SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. President Donald Trump participates in a roundtable discussion at the US Border Patrol Station in McAllen, Texas, US, January 10, 2019 (Photo: Leah Millis/Reuters)
Calling It "Gross Abuse of Power," Democrats Vow to Move Swiftly to Nullify Trump's National Emergency Declaration
"The only emergency facing the American people right now is the president's intent to subvert the separation of powers and the rule of law."
Feb 14, 2019
Bypassing Congress, President Donald Trump declared a national emergency Friday morning to access funding for "his racist and wasteful wall"--a move Democrats decried as a "gross abuse of power" and vowed to quickly nullify.
"The only emergency facing the American people right now is the president's intent to subvert the separation of powers and the rule of law," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said in a statement announcing his support for a joint resolution to terminate such a declaration.
Trump made the announcement from the White House Rose Garden in a typically rambling speech in which he falsely asserted that there is a "national security crisis at our southern border" and an "invasion of drugs and criminals." He'll use the declaration, along with the $1.375 billion Congress agreed to Thursday, to square away roughly $8 billion for the xenophobic barrier.
"We won't stand for this," responded fellow Democratic Judiciary Committee member Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), writing on Twitter, "A national emergency declaration for a non-emergency is not legal."
In his statement, which was issued ahead of the expected announcement, Nadler refuted Trump's characterization of a crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, said Trump was given no directive to construct "a medieval border wall," and argued that the president has no legal authority to pursue an emergency declaration given the situation.
"Congress entrusted the president with authority to reallocate funds during unforeseen and urgent situations, such as wars and natural disasters," Nadler said. "No sensible person believes there is an emergency at the southern border. Illegal immigration is at record lows, and families with children who lawfully seek asylum are not foreign invaders."
"Moreover," Nadler continued, "the law that the president reportedly plans to invoke applies only in situations where the military must be called upon for national defense purposes. But the military is prohibited from enforcing the nation's immigration laws--and the president cannot deploy the military in a transparent attempt to create the appearance of an emergency where none exists. The only emergency facing the American people right now is the president's intent to subvert the separation of powers and the rule of law."
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said she and fellow Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro (Texas) would introduce a bill to halt the declaration, while the top two Democrats in Congress--House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.)--vowed to take action "in the Congress, in the courts, and in the public" to stop the Trump's declaration.
Progressive advocacy groups, meanwhile, are gearing up for their own responses.
Trump himself acknowledged that there would be a likely legal challenge, but Public Citizen president Robert Weissman warned, "Although we think the law and Constitution is on our side, we can't count on the courts to act quickly or ultimately to restrain Trump."
"If the president can merely cry 'emergency' to override national law and contravene explicit congressional action--particularly when the claimed emergency is transparently fraudulent--then it is hard to know what limits exist on presidential power," Weissman wrote. "What's to stop the president from declaring an emergency and limiting the right to protest? To round up people of color en masse to combat purported gang activity? To deploy the military on the streets to maintain order? To censor social media and Internet conversations?"
"If the slide to authoritarianism and tyranny is to be averted, he will need to be restrained--in the first place by the Congress and, if not, hopefully the courts, but ultimately by the American people," he added. "It is imperative that Congress must act to stop Trump, and We the People must make Congress do that."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Bypassing Congress, President Donald Trump declared a national emergency Friday morning to access funding for "his racist and wasteful wall"--a move Democrats decried as a "gross abuse of power" and vowed to quickly nullify.
"The only emergency facing the American people right now is the president's intent to subvert the separation of powers and the rule of law," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said in a statement announcing his support for a joint resolution to terminate such a declaration.
Trump made the announcement from the White House Rose Garden in a typically rambling speech in which he falsely asserted that there is a "national security crisis at our southern border" and an "invasion of drugs and criminals." He'll use the declaration, along with the $1.375 billion Congress agreed to Thursday, to square away roughly $8 billion for the xenophobic barrier.
"We won't stand for this," responded fellow Democratic Judiciary Committee member Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), writing on Twitter, "A national emergency declaration for a non-emergency is not legal."
In his statement, which was issued ahead of the expected announcement, Nadler refuted Trump's characterization of a crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, said Trump was given no directive to construct "a medieval border wall," and argued that the president has no legal authority to pursue an emergency declaration given the situation.
"Congress entrusted the president with authority to reallocate funds during unforeseen and urgent situations, such as wars and natural disasters," Nadler said. "No sensible person believes there is an emergency at the southern border. Illegal immigration is at record lows, and families with children who lawfully seek asylum are not foreign invaders."
