The official portrait of CIA deputy director Gina Haspel, a woman some in her own agency called "Bloody Gina."
Despite Torture-Loving Pasts, Schumer Not Pushing Democrats to Oppose Pompeo or Haspel
Trump's nominees for secretary of state and CIA director have alarming pasts, but the Senate Minority Leader isn't encouraging his party to oppose their nominations
The Senate's top Democrat is not calling on his fellow party members to oppose President Donald Trump's nominee for secretary of state--torture-praising Mike Pompeo--or his nominee to lead the CIA--"actual torturer" Gina Haspel.
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of New York made his stance clear to reporters on Tuesday.
Schumer said Pompeo and Haspel face "lots of outstanding questions," but hoped that if Pompeo is confirmed, he "will turn over a new leaf and will start toughening up our policies towards Russia and Putin."
Currently the CIA Director, Pompeo was picked to be the nation's top diplomat following the "twouster" of Rex Tillerson. Trump chose CIA deputy director Haspel to fill Pompeo's shoes at the agency. Both nominations drew criticism from a broad range of groups.
Greenpeace USA Climate Director Naomi Ages, for example, said, "In addition to being a climate denier, like his predecessor, Pompeo is the Koch brothers' shill who will denigrate the United States' reputation abroad and make us vulnerable to threats at home."
Pompeo has also indicated he is open to the reauthorization of torture, and referred to CIA staff who waterboarded detainees as "patriots."
Haspel, meanwhile, is facing renewed scrutiny by progressive voices, if not by the top Democrat.
According to Vincent Warren, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), Haspel "should be prosecuted not promoted." Toronto Star columnist Heather Mallick writes that Haspel's "office skill set includes overseeing torture and taunting victims as they lie gasping and near death."
Among those shining a critical light on her background is Jeremy Scahill, author and co-founder of The Intercept. In interview on Democracy Now! Wednesday, Scahill said that "in addition to being involved with the outright torture of people," Haspel was "involved with the destruction of videotapes that were filmed at these black sites that showed, we understand, torture."
Torture whislteblower John Kiriakou told the outlet Wednesday that he and others at the agency called her "Bloody Gina." He explained:
Gina was always very quick and very willing to use force. You know, there was a group of officers in the CIA's Counterterrorism Center, when I was--when I was serving there, who--I hate to even make the accusation out loud, but I'm going to say it: who enjoyed using force. Yeah, everybody knew that torture didn't work. That's not even the issue. Lots of different things work. Was it moral, and was it ethical, and was it legal? I think the answers to those questions are very clearly no. But Gina and people like Gina did it, I think, because they enjoyed doing it. They tortured just for the sake of torture, not for the sake of gathering information.
As Pompeo and Haspel await their confirmation hearings, it's notable that Pompeo ultimately received the backing of 14 Democrats last year when he was nominated to head the CIA.
The new confirmations, the Washington Post reports, are "likely to be hampered but not stymied."
"Haspel's record is unlikely to destroy her chances of confirmation," the Post continues.
Though some Democratic senators, such as Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), said Haspel's past makes her "unsuitable to serve as CIA director," Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), author of the report that exposed the extent of the CIA's interrogation programs, appeared to defend her.
"She has been, I believe, a good deputy director," Feinstein said, stressing that the interrogation [torture] techniques employed on Haspel's watch were not, at the time, explicitly illegal. "Fortunately the law, thanks to Senator McCain, has been changed, and torture is now illegal in the United States," Feinstein said. "That's with specificity, and I think that's important. So it's a different day."
The Post also notes that "Pompeo's hard-line positions on Iran are also more in lockstep with Trump."
According to CounterPunch editor Jeffrey St. Clair, that gets to why Schumer isn't actively encouraging his party members to oppose Pompeo's nomination:
Pompeo's confirmation hearing will take place at some point in April; the date for Haspel's confirmation is not yet know.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Senate's top Democrat is not calling on his fellow party members to oppose President Donald Trump's nominee for secretary of state--torture-praising Mike Pompeo--or his nominee to lead the CIA--"actual torturer" Gina Haspel.
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of New York made his stance clear to reporters on Tuesday.
Schumer said Pompeo and Haspel face "lots of outstanding questions," but hoped that if Pompeo is confirmed, he "will turn over a new leaf and will start toughening up our policies towards Russia and Putin."
Currently the CIA Director, Pompeo was picked to be the nation's top diplomat following the "twouster" of Rex Tillerson. Trump chose CIA deputy director Haspel to fill Pompeo's shoes at the agency. Both nominations drew criticism from a broad range of groups.
Greenpeace USA Climate Director Naomi Ages, for example, said, "In addition to being a climate denier, like his predecessor, Pompeo is the Koch brothers' shill who will denigrate the United States' reputation abroad and make us vulnerable to threats at home."
Pompeo has also indicated he is open to the reauthorization of torture, and referred to CIA staff who waterboarded detainees as "patriots."
Haspel, meanwhile, is facing renewed scrutiny by progressive voices, if not by the top Democrat.
According to Vincent Warren, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), Haspel "should be prosecuted not promoted." Toronto Star columnist Heather Mallick writes that Haspel's "office skill set includes overseeing torture and taunting victims as they lie gasping and near death."
Among those shining a critical light on her background is Jeremy Scahill, author and co-founder of The Intercept. In interview on Democracy Now! Wednesday, Scahill said that "in addition to being involved with the outright torture of people," Haspel was "involved with the destruction of videotapes that were filmed at these black sites that showed, we understand, torture."
