SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions arrives to view the solar eclipse at the White House on August 21, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Amid a furious and "chilling" push by the Trump Justice Department to root out leakers--which has included suggestions that even journalists could be targeted--Axios reported Sunday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has floated the idea of putting White House officials through a polygraph test, a proposal that was quickly denounced as "legitimately insane."
"A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
--Ben Wizner, ACLU
"Sessions' idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the [National Security Council] staff," writes Axios's Jonathan Swan. "Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there's more than 100 of them), and ask them, individually, what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspects those leaks came from within the NSC, and thinks that a polygraph test--at the very least--would scare them out of leaking again."
CNN independently verified Swan's reporting Sunday night.
Swan notes that Sessions has pitched the idea to "multiple people" within the Trump administration.
The thought of potentially administering polygraph tests to White House staffers reportedly came to Sessions after transcripts of President Donald Trump's "crazy" phone conversations with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull were leaked to the press last month.
"Sessions has told associates he likes the idea of targeting the foreign leader phone calls because there's a small enough universe of people who would have had access to these transcripts," Swan reports. "That Sessions would seriously entertain such a startling action reveals how frustrated he's become about the rampant leaking of classified information."
As Common Dreams reported, Jeff Sessions declared last month that the Justice Department under his leadership plans to expand and intensify its pursuit of those leaking to the media, and asserted that the Trump administration has "tripled" the number of leak probes during its first seven months in power.
This is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up."
--Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast
Civil libertarians and journalists have characterized the Trump administration's posture toward leaks--and its hostility to the press more broadly--as "McCarthy-esque."
"Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration's threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists," concluded Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. "A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
Reporters and commentators reacted with a mixture of amazement and dismay to Sessions' reported idea on social media:
\u201cThis is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up https://t.co/4zuNksH0lw\u201d— Asawin Suebsaeng (@Asawin Suebsaeng) 1505085056
\u201cIn part because anyone who doesn't get their news from season 1 of law and order should know that lie detectors are so bullshit\u201d— Asawin Suebsaeng (@Asawin Suebsaeng) 1505085056
\u201cJeff Sessions wants the National Security Council staff to take a lie detector test to find leakers.\n\nHow about Sessions takes one first?\u201d— Mike Levin (@Mike Levin) 1505090898
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Amid a furious and "chilling" push by the Trump Justice Department to root out leakers--which has included suggestions that even journalists could be targeted--Axios reported Sunday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has floated the idea of putting White House officials through a polygraph test, a proposal that was quickly denounced as "legitimately insane."
"A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
--Ben Wizner, ACLU
"Sessions' idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the [National Security Council] staff," writes Axios's Jonathan Swan. "Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there's more than 100 of them), and ask them, individually, what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspects those leaks came from within the NSC, and thinks that a polygraph test--at the very least--would scare them out of leaking again."
CNN independently verified Swan's reporting Sunday night.
Swan notes that Sessions has pitched the idea to "multiple people" within the Trump administration.
The thought of potentially administering polygraph tests to White House staffers reportedly came to Sessions after transcripts of President Donald Trump's "crazy" phone conversations with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull were leaked to the press last month.
"Sessions has told associates he likes the idea of targeting the foreign leader phone calls because there's a small enough universe of people who would have had access to these transcripts," Swan reports. "That Sessions would seriously entertain such a startling action reveals how frustrated he's become about the rampant leaking of classified information."
As Common Dreams reported, Jeff Sessions declared last month that the Justice Department under his leadership plans to expand and intensify its pursuit of those leaking to the media, and asserted that the Trump administration has "tripled" the number of leak probes during its first seven months in power.
This is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up."
--Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast
Civil libertarians and journalists have characterized the Trump administration's posture toward leaks--and its hostility to the press more broadly--as "McCarthy-esque."
"Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration's threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists," concluded Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. "A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
Reporters and commentators reacted with a mixture of amazement and dismay to Sessions' reported idea on social media:
\u201cThis is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up https://t.co/4zuNksH0lw\u201d— Asawin Suebsaeng (@Asawin Suebsaeng) 1505085056
\u201cIn part because anyone who doesn't get their news from season 1 of law and order should know that lie detectors are so bullshit\u201d— Asawin Suebsaeng (@Asawin Suebsaeng) 1505085056
\u201cJeff Sessions wants the National Security Council staff to take a lie detector test to find leakers.\n\nHow about Sessions takes one first?\u201d— Mike Levin (@Mike Levin) 1505090898
Amid a furious and "chilling" push by the Trump Justice Department to root out leakers--which has included suggestions that even journalists could be targeted--Axios reported Sunday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has floated the idea of putting White House officials through a polygraph test, a proposal that was quickly denounced as "legitimately insane."
"A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
--Ben Wizner, ACLU
"Sessions' idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the [National Security Council] staff," writes Axios's Jonathan Swan. "Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there's more than 100 of them), and ask them, individually, what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspects those leaks came from within the NSC, and thinks that a polygraph test--at the very least--would scare them out of leaking again."
CNN independently verified Swan's reporting Sunday night.
Swan notes that Sessions has pitched the idea to "multiple people" within the Trump administration.
The thought of potentially administering polygraph tests to White House staffers reportedly came to Sessions after transcripts of President Donald Trump's "crazy" phone conversations with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull were leaked to the press last month.
"Sessions has told associates he likes the idea of targeting the foreign leader phone calls because there's a small enough universe of people who would have had access to these transcripts," Swan reports. "That Sessions would seriously entertain such a startling action reveals how frustrated he's become about the rampant leaking of classified information."
As Common Dreams reported, Jeff Sessions declared last month that the Justice Department under his leadership plans to expand and intensify its pursuit of those leaking to the media, and asserted that the Trump administration has "tripled" the number of leak probes during its first seven months in power.
This is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up."
--Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast
Civil libertarians and journalists have characterized the Trump administration's posture toward leaks--and its hostility to the press more broadly--as "McCarthy-esque."
"Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration's threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists," concluded Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. "A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
Reporters and commentators reacted with a mixture of amazement and dismay to Sessions' reported idea on social media:
\u201cThis is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up https://t.co/4zuNksH0lw\u201d— Asawin Suebsaeng (@Asawin Suebsaeng) 1505085056
\u201cIn part because anyone who doesn't get their news from season 1 of law and order should know that lie detectors are so bullshit\u201d— Asawin Suebsaeng (@Asawin Suebsaeng) 1505085056
\u201cJeff Sessions wants the National Security Council staff to take a lie detector test to find leakers.\n\nHow about Sessions takes one first?\u201d— Mike Levin (@Mike Levin) 1505090898