"Moreover," Nadler continued, "the law that the president reportedly plans to invoke applies only in situations where the military must be called upon for national defense purposes. But the military is prohibited from enforcing the nation's immigration laws--and the president cannot deploy the military in a transparent attempt to create the appearance of an emergency where none exists. The only emergency facing the American people right now is the president's intent to subvert the separation of powers and the rule of law."
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said she and fellow Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro (Texas) would introduce a bill to halt the declaration, while the top two Democrats in Congress--House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.)--vowed to take action "in the Congress, in the courts, and in the public" to stop the Trump's declaration.
Progressive advocacy groups, meanwhile, are gearing up for their own responses.
Trump himself acknowledged that there would be a likely legal challenge, but Public Citizen president Robert Weissman warned, "Although we think the law and Constitution is on our side, we can't count on the courts to act quickly or ultimately to restrain Trump."
"If the president can merely cry 'emergency' to override national law and contravene explicit congressional action--particularly when the claimed emergency is transparently fraudulent--then it is hard to know what limits exist on presidential power," Weissman wrote. "What's to stop the president from declaring an emergency and limiting the right to protest? To round up people of color en masse to combat purported gang activity? To deploy the military on the streets to maintain order? To censor social media and Internet conversations?"
"If the slide to authoritarianism and tyranny is to be averted, he will need to be restrained--in the first place by the Congress and, if not, hopefully the courts, but ultimately by the American people," he added. "It is imperative that Congress must act to stop Trump, and We the People must make Congress do that."
Bypassing Congress, President Donald Trump declared a national emergency Friday morning to access funding for "his racist and wasteful wall"--a move Democrats decried as a "gross abuse of power" and vowed to quickly nullify.
"The only emergency facing the American people right now is the president's intent to subvert the separation of powers and the rule of law," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said in a statement announcing his support for a joint resolution to terminate such a declaration.
Trump made the announcement from the White House Rose Garden in a typically rambling speech in which he falsely asserted that there is a "national security crisis at our southern border" and an "invasion of drugs and criminals." He'll use the declaration, along with the $1.375 billion Congress agreed to Thursday, to square away roughly $8 billion for the xenophobic barrier.
"We won't stand for this," responded fellow Democratic Judiciary Committee member Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), writing on Twitter, "A national emergency declaration for a non-emergency is not legal."
In his statement, which was issued ahead of the expected announcement, Nadler refuted Trump's characterization of a crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, said Trump was given no directive to construct "a medieval border wall," and argued that the president has no legal authority to pursue an emergency declaration given the situation.
"Congress entrusted the president with authority to reallocate funds during unforeseen and urgent situations, such as wars and natural disasters," Nadler said. "No sensible person believes there is an emergency at the southern border. Illegal immigration is at record lows, and families with children who lawfully seek asylum are not foreign invaders."
"Moreover," Nadler continued, "the law that the president reportedly plans to invoke applies only in situations where the military must be called upon for national defense purposes. But the military is prohibited from enforcing the nation's immigration laws--and the president cannot deploy the military in a transparent attempt to create the appearance of an emergency where none exists. The only emergency facing the American people right now is the president's intent to subvert the separation of powers and the rule of law."
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said she and fellow Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro (Texas) would introduce a bill to halt the declaration, while the top two Democrats in Congress--House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.)--vowed to take action "in the Congress, in the courts, and in the public" to stop the Trump's declaration.
Progressive advocacy groups, meanwhile, are gearing up for their own responses.
Trump himself acknowledged that there would be a likely legal challenge, but Public Citizen president Robert Weissman warned, "Although we think the law and Constitution is on our side, we can't count on the courts to act quickly or ultimately to restrain Trump."
"If the president can merely cry 'emergency' to override national law and contravene explicit congressional action--particularly when the claimed emergency is transparently fraudulent--then it is hard to know what limits exist on presidential power," Weissman wrote. "What's to stop the president from declaring an emergency and limiting the right to protest? To round up people of color en masse to combat purported gang activity? To deploy the military on the streets to maintain order? To censor social media and Internet conversations?"
"If the slide to authoritarianism and tyranny is to be averted, he will need to be restrained--in the first place by the Congress and, if not, hopefully the courts, but ultimately by the American people," he added. "It is imperative that Congress must act to stop Trump, and We the People must make Congress do that."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.