The tech conglomerate Amazon, headed by the world's richest man, Jeff Bezos, released a shortlist of 20 cities that could be the new home of the company's second headquarters on Thursday. (Photo: David Ryder/Getty)
Jan 18, 2018
Critics of Amazon's "race to the bottom" as it searches for a home for its second headquarters said on Thursday that the company's newly released shortlist of 20 cities highlights a crisis in the U.S. economy--one exemplified by the huge incentives offered to Amazon in the bidding war among potential hosts.
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) was among those slamming Amazon and the state and local governments willing to give billions of dollars in tax breaks to the extremely wealthy multinational company.
\u201cTax breaks to Amazon promised by New Jersey: $7 billion. Tax breaks promised by Illinois: $2 billion. Something is deeply wrong with our economy & democracy when local governments offer up their tax base to a corporation worth over $500 billion. https://t.co/csnETiF5zT\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1516291365
In addition to the incentives mentioned by Ellison, Boston offered $75 million to provide affordable housing to Amazon employees, while Maryland's offer exceeded $5 billion.
Some noted that Amazon's top 20 contenders--also including New York, Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Raleigh, N.C.--are fairly prosperous cities, with the company leaving out areas that could benefit from an influx of jobs and economic activity.
\u201cCompare Amazon's HQ2 finalist map with a map of where 50% of our GDP is coming from. Notice anything striking? It's kind of like the GOP tax reform. We just love to throw money where the most money is already piled instead of where it's most needed.\n\n#AmazonHQ2 #inequality\u201d— Scott Santens (@Scott Santens) 1516294663
After Amazon announced its search in September, promising to bring 50,000 jobs to the city it chose for its $5 billion headquarters, groups including Jobs With Justice and the Working Families Party released their own set of demands for the company.
As Common Dreams reported, the groups asked the company to "reserve a substantial number of construction jobs for local residents, especially underrepresented people of color and women," protect the right to form unions, pay living wages, and--in light of reports of unsafe conditions at Amazon warehouses--"allow independent, third party organizations to conduct health and safety trainings."
But as Lina Khan of the Open Markets Institute noted last month on Ellison's podcast, We the Podcast, Amazon's meteoric rise has been due largely to unfair business practices--leaving critics skeptical of the idea that Amazon's arrival in one of the 20 finalist cities will actually benefit those who call it home.
"In many instances, Amazon has gotten where it is because it has undertaken business practices and forms of conduct that previously used to be illegal," Khan said.
\u201c"In many instances, Amazon has gotten where it is because it has undertaken business practices... that previously used to be illegal."\n\nOn the latest We The Podcast, we discuss Amazon's monopolistic rise and what it's meant for workers and our democracy. https://t.co/r3iHKugGmz\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1513375958
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Critics of Amazon's "race to the bottom" as it searches for a home for its second headquarters said on Thursday that the company's newly released shortlist of 20 cities highlights a crisis in the U.S. economy--one exemplified by the huge incentives offered to Amazon in the bidding war among potential hosts.
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) was among those slamming Amazon and the state and local governments willing to give billions of dollars in tax breaks to the extremely wealthy multinational company.
\u201cTax breaks to Amazon promised by New Jersey: $7 billion. Tax breaks promised by Illinois: $2 billion. Something is deeply wrong with our economy & democracy when local governments offer up their tax base to a corporation worth over $500 billion. https://t.co/csnETiF5zT\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1516291365
In addition to the incentives mentioned by Ellison, Boston offered $75 million to provide affordable housing to Amazon employees, while Maryland's offer exceeded $5 billion.
Some noted that Amazon's top 20 contenders--also including New York, Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Raleigh, N.C.--are fairly prosperous cities, with the company leaving out areas that could benefit from an influx of jobs and economic activity.
\u201cCompare Amazon's HQ2 finalist map with a map of where 50% of our GDP is coming from. Notice anything striking? It's kind of like the GOP tax reform. We just love to throw money where the most money is already piled instead of where it's most needed.\n\n#AmazonHQ2 #inequality\u201d— Scott Santens (@Scott Santens) 1516294663
After Amazon announced its search in September, promising to bring 50,000 jobs to the city it chose for its $5 billion headquarters, groups including Jobs With Justice and the Working Families Party released their own set of demands for the company.
As Common Dreams reported, the groups asked the company to "reserve a substantial number of construction jobs for local residents, especially underrepresented people of color and women," protect the right to form unions, pay living wages, and--in light of reports of unsafe conditions at Amazon warehouses--"allow independent, third party organizations to conduct health and safety trainings."
But as Lina Khan of the Open Markets Institute noted last month on Ellison's podcast, We the Podcast, Amazon's meteoric rise has been due largely to unfair business practices--leaving critics skeptical of the idea that Amazon's arrival in one of the 20 finalist cities will actually benefit those who call it home.
"In many instances, Amazon has gotten where it is because it has undertaken business practices and forms of conduct that previously used to be illegal," Khan said.
\u201c"In many instances, Amazon has gotten where it is because it has undertaken business practices... that previously used to be illegal."\n\nOn the latest We The Podcast, we discuss Amazon's monopolistic rise and what it's meant for workers and our democracy. https://t.co/r3iHKugGmz\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1513375958
Critics of Amazon's "race to the bottom" as it searches for a home for its second headquarters said on Thursday that the company's newly released shortlist of 20 cities highlights a crisis in the U.S. economy--one exemplified by the huge incentives offered to Amazon in the bidding war among potential hosts.
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) was among those slamming Amazon and the state and local governments willing to give billions of dollars in tax breaks to the extremely wealthy multinational company.
\u201cTax breaks to Amazon promised by New Jersey: $7 billion. Tax breaks promised by Illinois: $2 billion. Something is deeply wrong with our economy & democracy when local governments offer up their tax base to a corporation worth over $500 billion. https://t.co/csnETiF5zT\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1516291365
In addition to the incentives mentioned by Ellison, Boston offered $75 million to provide affordable housing to Amazon employees, while Maryland's offer exceeded $5 billion.
Some noted that Amazon's top 20 contenders--also including New York, Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Raleigh, N.C.--are fairly prosperous cities, with the company leaving out areas that could benefit from an influx of jobs and economic activity.
\u201cCompare Amazon's HQ2 finalist map with a map of where 50% of our GDP is coming from. Notice anything striking? It's kind of like the GOP tax reform. We just love to throw money where the most money is already piled instead of where it's most needed.\n\n#AmazonHQ2 #inequality\u201d— Scott Santens (@Scott Santens) 1516294663
After Amazon announced its search in September, promising to bring 50,000 jobs to the city it chose for its $5 billion headquarters, groups including Jobs With Justice and the Working Families Party released their own set of demands for the company.
As Common Dreams reported, the groups asked the company to "reserve a substantial number of construction jobs for local residents, especially underrepresented people of color and women," protect the right to form unions, pay living wages, and--in light of reports of unsafe conditions at Amazon warehouses--"allow independent, third party organizations to conduct health and safety trainings."
But as Lina Khan of the Open Markets Institute noted last month on Ellison's podcast, We the Podcast, Amazon's meteoric rise has been due largely to unfair business practices--leaving critics skeptical of the idea that Amazon's arrival in one of the 20 finalist cities will actually benefit those who call it home.
"In many instances, Amazon has gotten where it is because it has undertaken business practices and forms of conduct that previously used to be illegal," Khan said.
\u201c"In many instances, Amazon has gotten where it is because it has undertaken business practices... that previously used to be illegal."\n\nOn the latest We The Podcast, we discuss Amazon's monopolistic rise and what it's meant for workers and our democracy. https://t.co/r3iHKugGmz\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1513375958
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.