SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A new rule proposed by the Trump administration would roll back Obama-era protections from discrimination in the medical field against transgender patients and those who have had abortions. (Photo: @civilrightsorg/Twitter)
In Latest Attack on Women and Trans People, Trump Invites Medical Providers to Discriminate Against Already-Marginalized Patients
"Trans people are being killed in the street and the administration wants to help facilitate more death."
May 24, 2019
The Trump administration unveiled on Friday its second attack in three days on the rights of transgender people and women, proposing a rule that would gut Obama-era protections against discrimination in the medical field.
The proposed rollback of the Healthcare Rights Law, or Section 1557 under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), would remove discrimination protections for transgender people and patients who have obtained abortions, suggesting that it's acceptable for healthcare providers to refuse care to such patients.
"Trans people are being killed in the street and the administration wants to help facilitate more death," Chase Strangio, a staff attorney at the ACLU, tweeted. "Announcing policies that will take away healthcare and shelter protections in a single week...So many people will die."
The Healthcare Rights Law prohibits discrimination in the medical field on the basis of sex, race, religion, and other characteristics, and in 2016 the Obama administration included "gender identity" and a history of "termination of pregnancy" as examples of sex discrimination.
"I shudder to think what this rule will inspire."
--Fatima Goss Graves, National Women's Law CenterUnder the new proposed rule, the medical field would no longer be directed to take gender identity--defined by the Obama administration as one's "internal sense of gender, which may be male, female, neither, or a combination of male and female, and which may be different from an individual's sex assigned at birth"--into consideration and would instead recognize gender as tied only to physical characteristics at birth.
The proposal gives tacit approval to doctors if they refuse to treat transgender patients or otherwise treat them unfairly, and could lead to transgender Americans facing even more barriers to quality care than they already do, critics say.
"Predicated on little more than prejudice, this proposal will abandon two million Americans who already face significant barriers to accessing adequate and life-saving health care," Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, said in a statement. "If permitted, this rule will promote ignorance and hate that no American should have to face while seeking care, and we are ready to fight it with everything we've got."
Numerous studies have identified a lack of medical training for doctors regarding how to care for transgender patients, difficulty obtaining insurance coverage, and outright discrimination as impediments to quality care that transgender people face.
Kris Hayashi, executive director of the Transgender Law Center, warned that the rule will directly put some of the most vulnerable populations in the U.S. in danger.
"Everyone should be able to go to the doctor when we need help without being turned away or denied treatment because of who we are," Hayashi said in a statement. "This rule dangerously encourages illegal discrimination, putting the lives of transgender people in jeopardy--particularly for trans people living with HIV, Black transgender people and people of color, trans people with disabilities, and rural and Southern trans folks."
Under the rule, the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) would also lift discrimination protections for women who have had abortions, allowing doctors to refuse them care. The rule was introduced weeks after the administration proposed another measure which would allow doctors and nurses to decline to treat people if the provider has moral or religious objections.
"The Trump-Pence Administration is attacking abortion rights AGAIN through a proposed rule to gut protections under the Health Care Rights Law," Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) tweeted. "This proposed rule is dangerous and wrong."
National Women's Law Center president Fatima Goss Graves expressed concern that the rollback of Section 1557 would have wide-ranging effects on patients who already face marginalization.
"The Healthcare Rights Law was groundbreaking," Goss Graves said in a press call. "It meant that finally there were explicit discrimination protections in healthcare...It meant no provider could refuse to treat a woman because she had an abortion."
"I shudder to think what this rule will inspire," she added. "I worry today about the patients in this country that are scared that they won't get the care they need."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Trump administration unveiled on Friday its second attack in three days on the rights of transgender people and women, proposing a rule that would gut Obama-era protections against discrimination in the medical field.
The proposed rollback of the Healthcare Rights Law, or Section 1557 under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), would remove discrimination protections for transgender people and patients who have obtained abortions, suggesting that it's acceptable for healthcare providers to refuse care to such patients.
"Trans people are being killed in the street and the administration wants to help facilitate more death," Chase Strangio, a staff attorney at the ACLU, tweeted. "Announcing policies that will take away healthcare and shelter protections in a single week...So many people will die."
The Healthcare Rights Law prohibits discrimination in the medical field on the basis of sex, race, religion, and other characteristics, and in 2016 the Obama administration included "gender identity" and a history of "termination of pregnancy" as examples of sex discrimination.
"I shudder to think what this rule will inspire."
--Fatima Goss Graves, National Women's Law CenterUnder the new proposed rule, the medical field would no longer be directed to take gender identity--defined by the Obama administration as one's "internal sense of gender, which may be male, female, neither, or a combination of male and female, and which may be different from an individual's sex assigned at birth"--into consideration and would instead recognize gender as tied only to physical characteristics at birth.
The proposal gives tacit approval to doctors if they refuse to treat transgender patients or otherwise treat them unfairly, and could lead to transgender Americans facing even more barriers to quality care than they already do, critics say.
