CIA Director nominee Gina Haspel is sworn in during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence May 9, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Democrats Shamed for Supporting Gina Haspel, CIA Nominee Who Oversaw 'Chaining Detainees to Ceiling for Days, Naked or in Diapers'
ACLU reminded lawmakers that Trump's nominee also "oversaw torture methods based on 1960s-era experiments on dogs."
After the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday advanced Gina Haspel's nomination to direct the CIA despite the key role she played in agency's post-9/11 torture program, the full chamber is poised to offer its final approval--with the large majority of Republicans and at least five Democrats pledging to vote in favor--which critics are calling "an affront to human rights."
The ACLU, in a series of tweets, shared the details about Haspel's history that are publicly known, and said the committee had "voted to reward a dark, criminal chapter of our country's history when it shouldn't have agreed to a vote until Haspel's full torture record was made public." Calling Wednesday's 10-5 vote "an embarrassment to our democracy," the group urged other members of the Senate to "do the job the committee failed to."
Two Republicans--Sens. John McCain (Ariz.) Rand Paul (Ky.)--are openly opposing Haspel. However, in a move that's been called "beyond shameful," five Democrats--Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Joe Donnelly, (Ind.), Mark Warner (Va.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), and Bill Nelson (Fla.)--have said they plan join with the rest of the GOP and vote for Haspel, which makes it likely her nomination will clear the full Senate.
Responding to the committee's vote on Wednesday, Daphne Eviatar of Amnesty International USA said, "Due to the overwhelming public evidence suggesting Haspel's participation and compliance with crimes including torture, enforced disappearance, and obstruction of justice, Haspel's nomination is an affront to human rights."
The United States, Eviatar added, "has not held any officials accountable for the use of torture, so it's even more outrageous that the government is considering someone to the chief intelligence position in spite of her alleged participation in that clearly illegal and immoral activity."
The controversy surrounding Haspel's nomination has led to renewed calls for the Justice Department to publicly release the Durham report, which details a probe launched in 2008, after Haspel and her colleagues destroyed 92 video tapes that showed CIA agents torturing detainees, and later expanded to assess "alleged CIA mistreatment of detainees" and "whether federal laws were violated in connection with the interrogation of specific detainees at overseas locations."
While an executive summary of the report was provided to members of the Senate Intelligence Committee during their deliberations on whether to advance Haspel's nomination, the full report remains classified. Democratic lawmakers and other opponents of Haspel have turned to Twitter to demand its release with the hashtag #UnlockDurhamReport.
And while the Justice Department would have to declassify that particular report, as Win Without War pointed out Wednesday, Haspel, as the CIA's acting director, has the power to declassify other records that would shed light on her history with the agency.
Although Haspel's confirmation now seems imminent--with a full Senate vote expected as early as this week--human rights advocates continue to raise alarm about what is known of her torture record and strongly condemn the Democrats who are expected make her ascension to the top of the CIA possible.
In a series of tweets, Indivisible's foreign policy manager Elizabeth Beavers called out each Democrat who has said they will vote for Haspel and highlighted some particularly gruesome details from the CIA torture program Haspel helped impose. Beavers has said she will also compose tweets to call out Republican senators, because "torture is not a partisan issue."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
After the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday advanced Gina Haspel's nomination to direct the CIA despite the key role she played in agency's post-9/11 torture program, the full chamber is poised to offer its final approval--with the large majority of Republicans and at least five Democrats pledging to vote in favor--which critics are calling "an affront to human rights."
The ACLU, in a series of tweets, shared the details about Haspel's history that are publicly known, and said the committee had "voted to reward a dark, criminal chapter of our country's history when it shouldn't have agreed to a vote until Haspel's full torture record was made public." Calling Wednesday's 10-5 vote "an embarrassment to our democracy," the group urged other members of the Senate to "do the job the committee failed to."
Two Republicans--Sens. John McCain (Ariz.) Rand Paul (Ky.)--are openly opposing Haspel. However, in a move that's been called "beyond shameful," five Democrats--Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Joe Donnelly, (Ind.), Mark Warner (Va.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), and Bill Nelson (Fla.)--have said they plan join with the rest of the GOP and vote for Haspel, which makes it likely her nomination will clear the full Senate.
Responding to the committee's vote on Wednesday, Daphne Eviatar of Amnesty International USA said, "Due to the overwhelming public evidence suggesting Haspel's participation and compliance with crimes including torture, enforced disappearance, and obstruction of justice, Haspel's nomination is an affront to human rights."
