Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) speaking at the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
After Career Full of Racist Remarks, GOP Finally Gets Around to Punishing Rep. Steve King
"I'm sorry but how are Republicans just now discovering that Steve King says racist things?"
Progressives on Tuesday expressed relief that Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) was booted from his House committee assignments following his latest racist comments, but also noted that the GOP's decision to penalize King is long overdue, following nearly two decades of openly bigoted remarks.
The move by Republicans--who have a long history of championing the racist and xenophobic policies King also supports--comes just days after a New York Times interview was published in which King asked why terms like "white supremacy" and "white nationalism" are considered offensive. As punishment, King will no longer be allowed to serve on the House Judiciary or Agriculture committees.
As Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) noted, "Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences."
Like other progressives, the New York Democrat expressed approval of King's punishment, writing on Twitter that his removal from the committees will have far-reaching consequences for his career in the current Congress, and that his constituents will likely take note.
Just months ago, King expressed similar sentiments to the comments he made to the Times, saying on a local radio show that the term "white nationalist" is used "as a derogatory term and they imply you are a racist." He also shared his concern over the white supremacist "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory, suggesting migrants to Western Europe are plotting to make white people a minority.
Earlier in his career on Capitol Hill, King first introduced a proposal to make English the official language of the U.S. with the English Language Unity Act and sued the Iowa Secretary of State for posting election information in other languages.
"King's district should start working to replace him in 2020. Regardless of party, it's not good for a district if their representative has such reprehensible views that they aren't allowed to touch legislation with a 10 foot pole." --Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.)The party's second-ranking House member, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), suggested he was unfamiliar with his longtime colleague's public remarks, telling the Times, "This just popped up on Friday," the day King's recent comments were released. Scalise cosponsored King's English Language Unity Act in 2017.
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) also feigned ignorance, telling the newspaper of King's previous racist statements, "Maybe I did not see those, but I disagree with these."
At the Washington Post, Eugene Robinson dismissed the GOP's attempts to convince the public that its leaders are truly troubled by King's conduct--considering that like the Iowa congressman, the party has publicly lined up behind President Donald Trump in its support for a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border, a proposal King made to his House colleagues years before Trump ran for office.
"Yeah, sure, whatever," Robinson scoffed in response to the party's claims of concern. "You don't want to be called racists, Republicans? Then stop letting bigots such as King and Trump define the party's policies. I'll believe stirring GOP words about diversity when they are backed up by votes."
Journalist Judd Legum suggested there's no reason to credit the GOP for punishing King so long as they continue to pursue the racist and bigoted policies that remain foundational to the party.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Progressives on Tuesday expressed relief that Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) was booted from his House committee assignments following his latest racist comments, but also noted that the GOP's decision to penalize King is long overdue, following nearly two decades of openly bigoted remarks.
The move by Republicans--who have a long history of championing the racist and xenophobic policies King also supports--comes just days after a New York Times interview was published in which King asked why terms like "white supremacy" and "white nationalism" are considered offensive. As punishment, King will no longer be allowed to serve on the House Judiciary or Agriculture committees.
As Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) noted, "Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences."
Like other progressives, the New York Democrat expressed approval of King's punishment, writing on Twitter that his removal from the committees will have far-reaching consequences for his career in the current Congress, and that his constituents will likely take note.
Just months ago, King expressed similar sentiments to the comments he made to the Times, saying on a local radio show that the term "white nationalist" is used "as a derogatory term and they imply you are a racist." He also shared his concern over the white supremacist "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory, suggesting migrants to Western Europe are plotting to make white people a minority.
Earlier in his career on Capitol Hill, King first introduced a proposal to make English the official language of the U.S. with the English Language Unity Act and sued the Iowa Secretary of State for posting election information in other languages.
"King's district should start working to replace him in 2020. Regardless of party, it's not good for a district if their representative has such reprehensible views that they aren't allowed to touch legislation with a 10 foot pole." --Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.)The party's second-ranking House member, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), suggested he was unfamiliar with his longtime colleague's public remarks, telling the Times, "This just popped up on Friday," the day King's recent comments were released. Scalise cosponsored King's English Language Unity Act in 2017.
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) also feigned ignorance, telling the newspaper of King's previous racist statements, "Maybe I did not see those, but I disagree with these."
At the Washington Post, Eugene Robinson dismissed the GOP's attempts to convince the public that its leaders are truly troubled by King's conduct--considering that like the Iowa congressman, the party has publicly lined up behind President Donald Trump in its support for a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border, a proposal King made to his House colleagues years before Trump ran for office.
"Yeah, sure, whatever," Robinson scoffed in response to the party's claims of concern. "You don't want to be called racists, Republicans? Then stop letting bigots such as King and Trump define the party's policies. I'll believe stirring GOP words about diversity when they are backed up by votes."
Journalist Judd Legum suggested there's no reason to credit the GOP for punishing King so long as they continue to pursue the racist and bigoted policies that remain foundational to the party.
Progressives on Tuesday expressed relief that Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) was booted from his House committee assignments following his latest racist comments, but also noted that the GOP's decision to penalize King is long overdue, following nearly two decades of openly bigoted remarks.
The move by Republicans--who have a long history of championing the racist and xenophobic policies King also supports--comes just days after a New York Times interview was published in which King asked why terms like "white supremacy" and "white nationalism" are considered offensive. As punishment, King will no longer be allowed to serve on the House Judiciary or Agriculture committees.
As Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) noted, "Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences."
Like other progressives, the New York Democrat expressed approval of King's punishment, writing on Twitter that his removal from the committees will have far-reaching consequences for his career in the current Congress, and that his constituents will likely take note.
Just months ago, King expressed similar sentiments to the comments he made to the Times, saying on a local radio show that the term "white nationalist" is used "as a derogatory term and they imply you are a racist." He also shared his concern over the white supremacist "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory, suggesting migrants to Western Europe are plotting to make white people a minority.
Earlier in his career on Capitol Hill, King first introduced a proposal to make English the official language of the U.S. with the English Language Unity Act and sued the Iowa Secretary of State for posting election information in other languages.
"King's district should start working to replace him in 2020. Regardless of party, it's not good for a district if their representative has such reprehensible views that they aren't allowed to touch legislation with a 10 foot pole." --Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.)The party's second-ranking House member, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), suggested he was unfamiliar with his longtime colleague's public remarks, telling the Times, "This just popped up on Friday," the day King's recent comments were released. Scalise cosponsored King's English Language Unity Act in 2017.
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) also feigned ignorance, telling the newspaper of King's previous racist statements, "Maybe I did not see those, but I disagree with these."
At the Washington Post, Eugene Robinson dismissed the GOP's attempts to convince the public that its leaders are truly troubled by King's conduct--considering that like the Iowa congressman, the party has publicly lined up behind President Donald Trump in its support for a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border, a proposal King made to his House colleagues years before Trump ran for office.
"Yeah, sure, whatever," Robinson scoffed in response to the party's claims of concern. "You don't want to be called racists, Republicans? Then stop letting bigots such as King and Trump define the party's policies. I'll believe stirring GOP words about diversity when they are backed up by votes."
Journalist Judd Legum suggested there's no reason to credit the GOP for punishing King so long as they continue to pursue the racist and bigoted policies that remain foundational to the party.