"Predicated on little more than prejudice, this proposal will abandon two million Americans who already face significant barriers to accessing adequate and life-saving health care," Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, said in a statement. "If permitted, this rule will promote ignorance and hate that no American should have to face while seeking care, and we are ready to fight it with everything we've got."
Numerous studies have identified a lack of medical training for doctors regarding how to care for transgender patients, difficulty obtaining insurance coverage, and outright discrimination as impediments to quality care that transgender people face.
Kris Hayashi, executive director of the Transgender Law Center, warned that the rule will directly put some of the most vulnerable populations in the U.S. in danger.
"Everyone should be able to go to the doctor when we need help without being turned away or denied treatment because of who we are," Hayashi said in a statement. "This rule dangerously encourages illegal discrimination, putting the lives of transgender people in jeopardy--particularly for trans people living with HIV, Black transgender people and people of color, trans people with disabilities, and rural and Southern trans folks."
Under the rule, the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) would also lift discrimination protections for women who have had abortions, allowing doctors to refuse them care. The rule was introduced weeks after the administration proposed another measure which would allow doctors and nurses to decline to treat people if the provider has moral or religious objections.
"The Trump-Pence Administration is attacking abortion rights AGAIN through a proposed rule to gut protections under the Health Care Rights Law," Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) tweeted. "This proposed rule is dangerous and wrong."
National Women's Law Center president Fatima Goss Graves expressed concern that the rollback of Section 1557 would have wide-ranging effects on patients who already face marginalization.
"The Healthcare Rights Law was groundbreaking," Goss Graves said in a press call. "It meant that finally there were explicit discrimination protections in healthcare...It meant no provider could refuse to treat a woman because she had an abortion."
"I shudder to think what this rule will inspire," she added. "I worry today about the patients in this country that are scared that they won't get the care they need."
The Trump administration unveiled on Friday its second attack in three days on the rights of transgender people and women, proposing a rule that would gut Obama-era protections against discrimination in the medical field.
The proposed rollback of the Healthcare Rights Law, or Section 1557 under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), would remove discrimination protections for transgender people and patients who have obtained abortions, suggesting that it's acceptable for healthcare providers to refuse care to such patients.
"Trans people are being killed in the street and the administration wants to help facilitate more death," Chase Strangio, a staff attorney at the ACLU, tweeted. "Announcing policies that will take away healthcare and shelter protections in a single week...So many people will die."
The Healthcare Rights Law prohibits discrimination in the medical field on the basis of sex, race, religion, and other characteristics, and in 2016 the Obama administration included "gender identity" and a history of "termination of pregnancy" as examples of sex discrimination.
"I shudder to think what this rule will inspire."
--Fatima Goss Graves, National Women's Law CenterUnder the new proposed rule, the medical field would no longer be directed to take gender identity--defined by the Obama administration as one's "internal sense of gender, which may be male, female, neither, or a combination of male and female, and which may be different from an individual's sex assigned at birth"--into consideration and would instead recognize gender as tied only to physical characteristics at birth.
The proposal gives tacit approval to doctors if they refuse to treat transgender patients or otherwise treat them unfairly, and could lead to transgender Americans facing even more barriers to quality care than they already do, critics say.
"Predicated on little more than prejudice, this proposal will abandon two million Americans who already face significant barriers to accessing adequate and life-saving health care," Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, said in a statement. "If permitted, this rule will promote ignorance and hate that no American should have to face while seeking care, and we are ready to fight it with everything we've got."
Numerous studies have identified a lack of medical training for doctors regarding how to care for transgender patients, difficulty obtaining insurance coverage, and outright discrimination as impediments to quality care that transgender people face.
Kris Hayashi, executive director of the Transgender Law Center, warned that the rule will directly put some of the most vulnerable populations in the U.S. in danger.
"Everyone should be able to go to the doctor when we need help without being turned away or denied treatment because of who we are," Hayashi said in a statement. "This rule dangerously encourages illegal discrimination, putting the lives of transgender people in jeopardy--particularly for trans people living with HIV, Black transgender people and people of color, trans people with disabilities, and rural and Southern trans folks."
Under the rule, the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) would also lift discrimination protections for women who have had abortions, allowing doctors to refuse them care. The rule was introduced weeks after the administration proposed another measure which would allow doctors and nurses to decline to treat people if the provider has moral or religious objections.
"The Trump-Pence Administration is attacking abortion rights AGAIN through a proposed rule to gut protections under the Health Care Rights Law," Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) tweeted. "This proposed rule is dangerous and wrong."
National Women's Law Center president Fatima Goss Graves expressed concern that the rollback of Section 1557 would have wide-ranging effects on patients who already face marginalization.
"The Healthcare Rights Law was groundbreaking," Goss Graves said in a press call. "It meant that finally there were explicit discrimination protections in healthcare...It meant no provider could refuse to treat a woman because she had an abortion."
"I shudder to think what this rule will inspire," she added. "I worry today about the patients in this country that are scared that they won't get the care they need."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.