National security advisor John Bolton listens to President Donald Trump talk to reporters during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington on Feb. 12. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
'Disturbing': Trump Reportedly Reviewed Bolton Plan to Threaten Iran by Sending 120,000 Troops to Middle East
"If you are worried about a new war in the Middle East, you are in good company. In fact, you are probably not worried enough."
Observers warned the United States is hurtling down the same path that led to the disastrous invasion of Iraq 16 years ago following a report late Monday that President Donald Trump reviewed a plan to send 120,000 ground troops to the Middle East if Iran launches an "attack" on American forces or moves to develop nuclear weapons.
"It's time for our leaders to stop sleepwalking and the public to speak out as an unrestrained Iraq war architect repeats the playbook from that generational catastrophe with Iran."
--Jamal Abdi, National Iranian American Council
According to the New York Times, the military plan was crafted by national security adviser John Bolton--who has repeatedly expressed support for bombing Iran, including in the pages of the Times--and presented to the president last Thursday by Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan, a former Boeing executive who Trump nominated last week to serve as permanent Pentagon chief.
"The size of the force involved has shocked some who have been briefed on [the plan]," the Times reported, citing more than a half-dozen anonymous national security officials. "The 120,000 troops would approach the size of the American force that invaded Iraq in 2003."
"The high-level review of the Pentagon's plans was presented during a meeting about broader Iran policy," according to the Times. "It was held days after what the Trump administration described, without evidence, as new intelligence indicating that Iran was mobilizing proxy groups in Iraq and Syria to attack American forces."
The Times report on Bolton's plan, which one critic described as "disturbing," comes just over a week after the national security adviser used the routine deployment of a U.S. aircraft carrier and bomber task force to threaten Iran with military action.
According to the Times, U.S. officials believe--without citing any evidence--that Iran was involved in reported attacks on UAE and Saudi oil tankers in the Persian Gulf over the weekend.
Trump seized upon the reported incident to threaten Iran.
"It's going to be a bad problem for Iran if something happens," the president told reporters on Monday.
"If you are worried about a new war in the Middle East, you are in good company," tweeted Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund. "In fact, you are probably not worried enough."
Others echoed Cirincione's warning in response to the Times report:
\u201cDoes anyone still doubt the Trump WH is charting a course for war w/ #Iran? Bolton asked for plans that envision "sending as many as 120,000 troops to the Middle East should Iran attack American forces or accelerate work on nuclear weapons." #NoWarWithIran https://t.co/RCYLwSK4nG\u201d— Peace Action - #PeopleOverPentagon (@Peace Action - #PeopleOverPentagon) 1557795665
Iran has responded to the Trump administration's belligerence and repeated threats with what one commentator called "remarkable restraint."
As Common Dreams reported last week, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani urged diplomacy in a speech detailing his nation's plan to gradually reduce compliance with some of the terms of the nuclear deal to pressure European countries to uphold their side of the agreement.
Trump violated the nuclear accord last May, a move critics at the time warned would dramatically increase the possibility of a war with Iran.
Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said in a statement late Monday that Bolton "is methodically setting the stage for war with Iran--forcing Iran into a corner and then readying war plans for when Iran takes the bait."
"There are two ways Bolton can be stopped: either Trump can fire him or Congress can pass legislation to block a war before it starts," Abdi said. "It's time for our leaders to stop sleepwalking and the public to speak out as an unrestrained Iraq war architect repeats the playbook from that generational catastrophe with Iran."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Observers warned the United States is hurtling down the same path that led to the disastrous invasion of Iraq 16 years ago following a report late Monday that President Donald Trump reviewed a plan to send 120,000 ground troops to the Middle East if Iran launches an "attack" on American forces or moves to develop nuclear weapons.
"It's time for our leaders to stop sleepwalking and the public to speak out as an unrestrained Iraq war architect repeats the playbook from that generational catastrophe with Iran."
--Jamal Abdi, National Iranian American Council
According to the New York Times, the military plan was crafted by national security adviser John Bolton--who has repeatedly expressed support for bombing Iran, including in the pages of the Times--and presented to the president last Thursday by Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan, a former Boeing executive who Trump nominated last week to serve as permanent Pentagon chief.
"The size of the force involved has shocked some who have been briefed on [the plan]," the Times reported, citing more than a half-dozen anonymous national security officials. "The 120,000 troops would approach the size of the American force that invaded Iraq in 2003."
"The high-level review of the Pentagon's plans was presented during a meeting about broader Iran policy," according to the Times. "It was held days after what the Trump administration described, without evidence, as new intelligence indicating that Iran was mobilizing proxy groups in Iraq and Syria to attack American forces."
The Times report on Bolton's plan, which one critic described as "disturbing," comes just over a week after the national security adviser used the routine deployment of a U.S. aircraft carrier and bomber task force to threaten Iran with military action.
