To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Members of the National Organization for Women (NOW), the National Task Force to End Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Against Women, and other groups hold a rally in support of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) on Capitol Hill June 26, 2012 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
The vast majority of House Republicans caved to pressure from the gun lobby on Thursday and refused to back Democrats' successful effort to extend the Violence Against Women Act for five years because of a new provision that would make it harder for abusers to acquire guns.
The 1994 law provides protections and funds programs for survivors of domestic and sexual violence. It's been reauthorized three times but expired in February. The new version passed the House 263-158 with support from all but one Democrat and only 33 Republicans. Read the full roll call results here.
It now faces an uphill battle in the GOP-controlled Senate.
The National Rifle Association (NRA) is urging GOP lawmakers to oppose the updated version because of a gun-related provision to close the so-called "boyfriend loophole."
As ThinkProgress explained earlier this week:
Currently, people convicted of domestic abuse are only prohibited from possessing guns if they live with the victim, have a child with them, are a parent or guardian, or they are, or were once, married to them. This leaves out many cases of intimate partner violence, and the VAWA reauthorization would expand this to include dating partners, stalkers, and former partners.
Lindsay Nichols, federal policy director at the Giffords Law Center, which provides legal assistance to lawmakers, activists, and government attorneys for gun control efforts, told ThinkProgress that the provisions recognizing stalkers are an important addition to this law.
"While stalking is a strong indicator of future violence, people convicted of stalking misdemeanors are still eligible to purchase guns. This bill would close these loopholes, and increase enforcement of the laws that prevent domestic abusers from using guns to harm their victims," she said.
As the NRA and some Republican lawmakers condemned the provision as a politically motivated "poison pill," one of its key proponents, Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), referenced her childhood when speaking about the importance of keeping guns out of the hands of abusers.
"This is something that I care very, very deeply about, because I lived in that household," she said outside the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday. "I know what it's like to live in a household with someone that has issues that can snap at a minute's notice, and suddenly the gun is pointed at your mother or pointed at you. And as a child, you're trying to grab a gun from someone and keep them from killing each other."
Speaking on the House floor ahead of the vote Thursday, Dingell declared: "Do not let the NRA bully you. This is not a poison pill!"
\u201cAfter @RepDebDingell -- speaking on behalf of Violence Against Women Act reauthorization -- urges members to "not let the NRA bully you," Republicans shout her down.\n\n"You know what? You can't shout down a woman!" she says.\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1554394889
"The NRA wants Congress to put the second amendment rights of abusers over the lives of the women and families who might die at their hands," the National Organization for Women (NOW) said in a statement on Thursday.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said on the House floor Wednesday that he was "deeply disappointed" that some Republicans were "using the NRA as cover to vote against this reauthorization, which has been overwhelmingly in a bipartisan fashion reauthorized over and over again."
Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.), who co-sponsored the House measure with Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), said before it passed that "while we have made significant progress, we still have much to do."
"Movements like MeToo, across this country, demand Congress' attention," she said, "to better deal with the gaping holes left unfilled in current law around the issues of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault/harassment, and stalking."
Although the Senate may refuse to reauthorize the measure with the contested provisions, advocacy groups still took to Twitter to celebrate the House vote and highlight new additions:
\u201cAmazing!! The House just passed the strongest version of the Violence Against Women Act which would help prevent abusers from accessing guns. \n\nNext stop: the Senate! https://t.co/lWkoFeqA1q #VAWA4All #VAWA\u201d— UltraViolet has the #ReproReceipts (@UltraViolet has the #ReproReceipts) 1554402088
\u201cWE DID IT! \ud83c\udf89\u00a0The House just passed #VAWA19! \n\nThis #VAWA4ALL will:\n\u27a1\ufe0f increase funding for campuses\n\u27a1\ufe0f expand trauma-informed training for advocates\n\u27a1\ufe0f include protections for transgender and non-binary survivors\n\nNext up: Passing #VAWA in the Senate\u201d— End Rape On Campus (@End Rape On Campus) 1554407878
\u201cFor too long, the Violence Against Women Act\u2014while securing necessary protections for many women across the country\u2014has failed Indigenous women.\n\nNo more. Leaders like @RepDebHaaland are creating #VAWA4All. This is what happens when Native women hold political power.\n\nIT MATTERS.\u201d— Women's March (@Women's March) 1554383165
\u201cThis is great news as we near the end of the week. Today, the House passed a renewed Violence Against Women Act that expands transgender rights and includes special restrictions on gun ownership, including closing the \u201cboyfriend loophole.\u201d \n\nhttps://t.co/q11eyoXRnQ\u201d— SafeHorizon (@SafeHorizon) 1554411265
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
The vast majority of House Republicans caved to pressure from the gun lobby on Thursday and refused to back Democrats' successful effort to extend the Violence Against Women Act for five years because of a new provision that would make it harder for abusers to acquire guns.
