Jun 03, 2019
In a move that was widely viewed as an attempt to exact revenge for last year's mass walkouts, the West Virginia state Senate on Monday passed a sweeping education bill containing a Republican amendment that would ban teacher strikes.
Fred Albert, president of the West Virginia chapter of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), called the GOP provision "pure retribution, retaliation."
"This is how the GOP retaliates against the people who educate our children. Absolutely disgusting."
--Winnie Wong
"Already, we don't have collective bargaining. It's a right-to-work state," Albert toldPolitico ahead of the bill's passage. "This is just I think another stab at trying to punish us, making the law perhaps a little more severe with such language."
The legislation now heads to West Virginia's House of Delegates, which is set to reconvene later this month.
Public employee strikes are technically already unlawful under West Virginia state law, but previous court decisions haven't detailed "possible consequences for teachers" who go on strike, the Charleston Gazette-Mail reported.
The GOP amendment, according to the Gazette-Mail, would "specify that public worker strikes are unlawful, that school workers can be fired if they strike, that school employees' pay can be withheld on strike days, and that county superintendents can't close schools in anticipation of a strike or to help a strike."
Republican state Sen. Charles Trump, the sponsor of the amendment, described the provision as "a codification of what is the current law of West Virginia."
Winnie Wong, senior political adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), called the measure "absolutely disgusting" in a tweet on Monday.
In addition to walkouts over pay and benefits last year that shut down every school in the state, West Virginia teachers also went on strike earlier this year to protest Republican privatization efforts.
"This is how the GOP retaliates against the people who educate our children," Wong wrote of the anti-strike provision.
\u201cThis is how the GOP retaliates against the people who educate our children. Absolutely disgusting. \n\nhttps://t.co/xFKn1JeP4Y\u201d— Fred (@Fred) 1559582410
Others echoed Wong's outrage, noting that the state Republican Party's efforts to stop strikes are evidence of their effectiveness.
"If strikes weren't effective, they wouldn't be doing this," tweeted activist Jordan Uhl. "All workers need to recognize the power they have when they unify and stand together."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a move that was widely viewed as an attempt to exact revenge for last year's mass walkouts, the West Virginia state Senate on Monday passed a sweeping education bill containing a Republican amendment that would ban teacher strikes.
Fred Albert, president of the West Virginia chapter of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), called the GOP provision "pure retribution, retaliation."
"This is how the GOP retaliates against the people who educate our children. Absolutely disgusting."
--Winnie Wong
"Already, we don't have collective bargaining. It's a right-to-work state," Albert toldPolitico ahead of the bill's passage. "This is just I think another stab at trying to punish us, making the law perhaps a little more severe with such language."
The legislation now heads to West Virginia's House of Delegates, which is set to reconvene later this month.
Public employee strikes are technically already unlawful under West Virginia state law, but previous court decisions haven't detailed "possible consequences for teachers" who go on strike, the Charleston Gazette-Mail reported.
The GOP amendment, according to the Gazette-Mail, would "specify that public worker strikes are unlawful, that school workers can be fired if they strike, that school employees' pay can be withheld on strike days, and that county superintendents can't close schools in anticipation of a strike or to help a strike."
Republican state Sen. Charles Trump, the sponsor of the amendment, described the provision as "a codification of what is the current law of West Virginia."
Winnie Wong, senior political adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), called the measure "absolutely disgusting" in a tweet on Monday.
In addition to walkouts over pay and benefits last year that shut down every school in the state, West Virginia teachers also went on strike earlier this year to protest Republican privatization efforts.
"This is how the GOP retaliates against the people who educate our children," Wong wrote of the anti-strike provision.
\u201cThis is how the GOP retaliates against the people who educate our children. Absolutely disgusting. \n\nhttps://t.co/xFKn1JeP4Y\u201d— Fred (@Fred) 1559582410
Others echoed Wong's outrage, noting that the state Republican Party's efforts to stop strikes are evidence of their effectiveness.
"If strikes weren't effective, they wouldn't be doing this," tweeted activist Jordan Uhl. "All workers need to recognize the power they have when they unify and stand together."
In a move that was widely viewed as an attempt to exact revenge for last year's mass walkouts, the West Virginia state Senate on Monday passed a sweeping education bill containing a Republican amendment that would ban teacher strikes.
Fred Albert, president of the West Virginia chapter of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), called the GOP provision "pure retribution, retaliation."
"This is how the GOP retaliates against the people who educate our children. Absolutely disgusting."
--Winnie Wong
"Already, we don't have collective bargaining. It's a right-to-work state," Albert toldPolitico ahead of the bill's passage. "This is just I think another stab at trying to punish us, making the law perhaps a little more severe with such language."
The legislation now heads to West Virginia's House of Delegates, which is set to reconvene later this month.
Public employee strikes are technically already unlawful under West Virginia state law, but previous court decisions haven't detailed "possible consequences for teachers" who go on strike, the Charleston Gazette-Mail reported.
The GOP amendment, according to the Gazette-Mail, would "specify that public worker strikes are unlawful, that school workers can be fired if they strike, that school employees' pay can be withheld on strike days, and that county superintendents can't close schools in anticipation of a strike or to help a strike."
Republican state Sen. Charles Trump, the sponsor of the amendment, described the provision as "a codification of what is the current law of West Virginia."
Winnie Wong, senior political adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), called the measure "absolutely disgusting" in a tweet on Monday.
In addition to walkouts over pay and benefits last year that shut down every school in the state, West Virginia teachers also went on strike earlier this year to protest Republican privatization efforts.
"This is how the GOP retaliates against the people who educate our children," Wong wrote of the anti-strike provision.
\u201cThis is how the GOP retaliates against the people who educate our children. Absolutely disgusting. \n\nhttps://t.co/xFKn1JeP4Y\u201d— Fred (@Fred) 1559582410
Others echoed Wong's outrage, noting that the state Republican Party's efforts to stop strikes are evidence of their effectiveness.
"If strikes weren't effective, they wouldn't be doing this," tweeted activist Jordan Uhl. "All workers need to recognize the power they have when they unify and stand together."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.