SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinionâfunded by the people, not the corporationsâdelivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinionâfunded by the people, not the corporationsâdelivered straight to your inbox.
As calls to rein in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reached the halls of Congress this week, with Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) calling to abolish the agency that's enforced the Trump administration's family separation policy, direct actions aimed at shutting down ICE's facilities are spreading across the country.
With outrage growing this month over the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" immigration policy, demonstrators in Portland, Oregon congregated outside ICE's facility in their city on June 17 to hold a candlelight vigil. Many protesters have remained outside the building ever since, blocking the entrance in an effort to keep deportation trials from proceeding.
In the weeks that have followed, similar actions have cropped up at ICE's offices in several other cities across the country.
More than 30 protesters temporarily shut down ICE's operations in Detroit on Monday, with plans to stay at the agency's field office until June 30.
\u201c#OccupyICEDetroit protestors are blocking all entrances to the Detroit ICE building. No one has been able to report to work in that building yet.\u201dâ MIStudentsDream (@MIStudentsDream) 1529930705
Over the weekend, the #OccupyICE movement came to Los Angeles, with demonstrators blocking the agency's vans from leaving its driveway.
\u201cLA is blocking off the driveway for ICE vans and has a message for ICE agents #LAAgainstICE #AbolishICE #OccupyICELA\u201dâ Left In LA (@Left In LA) 1529711451
Protesters in New York began their #OccupyICE demonstration last week, forcing all of Monday's planned immigration hearings to be postponed.
As Common Dreams reported on Monday, Pocan introduced legislation to abolish ICE, accusing the agency of "tearing apart families and ripping at the moral fabric of our nation."
The proposal was another sign that more Americans are refusing to tolerate the separation of families, raids by ICE agents that leave families and communities reeling, and the agency's targeting of immigrants with no criminal records and people whose green card applications are underway.
ICE was formed in 2003, ostensibly to "protect national security and strengthen public safety."
As Cynthia Nixon, who is running in New York's Democratic primary for governor, told "The View" last week, ICE is far from fulfilling its claimed mission.
"I think we need to abolish ICE; that seems really clear. ICE is relatively new, it came in after September 11," Nixon told Joy Behar. "We've been handling immigration and customs for a long time here. We don't need ICE, and they have strayed so far from the interests of the American people and the interests of humanity. We need to abolish it."
At least 19 Democratic challengers have also called for ICE to be abolished, according to New York magazine, with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez making the proposal a signature issue of her campaign in the Democratic primary in New York's 14th Congressional district.
\u201cICE is operating exactly as designed when it rips screaming children from parents. That\u2019s exactly why we must abolish it.\n\nWe MUST have the moral and political courage to #abolishICE.\n\nWeak half-measures do nothing. This is a defining moment of our time - the time to act is now.\u201dâ Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1529440816
In his campaign for Florida's 27th district, progressive Democrat Matt Haggman made the issue the focus of a campaign ad.
\u201cIt's official -- we're going up on TV!\n\nDonna Shalala has had her chance, it's time for new voices, new leadership, and new energy in Washington. As your Congressman, I'll fight to shut ICE down. It's time for a new day.\u201dâ Matt Haggman \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6 (@Matt Haggman \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6) 1529421984
Zephyr Teachout, Democratic candidate for Attorney General in New York, wrote about ICE's "lawlessness" in an editorial in The Guardian.
"It is not an accident that Donald Trump can use ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as tools of unconstitutional illegal behavior: it is part of the structural flaw of the agencies themselves," wrote Teachout. "ICE undermines what we aspire to be as Americans, and is an unaccountable and inhumane political tool, treating all immigrants as national security threats...ICE and CBP are so politicized that they are not credible as law enforcement agencies, and so deeply connected with illegal behavior that they are no longer credible as self-governing agencies. Instead, they have become tools of arbitrary power and cruelty; the opposite of law."
Donald Trumpâs attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating â putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we canât get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you â our readers, activists, and changemakers â not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others wonât, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give â $10, $25, or $100 â helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, weâll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
As calls to rein in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reached the halls of Congress this week, with Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) calling to abolish the agency that's enforced the Trump administration's family separation policy, direct actions aimed at shutting down ICE's facilities are spreading across the country.
With outrage growing this month over the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" immigration policy, demonstrators in Portland, Oregon congregated outside ICE's facility in their city on June 17 to hold a candlelight vigil. Many protesters have remained outside the building ever since, blocking the entrance in an effort to keep deportation trials from proceeding.
In the weeks that have followed, similar actions have cropped up at ICE's offices in several other cities across the country.
More than 30 protesters temporarily shut down ICE's operations in Detroit on Monday, with plans to stay at the agency's field office until June 30.
\u201c#OccupyICEDetroit protestors are blocking all entrances to the Detroit ICE building. No one has been able to report to work in that building yet.\u201dâ MIStudentsDream (@MIStudentsDream) 1529930705
Over the weekend, the #OccupyICE movement came to Los Angeles, with demonstrators blocking the agency's vans from leaving its driveway.
\u201cLA is blocking off the driveway for ICE vans and has a message for ICE agents #LAAgainstICE #AbolishICE #OccupyICELA\u201dâ Left In LA (@Left In LA) 1529711451
Protesters in New York began their #OccupyICE demonstration last week, forcing all of Monday's planned immigration hearings to be postponed.
As Common Dreams reported on Monday, Pocan introduced legislation to abolish ICE, accusing the agency of "tearing apart families and ripping at the moral fabric of our nation."
The proposal was another sign that more Americans are refusing to tolerate the separation of families, raids by ICE agents that leave families and communities reeling, and the agency's targeting of immigrants with no criminal records and people whose green card applications are underway.
ICE was formed in 2003, ostensibly to "protect national security and strengthen public safety."
As Cynthia Nixon, who is running in New York's Democratic primary for governor, told "The View" last week, ICE is far from fulfilling its claimed mission.
"I think we need to abolish ICE; that seems really clear. ICE is relatively new, it came in after September 11," Nixon told Joy Behar. "We've been handling immigration and customs for a long time here. We don't need ICE, and they have strayed so far from the interests of the American people and the interests of humanity. We need to abolish it."
At least 19 Democratic challengers have also called for ICE to be abolished, according to New York magazine, with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez making the proposal a signature issue of her campaign in the Democratic primary in New York's 14th Congressional district.
\u201cICE is operating exactly as designed when it rips screaming children from parents. That\u2019s exactly why we must abolish it.\n\nWe MUST have the moral and political courage to #abolishICE.\n\nWeak half-measures do nothing. This is a defining moment of our time - the time to act is now.\u201dâ Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1529440816
In his campaign for Florida's 27th district, progressive Democrat Matt Haggman made the issue the focus of a campaign ad.
\u201cIt's official -- we're going up on TV!\n\nDonna Shalala has had her chance, it's time for new voices, new leadership, and new energy in Washington. As your Congressman, I'll fight to shut ICE down. It's time for a new day.\u201dâ Matt Haggman \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6 (@Matt Haggman \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6) 1529421984
Zephyr Teachout, Democratic candidate for Attorney General in New York, wrote about ICE's "lawlessness" in an editorial in The Guardian.
"It is not an accident that Donald Trump can use ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as tools of unconstitutional illegal behavior: it is part of the structural flaw of the agencies themselves," wrote Teachout. "ICE undermines what we aspire to be as Americans, and is an unaccountable and inhumane political tool, treating all immigrants as national security threats...ICE and CBP are so politicized that they are not credible as law enforcement agencies, and so deeply connected with illegal behavior that they are no longer credible as self-governing agencies. Instead, they have become tools of arbitrary power and cruelty; the opposite of law."
As calls to rein in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reached the halls of Congress this week, with Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) calling to abolish the agency that's enforced the Trump administration's family separation policy, direct actions aimed at shutting down ICE's facilities are spreading across the country.
With outrage growing this month over the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" immigration policy, demonstrators in Portland, Oregon congregated outside ICE's facility in their city on June 17 to hold a candlelight vigil. Many protesters have remained outside the building ever since, blocking the entrance in an effort to keep deportation trials from proceeding.
In the weeks that have followed, similar actions have cropped up at ICE's offices in several other cities across the country.
More than 30 protesters temporarily shut down ICE's operations in Detroit on Monday, with plans to stay at the agency's field office until June 30.
\u201c#OccupyICEDetroit protestors are blocking all entrances to the Detroit ICE building. No one has been able to report to work in that building yet.\u201dâ MIStudentsDream (@MIStudentsDream) 1529930705
Over the weekend, the #OccupyICE movement came to Los Angeles, with demonstrators blocking the agency's vans from leaving its driveway.
\u201cLA is blocking off the driveway for ICE vans and has a message for ICE agents #LAAgainstICE #AbolishICE #OccupyICELA\u201dâ Left In LA (@Left In LA) 1529711451
Protesters in New York began their #OccupyICE demonstration last week, forcing all of Monday's planned immigration hearings to be postponed.
As Common Dreams reported on Monday, Pocan introduced legislation to abolish ICE, accusing the agency of "tearing apart families and ripping at the moral fabric of our nation."
The proposal was another sign that more Americans are refusing to tolerate the separation of families, raids by ICE agents that leave families and communities reeling, and the agency's targeting of immigrants with no criminal records and people whose green card applications are underway.
ICE was formed in 2003, ostensibly to "protect national security and strengthen public safety."
As Cynthia Nixon, who is running in New York's Democratic primary for governor, told "The View" last week, ICE is far from fulfilling its claimed mission.
"I think we need to abolish ICE; that seems really clear. ICE is relatively new, it came in after September 11," Nixon told Joy Behar. "We've been handling immigration and customs for a long time here. We don't need ICE, and they have strayed so far from the interests of the American people and the interests of humanity. We need to abolish it."
At least 19 Democratic challengers have also called for ICE to be abolished, according to New York magazine, with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez making the proposal a signature issue of her campaign in the Democratic primary in New York's 14th Congressional district.
\u201cICE is operating exactly as designed when it rips screaming children from parents. That\u2019s exactly why we must abolish it.\n\nWe MUST have the moral and political courage to #abolishICE.\n\nWeak half-measures do nothing. This is a defining moment of our time - the time to act is now.\u201dâ Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1529440816
In his campaign for Florida's 27th district, progressive Democrat Matt Haggman made the issue the focus of a campaign ad.
\u201cIt's official -- we're going up on TV!\n\nDonna Shalala has had her chance, it's time for new voices, new leadership, and new energy in Washington. As your Congressman, I'll fight to shut ICE down. It's time for a new day.\u201dâ Matt Haggman \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6 (@Matt Haggman \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6) 1529421984
Zephyr Teachout, Democratic candidate for Attorney General in New York, wrote about ICE's "lawlessness" in an editorial in The Guardian.
"It is not an accident that Donald Trump can use ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as tools of unconstitutional illegal behavior: it is part of the structural flaw of the agencies themselves," wrote Teachout. "ICE undermines what we aspire to be as Americans, and is an unaccountable and inhumane political tool, treating all immigrants as national security threats...ICE and CBP are so politicized that they are not credible as law enforcement agencies, and so deeply connected with illegal behavior that they are no longer credible as self-governing agencies. Instead, they have become tools of arbitrary power and cruelty; the opposite of law."
"Deepfakes are evolving faster than human sanity can keep up," said one critic. "We're three clicks away from a world where no one knows what's real."
Grok Imagineâa generative artificial intelligence tool developed by Elon Musk's xAIâhas rolled out a "spicy mode" that is under fire for creating deepfake images on demand, including nudes of superstar Taylor Swift that's prompting calls for guardrails on the rapidly evolving technology.
The Verge's Jess Weatherbed reported Tuesday that Grok's spicy modeâone of four presets on an updated Grok 4, including fun, normal, and customâ"didn't hesitate to spit out fully uncensored topless videos of Taylor Swift the very first time I used it, without me even specifically asking the bot to take her clothes off."
Weatherbed noted:
You would think a company that already has a complicated history with Taylor Swift deepfakes, in a regulatory landscape with rules like the Take It Down Act, would be a little more careful. The xAI acceptable use policy does ban "depicting likenesses of persons in a pornographic manner," but Grok Imagine simply seems to do nothing to stop people creating likenesses of celebrities like Swift, while offering a service designed specifically to make suggestive videos including partial nudity. The age check only appeared once and was laughably easy to bypass, requesting no proof that I was the age I claimed to be.
Weatherbedâwhose article is subtitled "Safeguards? What Safeguards?"âasserted that the latest iteration of Grok "feels like a lawsuit ready to happen."
Grok is now creating AI video deepfakes of celebrities such as Taylor Swift that include nonconsensual nude depictions. Worse, the user doesn't even have to specifically ask for it, they can just click the "spicy" option and Grok will simply produce videos with nudity.Video from @theverge.com.
[image or embed]
â Alejandra Caraballo (@esqueer.net) August 5, 2025 at 9:57 AM
Grok had already made headlines in recent weeks after going full "MechaHitler" following an update that the chatbot said prioritized "uncensored truth bombs over woke lobotomies."
Numerous observers have sounded the alarm on the dangers of unchained generative AI.
"Instead of heeding our call to remove its 'NSFW' AI chatbot, xAI appears to be doubling down on furthering sexual exploitation by enabling AI videos to create nudity," Haley McNamara, a senior vice president at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, said last week.
"There's no confirmation it won't create pornographic content that resembles a recognizable person," McNamara added. "xAI should seek ways to prevent sexual abuse and exploitation."
Users of X, Musk's social platform, also weighed in on the Swift images.
"Deepfakes are evolving faster than human sanity can keep up," said one account. "We're three clicks away from a world where no one knows what's real.This isn't innovationâit's industrial scale gaslighting, and y'all [are] clapping like it's entertainment."
Another user wrote: "Not everything we can build deserves to exist. Grok Imagine's new 'spicy' mode can generate topless videos of anyone on this Earth. If this is the future, burn it down."
Musk is seemingly unfazed by the latest Grok controversy. On Tuesday, he boasted on X that "Grok Imagine usage is growing like wildfire," with "14 million images generated yesterday, now over 20 million today!"
According to a poll published in January by the Artificial Intelligence Policy Institute, 84% of U.S. voters "supported legislation making nonconsensual deepfake porn illegal, while 86% supported legislation requiring companies to restrict models to prevent their use in creating deepfake porn."
During the 2024 presidential election, Swift weighed in on the subject of AI deepfakes after then-Republican nominee Donald Trump posted an AI-generated image suggesting she endorsed the felonious former Republican president. Swift ultimately endorsed then-Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee.
"It really conjured up my fears around AI, and the dangers of spreading misinformation," Swift said at the time.
One advocate said the ruling "offers hope that we can restore protections to wolves in the northern Rockies, but only if the federal government fulfills its duty under the Endangered Species Act."
Conservationists cautiously celebrated a U.S. judge's Tuesday ruling that the federal government must reconsider its refusal to grant protections for gray wolves in the Rocky Mountains, as killing regimes in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming put the species at risk.
Former President Joe Biden's administration determined last year that Endangered Species Act (ESA) protections for the region's wolves were "not warranted," sparking multiple lawsuits from coalitions of conservation groups. The cases were consolidated and considered by Montana-based District Judge Donald Molloy, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton.
As the judge detailed in his 105-page decision, the advocacy groups argued that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) failed to consider a "significant portion" of the gray wolf's range, the "best available science" on their populations and the impact of humans killing them, and the true threat to the species. He also wrote that "for the most part, the plaintiffs are correct."
Matthew Bishop, senior attorney at the Western Environmental Law Center (WELC), which represented one of the coalitions, said in a statement that "the Endangered Species Act requires the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to consider the best available science, and that requirement is what won the day for wolves in this case."
"Wolves have yet to recover across the West, and allowing a few states to undertake aggressive wolf-killing regimes is inconsistent with the law," Bishop continued. "We hope this decision will encourage the service to undertake a holistic approach to wolf recovery in the West."
Coalition members similarly welcomed Molloy's decision as "an important step toward finally ending the horrific and brutal war on wolves that the states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming have waged in recent years," in the words of George Nickas, executive director of Wilderness Watch.
Predator Defense executive director Brooks Fahy said that "today's ruling is an incredible victory for wolves. At a time where their numbers are being driven down to near extinction levels, this decision is a vital lifeline."
Patrick Kelly, Montana director for Western Watersheds Project, pointed out that "with Montana set to approve a 500 wolf kill quota at the end of August, this decision could not have come at a better time. Wolves may now have a real shot at meaningful recovery."
Breaking news! A federal judge in Missoula ruled USFWS broke the law when it denied protections for gray wolves in the western U.S. The agency must now reconsider using the best available science. A major step forward for wolf recovery.Read more: đ wildearthguardians.org/press-releas...
[image or embed]
â Wolf Conservation Center đș (@nywolforg.bsky.social) August 5, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Sierra Club northern Rockies campaign strategist Nick Gevock said that "wolf recovery is dependent on responsible management by the states, and Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming have shown that they're grossly unsuited to manage the species."
Gevock's group is part of a coalition represented by the Center for Biological Diversity and Humane World for Animals, formerly called the Humane Society of the United States. Kitty Block, president and CEO of the latter, said Tuesday that "wolves are deeply intelligent, social animals who play an irreplaceable role in the ecosystems they call home."
"Today's ruling offers hope that we can restore protections to wolves in the northern Rockies, but only if the federal government fulfills its duty under the Endangered Species Act," Block stressed. "These animals deserve protection, not abandonment, as they fight to return to the landscapes they once roamed freely.
While "Judge Molloy's ruling means now the Fish and Wildlife Service must go back to the drawing board to determine whether federal management is needed to ensure wolves survive and play their vital role in the ecosystem," as Gevock put it, the agency may also appeal his decision.
