SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A protester holds a sign at a pro-choice demonstration in 2014. (Photo: Zhu/Flickr/cc)
'A Very Scary Case': Placing Rights of Woman Last, Alabama Judge Allows Boyfriend to Sue Abortion Clinic With Fetus as Co-Plaintiff
"When the fetus becomes a person as per Alabama 'personhood law,' a woman is rendered a walking incubator with less rights than a fetus and the man."
Mar 04, 2019
An Alabama county court recognized an aborted fetus as a plaintiff in a lawsuit Tuesday, opening a new chapter in the fight for reproductive rights in the United States.
Madison County probate court Judge Frank Barger allowed Ryan Magers to name the fetus his girlfriend had aborted as a co-plaintiff in his case against Alabama Women's Center.
The judge's decision to establish an estate for the fetus, allowing the suit to move forward, came four months after the passage of Amendment 2 by voters in a state referendum last November. The law, which passed by 18 percentage points, gives fetuses the same legal rights held by a person under the state constitution.
Women's rights advocates on social media slammed the decision, noting that it was perhaps the first time in U.S. history a fetus was named as a co-plaintiff in a case.
\u201cAn Alabama probate judge just opened an estate for an aborted fetus. It's the rest time this has happened in the country and opens the door for partners to sue to block abortions, among other things #TeamLegal\n\nhttps://t.co/YX8rTPF40h\u201d— Jessica Mason Pieklo (@Jessica Mason Pieklo) 1551801375
\u201cAn Alabama man is mad that his girlfriend got an abortion against his wishes, so he\u2019s suing the clinic. How did the county respond? By declaring the aborted embryo (she was just 6 wks pregnant) a person with legal rights https://t.co/pOcFdNAQpy\u201d— Jessica Valenti (@Jessica Valenti) 1551800716
As NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue wrote on social media, the "very scary case" asserts that a "woman's rights [are] third in line," after those of a man who impregnates her and the fetus she aborts.
\u201cBreaking: Alabama allows a suit from man AND fetus against abortion clinic where his girlfriend terminated her pregnancy. First under Alabama's new personhood law, asserting woman's rights third in line. Very scary case. https://t.co/xXCSyJN3AQ\u201d— Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon (@Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon) 1551807763
Author Mona Eltahawy added that the case effectively renders the woman--and all women in Alabama--"walking incubators" with fewer rights than a fetus.
\u201cThis is the USA in the year 2019: a man AND a fetus are suing an abortion clinic. \n\nThe woman? \n\nWhen the fetus becomes a person as per Alabama \u201cpersonhood law,\u201d a woman is rendered a walking incubator with less rights than a fetus and the man. https://t.co/sIOPfkXJ6h\u201d— Mona Eltahawy (@Mona Eltahawy) 1551810646
According to WAAY 31, a local ABC affiliate, Magers' girlfriend obtained an abortion two years ago when she was just six weeks pregnant.
"Pregnant people are full citizens with bodily autonomy and a right to choose the outcome of their pregnancy," wrote Dr. Katie McHugh, a fellow with Physicians for Reproductive Rights. "Attempting to grant a six week gestational sac equal rights is both unlawful and idiotic."
\u201cDear Alabama, \n\nThis just in: Pregnant people are full citizens with bodily autonomy and a right to choose. The outcome of their pregnancy. Attempting to grant a 6 week gestational sac equal rights is both unlawful and idiotic. \n\n#AbortionIsHealthcare \n\nhttps://t.co/krQEYzSSez\u201d— Katie McHugh, MD (she/her) (@Katie McHugh, MD (she/her)) 1551820931
The Alabama Women's Center has until April 1 to respond to the suit. Magers' attorney told WAAY 31 he believes the case could eventually proceed to the state Supreme Court.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
An Alabama county court recognized an aborted fetus as a plaintiff in a lawsuit Tuesday, opening a new chapter in the fight for reproductive rights in the United States.
Madison County probate court Judge Frank Barger allowed Ryan Magers to name the fetus his girlfriend had aborted as a co-plaintiff in his case against Alabama Women's Center.
The judge's decision to establish an estate for the fetus, allowing the suit to move forward, came four months after the passage of Amendment 2 by voters in a state referendum last November. The law, which passed by 18 percentage points, gives fetuses the same legal rights held by a person under the state constitution.
Women's rights advocates on social media slammed the decision, noting that it was perhaps the first time in U.S. history a fetus was named as a co-plaintiff in a case.
\u201cAn Alabama probate judge just opened an estate for an aborted fetus. It's the rest time this has happened in the country and opens the door for partners to sue to block abortions, among other things #TeamLegal\n\nhttps://t.co/YX8rTPF40h\u201d— Jessica Mason Pieklo (@Jessica Mason Pieklo) 1551801375
\u201cAn Alabama man is mad that his girlfriend got an abortion against his wishes, so he\u2019s suing the clinic. How did the county respond? By declaring the aborted embryo (she was just 6 wks pregnant) a person with legal rights https://t.co/pOcFdNAQpy\u201d— Jessica Valenti (@Jessica Valenti) 1551800716
As NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue wrote on social media, the "very scary case" asserts that a "woman's rights [are] third in line," after those of a man who impregnates her and the fetus she aborts.
\u201cBreaking: Alabama allows a suit from man AND fetus against abortion clinic where his girlfriend terminated her pregnancy. First under Alabama's new personhood law, asserting woman's rights third in line. Very scary case. https://t.co/xXCSyJN3AQ\u201d— Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon (@Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon) 1551807763
Author Mona Eltahawy added that the case effectively renders the woman--and all women in Alabama--"walking incubators" with fewer rights than a fetus.
\u201cThis is the USA in the year 2019: a man AND a fetus are suing an abortion clinic. \n\nThe woman? \n\nWhen the fetus becomes a person as per Alabama \u201cpersonhood law,\u201d a woman is rendered a walking incubator with less rights than a fetus and the man. https://t.co/sIOPfkXJ6h\u201d— Mona Eltahawy (@Mona Eltahawy) 1551810646
According to WAAY 31, a local ABC affiliate, Magers' girlfriend obtained an abortion two years ago when she was just six weeks pregnant.
"Pregnant people are full citizens with bodily autonomy and a right to choose the outcome of their pregnancy," wrote Dr. Katie McHugh, a fellow with Physicians for Reproductive Rights. "Attempting to grant a six week gestational sac equal rights is both unlawful and idiotic."
\u201cDear Alabama, \n\nThis just in: Pregnant people are full citizens with bodily autonomy and a right to choose. The outcome of their pregnancy. Attempting to grant a 6 week gestational sac equal rights is both unlawful and idiotic. \n\n#AbortionIsHealthcare \n\nhttps://t.co/krQEYzSSez\u201d— Katie McHugh, MD (she/her) (@Katie McHugh, MD (she/her)) 1551820931
The Alabama Women's Center has until April 1 to respond to the suit. Magers' attorney told WAAY 31 he believes the case could eventually proceed to the state Supreme Court.
An Alabama county court recognized an aborted fetus as a plaintiff in a lawsuit Tuesday, opening a new chapter in the fight for reproductive rights in the United States.
Madison County probate court Judge Frank Barger allowed Ryan Magers to name the fetus his girlfriend had aborted as a co-plaintiff in his case against Alabama Women's Center.
The judge's decision to establish an estate for the fetus, allowing the suit to move forward, came four months after the passage of Amendment 2 by voters in a state referendum last November. The law, which passed by 18 percentage points, gives fetuses the same legal rights held by a person under the state constitution.
Women's rights advocates on social media slammed the decision, noting that it was perhaps the first time in U.S. history a fetus was named as a co-plaintiff in a case.
\u201cAn Alabama probate judge just opened an estate for an aborted fetus. It's the rest time this has happened in the country and opens the door for partners to sue to block abortions, among other things #TeamLegal\n\nhttps://t.co/YX8rTPF40h\u201d— Jessica Mason Pieklo (@Jessica Mason Pieklo) 1551801375
\u201cAn Alabama man is mad that his girlfriend got an abortion against his wishes, so he\u2019s suing the clinic. How did the county respond? By declaring the aborted embryo (she was just 6 wks pregnant) a person with legal rights https://t.co/pOcFdNAQpy\u201d— Jessica Valenti (@Jessica Valenti) 1551800716
As NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue wrote on social media, the "very scary case" asserts that a "woman's rights [are] third in line," after those of a man who impregnates her and the fetus she aborts.
\u201cBreaking: Alabama allows a suit from man AND fetus against abortion clinic where his girlfriend terminated her pregnancy. First under Alabama's new personhood law, asserting woman's rights third in line. Very scary case. https://t.co/xXCSyJN3AQ\u201d— Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon (@Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon) 1551807763
Author Mona Eltahawy added that the case effectively renders the woman--and all women in Alabama--"walking incubators" with fewer rights than a fetus.
\u201cThis is the USA in the year 2019: a man AND a fetus are suing an abortion clinic. \n\nThe woman? \n\nWhen the fetus becomes a person as per Alabama \u201cpersonhood law,\u201d a woman is rendered a walking incubator with less rights than a fetus and the man. https://t.co/sIOPfkXJ6h\u201d— Mona Eltahawy (@Mona Eltahawy) 1551810646
According to WAAY 31, a local ABC affiliate, Magers' girlfriend obtained an abortion two years ago when she was just six weeks pregnant.
"Pregnant people are full citizens with bodily autonomy and a right to choose the outcome of their pregnancy," wrote Dr. Katie McHugh, a fellow with Physicians for Reproductive Rights. "Attempting to grant a six week gestational sac equal rights is both unlawful and idiotic."
\u201cDear Alabama, \n\nThis just in: Pregnant people are full citizens with bodily autonomy and a right to choose. The outcome of their pregnancy. Attempting to grant a 6 week gestational sac equal rights is both unlawful and idiotic. \n\n#AbortionIsHealthcare \n\nhttps://t.co/krQEYzSSez\u201d— Katie McHugh, MD (she/her) (@Katie McHugh, MD (she/her)) 1551820931
The Alabama Women's Center has until April 1 to respond to the suit. Magers' attorney told WAAY 31 he believes the case could eventually proceed to the state Supreme Court.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.