Migrants walk into the interior of Mexico after crossing the Guatemalan border near Ciudad Hidalgo, Mexico on Oct. 21, 2018. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Apr 12, 2019
In what critics and rights groups condemned as further evidence that the Trump administration views asylum seekers as mere political pawns rather than vulnerable human beings, the White House reportedly considered dropping migrants off in Democratic districts as a supposed "punishment" for their opposition to the president's anti-immigrant agenda.
"The extent of this administration's cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated," said Ashley Etienne, a spokeswoman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), whose district was reportedly floated as a "target" by the White House. "Using human beings--including little children--as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable."
According to the Washington Post, which first reported on the White House plan late Thursday, "Trump administration officials have proposed transporting detained immigrants to sanctuary cities at least twice in the past six months--once in November, as a migrant caravan approached the U.S. southern border, and again in February, amid a standoff with Democrats over funding for Trump's border wall."
Anna Griffin, news director at Oregon Public Broadcasting, pointed out that an "unmentioned irony" of the Trump administration's cynical ploy is that, if it had been carried out, "folks in Portland and other sanctuary cities would have been very welcoming and probably looked for ways to make their guests feel at home."
\u201cUnmentioned irony in this story \u2014 which is, to use a technical journalism term, an insane amazeballs scoop \u2014 is that folks in Portland & other sanctuary cities would have been very welcoming & probably looked for ways to make their guests feel at home. \n\nhttps://t.co/tqcoJNumXY\u201d— Anna Griffin (@Anna Griffin) 1555038697
President Donald Trump's xenophobic senior adviser Stephen Miller--who has been quickly gaining power in the White House amid an ongoing "purge" of immigration staff--spearheaded discussions of the proposal, the Post reported, citing Department of Homeland Security officials and internal administration emails.
"White House officials first broached the plan in a Nov. 16 email, asking officials at several agencies whether members of the caravan could be arrested at the border and then bused 'to small- and mid-sized sanctuary cities,' places where local authorities have refused to hand over illegal immigrants for deportation," according to the Post.
Progressives were appalled by the Trump administration's proposal, which the White House downplayed as little more than a "suggestion" that was not carried out.
\u201cthe White House doesn't view migrants as human beings\nhttps://t.co/2ZXN3Rx6R3\u201d— Simon Maloy (@Simon Maloy) 1555028787
As observers pointed out, the reported ploy lays bare once more the Trump administration's xenophobic and false view of migrants as dangerous "invaders," rather than people seeking refuge from violence and persecution in their home countries.
"These are people seeking safety, not political pawns," tweeted the ACLU.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In what critics and rights groups condemned as further evidence that the Trump administration views asylum seekers as mere political pawns rather than vulnerable human beings, the White House reportedly considered dropping migrants off in Democratic districts as a supposed "punishment" for their opposition to the president's anti-immigrant agenda.
"The extent of this administration's cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated," said Ashley Etienne, a spokeswoman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), whose district was reportedly floated as a "target" by the White House. "Using human beings--including little children--as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable."
According to the Washington Post, which first reported on the White House plan late Thursday, "Trump administration officials have proposed transporting detained immigrants to sanctuary cities at least twice in the past six months--once in November, as a migrant caravan approached the U.S. southern border, and again in February, amid a standoff with Democrats over funding for Trump's border wall."
Anna Griffin, news director at Oregon Public Broadcasting, pointed out that an "unmentioned irony" of the Trump administration's cynical ploy is that, if it had been carried out, "folks in Portland and other sanctuary cities would have been very welcoming and probably looked for ways to make their guests feel at home."
\u201cUnmentioned irony in this story \u2014 which is, to use a technical journalism term, an insane amazeballs scoop \u2014 is that folks in Portland & other sanctuary cities would have been very welcoming & probably looked for ways to make their guests feel at home. \n\nhttps://t.co/tqcoJNumXY\u201d— Anna Griffin (@Anna Griffin) 1555038697
President Donald Trump's xenophobic senior adviser Stephen Miller--who has been quickly gaining power in the White House amid an ongoing "purge" of immigration staff--spearheaded discussions of the proposal, the Post reported, citing Department of Homeland Security officials and internal administration emails.
"White House officials first broached the plan in a Nov. 16 email, asking officials at several agencies whether members of the caravan could be arrested at the border and then bused 'to small- and mid-sized sanctuary cities,' places where local authorities have refused to hand over illegal immigrants for deportation," according to the Post.
Progressives were appalled by the Trump administration's proposal, which the White House downplayed as little more than a "suggestion" that was not carried out.
\u201cthe White House doesn't view migrants as human beings\nhttps://t.co/2ZXN3Rx6R3\u201d— Simon Maloy (@Simon Maloy) 1555028787
As observers pointed out, the reported ploy lays bare once more the Trump administration's xenophobic and false view of migrants as dangerous "invaders," rather than people seeking refuge from violence and persecution in their home countries.
"These are people seeking safety, not political pawns," tweeted the ACLU.
In what critics and rights groups condemned as further evidence that the Trump administration views asylum seekers as mere political pawns rather than vulnerable human beings, the White House reportedly considered dropping migrants off in Democratic districts as a supposed "punishment" for their opposition to the president's anti-immigrant agenda.
"The extent of this administration's cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated," said Ashley Etienne, a spokeswoman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), whose district was reportedly floated as a "target" by the White House. "Using human beings--including little children--as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable."
According to the Washington Post, which first reported on the White House plan late Thursday, "Trump administration officials have proposed transporting detained immigrants to sanctuary cities at least twice in the past six months--once in November, as a migrant caravan approached the U.S. southern border, and again in February, amid a standoff with Democrats over funding for Trump's border wall."
Anna Griffin, news director at Oregon Public Broadcasting, pointed out that an "unmentioned irony" of the Trump administration's cynical ploy is that, if it had been carried out, "folks in Portland and other sanctuary cities would have been very welcoming and probably looked for ways to make their guests feel at home."
\u201cUnmentioned irony in this story \u2014 which is, to use a technical journalism term, an insane amazeballs scoop \u2014 is that folks in Portland & other sanctuary cities would have been very welcoming & probably looked for ways to make their guests feel at home. \n\nhttps://t.co/tqcoJNumXY\u201d— Anna Griffin (@Anna Griffin) 1555038697
President Donald Trump's xenophobic senior adviser Stephen Miller--who has been quickly gaining power in the White House amid an ongoing "purge" of immigration staff--spearheaded discussions of the proposal, the Post reported, citing Department of Homeland Security officials and internal administration emails.
"White House officials first broached the plan in a Nov. 16 email, asking officials at several agencies whether members of the caravan could be arrested at the border and then bused 'to small- and mid-sized sanctuary cities,' places where local authorities have refused to hand over illegal immigrants for deportation," according to the Post.
Progressives were appalled by the Trump administration's proposal, which the White House downplayed as little more than a "suggestion" that was not carried out.
\u201cthe White House doesn't view migrants as human beings\nhttps://t.co/2ZXN3Rx6R3\u201d— Simon Maloy (@Simon Maloy) 1555028787
As observers pointed out, the reported ploy lays bare once more the Trump administration's xenophobic and false view of migrants as dangerous "invaders," rather than people seeking refuge from violence and persecution in their home countries.
"These are people seeking safety, not political pawns," tweeted the ACLU.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.