SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A small group of activists rally against the Republican healthcare agenda outside of the Metropolitan Republican Club, July 5, 2017 in New York City. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Study Confirms GOP Medicaid Work Requirements Succeeded in Taking Away People's Healthcare, But Did Nothing to Boost Employment
"If the GOP wants to help people find work, they should invest in employment programs and guarantee health care as a right—not punish people who are struggling."
Jun 20, 2019
The first major study of new Medicaid work requirements confirmed that the warnings of critics were correct: requiring program recipients to work serves only to take healthcare away from vulnerable communities, while doing nothing to promote employment.
Researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health released a report Wednesday on the work requirements, which went into effect in Arkansas in 2018. One of President Donald Trump's signature healthcare policies, the program demanded that Medicaid recipients work at least 80 hours per month or participate in job training, or risk losing their health insurance.
The program, which is now on hold following a federal judge's decision in March, resulted in nearly 20,000 low-income Arkansas residents losing their health coverage.
"Medicaid work requirements don't cause anybody to get work; they just lose their insurance. Which since the GOP is the party of 'Cruelty is the Point,' means the policy is working." --Scott Lemieux, bloggerThe share of adults between the ages of 30 and 49 who had Medicaid coverage fell from 70.5 percent to 63.7 percent after the requirements were implemented, contributing to a four percent increase in the uninsured rate in the state.
The employment rate went down four percent over the same period, and the Harvard researchers found that "the population targeted by Arkansas' work requirement saw significantly more deterioration than other age groups and people in other states," Dylan Scott reported at Vox.
Policy experts who had warned against implementing work requirements wrote that the findings and their implications for poor Americans were troubling but unsurprising.
"Some (including me) have long suspected that the Trump administration's signature Medicaid initiative--the promotion of work reporting requirements--is not about supporting better economic or health outcomes for low-income people, but rather about perpetuating inaccurate stigmas and taking away health insurance from those who rely on Medicaid to cut costs," wrote Joan Alker, executive director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. "These new findings offer cold validation for these suspicions."
Political science professor and writer Scott Lemieux wrote on Twitter that while Arkansas's work requirements appear to have failed in reaching the Trump adminsitration's stated goal, they have actually succeeded in further marginalizing and harming some of the poorest Americans.
"Medicaid work requirements don't cause anybody to get work; they just lose their insurance. Which since the GOP is the party of 'Cruelty is the Point,' means the policy is working," wrote Lemieux.
The Republican Party has long claimed that offering Medicaid coverage, SNAP benefits, and other government to people who are not employed "trap[s] people on government programs," and discourages them from finding work, as Medicaid and Medicare administrator Seema Verma said before Arkansas adopted the rules.
As Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote on Twitter, "If the GOP wants to help people find work, they should invest in employment programs and guarantee health care as a right--not punish people who are struggling."
Harvard's study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, also revealed that a lack of transparency surrounding the requirements caused major confusion in Arkansas and resulted in many Medicaid recipients being kicked off the rolls despite the fact that they were already working.
More than 95 percent of Medicaid recipients were already working or were eligible for an exemption due to disabilities or other factors, but about a third of them had not heard of the requirements and didn't know they had to report their working hours in order to keep their coverage.
However, the grassroots group Progress Michigan wrote, the key to solving the problem of work requirements isn't to simply clarify them or attempt to improve them.
"The fact of the matter is that Medicaid work requirements are a cruel scam designed to rip health care away from low-income folks under the guise of saving a few bucks," wrote the group.
"It's time for our elected officials to stop trying to make a bad law more palatable and recognize the one change that would actually fix the many problems with Medicaid work requirements: Getting rid of them once and for all."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The first major study of new Medicaid work requirements confirmed that the warnings of critics were correct: requiring program recipients to work serves only to take healthcare away from vulnerable communities, while doing nothing to promote employment.
Researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health released a report Wednesday on the work requirements, which went into effect in Arkansas in 2018. One of President Donald Trump's signature healthcare policies, the program demanded that Medicaid recipients work at least 80 hours per month or participate in job training, or risk losing their health insurance.
The program, which is now on hold following a federal judge's decision in March, resulted in nearly 20,000 low-income Arkansas residents losing their health coverage.
"Medicaid work requirements don't cause anybody to get work; they just lose their insurance. Which since the GOP is the party of 'Cruelty is the Point,' means the policy is working." --Scott Lemieux, bloggerThe share of adults between the ages of 30 and 49 who had Medicaid coverage fell from 70.5 percent to 63.7 percent after the requirements were implemented, contributing to a four percent increase in the uninsured rate in the state.
The employment rate went down four percent over the same period, and the Harvard researchers found that "the population targeted by Arkansas' work requirement saw significantly more deterioration than other age groups and people in other states," Dylan Scott reported at Vox.
Policy experts who had warned against implementing work requirements wrote that the findings and their implications for poor Americans were troubling but unsurprising.
