on Thursday.
Workers' rights supporters celebrated Thursday after General Motors caved to pressure and agreed to continue paying healthcare premiums for thousands of striking workers.
The company moved to fund its employees' benefits after its earlier announcement that United Auto Workers (UAW) would have to fund workers' healthcare during the strike was met with scorn from labor leaders and lawmakers.
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, applauded UAW workers for forcing GM to reinstate their coverage.
GM said it would cut off employees' health coverage last week, two days into a strike over stagnant wages. The move was condemned by Medicare for All and labor advocates who said the "intimidation" tactic was "heartless and unconscionable."
As Negin Owliaei of the Institute for Policy Studies wrote at Common Dreams on Thursday, GM's move threatening the wellbeing of its workers and their families served to illustrate the need for Medicare for All--under which companies would no longer be able to use employer-sponsored healthcare as a bargaining chip, keeping workers' wages low.
"As GM showed, our current system turns health coverage into leverage for employers," wrote Owliaei. "What could unions fight for if they didn't have to constantly play defense against employers trying to gut their health care?"
"If we already had Medicare for All," she added, "the United Auto Workers could be using their collective power to fight for higher wages and better benefits."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has made his decades-long fight for Medicare for All a central theme of his 2020 presidential campaign, agreed.
"Your health care should never be in the hands of greedy corporations who can take it away to punish workers," Sanders tweeted after GM's announcement on Thursday.