The 1994 law provides protections and funds programs for survivors of domestic and sexual violence. It's been reauthorized three times but expired in February. The new version passed the House 263-158 with support from all but one Democrat and only 33 Republicans. Read the full roll call results here.
It now faces an uphill battle in the GOP-controlled Senate.
The National Rifle Association (NRA) is urging GOP lawmakers to oppose the updated version because of a gun-related provision to close the so-called "boyfriend loophole."
As ThinkProgress explained earlier this week:
Currently, people convicted of domestic abuse are only prohibited from possessing guns if they live with the victim, have a child with them, are a parent or guardian, or they are, or were once, married to them. This leaves out many cases of intimate partner violence, and the VAWA reauthorization would expand this to include dating partners, stalkers, and former partners.
Lindsay Nichols, federal policy director at the Giffords Law Center, which provides legal assistance to lawmakers, activists, and government attorneys for gun control efforts, told ThinkProgress that the provisions recognizing stalkers are an important addition to this law.
"While stalking is a strong indicator of future violence, people convicted of stalking misdemeanors are still eligible to purchase guns. This bill would close these loopholes, and increase enforcement of the laws that prevent domestic abusers from using guns to harm their victims," she said.
As the NRA and some Republican lawmakers condemned the provision as a politically motivated "poison pill," one of its key proponents, Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), referenced her childhood when speaking about the importance of keeping guns out of the hands of abusers.
"This is something that I care very, very deeply about, because I lived in that household," she said outside the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday. "I know what it's like to live in a household with someone that has issues that can snap at a minute's notice, and suddenly the gun is pointed at your mother or pointed at you. And as a child, you're trying to grab a gun from someone and keep them from killing each other."
Speaking on the House floor ahead of the vote Thursday, Dingell declared: "Do not let the NRA bully you. This is not a poison pill!"
\u201cAfter @RepDebDingell -- speaking on behalf of Violence Against Women Act reauthorization -- urges members to "not let the NRA bully you," Republicans shout her down.\n\n"You know what? You can't shout down a woman!" she says.\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1554394889
"The NRA wants Congress to put the second amendment rights of abusers over the lives of the women and families who might die at their hands," the National Organization for Women (NOW) said in a statement on Thursday.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said on the House floor Wednesday that he was "deeply disappointed" that some Republicans were "using the NRA as cover to vote against this reauthorization, which has been overwhelmingly in a bipartisan fashion reauthorized over and over again."
Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.), who co-sponsored the House measure with Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), said before it passed that "while we have made significant progress, we still have much to do."
"Movements like MeToo, across this country, demand Congress' attention," she said, "to better deal with the gaping holes left unfilled in current law around the issues of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault/harassment, and stalking."
Although the Senate may refuse to reauthorize the measure with the contested provisions, advocacy groups still took to Twitter to celebrate the House vote and highlight new additions:
\u201cAmazing!! The House just passed the strongest version of the Violence Against Women Act which would help prevent abusers from accessing guns. \n\nNext stop: the Senate! https://t.co/lWkoFeqA1q #VAWA4All #VAWA\u201d— UltraViolet has the #ReproReceipts (@UltraViolet has the #ReproReceipts) 1554402088
\u201cWE DID IT! \ud83c\udf89\u00a0The House just passed #VAWA19! \n\nThis #VAWA4ALL will:\n\u27a1\ufe0f increase funding for campuses\n\u27a1\ufe0f expand trauma-informed training for advocates\n\u27a1\ufe0f include protections for transgender and non-binary survivors\n\nNext up: Passing #VAWA in the Senate\u201d— End Rape On Campus (@End Rape On Campus) 1554407878
\u201cFor too long, the Violence Against Women Act\u2014while securing necessary protections for many women across the country\u2014has failed Indigenous women.\n\nNo more. Leaders like @RepDebHaaland are creating #VAWA4All. This is what happens when Native women hold political power.\n\nIT MATTERS.\u201d— Women's March (@Women's March) 1554383165
\u201cThis is great news as we near the end of the week. Today, the House passed a renewed Violence Against Women Act that expands transgender rights and includes special restrictions on gun ownership, including closing the \u201cboyfriend loophole.\u201d \n\nhttps://t.co/q11eyoXRnQ\u201d— SafeHorizon (@SafeHorizon) 1554411265
The vast majority of House Republicans caved to pressure from the gun lobby on Thursday and refused to back Democrats' successful effort to extend the Violence Against Women Act for five years because of a new provision that would make it harder for abusers to acquire guns.
