

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Greenpeace published a new report about phasing out fossil fuels Thursday. (Photo: Greenpeace/Real Climate Leadership)
As public demands for the Democratic Party to allow a 2020 primary debate centered solely on the climate crisis ramped up Thursday, Greenpeace USA released a new report that implores the next president--whoever it is and with help from Congress--to enact ambitious policies that urgently phase out oil, gas, and coal production to prevent planetary catastrophe.
"Right now we need leaders who have the mettle to stand up to the industry at the center of the climate crisis and reclaim our democracy and economy."
--Tim Donaghy, Greenpeace
Greenpeace's report, entitled Real Climate Leadership: Why The Next President Must Prioritize a Fossil Fuel Phase Out, outlines the need for "a transformative Green New Deal" in the United States to ensure "a clean and prosperous future" on a global scale.
"For the next president and Congress, real climate leadership means not only saying yes to real solutions like a rapid transition to renewable energy with equitable ownership and participation, but also saying no to the destructive impacts of fossil fuel extraction," the report declares.
Just transitioning to clean energy sources in the United States, the report explains, is not enough to limit global warming to 1.5degC above pre-industrial levels--a key target of the international Paris climate agreement.
The United States could run on 100 percent renewable energy and still export enough oil to derail progress on cutting planet-warming emissions, according to an original analysis included in the report. "If steps are not taken to reduce domestic oil production," it reads, "roughly half of any reduction in domestic oil consumption will be counteracted by increased oil consumption elsewhere in the worId."
"It should be obvious that we can't fight climate change and expand fossil fuel use at the same time, but still too many politicians are buying into fossil fuel executives' myth that we need oil, gas, and coal to survive," the report's lead author, Greenpeace USA senior research specialist Tim Donaghy, said in a statement.
"The exact opposite is true, and right now we need leaders who have the mettle to stand up to the industry at the center of the climate crisis and reclaim our democracy and economy," he said. "The science demands our next president initiate nothing short of a full-scale mobilization to phase out fossil fuels and kickstart the renewable energy economy."
Specifically, Greenpeace's report calls on the next occupant of the Oval Office to:
The group also urges the next president and Congress to end subsidies for fossil fuel production--which now total $20 billion a year--as well as restore the ban on exporting crude oil, and expand it to other dirty energy sources.
"Because policies to restrict fossil fuel production have particular relevance to industry workers and frontline communities impacted by extraction," the report notes, "extra care must be taken to ensure the transition is managed equitably, with an a emphasis on centering frontline leadership, implementing strong labor protections and ensuring family-sustaining jobs."
Greenpeace's Thursday report--published in collaboration with Oil Change United States, Labor Network for Sustainability, Data for Progress, Honor the Earth, and the Indigenous Environmental Network--follows the release last week of the group's scorecard for Democratic presidential hopefuls.
"No candidate received more than two points out of a possible 10 for their position on phasing out fossil fuels," Greenpeace pointed out in its Thursday statement. However, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) as well as Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, author Marianne Williamson, and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) all received partial credit.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As public demands for the Democratic Party to allow a 2020 primary debate centered solely on the climate crisis ramped up Thursday, Greenpeace USA released a new report that implores the next president--whoever it is and with help from Congress--to enact ambitious policies that urgently phase out oil, gas, and coal production to prevent planetary catastrophe.
"Right now we need leaders who have the mettle to stand up to the industry at the center of the climate crisis and reclaim our democracy and economy."
--Tim Donaghy, Greenpeace
Greenpeace's report, entitled Real Climate Leadership: Why The Next President Must Prioritize a Fossil Fuel Phase Out, outlines the need for "a transformative Green New Deal" in the United States to ensure "a clean and prosperous future" on a global scale.
"For the next president and Congress, real climate leadership means not only saying yes to real solutions like a rapid transition to renewable energy with equitable ownership and participation, but also saying no to the destructive impacts of fossil fuel extraction," the report declares.
Just transitioning to clean energy sources in the United States, the report explains, is not enough to limit global warming to 1.5degC above pre-industrial levels--a key target of the international Paris climate agreement.
The United States could run on 100 percent renewable energy and still export enough oil to derail progress on cutting planet-warming emissions, according to an original analysis included in the report. "If steps are not taken to reduce domestic oil production," it reads, "roughly half of any reduction in domestic oil consumption will be counteracted by increased oil consumption elsewhere in the worId."
