SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Whereas some argue, for example, that single-payer healthcare is impossible, those same voices remain "pretty quiet on the F-35 being a money pit." (Photo: Forsvarsdepartementet/flickr/cc)
The nation's most expensive weapons program isn't done showing U.S. taxpayers how much it will ultimately cost them, with Bloomberg reporting Monday that the F-35 fighter jet budget is now predicted to jump by a cool $27 billion.
"Think about [F-35's] $405 billion price tag when a family member dies of a preventable disease. Get angry."
Though the estimated future cost of the program had previously hovered at a mind-boggling $379 billion, an updated draft that could be submitted to Congress as early as today will reportedly exceed $406 billion--a nearly 7 percent increase.
The new cost increases may come as a hit to President Donald Trump, who has bragged about his ability to get weapons manufacturers to offer the Pentagon "better deals."
Rob Garver, national correspondent for the Fiscal Times, made the point this way:
Others simply pointed out how ridiculous it is that a weapons program so fraught with failures is allowed to receive such outlandish funding when lawmakers--mostly Republicans, but also many Democrats--continue to argue that the nation is "too broke" to increase spending on social programs that improve education or healthcare.
\u201cWe got fucking liberals out here saying single-payer is impossible but remaining pretty quiet on the F-35 being a money pit.\u201d— \ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51 (@\ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51) 1499712714
\u201cThe F-35 will never, ever be used. Think about it's $405 billion price tag when a family member dies of a preventable disease. Get angry.\u201d— \ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51 (@\ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51) 1499712714
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The nation's most expensive weapons program isn't done showing U.S. taxpayers how much it will ultimately cost them, with Bloomberg reporting Monday that the F-35 fighter jet budget is now predicted to jump by a cool $27 billion.
"Think about [F-35's] $405 billion price tag when a family member dies of a preventable disease. Get angry."
Though the estimated future cost of the program had previously hovered at a mind-boggling $379 billion, an updated draft that could be submitted to Congress as early as today will reportedly exceed $406 billion--a nearly 7 percent increase.
The new cost increases may come as a hit to President Donald Trump, who has bragged about his ability to get weapons manufacturers to offer the Pentagon "better deals."
Rob Garver, national correspondent for the Fiscal Times, made the point this way:
Others simply pointed out how ridiculous it is that a weapons program so fraught with failures is allowed to receive such outlandish funding when lawmakers--mostly Republicans, but also many Democrats--continue to argue that the nation is "too broke" to increase spending on social programs that improve education or healthcare.
\u201cWe got fucking liberals out here saying single-payer is impossible but remaining pretty quiet on the F-35 being a money pit.\u201d— \ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51 (@\ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51) 1499712714
\u201cThe F-35 will never, ever be used. Think about it's $405 billion price tag when a family member dies of a preventable disease. Get angry.\u201d— \ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51 (@\ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51) 1499712714
The nation's most expensive weapons program isn't done showing U.S. taxpayers how much it will ultimately cost them, with Bloomberg reporting Monday that the F-35 fighter jet budget is now predicted to jump by a cool $27 billion.
"Think about [F-35's] $405 billion price tag when a family member dies of a preventable disease. Get angry."
Though the estimated future cost of the program had previously hovered at a mind-boggling $379 billion, an updated draft that could be submitted to Congress as early as today will reportedly exceed $406 billion--a nearly 7 percent increase.
The new cost increases may come as a hit to President Donald Trump, who has bragged about his ability to get weapons manufacturers to offer the Pentagon "better deals."
Rob Garver, national correspondent for the Fiscal Times, made the point this way:
Others simply pointed out how ridiculous it is that a weapons program so fraught with failures is allowed to receive such outlandish funding when lawmakers--mostly Republicans, but also many Democrats--continue to argue that the nation is "too broke" to increase spending on social programs that improve education or healthcare.
\u201cWe got fucking liberals out here saying single-payer is impossible but remaining pretty quiet on the F-35 being a money pit.\u201d— \ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51 (@\ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51) 1499712714
\u201cThe F-35 will never, ever be used. Think about it's $405 billion price tag when a family member dies of a preventable disease. Get angry.\u201d— \ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51 (@\ud83d\udc51 \ud835\udd7d\ud835\udd94\ud835\udd9e\ud835\udd86\ud835\udd91 \ud83d\udc51) 1499712714