

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Ahead of the 2016 election, demonstrators protested against Donald Trump, who had reportedly asked a policy expert why the U.S. couldn't use nuclear weapons. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty)
In the wake of what many perceived as an explicit threat to ignite a nuclear war on Tuesday, critics of President Donald Trump reacted with horror--calling it "frightening" and "crazy"--after the president threatened North Korea "with fire, fury, and frankly power the likes of which the world has never seen before."
Watch:
The statement came hours after several news outlets, citing internal U.S. intelligence assessments, reported that Kim Jong-un's regime has successfully made a nuclear warhead small enough to fit inside its missiles, an advancement that was reached sooner than military experts had predicted--and one that added to concerns that North Korea could be capable of building a nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) that could potentially reach the United States.
"That this threat comes between the anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki underlines the president's dangerous lack of appreciation of the horror and evil of nuclear war." --Jon Rainwater, PeaceActionTrump's threat added to the concerns of many who have strongly urged diplomacy to de-escalate tensions between the U.S., North and South Korea, and others in the region.
"The president's latest threat of 'fire, fury and frankly power, the likes of which this world has never seen before,' is clearly a reference to the use of nuclear weapons," said Jon Rainwater, executive director of Peace Action. "That this threat comes between the anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki underlines the president's dangerous lack of appreciation of the horror and evil of nuclear war."
He added, "'Fire and fury' isn't a strategy. Painstaking and sustained diplomacy of the type that led to the Iran deal is the only viable option with North Korea. It won't be easy but that's why the U.S. needs to drop its current preconditions for talks and get down to the hard work of hammering out a settlement to this political crisis."
Siegfried Hecker, the last known American official to inspect North Korea's nuclear facilities, said prior to Trump's statement that treating Kim Jong-un as though he is on the verge of attacking the U.S. is both inaccurate and dangerous.
"Some like to depict Kim as being crazy--a madman--and that makes the public believe that the guy is undeterrable," said Hecker. "He's not crazy and he's not suicidal. And he's not even unpredictable. The real threat is we're going to stumble into a nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula."
Journalists and advocates for responsible national security policy quickly took to social media to condemn Trump's threat and demand caution and diplomacy. Initiating the #PleaseDontKillUs hashtag and calling for dialogue, the peace advocacy group Win Without War declared, "We can't let reckless behavior lead to war."
Former White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer also wondered if Trump was speaking spontaneously about the threat of nuclear war, rather than relaying a new policy that had been reached after deliberations with his military advisors--an action that wouldn't be unprecedented by the president.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In the wake of what many perceived as an explicit threat to ignite a nuclear war on Tuesday, critics of President Donald Trump reacted with horror--calling it "frightening" and "crazy"--after the president threatened North Korea "with fire, fury, and frankly power the likes of which the world has never seen before."
Watch:
The statement came hours after several news outlets, citing internal U.S. intelligence assessments, reported that Kim Jong-un's regime has successfully made a nuclear warhead small enough to fit inside its missiles, an advancement that was reached sooner than military experts had predicted--and one that added to concerns that North Korea could be capable of building a nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) that could potentially reach the United States.
"That this threat comes between the anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki underlines the president's dangerous lack of appreciation of the horror and evil of nuclear war." --Jon Rainwater, PeaceActionTrump's threat added to the concerns of many who have strongly urged diplomacy to de-escalate tensions between the U.S., North and South Korea, and others in the region.
"The president's latest threat of 'fire, fury and frankly power, the likes of which this world has never seen before,' is clearly a reference to the use of nuclear weapons," said Jon Rainwater, executive director of Peace Action. "That this threat comes between the anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki underlines the president's dangerous lack of appreciation of the horror and evil of nuclear war."
He added, "'Fire and fury' isn't a strategy. Painstaking and sustained diplomacy of the type that led to the Iran deal is the only viable option with North Korea. It won't be easy but that's why the U.S. needs to drop its current preconditions for talks and get down to the hard work of hammering out a settlement to this political crisis."
Siegfried Hecker, the last known American official to inspect North Korea's nuclear facilities, said prior to Trump's statement that treating Kim Jong-un as though he is on the verge of attacking the U.S. is both inaccurate and dangerous.
"Some like to depict Kim as being crazy--a madman--and that makes the public believe that the guy is undeterrable," said Hecker. "He's not crazy and he's not suicidal. And he's not even unpredictable. The real threat is we're going to stumble into a nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula."
Journalists and advocates for responsible national security policy quickly took to social media to condemn Trump's threat and demand caution and diplomacy. Initiating the #PleaseDontKillUs hashtag and calling for dialogue, the peace advocacy group Win Without War declared, "We can't let reckless behavior lead to war."
Former White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer also wondered if Trump was speaking spontaneously about the threat of nuclear war, rather than relaying a new policy that had been reached after deliberations with his military advisors--an action that wouldn't be unprecedented by the president.
In the wake of what many perceived as an explicit threat to ignite a nuclear war on Tuesday, critics of President Donald Trump reacted with horror--calling it "frightening" and "crazy"--after the president threatened North Korea "with fire, fury, and frankly power the likes of which the world has never seen before."
Watch:
The statement came hours after several news outlets, citing internal U.S. intelligence assessments, reported that Kim Jong-un's regime has successfully made a nuclear warhead small enough to fit inside its missiles, an advancement that was reached sooner than military experts had predicted--and one that added to concerns that North Korea could be capable of building a nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) that could potentially reach the United States.
"That this threat comes between the anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki underlines the president's dangerous lack of appreciation of the horror and evil of nuclear war." --Jon Rainwater, PeaceActionTrump's threat added to the concerns of many who have strongly urged diplomacy to de-escalate tensions between the U.S., North and South Korea, and others in the region.
"The president's latest threat of 'fire, fury and frankly power, the likes of which this world has never seen before,' is clearly a reference to the use of nuclear weapons," said Jon Rainwater, executive director of Peace Action. "That this threat comes between the anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki underlines the president's dangerous lack of appreciation of the horror and evil of nuclear war."
He added, "'Fire and fury' isn't a strategy. Painstaking and sustained diplomacy of the type that led to the Iran deal is the only viable option with North Korea. It won't be easy but that's why the U.S. needs to drop its current preconditions for talks and get down to the hard work of hammering out a settlement to this political crisis."
Siegfried Hecker, the last known American official to inspect North Korea's nuclear facilities, said prior to Trump's statement that treating Kim Jong-un as though he is on the verge of attacking the U.S. is both inaccurate and dangerous.
"Some like to depict Kim as being crazy--a madman--and that makes the public believe that the guy is undeterrable," said Hecker. "He's not crazy and he's not suicidal. And he's not even unpredictable. The real threat is we're going to stumble into a nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula."
Journalists and advocates for responsible national security policy quickly took to social media to condemn Trump's threat and demand caution and diplomacy. Initiating the #PleaseDontKillUs hashtag and calling for dialogue, the peace advocacy group Win Without War declared, "We can't let reckless behavior lead to war."
Former White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer also wondered if Trump was speaking spontaneously about the threat of nuclear war, rather than relaying a new policy that had been reached after deliberations with his military advisors--an action that wouldn't be unprecedented by the president.