Torture whislteblower John Kiriakou told the outlet Wednesday that he and others at the agency called her "Bloody Gina." He explained:
Gina was always very quick and very willing to use force. You know, there was a group of officers in the CIA's Counterterrorism Center, when I was--when I was serving there, who--I hate to even make the accusation out loud, but I'm going to say it: who enjoyed using force. Yeah, everybody knew that torture didn't work. That's not even the issue. Lots of different things work. Was it moral, and was it ethical, and was it legal? I think the answers to those questions are very clearly no. But Gina and people like Gina did it, I think, because they enjoyed doing it. They tortured just for the sake of torture, not for the sake of gathering information.
As Pompeo and Haspel await their confirmation hearings, it's notable that Pompeo ultimately received the backing of 14 Democrats last year when he was nominated to head the CIA.
The new confirmations, the Washington Post reports, are "likely to be hampered but not stymied."
"Haspel's record is unlikely to destroy her chances of confirmation," the Post continues.
Though some Democratic senators, such as Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), said Haspel's past makes her "unsuitable to serve as CIA director," Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), author of the report that exposed the extent of the CIA's interrogation programs, appeared to defend her.
"She has been, I believe, a good deputy director," Feinstein said, stressing that the interrogation [torture] techniques employed on Haspel's watch were not, at the time, explicitly illegal. "Fortunately the law, thanks to Senator McCain, has been changed, and torture is now illegal in the United States," Feinstein said. "That's with specificity, and I think that's important. So it's a different day."
The Post also notes that "Pompeo's hard-line positions on Iran are also more in lockstep with Trump."
According to CounterPunch editor Jeffrey St. Clair, that gets to why Schumer isn't actively encouraging his party members to oppose Pompeo's nomination:
Pompeo's confirmation hearing will take place at some point in April; the date for Haspel's confirmation is not yet know.
The Senate's top Democrat is not calling on his fellow party members to oppose President Donald Trump's nominee for secretary of state--torture-praising Mike Pompeo--or his nominee to lead the CIA--"actual torturer" Gina Haspel.
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of New York made his stance clear to reporters on Tuesday.
Schumer said Pompeo and Haspel face "lots of outstanding questions," but hoped that if Pompeo is confirmed, he "will turn over a new leaf and will start toughening up our policies towards Russia and Putin."
Currently the CIA Director, Pompeo was picked to be the nation's top diplomat following the "twouster" of Rex Tillerson. Trump chose CIA deputy director Haspel to fill Pompeo's shoes at the agency. Both nominations drew criticism from a broad range of groups.
Greenpeace USA Climate Director Naomi Ages, for example, said, "In addition to being a climate denier, like his predecessor, Pompeo is the Koch brothers' shill who will denigrate the United States' reputation abroad and make us vulnerable to threats at home."
Pompeo has also indicated he is open to the reauthorization of torture, and referred to CIA staff who waterboarded detainees as "patriots."
Haspel, meanwhile, is facing renewed scrutiny by progressive voices, if not by the top Democrat.
According to Vincent Warren, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), Haspel "should be prosecuted not promoted." Toronto Star columnist Heather Mallick writes that Haspel's "office skill set includes overseeing torture and taunting victims as they lie gasping and near death."
Among those shining a critical light on her background is Jeremy Scahill, author and co-founder of The Intercept. In interview on Democracy Now! Wednesday, Scahill said that "in addition to being involved with the outright torture of people," Haspel was "involved with the destruction of videotapes that were filmed at these black sites that showed, we understand, torture."
Torture whislteblower John Kiriakou told the outlet Wednesday that he and others at the agency called her "Bloody Gina." He explained:
Gina was always very quick and very willing to use force. You know, there was a group of officers in the CIA's Counterterrorism Center, when I was--when I was serving there, who--I hate to even make the accusation out loud, but I'm going to say it: who enjoyed using force. Yeah, everybody knew that torture didn't work. That's not even the issue. Lots of different things work. Was it moral, and was it ethical, and was it legal? I think the answers to those questions are very clearly no. But Gina and people like Gina did it, I think, because they enjoyed doing it. They tortured just for the sake of torture, not for the sake of gathering information.
As Pompeo and Haspel await their confirmation hearings, it's notable that Pompeo ultimately received the backing of 14 Democrats last year when he was nominated to head the CIA.
The new confirmations, the Washington Post reports, are "likely to be hampered but not stymied."
"Haspel's record is unlikely to destroy her chances of confirmation," the Post continues.
Though some Democratic senators, such as Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), said Haspel's past makes her "unsuitable to serve as CIA director," Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), author of the report that exposed the extent of the CIA's interrogation programs, appeared to defend her.
"She has been, I believe, a good deputy director," Feinstein said, stressing that the interrogation [torture] techniques employed on Haspel's watch were not, at the time, explicitly illegal. "Fortunately the law, thanks to Senator McCain, has been changed, and torture is now illegal in the United States," Feinstein said. "That's with specificity, and I think that's important. So it's a different day."
The Post also notes that "Pompeo's hard-line positions on Iran are also more in lockstep with Trump."
According to CounterPunch editor Jeffrey St. Clair, that gets to why Schumer isn't actively encouraging his party members to oppose Pompeo's nomination:
Pompeo's confirmation hearing will take place at some point in April; the date for Haspel's confirmation is not yet know.