

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions arrives to view the solar eclipse at the White House on August 21, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Amid a furious and "chilling" push by the Trump Justice Department to root out leakers--which has included suggestions that even journalists could be targeted--Axios reported Sunday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has floated the idea of putting White House officials through a polygraph test, a proposal that was quickly denounced as "legitimately insane."
"A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
--Ben Wizner, ACLU
"Sessions' idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the [National Security Council] staff," writes Axios's Jonathan Swan. "Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there's more than 100 of them), and ask them, individually, what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspects those leaks came from within the NSC, and thinks that a polygraph test--at the very least--would scare them out of leaking again."
CNN independently verified Swan's reporting Sunday night.
Swan notes that Sessions has pitched the idea to "multiple people" within the Trump administration.
The thought of potentially administering polygraph tests to White House staffers reportedly came to Sessions after transcripts of President Donald Trump's "crazy" phone conversations with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull were leaked to the press last month.
"Sessions has told associates he likes the idea of targeting the foreign leader phone calls because there's a small enough universe of people who would have had access to these transcripts," Swan reports. "That Sessions would seriously entertain such a startling action reveals how frustrated he's become about the rampant leaking of classified information."
As Common Dreams reported, Jeff Sessions declared last month that the Justice Department under his leadership plans to expand and intensify its pursuit of those leaking to the media, and asserted that the Trump administration has "tripled" the number of leak probes during its first seven months in power.
This is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up."
--Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast
Civil libertarians and journalists have characterized the Trump administration's posture toward leaks--and its hostility to the press more broadly--as "McCarthy-esque."
"Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration's threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists," concluded Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. "A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
Reporters and commentators reacted with a mixture of amazement and dismay to Sessions' reported idea on social media:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Amid a furious and "chilling" push by the Trump Justice Department to root out leakers--which has included suggestions that even journalists could be targeted--Axios reported Sunday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has floated the idea of putting White House officials through a polygraph test, a proposal that was quickly denounced as "legitimately insane."
"A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
--Ben Wizner, ACLU
"Sessions' idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the [National Security Council] staff," writes Axios's Jonathan Swan. "Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there's more than 100 of them), and ask them, individually, what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspects those leaks came from within the NSC, and thinks that a polygraph test--at the very least--would scare them out of leaking again."
CNN independently verified Swan's reporting Sunday night.
Swan notes that Sessions has pitched the idea to "multiple people" within the Trump administration.
The thought of potentially administering polygraph tests to White House staffers reportedly came to Sessions after transcripts of President Donald Trump's "crazy" phone conversations with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull were leaked to the press last month.
"Sessions has told associates he likes the idea of targeting the foreign leader phone calls because there's a small enough universe of people who would have had access to these transcripts," Swan reports. "That Sessions would seriously entertain such a startling action reveals how frustrated he's become about the rampant leaking of classified information."
As Common Dreams reported, Jeff Sessions declared last month that the Justice Department under his leadership plans to expand and intensify its pursuit of those leaking to the media, and asserted that the Trump administration has "tripled" the number of leak probes during its first seven months in power.
This is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up."
--Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast
Civil libertarians and journalists have characterized the Trump administration's posture toward leaks--and its hostility to the press more broadly--as "McCarthy-esque."
"Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration's threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists," concluded Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. "A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
Reporters and commentators reacted with a mixture of amazement and dismay to Sessions' reported idea on social media:
Amid a furious and "chilling" push by the Trump Justice Department to root out leakers--which has included suggestions that even journalists could be targeted--Axios reported Sunday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has floated the idea of putting White House officials through a polygraph test, a proposal that was quickly denounced as "legitimately insane."
"A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
--Ben Wizner, ACLU
"Sessions' idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the [National Security Council] staff," writes Axios's Jonathan Swan. "Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there's more than 100 of them), and ask them, individually, what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspects those leaks came from within the NSC, and thinks that a polygraph test--at the very least--would scare them out of leaking again."
CNN independently verified Swan's reporting Sunday night.
Swan notes that Sessions has pitched the idea to "multiple people" within the Trump administration.
The thought of potentially administering polygraph tests to White House staffers reportedly came to Sessions after transcripts of President Donald Trump's "crazy" phone conversations with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull were leaked to the press last month.
"Sessions has told associates he likes the idea of targeting the foreign leader phone calls because there's a small enough universe of people who would have had access to these transcripts," Swan reports. "That Sessions would seriously entertain such a startling action reveals how frustrated he's become about the rampant leaking of classified information."
As Common Dreams reported, Jeff Sessions declared last month that the Justice Department under his leadership plans to expand and intensify its pursuit of those leaking to the media, and asserted that the Trump administration has "tripled" the number of leak probes during its first seven months in power.
This is insane. Legitimately insane that the attorney general would keep bringing this up."
--Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast
Civil libertarians and journalists have characterized the Trump administration's posture toward leaks--and its hostility to the press more broadly--as "McCarthy-esque."
"Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration's threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists," concluded Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. "A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy as a whole."
Reporters and commentators reacted with a mixture of amazement and dismay to Sessions' reported idea on social media: