DNC Rejects Ban on Corporate PAC Money, Delaying Decision Until 2020
"We will keep up the fight to put people over PACs, to make the Democratic Party more democratic."

After rejecting a proposal to reinstate a full ban on corporate PAC donations earlier this week, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) decided on Saturday that the party's Platform Committee would review a possible ban in 2020.
At the DNC's winter meeting, the DNC failed to pass the anti-corporate PAC resolution proposed by Christine Pelosi, chair of the California Democratic Party women's caucus and daughter of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif). But Pelosi applauded the committee's rejection of a resolution to "study" the effects of corporate PAC donations, instead directing the DNC's Platform Committee to vote on whether the contributions will be allowed in 2020.
Melissa Byrne, a former organizer on Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) 2016 presidential campaign, tweeted that the resolution should be a "no-brainer" for the committee to pass in 2020.
Pelosi has led the charge in recent months to demand that the DNC stops accepting corporate PAC money in the interest of running "people-powered" campaigns.
"We're going to have a presidential debate, they're going to ask what side we're on," Pelosi told Vox.com after her resolution to ban corporate PAC money failed. "I just want us all to be ready."
"What are we saying to the people across this country, whose votes we need, not only to eliminate this president but to adopt an agenda for change?" --Larry Cohen, Our RevolutionThe DNC declined to pass the ban despite the fact that candidates who reject corporate donations have proven popular in recent years. More than 50 House Democrats now refuse corporate PAC money, including 35 new members who were elected in November. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) are among the Democratic presidential candidates who have pledged not to take corporate PAC money.
Former President Barack Obama introduced a ban on corporate PAC money in 2008, but the DNC reversed it in 2016. Despite the fact that reinstating the ban is clearly a winning issue with voters, some Democrats still claim that refusing corporate donations will harm the Party's chance of defeating President Donald Trump in 2020.
"My number one focus, frankly, is to get rid of Donald Trump," Charlie King, a DNC member and former executive director of the New York State Democratic Party, told Vox.com--indicating that offering voters broadly popular ideas is far less important to some members than simply defeating Trump and returning to the corporate-friendly status quo that existed before he was elected.
Larry Cohen, a member who supported Pelosi's resolution and who serves on the board of Our Revolution, strongly disagreed.
"What are we saying to the people across this country, whose votes we need, not only to eliminate this president but to adopt an agenda for change?" Cohen said.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |

After rejecting a proposal to reinstate a full ban on corporate PAC donations earlier this week, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) decided on Saturday that the party's Platform Committee would review a possible ban in 2020.
At the DNC's winter meeting, the DNC failed to pass the anti-corporate PAC resolution proposed by Christine Pelosi, chair of the California Democratic Party women's caucus and daughter of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif). But Pelosi applauded the committee's rejection of a resolution to "study" the effects of corporate PAC donations, instead directing the DNC's Platform Committee to vote on whether the contributions will be allowed in 2020.
Melissa Byrne, a former organizer on Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) 2016 presidential campaign, tweeted that the resolution should be a "no-brainer" for the committee to pass in 2020.
Pelosi has led the charge in recent months to demand that the DNC stops accepting corporate PAC money in the interest of running "people-powered" campaigns.
"We're going to have a presidential debate, they're going to ask what side we're on," Pelosi told Vox.com after her resolution to ban corporate PAC money failed. "I just want us all to be ready."
"What are we saying to the people across this country, whose votes we need, not only to eliminate this president but to adopt an agenda for change?" --Larry Cohen, Our RevolutionThe DNC declined to pass the ban despite the fact that candidates who reject corporate donations have proven popular in recent years. More than 50 House Democrats now refuse corporate PAC money, including 35 new members who were elected in November. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) are among the Democratic presidential candidates who have pledged not to take corporate PAC money.
Former President Barack Obama introduced a ban on corporate PAC money in 2008, but the DNC reversed it in 2016. Despite the fact that reinstating the ban is clearly a winning issue with voters, some Democrats still claim that refusing corporate donations will harm the Party's chance of defeating President Donald Trump in 2020.
"My number one focus, frankly, is to get rid of Donald Trump," Charlie King, a DNC member and former executive director of the New York State Democratic Party, told Vox.com--indicating that offering voters broadly popular ideas is far less important to some members than simply defeating Trump and returning to the corporate-friendly status quo that existed before he was elected.
Larry Cohen, a member who supported Pelosi's resolution and who serves on the board of Our Revolution, strongly disagreed.
"What are we saying to the people across this country, whose votes we need, not only to eliminate this president but to adopt an agenda for change?" Cohen said.

After rejecting a proposal to reinstate a full ban on corporate PAC donations earlier this week, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) decided on Saturday that the party's Platform Committee would review a possible ban in 2020.
At the DNC's winter meeting, the DNC failed to pass the anti-corporate PAC resolution proposed by Christine Pelosi, chair of the California Democratic Party women's caucus and daughter of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif). But Pelosi applauded the committee's rejection of a resolution to "study" the effects of corporate PAC donations, instead directing the DNC's Platform Committee to vote on whether the contributions will be allowed in 2020.
Melissa Byrne, a former organizer on Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) 2016 presidential campaign, tweeted that the resolution should be a "no-brainer" for the committee to pass in 2020.
Pelosi has led the charge in recent months to demand that the DNC stops accepting corporate PAC money in the interest of running "people-powered" campaigns.
"We're going to have a presidential debate, they're going to ask what side we're on," Pelosi told Vox.com after her resolution to ban corporate PAC money failed. "I just want us all to be ready."
"What are we saying to the people across this country, whose votes we need, not only to eliminate this president but to adopt an agenda for change?" --Larry Cohen, Our RevolutionThe DNC declined to pass the ban despite the fact that candidates who reject corporate donations have proven popular in recent years. More than 50 House Democrats now refuse corporate PAC money, including 35 new members who were elected in November. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) are among the Democratic presidential candidates who have pledged not to take corporate PAC money.
Former President Barack Obama introduced a ban on corporate PAC money in 2008, but the DNC reversed it in 2016. Despite the fact that reinstating the ban is clearly a winning issue with voters, some Democrats still claim that refusing corporate donations will harm the Party's chance of defeating President Donald Trump in 2020.
"My number one focus, frankly, is to get rid of Donald Trump," Charlie King, a DNC member and former executive director of the New York State Democratic Party, told Vox.com--indicating that offering voters broadly popular ideas is far less important to some members than simply defeating Trump and returning to the corporate-friendly status quo that existed before he was elected.
Larry Cohen, a member who supported Pelosi's resolution and who serves on the board of Our Revolution, strongly disagreed.
"What are we saying to the people across this country, whose votes we need, not only to eliminate this president but to adopt an agenda for change?" Cohen said.