The United States, Eviatar added, "has not held any officials accountable for the use of torture, so it's even more outrageous that the government is considering someone to the chief intelligence position in spite of her alleged participation in that clearly illegal and immoral activity."
The controversy surrounding Haspel's nomination has led to renewed calls for the Justice Department to publicly release the Durham report, which details a probe launched in 2008, after Haspel and her colleagues destroyed 92 video tapes that showed CIA agents torturing detainees, and later expanded to assess "alleged CIA mistreatment of detainees" and "whether federal laws were violated in connection with the interrogation of specific detainees at overseas locations."
While an executive summary of the report was provided to members of the Senate Intelligence Committee during their deliberations on whether to advance Haspel's nomination, the full report remains classified. Democratic lawmakers and other opponents of Haspel have turned to Twitter to demand its release with the hashtag #UnlockDurhamReport.
And while the Justice Department would have to declassify that particular report, as Win Without War pointed out Wednesday, Haspel, as the CIA's acting director, has the power to declassify other records that would shed light on her history with the agency.
Although Haspel's confirmation now seems imminent--with a full Senate vote expected as early as this week--human rights advocates continue to raise alarm about what is known of her torture record and strongly condemn the Democrats who are expected make her ascension to the top of the CIA possible.
In a series of tweets, Indivisible's foreign policy manager Elizabeth Beavers called out each Democrat who has said they will vote for Haspel and highlighted some particularly gruesome details from the CIA torture program Haspel helped impose. Beavers has said she will also compose tweets to call out Republican senators, because "torture is not a partisan issue."
After the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday advanced Gina Haspel's nomination to direct the CIA despite the key role she played in agency's post-9/11 torture program, the full chamber is poised to offer its final approval--with the large majority of Republicans and at least five Democrats pledging to vote in favor--which critics are calling "an affront to human rights."
The ACLU, in a series of tweets, shared the details about Haspel's history that are publicly known, and said the committee had "voted to reward a dark, criminal chapter of our country's history when it shouldn't have agreed to a vote until Haspel's full torture record was made public." Calling Wednesday's 10-5 vote "an embarrassment to our democracy," the group urged other members of the Senate to "do the job the committee failed to."
Two Republicans--Sens. John McCain (Ariz.) Rand Paul (Ky.)--are openly opposing Haspel. However, in a move that's been called "beyond shameful," five Democrats--Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Joe Donnelly, (Ind.), Mark Warner (Va.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), and Bill Nelson (Fla.)--have said they plan join with the rest of the GOP and vote for Haspel, which makes it likely her nomination will clear the full Senate.
Responding to the committee's vote on Wednesday, Daphne Eviatar of Amnesty International USA said, "Due to the overwhelming public evidence suggesting Haspel's participation and compliance with crimes including torture, enforced disappearance, and obstruction of justice, Haspel's nomination is an affront to human rights."
The United States, Eviatar added, "has not held any officials accountable for the use of torture, so it's even more outrageous that the government is considering someone to the chief intelligence position in spite of her alleged participation in that clearly illegal and immoral activity."
The controversy surrounding Haspel's nomination has led to renewed calls for the Justice Department to publicly release the Durham report, which details a probe launched in 2008, after Haspel and her colleagues destroyed 92 video tapes that showed CIA agents torturing detainees, and later expanded to assess "alleged CIA mistreatment of detainees" and "whether federal laws were violated in connection with the interrogation of specific detainees at overseas locations."
While an executive summary of the report was provided to members of the Senate Intelligence Committee during their deliberations on whether to advance Haspel's nomination, the full report remains classified. Democratic lawmakers and other opponents of Haspel have turned to Twitter to demand its release with the hashtag #UnlockDurhamReport.
And while the Justice Department would have to declassify that particular report, as Win Without War pointed out Wednesday, Haspel, as the CIA's acting director, has the power to declassify other records that would shed light on her history with the agency.
Although Haspel's confirmation now seems imminent--with a full Senate vote expected as early as this week--human rights advocates continue to raise alarm about what is known of her torture record and strongly condemn the Democrats who are expected make her ascension to the top of the CIA possible.
In a series of tweets, Indivisible's foreign policy manager Elizabeth Beavers called out each Democrat who has said they will vote for Haspel and highlighted some particularly gruesome details from the CIA torture program Haspel helped impose. Beavers has said she will also compose tweets to call out Republican senators, because "torture is not a partisan issue."