"Some (including me) have long suspected that the Trump administration's signature Medicaid initiative--the promotion of work reporting requirements--is not about supporting better economic or health outcomes for low-income people, but rather about perpetuating inaccurate stigmas and taking away health insurance from those who rely on Medicaid to cut costs," wrote Joan Alker, executive director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. "These new findings offer cold validation for these suspicions."
Political science professor and writer Scott Lemieux wrote on Twitter that while Arkansas's work requirements appear to have failed in reaching the Trump adminsitration's stated goal, they have actually succeeded in further marginalizing and harming some of the poorest Americans.
"Medicaid work requirements don't cause anybody to get work; they just lose their insurance. Which since the GOP is the party of 'Cruelty is the Point,' means the policy is working," wrote Lemieux.
The Republican Party has long claimed that offering Medicaid coverage, SNAP benefits, and other government to people who are not employed "trap[s] people on government programs," and discourages them from finding work, as Medicaid and Medicare administrator Seema Verma said before Arkansas adopted the rules.
As Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote on Twitter, "If the GOP wants to help people find work, they should invest in employment programs and guarantee health care as a right--not punish people who are struggling."
Harvard's study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, also revealed that a lack of transparency surrounding the requirements caused major confusion in Arkansas and resulted in many Medicaid recipients being kicked off the rolls despite the fact that they were already working.
More than 95 percent of Medicaid recipients were already working or were eligible for an exemption due to disabilities or other factors, but about a third of them had not heard of the requirements and didn't know they had to report their working hours in order to keep their coverage.
However, the grassroots group Progress Michigan wrote, the key to solving the problem of work requirements isn't to simply clarify them or attempt to improve them.
"The fact of the matter is that Medicaid work requirements are a cruel scam designed to rip health care away from low-income folks under the guise of saving a few bucks," wrote the group.
"It's time for our elected officials to stop trying to make a bad law more palatable and recognize the one change that would actually fix the many problems with Medicaid work requirements: Getting rid of them once and for all."
The first major study of new Medicaid work requirements confirmed that the warnings of critics were correct: requiring program recipients to work serves only to take healthcare away from vulnerable communities, while doing nothing to promote employment.
Researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health released a report Wednesday on the work requirements, which went into effect in Arkansas in 2018. One of President Donald Trump's signature healthcare policies, the program demanded that Medicaid recipients work at least 80 hours per month or participate in job training, or risk losing their health insurance.
The program, which is now on hold following a federal judge's decision in March, resulted in nearly 20,000 low-income Arkansas residents losing their health coverage.
"Medicaid work requirements don't cause anybody to get work; they just lose their insurance. Which since the GOP is the party of 'Cruelty is the Point,' means the policy is working." --Scott Lemieux, bloggerThe share of adults between the ages of 30 and 49 who had Medicaid coverage fell from 70.5 percent to 63.7 percent after the requirements were implemented, contributing to a four percent increase in the uninsured rate in the state.
The employment rate went down four percent over the same period, and the Harvard researchers found that "the population targeted by Arkansas' work requirement saw significantly more deterioration than other age groups and people in other states," Dylan Scott reported at Vox.
Policy experts who had warned against implementing work requirements wrote that the findings and their implications for poor Americans were troubling but unsurprising.
"Some (including me) have long suspected that the Trump administration's signature Medicaid initiative--the promotion of work reporting requirements--is not about supporting better economic or health outcomes for low-income people, but rather about perpetuating inaccurate stigmas and taking away health insurance from those who rely on Medicaid to cut costs," wrote Joan Alker, executive director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. "These new findings offer cold validation for these suspicions."
Political science professor and writer Scott Lemieux wrote on Twitter that while Arkansas's work requirements appear to have failed in reaching the Trump adminsitration's stated goal, they have actually succeeded in further marginalizing and harming some of the poorest Americans.
"Medicaid work requirements don't cause anybody to get work; they just lose their insurance. Which since the GOP is the party of 'Cruelty is the Point,' means the policy is working," wrote Lemieux.
The Republican Party has long claimed that offering Medicaid coverage, SNAP benefits, and other government to people who are not employed "trap[s] people on government programs," and discourages them from finding work, as Medicaid and Medicare administrator Seema Verma said before Arkansas adopted the rules.
As Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote on Twitter, "If the GOP wants to help people find work, they should invest in employment programs and guarantee health care as a right--not punish people who are struggling."
Harvard's study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, also revealed that a lack of transparency surrounding the requirements caused major confusion in Arkansas and resulted in many Medicaid recipients being kicked off the rolls despite the fact that they were already working.
More than 95 percent of Medicaid recipients were already working or were eligible for an exemption due to disabilities or other factors, but about a third of them had not heard of the requirements and didn't know they had to report their working hours in order to keep their coverage.
However, the grassroots group Progress Michigan wrote, the key to solving the problem of work requirements isn't to simply clarify them or attempt to improve them.
"The fact of the matter is that Medicaid work requirements are a cruel scam designed to rip health care away from low-income folks under the guise of saving a few bucks," wrote the group.
"It's time for our elected officials to stop trying to make a bad law more palatable and recognize the one change that would actually fix the many problems with Medicaid work requirements: Getting rid of them once and for all."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.