

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

A 2015 protest targets banks as climate change profiteers. (Photo: Peg Hunter/flickr/cc)
In a move being hailed as a win for the climate, banking giant BNP Paribas announced Wednesday that it is severing ties with companies whose main business is connected to shale and/or oil from tar sands, will stop financing transportation projects for such fuels, and will not finance any oil or gas projects in the Arctic region.
"In concrete terms," writes Jean-Laurent Bonnafe, director and CEO of BNP Paribas, "these decisions mean that we will cease providing finance to a number of companies and organizations that are not making an effort to be part of the transition to a less greenhouse gas-emitting economy."
According to Lucie Pinson, Friends of the Earth France's private finance campaigner, it's "great news for the climate and a huge victory for the groups who have been mobilizing in support of Indigenous peoples who are on the front line of the impacts of tar sands, shale gas, and LNG projects in North America."
Her organization, along with other climate groups, was behind a report (pdf) issued earlier this year that denounced the bank for "contributing to a range of serious potential climate, environmental, and social impacts" through its financial help for a proposed Texas LNG project. A press statement from the group notes that the decision means the bank won't finance the export terminal in the Rio Grande Valley.
Alex Speers-Roesch, an oil campaigner with Greenpeace Canada, similarly called it "a testament to the diligent work of Indigenous activists, environmental groups, concerned citizens, and everyone advocating to reform the financial sector."
"More and more banks and investment funds recognize that in order to preserve their reputations and long-term financial performance, tar sands pipelines, and other extreme fossil fuel projects are not the way to go," he added. "Banks such as TD and Desjardins, that stake their reputations on being socially responsible, should expect growing resistance if they continue to fund pipelines such as Kinder Morgan."
Patrick McCully, director of Rainforest Action Network's Climate and Energy Program, also draws attention to "JPMorgan Chase, the largest U.S. funder of tar sands," saying that it and other U.S. banks "now need to decide if they want to continue to follow the Trump dirty energy agenda, or change course and get in alignment with those trying to avert climate disaster."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a move being hailed as a win for the climate, banking giant BNP Paribas announced Wednesday that it is severing ties with companies whose main business is connected to shale and/or oil from tar sands, will stop financing transportation projects for such fuels, and will not finance any oil or gas projects in the Arctic region.
"In concrete terms," writes Jean-Laurent Bonnafe, director and CEO of BNP Paribas, "these decisions mean that we will cease providing finance to a number of companies and organizations that are not making an effort to be part of the transition to a less greenhouse gas-emitting economy."
According to Lucie Pinson, Friends of the Earth France's private finance campaigner, it's "great news for the climate and a huge victory for the groups who have been mobilizing in support of Indigenous peoples who are on the front line of the impacts of tar sands, shale gas, and LNG projects in North America."
Her organization, along with other climate groups, was behind a report (pdf) issued earlier this year that denounced the bank for "contributing to a range of serious potential climate, environmental, and social impacts" through its financial help for a proposed Texas LNG project. A press statement from the group notes that the decision means the bank won't finance the export terminal in the Rio Grande Valley.
Alex Speers-Roesch, an oil campaigner with Greenpeace Canada, similarly called it "a testament to the diligent work of Indigenous activists, environmental groups, concerned citizens, and everyone advocating to reform the financial sector."
"More and more banks and investment funds recognize that in order to preserve their reputations and long-term financial performance, tar sands pipelines, and other extreme fossil fuel projects are not the way to go," he added. "Banks such as TD and Desjardins, that stake their reputations on being socially responsible, should expect growing resistance if they continue to fund pipelines such as Kinder Morgan."
Patrick McCully, director of Rainforest Action Network's Climate and Energy Program, also draws attention to "JPMorgan Chase, the largest U.S. funder of tar sands," saying that it and other U.S. banks "now need to decide if they want to continue to follow the Trump dirty energy agenda, or change course and get in alignment with those trying to avert climate disaster."
In a move being hailed as a win for the climate, banking giant BNP Paribas announced Wednesday that it is severing ties with companies whose main business is connected to shale and/or oil from tar sands, will stop financing transportation projects for such fuels, and will not finance any oil or gas projects in the Arctic region.
"In concrete terms," writes Jean-Laurent Bonnafe, director and CEO of BNP Paribas, "these decisions mean that we will cease providing finance to a number of companies and organizations that are not making an effort to be part of the transition to a less greenhouse gas-emitting economy."
According to Lucie Pinson, Friends of the Earth France's private finance campaigner, it's "great news for the climate and a huge victory for the groups who have been mobilizing in support of Indigenous peoples who are on the front line of the impacts of tar sands, shale gas, and LNG projects in North America."
Her organization, along with other climate groups, was behind a report (pdf) issued earlier this year that denounced the bank for "contributing to a range of serious potential climate, environmental, and social impacts" through its financial help for a proposed Texas LNG project. A press statement from the group notes that the decision means the bank won't finance the export terminal in the Rio Grande Valley.
Alex Speers-Roesch, an oil campaigner with Greenpeace Canada, similarly called it "a testament to the diligent work of Indigenous activists, environmental groups, concerned citizens, and everyone advocating to reform the financial sector."
"More and more banks and investment funds recognize that in order to preserve their reputations and long-term financial performance, tar sands pipelines, and other extreme fossil fuel projects are not the way to go," he added. "Banks such as TD and Desjardins, that stake their reputations on being socially responsible, should expect growing resistance if they continue to fund pipelines such as Kinder Morgan."
Patrick McCully, director of Rainforest Action Network's Climate and Energy Program, also draws attention to "JPMorgan Chase, the largest U.S. funder of tar sands," saying that it and other U.S. banks "now need to decide if they want to continue to follow the Trump dirty energy agenda, or change course and get in alignment with those trying to avert climate disaster."