"It should be obvious that we can't fight climate change and expand fossil fuel use at the same time, but still too many politicians are buying into fossil fuel executives' myth that we need oil, gas, and coal to survive," the report's lead author, Greenpeace USA senior research specialist Tim Donaghy, said in a statement.
"The exact opposite is true, and right now we need leaders who have the mettle to stand up to the industry at the center of the climate crisis and reclaim our democracy and economy," he said. "The science demands our next president initiate nothing short of a full-scale mobilization to phase out fossil fuels and kickstart the renewable energy economy."
Specifically, Greenpeace's report calls on the next occupant of the Oval Office to:
The group also urges the next president and Congress to end subsidies for fossil fuel production--which now total $20 billion a year--as well as restore the ban on exporting crude oil, and expand it to other dirty energy sources.
"Because policies to restrict fossil fuel production have particular relevance to industry workers and frontline communities impacted by extraction," the report notes, "extra care must be taken to ensure the transition is managed equitably, with an a emphasis on centering frontline leadership, implementing strong labor protections and ensuring family-sustaining jobs."
Greenpeace's Thursday report--published in collaboration with Oil Change United States, Labor Network for Sustainability, Data for Progress, Honor the Earth, and the Indigenous Environmental Network--follows the release last week of the group's scorecard for Democratic presidential hopefuls.
"No candidate received more than two points out of a possible 10 for their position on phasing out fossil fuels," Greenpeace pointed out in its Thursday statement. However, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) as well as Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, author Marianne Williamson, and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) all received partial credit.
As public demands for the Democratic Party to allow a 2020 primary debate centered solely on the climate crisis ramped up Thursday, Greenpeace USA released a new report that implores the next president--whoever it is and with help from Congress--to enact ambitious policies that urgently phase out oil, gas, and coal production to prevent planetary catastrophe.
"Right now we need leaders who have the mettle to stand up to the industry at the center of the climate crisis and reclaim our democracy and economy."
--Tim Donaghy, Greenpeace
Greenpeace's report, entitled Real Climate Leadership: Why The Next President Must Prioritize a Fossil Fuel Phase Out, outlines the need for "a transformative Green New Deal" in the United States to ensure "a clean and prosperous future" on a global scale.
"For the next president and Congress, real climate leadership means not only saying yes to real solutions like a rapid transition to renewable energy with equitable ownership and participation, but also saying no to the destructive impacts of fossil fuel extraction," the report declares.
Just transitioning to clean energy sources in the United States, the report explains, is not enough to limit global warming to 1.5degC above pre-industrial levels--a key target of the international Paris climate agreement.
The United States could run on 100 percent renewable energy and still export enough oil to derail progress on cutting planet-warming emissions, according to an original analysis included in the report. "If steps are not taken to reduce domestic oil production," it reads, "roughly half of any reduction in domestic oil consumption will be counteracted by increased oil consumption elsewhere in the worId."
"It should be obvious that we can't fight climate change and expand fossil fuel use at the same time, but still too many politicians are buying into fossil fuel executives' myth that we need oil, gas, and coal to survive," the report's lead author, Greenpeace USA senior research specialist Tim Donaghy, said in a statement.
"The exact opposite is true, and right now we need leaders who have the mettle to stand up to the industry at the center of the climate crisis and reclaim our democracy and economy," he said. "The science demands our next president initiate nothing short of a full-scale mobilization to phase out fossil fuels and kickstart the renewable energy economy."
Specifically, Greenpeace's report calls on the next occupant of the Oval Office to:
The group also urges the next president and Congress to end subsidies for fossil fuel production--which now total $20 billion a year--as well as restore the ban on exporting crude oil, and expand it to other dirty energy sources.
"Because policies to restrict fossil fuel production have particular relevance to industry workers and frontline communities impacted by extraction," the report notes, "extra care must be taken to ensure the transition is managed equitably, with an a emphasis on centering frontline leadership, implementing strong labor protections and ensuring family-sustaining jobs."
Greenpeace's Thursday report--published in collaboration with Oil Change United States, Labor Network for Sustainability, Data for Progress, Honor the Earth, and the Indigenous Environmental Network--follows the release last week of the group's scorecard for Democratic presidential hopefuls.
"No candidate received more than two points out of a possible 10 for their position on phasing out fossil fuels," Greenpeace pointed out in its Thursday statement. However, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) as well as Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, author Marianne Williamson, and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) all received partial credit.