

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions arrives to view the solar eclipse at the White House on August 21, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Amid a furious and "chilling" push by the Trump Justice Department to root out leakers--which has included suggestions that even journalists could be targeted--Axios reported Sunday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has floated the idea of putting White House officials through a polygraph test, a proposal that was quickly denounced as "legitimately insane."
"A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
--Ben Wizner, ACLU
"Sessions' idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the [National Security Council] staff," writes Axios's Jonathan Swan. "Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there's more than 100 of them), and ask them, individually, what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspects those leaks came from within the NSC, and thinks that a polygraph test--at the very least--would scare them out of leaking again."
CNN independently verified Swan's reporting Sunday night.
Swan notes that Sessions has pitched the idea to "multiple people" within the Trump administration.
The thought of potentially administering polygraph tests to White House staffers reportedly came to Sessions after transcripts of President Donald Trump's "crazy" phone conversations with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull were leaked to the press last month.
"Sessions has told associates he likes the idea of targeting the foreign leader phone calls because there's a small enough universe of people who would have had access to these transcripts," Swan reports. "That Sessions would seriously entertain such a startling action reveals how frustrated he's become about the rampant leaking of classified information."
As Common Dreams reported, Jeff Sessions declared last month that the Justice Department under his leadership plans to expand and intensify its pursuit of those leaking to the media, and asserted that the Trump administration has "tripled" the number of leak probes during its first seven months in power.
This is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up."
--Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast
Civil libertarians and journalists have characterized the Trump administration's posture toward leaks--and its hostility to the press more broadly--as "McCarthy-esque."
"Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration's threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists," concluded Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. "A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
Reporters and commentators reacted with a mixture of amazement and dismay to Sessions' reported idea on social media:
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Amid a furious and "chilling" push by the Trump Justice Department to root out leakers--which has included suggestions that even journalists could be targeted--Axios reported Sunday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has floated the idea of putting White House officials through a polygraph test, a proposal that was quickly denounced as "legitimately insane."
"A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
--Ben Wizner, ACLU
"Sessions' idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the [National Security Council] staff," writes Axios's Jonathan Swan. "Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there's more than 100 of them), and ask them, individually, what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspects those leaks came from within the NSC, and thinks that a polygraph test--at the very least--would scare them out of leaking again."
CNN independently verified Swan's reporting Sunday night.
Swan notes that Sessions has pitched the idea to "multiple people" within the Trump administration.
The thought of potentially administering polygraph tests to White House staffers reportedly came to Sessions after transcripts of President Donald Trump's "crazy" phone conversations with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull were leaked to the press last month.
"Sessions has told associates he likes the idea of targeting the foreign leader phone calls because there's a small enough universe of people who would have had access to these transcripts," Swan reports. "That Sessions would seriously entertain such a startling action reveals how frustrated he's become about the rampant leaking of classified information."
As Common Dreams reported, Jeff Sessions declared last month that the Justice Department under his leadership plans to expand and intensify its pursuit of those leaking to the media, and asserted that the Trump administration has "tripled" the number of leak probes during its first seven months in power.
This is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up."
--Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast
Civil libertarians and journalists have characterized the Trump administration's posture toward leaks--and its hostility to the press more broadly--as "McCarthy-esque."
"Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration's threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists," concluded Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. "A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
Reporters and commentators reacted with a mixture of amazement and dismay to Sessions' reported idea on social media:
Amid a furious and "chilling" push by the Trump Justice Department to root out leakers--which has included suggestions that even journalists could be targeted--Axios reported Sunday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has floated the idea of putting White House officials through a polygraph test, a proposal that was quickly denounced as "legitimately insane."
"A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
--Ben Wizner, ACLU
"Sessions' idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the [National Security Council] staff," writes Axios's Jonathan Swan. "Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there's more than 100 of them), and ask them, individually, what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspects those leaks came from within the NSC, and thinks that a polygraph test--at the very least--would scare them out of leaking again."
CNN independently verified Swan's reporting Sunday night.
Swan notes that Sessions has pitched the idea to "multiple people" within the Trump administration.
The thought of potentially administering polygraph tests to White House staffers reportedly came to Sessions after transcripts of President Donald Trump's "crazy" phone conversations with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull were leaked to the press last month.
"Sessions has told associates he likes the idea of targeting the foreign leader phone calls because there's a small enough universe of people who would have had access to these transcripts," Swan reports. "That Sessions would seriously entertain such a startling action reveals how frustrated he's become about the rampant leaking of classified information."
As Common Dreams reported, Jeff Sessions declared last month that the Justice Department under his leadership plans to expand and intensify its pursuit of those leaking to the media, and asserted that the Trump administration has "tripled" the number of leak probes during its first seven months in power.
This is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up."
--Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast
Civil libertarians and journalists have characterized the Trump administration's posture toward leaks--and its hostility to the press more broadly--as "McCarthy-esque."
"Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration's threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists," concluded Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. "A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
Reporters and commentators reacted with a mixture of amazement and dismay to Sessions' reported idea on social media: