SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders conducts the daily press briefing at the White House October 2, 2017 in Washington, DC. Sanders announced that President Donald Trump will travel to Las Vegas on Wednesday, three days after at least 58 people were killed when a man opened fire on a country music festival, the deadliest mass shooting in recent American history. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
White House: Deadliest Shooting in US History No Reason to Have "Political Debate" About Guns
Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders says too early to call murder of 58 people "domestic terrorism" and that debate about gun control not yet appropriate
Oct 02, 2017
Contrary to the popular demand that the conversation be put front and center, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders confirmed on Monday afternoon that the Trump administration simply does not want to talk about gun control in the immediate wake of Sunday night's mass shooting in Las Vegas in which at least 58 people were killed.
At an afternoon press briefing, repeatedly pressed on the issue, Huckabee Sanders called it "premature" to have a debate about the politics of guns.
"There's a time and a place to debate, but now is the time to unite as a country," she said.
That message is diametrically opposite to what gun control advocates and some Democratic lawmakers were saying on Monday. "Tragedies like Las Vegas have happened too many times," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in a tweet. "We need to have the conversation about how to stop gun violence. We need it NOW."
Author and activist Naomi Klein put the White House's position in the context of a broader pattern of dodging and denial that is well-worn in right-wing political circles:
Don't talk about guns after a massacre. Or climate change after storms. Or austerity after firetrap buildings burn. Talk when no one listens
-- Naomi Klein (@NaomiAKlein) October 2, 2017
Meanwhile, Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat who represents the state of Connecticut where the 2012 mass killing of schoolchildren in the town of Sandy Hook took place, called on Congress to "get off its ass and do something" on the issue of gun violence and mass shootings.
And though President Trump has repeatedly jumped to conclusions in the wake of attacks in which he perceived the assailant(s) as Muslim, Huckabee Sanders on Wednesday said the White House in this case was waiting for the "facts" to emerge before calling Sunday night's attack--the most deadly mass shooting ever to take place in U.S. history--an act of "domestic terrorism."
Watch:
Writing at Rolling Stone on Monday, journalist Tim Dickinson dismissed those who argue the immediate aftermath of the latest massacre is the wrong time to politicize guns or mass violence--and placed blame for that squarely at the feet of the nation's powerful gun industry lobby and the lawmakers who do their bidding.
"America's soft underbelly is vulnerable to terrorist attack because of the political power of the National Rifle Association," Dickinson wrote. "Full stop."
He continued:
And we have never had a president more indebted to the NRA than Donald Trump. Trump took office thanks to more than $30 million in NRA spending on his behalf. Appearing at the gun lobby's national convention earlier this year, Trump thanked the NRA and promised to advance its agenda. "You came through for me, and I am going to come through for you," he said.
On Monday, President Trump piously quoted the Bible and condemned an "act of pure evil." But he made no promise of federal action or intention to prevent future bloodshed. The president only directed that "our great flag" be flown at half mast. In the War on Terror - as prosecuted at home, against those who would commit atrocities with guns - the president might as well be waving a white flag of surrender.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Contrary to the popular demand that the conversation be put front and center, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders confirmed on Monday afternoon that the Trump administration simply does not want to talk about gun control in the immediate wake of Sunday night's mass shooting in Las Vegas in which at least 58 people were killed.
At an afternoon press briefing, repeatedly pressed on the issue, Huckabee Sanders called it "premature" to have a debate about the politics of guns.
"There's a time and a place to debate, but now is the time to unite as a country," she said.
That message is diametrically opposite to what gun control advocates and some Democratic lawmakers were saying on Monday. "Tragedies like Las Vegas have happened too many times," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in a tweet. "We need to have the conversation about how to stop gun violence. We need it NOW."
Author and activist Naomi Klein put the White House's position in the context of a broader pattern of dodging and denial that is well-worn in right-wing political circles:
Don't talk about guns after a massacre. Or climate change after storms. Or austerity after firetrap buildings burn. Talk when no one listens
-- Naomi Klein (@NaomiAKlein) October 2, 2017
Meanwhile, Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat who represents the state of Connecticut where the 2012 mass killing of schoolchildren in the town of Sandy Hook took place, called on Congress to "get off its ass and do something" on the issue of gun violence and mass shootings.
And though President Trump has repeatedly jumped to conclusions in the wake of attacks in which he perceived the assailant(s) as Muslim, Huckabee Sanders on Wednesday said the White House in this case was waiting for the "facts" to emerge before calling Sunday night's attack--the most deadly mass shooting ever to take place in U.S. history--an act of "domestic terrorism."
Watch:
Writing at Rolling Stone on Monday, journalist Tim Dickinson dismissed those who argue the immediate aftermath of the latest massacre is the wrong time to politicize guns or mass violence--and placed blame for that squarely at the feet of the nation's powerful gun industry lobby and the lawmakers who do their bidding.
"America's soft underbelly is vulnerable to terrorist attack because of the political power of the National Rifle Association," Dickinson wrote. "Full stop."
He continued:
And we have never had a president more indebted to the NRA than Donald Trump. Trump took office thanks to more than $30 million in NRA spending on his behalf. Appearing at the gun lobby's national convention earlier this year, Trump thanked the NRA and promised to advance its agenda. "You came through for me, and I am going to come through for you," he said.
On Monday, President Trump piously quoted the Bible and condemned an "act of pure evil." But he made no promise of federal action or intention to prevent future bloodshed. The president only directed that "our great flag" be flown at half mast. In the War on Terror - as prosecuted at home, against those who would commit atrocities with guns - the president might as well be waving a white flag of surrender.
Contrary to the popular demand that the conversation be put front and center, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders confirmed on Monday afternoon that the Trump administration simply does not want to talk about gun control in the immediate wake of Sunday night's mass shooting in Las Vegas in which at least 58 people were killed.
At an afternoon press briefing, repeatedly pressed on the issue, Huckabee Sanders called it "premature" to have a debate about the politics of guns.
"There's a time and a place to debate, but now is the time to unite as a country," she said.
That message is diametrically opposite to what gun control advocates and some Democratic lawmakers were saying on Monday. "Tragedies like Las Vegas have happened too many times," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in a tweet. "We need to have the conversation about how to stop gun violence. We need it NOW."
Author and activist Naomi Klein put the White House's position in the context of a broader pattern of dodging and denial that is well-worn in right-wing political circles:
Don't talk about guns after a massacre. Or climate change after storms. Or austerity after firetrap buildings burn. Talk when no one listens
-- Naomi Klein (@NaomiAKlein) October 2, 2017
Meanwhile, Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat who represents the state of Connecticut where the 2012 mass killing of schoolchildren in the town of Sandy Hook took place, called on Congress to "get off its ass and do something" on the issue of gun violence and mass shootings.
And though President Trump has repeatedly jumped to conclusions in the wake of attacks in which he perceived the assailant(s) as Muslim, Huckabee Sanders on Wednesday said the White House in this case was waiting for the "facts" to emerge before calling Sunday night's attack--the most deadly mass shooting ever to take place in U.S. history--an act of "domestic terrorism."
Watch:
Writing at Rolling Stone on Monday, journalist Tim Dickinson dismissed those who argue the immediate aftermath of the latest massacre is the wrong time to politicize guns or mass violence--and placed blame for that squarely at the feet of the nation's powerful gun industry lobby and the lawmakers who do their bidding.
"America's soft underbelly is vulnerable to terrorist attack because of the political power of the National Rifle Association," Dickinson wrote. "Full stop."
He continued:
And we have never had a president more indebted to the NRA than Donald Trump. Trump took office thanks to more than $30 million in NRA spending on his behalf. Appearing at the gun lobby's national convention earlier this year, Trump thanked the NRA and promised to advance its agenda. "You came through for me, and I am going to come through for you," he said.
On Monday, President Trump piously quoted the Bible and condemned an "act of pure evil." But he made no promise of federal action or intention to prevent future bloodshed. The president only directed that "our great flag" be flown at half mast. In the War on Terror - as prosecuted at home, against those who would commit atrocities with guns - the president might as well be waving a white flag of surrender.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.