The original rejection came under Biden, but the reconsideration will occur under President Donald Trump, whose first administration was hostile to the ESA in general and wolves in particular. The current administration and the Republican-controlled Congress have signaled in recent months that they intend to maintain that posture.
WELC highlighted Tuesday that Congresswoman Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) "introduced H.R. 845 to strip ESA protections from gray wolves across the Lower 48. If passed, this bill would congressionally delist all gray wolves in the Lower 48 the same way wolves in the northern Rockies were congressionally delisted in 2011, handing management authority over to states."
Emphasizing what that would mean for the species, WELC added that "regulations in Montana, for example, allow hunters and trappers to kill several hundred wolves per yearâwith another 500-wolf quota proposed this yearâwith bait, traps, snares, night hunting, infrared and thermal imagery scopes, and artificial light."
The 16 groups urge the agency "to uphold its obligation to promote competition, localism, and diversity in the U.S. media."
A coalition of 16 civil liberties, press freedom, and labor groups this week urged U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to abandon any plans to loosen media ownership restrictions and warned against opening the floodgates to further corporate consolidation.
Public comments on the National Television Multiple Ownership Rule were due to the Federal Communications Commission by Mondayâwhich is when the coalition wrote to the FCC about the 39% national audience reach cap for U.S. broadcast media conglomerates, and how more mergers could negatively impact "the independence of the nation's press and the vitality of its local journalism."
"In our experience, the past 30 years of media consolidation have not fostered a better environment for local news and information. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 radically changed the radio and television broadcasting marketplace, causing rapid consolidation of radio station ownership," the coalition detailed. "Since the 1996 act, lawmakers and regulators have further relaxed television ownership limits, spurring further waves of station consolidation, the full harms of which are being felt by local newsrooms and the communities they serve."
The coalition highlighted how this consolidation has spread "across the entire news media ecosystem, including newspapers, online news outlets, and even online platforms," and led to "newsroom layoffs and closures, and the related spread of 'news deserts' across the country."
"Over a similar period, the economic model for news production has been undercut by technology platforms owned by the likes of Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta, which have offered an advertising model for better targeting readers, listeners, and viewers, and attracted much of the advertising revenue that once funded local journalism," the coalition noted.
While "lobbyists working for large news media companies argue that further consolidation is the economic answer, giving them the size necessary to compete with Big Tech," the letter argues, "in fact, the opposite appears to be true."
We object."Handing even more control of the public airwaves to a handful of capitulating broadcast conglomerates undermines press freedom." - S. Derek TurnerOur statement: https://www.freepress.net/news/free-press-slams-trump-fccs-broadcast-ownership-proceeding-wildly-dangerous-democracy
[image or embed]
â Free Press (@freepress.bsky.social) August 5, 2025 at 12:58 PM
The letter points out that a recent analysis from Free Pressâone of the groups that signed the letterâfound a "pervasive pattern of editorial compromise and capitulation" at 35 of the largest media and tech companies in the United States, "as owners of massive media conglomerates seek to curry favor with political leadership."
That analysisâreleased last week alongside a Media Capitulation Indexâmakes clear that "the interests of wealthy media owners have become so inextricably entangled with government officials that they've limited their news operations' ability to act as checks against abuses of political power," according to the coalition.
In addition to warning about further consolidation and urging the FCC "to uphold its obligation to promote competition, localism, and diversity in the U.S. media," the coalition argued that the agency actually "lacks the authority to change the national audience reach cap," citing congressional action in 2004.
Along with Free Press co-CEO Craig Aaron, the letter is signed by leaders at Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians - Communications Workers of America, National Coalition Against Censorship, Local Independent Online News Publishers, Media Freedom Foundation, NewsGuild-CWA, Open Markets Institute, Park Center for Independent Media, Project Censored, Reporters Without Borders USA, Society of Professional Journalists, Tully Center for Free Speech, Whistleblower and Source Protection Program at ExposeFacts, and Writers Guild of America East and West.
Free Press also filed its own comments. In a related Tuesday statement, senior economic and policy adviser S. Derek Turner, who co-authored the filing, accused FCC Chair Brendan Carr of "placing a for-sale sign on the public airwaves and inviting media companies to monopolize the local news markets as long as they agree to display political fealty to Donald Trump and the MAGA movement."
"The price broadcast companies have to pay for consolidating further is bending the knee, and the line starts outside of the FCC chairman's office," said Turner. "Trump's autocratic demands seemingly have no bounds, and Carr apparently has no qualms about satisfying them. Carr's grossly partisan and deeply hypocritical water-carrying for Trump has already stained the agency, making it clear that this FCC is no longer independent, impartial, or fair."