The 1994 law provides protections and funds programs for survivors of domestic and sexual violence. It's been reauthorized three times but expired in February. The new version passed the House 263-158 with support from all but one Democrat and only 33 Republicans. Read the full roll call results here.
It now faces an uphill battle in the GOP-controlled Senate.
The National Rifle Association (NRA) is urging GOP lawmakers to oppose the updated version because of a gun-related provision to close the so-called "boyfriend loophole."
As ThinkProgress explained earlier this week:
Currently, people convicted of domestic abuse are only prohibited from possessing guns if they live with the victim, have a child with them, are a parent or guardian, or they are, or were once, married to them. This leaves out many cases of intimate partner violence, and the VAWA reauthorization would expand this to include dating partners, stalkers, and former partners.
Lindsay Nichols, federal policy director at the Giffords Law Center, which provides legal assistance to lawmakers, activists, and government attorneys for gun control efforts, told ThinkProgress that the provisions recognizing stalkers are an important addition to this law.
"While stalking is a strong indicator of future violence, people convicted of stalking misdemeanors are still eligible to purchase guns. This bill would close these loopholes, and increase enforcement of the laws that prevent domestic abusers from using guns to harm their victims," she said.
As the NRA and some Republican lawmakers condemned the provision as a politically motivated "poison pill," one of its key proponents, Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), referenced her childhood when speaking about the importance of keeping guns out of the hands of abusers.
"This is something that I care very, very deeply about, because I lived in that household," she said outside the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday. "I know what it's like to live in a household with someone that has issues that can snap at a minute's notice, and suddenly the gun is pointed at your mother or pointed at you. And as a child, you're trying to grab a gun from someone and keep them from killing each other."
Speaking on the House floor ahead of the vote Thursday, Dingell declared: "Do not let the NRA bully you. This is not a poison pill!"
\u201cAfter @RepDebDingell -- speaking on behalf of Violence Against Women Act reauthorization -- urges members to "not let the NRA bully you," Republicans shout her down.\n\n"You know what? You can't shout down a woman!" she says.\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1554394889
"The NRA wants Congress to put the second amendment rights of abusers over the lives of the women and families who might die at their hands," the National Organization for Women (NOW) said in a statement on Thursday.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said on the House floor Wednesday that he was "deeply disappointed" that some Republicans were "using the NRA as cover to vote against this reauthorization, which has been overwhelmingly in a bipartisan fashion reauthorized over and over again."
Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.), who co-sponsored the House measure with Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), said before it passed that "while we have made significant progress, we still have much to do."
"Movements like MeToo, across this country, demand Congress' attention," she said, "to better deal with the gaping holes left unfilled in current law around the issues of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault/harassment, and stalking."
Although the Senate may refuse to reauthorize the measure with the contested provisions, advocacy groups still took to Twitter to celebrate the House vote and highlight new additions:
\u201cAmazing!! The House just passed the strongest version of the Violence Against Women Act which would help prevent abusers from accessing guns. \n\nNext stop: the Senate! https://t.co/lWkoFeqA1q #VAWA4All #VAWA\u201d— UltraViolet has the #ReproReceipts (@UltraViolet has the #ReproReceipts) 1554402088
\u201cWE DID IT! \ud83c\udf89\u00a0The House just passed #VAWA19! \n\nThis #VAWA4ALL will:\n\u27a1\ufe0f increase funding for campuses\n\u27a1\ufe0f expand trauma-informed training for advocates\n\u27a1\ufe0f include protections for transgender and non-binary survivors\n\nNext up: Passing #VAWA in the Senate\u201d— End Rape On Campus (@End Rape On Campus) 1554407878
\u201cFor too long, the Violence Against Women Act\u2014while securing necessary protections for many women across the country\u2014has failed Indigenous women.\n\nNo more. Leaders like @RepDebHaaland are creating #VAWA4All. This is what happens when Native women hold political power.\n\nIT MATTERS.\u201d— Women's March (@Women's March) 1554383165
\u201cThis is great news as we near the end of the week. Today, the House passed a renewed Violence Against Women Act that expands transgender rights and includes special restrictions on gun ownership, including closing the \u201cboyfriend loophole.\u201d \n\nhttps://t.co/q11eyoXRnQ\u201d— SafeHorizon (@SafeHorizon) 1554411265
