Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) speaks while introducing healthcare legislation titled the "Medicare for All Act of 2019" with Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) during a news conference on Capitol Hill, on April 9, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

'How Will You Pay for It?' Bernie Sanders Tackles Key Question on Medicare for All

"Under every single one of these options the average American family will save thousands of dollars a year because it will no longer be writing large checks to private health insurance companies."

Sen. Bernie Sanders is not ducking the key question constantly posed to Medicare for All supporters by journalists, fellow members of Congress, and critics: "How will you pay for it?"

"'How are you going to pay for it?' That is the question that bookends nearly every media conversation that takes place on Medicare for All. The straightforward answer is, we already are."
—Sen. Bernie Sanders' office

In a white paper (pdf) released Wednesday alongside the 2020 contender's updated and improved Medicare for All legislation, Sanders' office outlined a number of possible funding mechanisms for the comprehensive bill and detailed the enormous savings the U.S. would reap by transitioning to single-payer.

"Every major industrialized nation on Earth has made healthcare a right, provided universal coverage to all, and achieved far better health outcomes in terms of life expectancy and infant mortality rates—all while spending far less per capita than we do," the paper states. "Please do not tell us that the United States of America, the wealthiest nation in the history of the world, cannot do the same."

The paper lists a number of policy changes that could help raise revenue for Medicare for All, including:

  • A 70 percent top marginal tax rate on Americans earning over $10 million per year;
  • A 77 percent top tax rate on estates above $1 billion;
  • A tax on "extreme wealth";
  • A "fee on large financial institutions";
  • A "7.5 percent income-based premium paid by employers, exempting the first $2 million in payroll to protect small businesses"; and
  • A four percent "income-based premium paid by employees, exempting the first $29,000 in income for a family of four."

While acknowledging its list is not exhaustive, Sanders' office said the U.S. has a large "variety of options available to support a Medicare for All, single-payer healthcare system."

"Under every single one of these options the average American family will save thousands of dollars a year because it will no longer be writing large checks to private health insurance companies," the document says.

"The American people are increasingly clear. They want a healthcare system which guarantees healthcare to all Americans as a right. They want a healthcare system which will lower healthcare costs and save them money."
—Sen. Bernie Sanders

The white paper also emphasizes the massive savings American families and the U.S. overall would reap by transitioning from the wasteful for-profit system to Medicare for All, which would eliminate premiums, deductibles, and co-pays.

"'How are you going to pay for it?' That is the question that bookends nearly every media conversation that takes place on Medicare for All," the paper states. "The straightforward answer is, we already are."

"Unlike other government outlays—for example, a ship for the Navy—Medicare for All does not represent any new spending at all," the document continues. "Instead, it represents a rebalance of how our current dollars are spent."

Under the for-profit status quo, Sanders' office points out, the U.S. federal government is on track to spend $59.65 trillion on healthcare between 2022 and 2031.

By contrast, according to two studies published last year, Medicare for All would cost the U.S. significantly less while providing comprehensive healthcare to all Americans.

"According to estimates from the conservative Mercatus Center, under the Senate's Medicare for All legislation, [national healthcare] expenditures will drop by approximately $2 trillion," the paper notes. "Another study released by PERI at the University of Massachusetts found that 'Medicare for All could reduce total healthcare spending in the U.S. by nearly 10 percent,' resulting in more than $5 trillion in savings."

Medicare for All would also save the U.S. money by slashing prescription drug costs, Sanders' office argued.

"If the U.S. joined the rest of the industrialized world and negotiated with the pharmaceutical companies to lower prices, our country could save up to $113 billion per year," the paper states.

The paper closes with a call for "vigorous debate" on the ideal path to funding Medicare for All.

As Vox's Sarah Kliff noted, the items offered by Sanders' paper "could no doubt be used to finance a national healthcare system."

"But eventually," Kliff added, "someone is going to have to pick which items on this list become law—and that's where things get tough."

"Unlike the Republican leadership in Congress which held no hearings on their disastrous bill which would have thrown 32 million people off of health insurance," Sanders' office concludes, "we will continue to get the best ideas from economists, doctors, nurses, and ordinary Americans to guarantee healthcare as a fundamental right."

The white paper was released as Sanders officially introduced his Medicare for All legislation with the support of 14 Democratic co-sponsors and more than 60 progressive advocacy groups.

"The American people are increasingly clear," Sanders said in a statement. "They want a healthcare system which guarantees healthcare to all Americans as a right. They want a healthcare system which will lower healthcare costs and save them money. They want a healthcare system which will guarantee them freedom of choice as to which doctor or hospital they can go to."

"In other words," the Vermont senator added, "they want Medicare for All, and that's what we will deliver to them."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We need your help.

Support progressive journalism.

Common Dreams is not your average news site. We don't survive on clicks or advertising dollars. We rely entirely on your support. And without it, our independent progressive journalism simply wouldn’t exist. Every gift of every amount matters.

Join the fight and support our common dreams today.

Ocasio-Cortez Says 'Elephant in the Room' Is Senate Democrats Blocking Their Own Party's Agenda

"The argument that we need to make here," the New York Democrat said of bipartisanship's dead end, "is that it's worth going it alone if we can do more for working people in this country."

Jon Queally, staff writer ·


On Climate and Covid-19 Emergencies, G7 Judged a 'Colossal Failure' for All the World to See

"Never in the history of the G7 has there been a bigger gap between their actions and the needs of the world. In the face of these challenges the G7 have chosen to cook the books on vaccines and continue to cook the planet."

Jon Queally, staff writer ·


NYC Mayoral Candidate Eric Adams Rebuked for 'Dangerous' 400-Students-to-1-Teacher Theory

"Defunding schools to the point that we have a 400:1 student-to-teacher ratio so we can bankroll another huge expansion in an already-multibillion dollar police budget," said Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, "is how you build a school-to-prison pipeline."

Jon Queally, staff writer ·


Lack of Patent Waiver Would Add Over $70 Billion to Cost of Vaccinating World: Oxfam

Most of that money, said a spokesperson for the group, "will go directly into the pockets" of Big Pharma shareholders.

Jon Queally, staff writer ·


Darnella Frazier Receives Pulitzer Special Citation 'for Courageously Recording the Murder of George Floyd'

"Without Darnella, Derek Chauvin never would have been tried and George Floyd would have been blamed by the state for his own death."

Brett Wilkins, staff writer ·