SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"If there is no truth to [Ford's] charges, the FBI investigation will show that. Are you afraid that they might not?" Durbin asked. (Photo: Gustavo Luis/Twitter)
'Are You Afraid?': Kavanaugh Claims Innocence But Angrily and Repeatedly Refuses to Back Call for FBI Probe
After a flailing opening statement insisting he is innocent of all sexual assault charges, the judge repeatedly refused to support a federal investigation
Sep 27, 2018
After delivering a flailing, furious, and blatantly partisan opening statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, Trump Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly and angrily refused to express support for an FBI investigation into Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's sexual assault allegations or to encourage his friend Mark Judge to testify when given multiple opportunities to do so by three consecutive Democratic senators.
Asked by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) to turn to White House counsel Don McGahn--who was seated in the front row--to demand that the confirmation hearings be suspended for the sake of a full FBI probe, Kavanaugh ducked, dodged, and insisted that he is completely innocent of the multiple sexual assault charges against him despite the lack of a federal investigation.
"If there is no truth to [Ford's] charges, the FBI investigation will show that. Are you afraid that they might not?" Durbin asked.
Unlike Ford, who said she supports an FBI probe, Kavanaugh refused to answer and accused Durbin of asking a "phony question."
\u201cAsked numerous times by Sen. Durbin if he will commit to having the FBI investigate, Judge Kavanaugh repeats that he would do whatever the committee would like to do and declines to explicitly support an FBI review.\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1538077846
Asked again why he would resist a federal investigation, Kavanaugh dodged once more and claimed he would "welcome" whatever the Senate Judiciary Committee recommends. After Durbin asked Kavanaugh what he personally wants, the judge stayed totally silent:
\u201cSupreme Court nominee Brett Kavanuagh does not directly answer whether he'd support an FBI investigation.\n\n"Look, senator\u2014I've said I wanted a hearing...I'm innocent. This thing was held when it could have been presented in the ordinary way." https://t.co/jVcMft2EgR\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1538081149
Kavanaugh's indignant assertion of innocence combined with a furious refusal to back a full investigation was repeated in three separate exchanges with Democratic senators.
When Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said the FBI should be able to interview possible witnesses to the alleged sexual assault--such as Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge, who Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee have refused to subpoena--Kavanaugh interrupted Feinstein and again refused to support an FBI investigation.
\u201cIn a back-and-forth between Dianne Feinstein, D-California, Brett Kavanaugh says he "emphatically" says the allegations are wrong. #KavanaughHearings\u201d— ABC 7 Chicago (@ABC 7 Chicago) 1538079669
The judge was equally evasive on the topic of Judge, who Ford says was in the room when Kavanaugh allegedly sexually assaulted her.
"The big news out of Kavanaugh's appearance is that he has repeatedly confirmed that he does not want the person who Christine Ford claims was his accomplice in his sexual assault to face serious questioning in any forum," noted the Washington Post's Greg Sargent.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (I-Vt.) said he's never seen somebody so "critical" not be called to testify in any previous hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and asked Kavanaugh whether he wants Judge to testify.
Kavanaugh dodged the question, saying that Judge had already submitted sworn testimony.
\u201c.@SenatorLeahy: Do you want Mark Judge to testify?\n\nKAVANAUGH: He's already provided sworn testimony.\n\nL: But the accusation hasn't been investigated by the FBI & Judge hasn't been called to testify under oath.\n\nK: It shoulda been handled earlier!\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1538077655
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
brett kavanaughchristine blasey forddon mcgahnfbimsnbcsexual assaulttrumpismus senateus supreme court
After delivering a flailing, furious, and blatantly partisan opening statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, Trump Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly and angrily refused to express support for an FBI investigation into Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's sexual assault allegations or to encourage his friend Mark Judge to testify when given multiple opportunities to do so by three consecutive Democratic senators.
Asked by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) to turn to White House counsel Don McGahn--who was seated in the front row--to demand that the confirmation hearings be suspended for the sake of a full FBI probe, Kavanaugh ducked, dodged, and insisted that he is completely innocent of the multiple sexual assault charges against him despite the lack of a federal investigation.
"If there is no truth to [Ford's] charges, the FBI investigation will show that. Are you afraid that they might not?" Durbin asked.
Unlike Ford, who said she supports an FBI probe, Kavanaugh refused to answer and accused Durbin of asking a "phony question."
\u201cAsked numerous times by Sen. Durbin if he will commit to having the FBI investigate, Judge Kavanaugh repeats that he would do whatever the committee would like to do and declines to explicitly support an FBI review.\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1538077846
Asked again why he would resist a federal investigation, Kavanaugh dodged once more and claimed he would "welcome" whatever the Senate Judiciary Committee recommends. After Durbin asked Kavanaugh what he personally wants, the judge stayed totally silent:
\u201cSupreme Court nominee Brett Kavanuagh does not directly answer whether he'd support an FBI investigation.\n\n"Look, senator\u2014I've said I wanted a hearing...I'm innocent. This thing was held when it could have been presented in the ordinary way." https://t.co/jVcMft2EgR\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1538081149
Kavanaugh's indignant assertion of innocence combined with a furious refusal to back a full investigation was repeated in three separate exchanges with Democratic senators.
When Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said the FBI should be able to interview possible witnesses to the alleged sexual assault--such as Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge, who Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee have refused to subpoena--Kavanaugh interrupted Feinstein and again refused to support an FBI investigation.
\u201cIn a back-and-forth between Dianne Feinstein, D-California, Brett Kavanaugh says he "emphatically" says the allegations are wrong. #KavanaughHearings\u201d— ABC 7 Chicago (@ABC 7 Chicago) 1538079669
The judge was equally evasive on the topic of Judge, who Ford says was in the room when Kavanaugh allegedly sexually assaulted her.
"The big news out of Kavanaugh's appearance is that he has repeatedly confirmed that he does not want the person who Christine Ford claims was his accomplice in his sexual assault to face serious questioning in any forum," noted the Washington Post's Greg Sargent.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (I-Vt.) said he's never seen somebody so "critical" not be called to testify in any previous hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and asked Kavanaugh whether he wants Judge to testify.
Kavanaugh dodged the question, saying that Judge had already submitted sworn testimony.
\u201c.@SenatorLeahy: Do you want Mark Judge to testify?\n\nKAVANAUGH: He's already provided sworn testimony.\n\nL: But the accusation hasn't been investigated by the FBI & Judge hasn't been called to testify under oath.\n\nK: It shoulda been handled earlier!\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1538077655
After delivering a flailing, furious, and blatantly partisan opening statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, Trump Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly and angrily refused to express support for an FBI investigation into Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's sexual assault allegations or to encourage his friend Mark Judge to testify when given multiple opportunities to do so by three consecutive Democratic senators.
Asked by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) to turn to White House counsel Don McGahn--who was seated in the front row--to demand that the confirmation hearings be suspended for the sake of a full FBI probe, Kavanaugh ducked, dodged, and insisted that he is completely innocent of the multiple sexual assault charges against him despite the lack of a federal investigation.
"If there is no truth to [Ford's] charges, the FBI investigation will show that. Are you afraid that they might not?" Durbin asked.
Unlike Ford, who said she supports an FBI probe, Kavanaugh refused to answer and accused Durbin of asking a "phony question."
\u201cAsked numerous times by Sen. Durbin if he will commit to having the FBI investigate, Judge Kavanaugh repeats that he would do whatever the committee would like to do and declines to explicitly support an FBI review.\u201d— MSNBC (@MSNBC) 1538077846
Asked again why he would resist a federal investigation, Kavanaugh dodged once more and claimed he would "welcome" whatever the Senate Judiciary Committee recommends. After Durbin asked Kavanaugh what he personally wants, the judge stayed totally silent:
\u201cSupreme Court nominee Brett Kavanuagh does not directly answer whether he'd support an FBI investigation.\n\n"Look, senator\u2014I've said I wanted a hearing...I'm innocent. This thing was held when it could have been presented in the ordinary way." https://t.co/jVcMft2EgR\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1538081149
Kavanaugh's indignant assertion of innocence combined with a furious refusal to back a full investigation was repeated in three separate exchanges with Democratic senators.
When Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said the FBI should be able to interview possible witnesses to the alleged sexual assault--such as Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge, who Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee have refused to subpoena--Kavanaugh interrupted Feinstein and again refused to support an FBI investigation.
\u201cIn a back-and-forth between Dianne Feinstein, D-California, Brett Kavanaugh says he "emphatically" says the allegations are wrong. #KavanaughHearings\u201d— ABC 7 Chicago (@ABC 7 Chicago) 1538079669
The judge was equally evasive on the topic of Judge, who Ford says was in the room when Kavanaugh allegedly sexually assaulted her.
"The big news out of Kavanaugh's appearance is that he has repeatedly confirmed that he does not want the person who Christine Ford claims was his accomplice in his sexual assault to face serious questioning in any forum," noted the Washington Post's Greg Sargent.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (I-Vt.) said he's never seen somebody so "critical" not be called to testify in any previous hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and asked Kavanaugh whether he wants Judge to testify.
Kavanaugh dodged the question, saying that Judge had already submitted sworn testimony.
\u201c.@SenatorLeahy: Do you want Mark Judge to testify?\n\nKAVANAUGH: He's already provided sworn testimony.\n\nL: But the accusation hasn't been investigated by the FBI & Judge hasn't been called to testify under oath.\n\nK: It shoulda been handled earlier!\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1538077655
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.