According to the Times, U.S. officials believe--without citing any evidence--that Iran was involved in reported attacks on UAE and Saudi oil tankers in the Persian Gulf over the weekend.
Trump seized upon the reported incident to threaten Iran.
"It's going to be a bad problem for Iran if something happens," the president told reporters on Monday.
"If you are worried about a new war in the Middle East, you are in good company," tweeted Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund. "In fact, you are probably not worried enough."
Others echoed Cirincione's warning in response to the Times report:
\u201cDoes anyone still doubt the Trump WH is charting a course for war w/ #Iran? Bolton asked for plans that envision "sending as many as 120,000 troops to the Middle East should Iran attack American forces or accelerate work on nuclear weapons." #NoWarWithIran https://t.co/RCYLwSK4nG\u201d— Peace Action - #PeopleOverPentagon (@Peace Action - #PeopleOverPentagon) 1557795665
Iran has responded to the Trump administration's belligerence and repeated threats with what one commentator called "remarkable restraint."
As Common Dreams reported last week, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani urged diplomacy in a speech detailing his nation's plan to gradually reduce compliance with some of the terms of the nuclear deal to pressure European countries to uphold their side of the agreement.
Trump violated the nuclear accord last May, a move critics at the time warned would dramatically increase the possibility of a war with Iran.
Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said in a statement late Monday that Bolton "is methodically setting the stage for war with Iran--forcing Iran into a corner and then readying war plans for when Iran takes the bait."
"There are two ways Bolton can be stopped: either Trump can fire him or Congress can pass legislation to block a war before it starts," Abdi said. "It's time for our leaders to stop sleepwalking and the public to speak out as an unrestrained Iraq war architect repeats the playbook from that generational catastrophe with Iran."
Observers warned the United States is hurtling down the same path that led to the disastrous invasion of Iraq 16 years ago following a report late Monday that President Donald Trump reviewed a plan to send 120,000 ground troops to the Middle East if Iran launches an "attack" on American forces or moves to develop nuclear weapons.
"It's time for our leaders to stop sleepwalking and the public to speak out as an unrestrained Iraq war architect repeats the playbook from that generational catastrophe with Iran."
--Jamal Abdi, National Iranian American Council
According to the New York Times, the military plan was crafted by national security adviser John Bolton--who has repeatedly expressed support for bombing Iran, including in the pages of the Times--and presented to the president last Thursday by Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan, a former Boeing executive who Trump nominated last week to serve as permanent Pentagon chief.
"The size of the force involved has shocked some who have been briefed on [the plan]," the Times reported, citing more than a half-dozen anonymous national security officials. "The 120,000 troops would approach the size of the American force that invaded Iraq in 2003."
"The high-level review of the Pentagon's plans was presented during a meeting about broader Iran policy," according to the Times. "It was held days after what the Trump administration described, without evidence, as new intelligence indicating that Iran was mobilizing proxy groups in Iraq and Syria to attack American forces."
The Times report on Bolton's plan, which one critic described as "disturbing," comes just over a week after the national security adviser used the routine deployment of a U.S. aircraft carrier and bomber task force to threaten Iran with military action.
According to the Times, U.S. officials believe--without citing any evidence--that Iran was involved in reported attacks on UAE and Saudi oil tankers in the Persian Gulf over the weekend.
Trump seized upon the reported incident to threaten Iran.
"It's going to be a bad problem for Iran if something happens," the president told reporters on Monday.
"If you are worried about a new war in the Middle East, you are in good company," tweeted Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund. "In fact, you are probably not worried enough."
Others echoed Cirincione's warning in response to the Times report:
\u201cDoes anyone still doubt the Trump WH is charting a course for war w/ #Iran? Bolton asked for plans that envision "sending as many as 120,000 troops to the Middle East should Iran attack American forces or accelerate work on nuclear weapons." #NoWarWithIran https://t.co/RCYLwSK4nG\u201d— Peace Action - #PeopleOverPentagon (@Peace Action - #PeopleOverPentagon) 1557795665
Iran has responded to the Trump administration's belligerence and repeated threats with what one commentator called "remarkable restraint."
As Common Dreams reported last week, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani urged diplomacy in a speech detailing his nation's plan to gradually reduce compliance with some of the terms of the nuclear deal to pressure European countries to uphold their side of the agreement.
Trump violated the nuclear accord last May, a move critics at the time warned would dramatically increase the possibility of a war with Iran.
Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said in a statement late Monday that Bolton "is methodically setting the stage for war with Iran--forcing Iran into a corner and then readying war plans for when Iran takes the bait."
"There are two ways Bolton can be stopped: either Trump can fire him or Congress can pass legislation to block a war before it starts," Abdi said. "It's time for our leaders to stop sleepwalking and the public to speak out as an unrestrained Iraq war architect repeats the playbook from that generational catastrophe with Iran."