SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Trump, DeVos 'Betray' Students With Gift to Predatory For-Profit Schools
The Department of Education will delay Obama-era rules designed to help students defrauded by for-profit colleges
Jun 14, 2017
The Trump administration on Wednesday announced that rules designed to protect students from predatory for-profit schools will be delayed and possibly scrapped entirely.
"We need a Department of Education that will vigorously defend protections for vulnerable students, not enable the continued abuse and fraud we have fought against for years."
--Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey
"The new rules stood to benefit students from failed for-profit colleges already seeking to have their loans forgiven, as well as others who might be eligible to do so," the New York Times reported. "They also established tougher standards intended to check the flow of further federal funds to rogue for-profit operators."
The move was denounced by critics who characterized it as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to dismantle Obama-era regulations and give excessive leeway to institutions engaged in exploitative practices.
In response to the Department of Education's announcement, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey wrote that by working to delay borrower defense rules, Trump and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos "have betrayed students and families across the U.S."
"I'm going to sue them," she added.
On Tuesday, Healey and several other state attorneys general filed a motion to intervene in a California lawsuit--filed by an association of for-profit schools--challenging the same regulations the Trump administration is set to inhibit. As the Times noted, the Department of Education had previously cited the lawsuit as a reason to delay the rules.
"While Secretary DeVos and her advisors remain silent, a trade association backed by predatory, for-profit school executives is trying to dismantle one of our most important protections for students and taxpayers," Healey said in a statement. "We need a Department of Education that will vigorously defend protections for vulnerable students, not enable the continued abuse and fraud we have fought against for years."
Last week, Sens. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote a letter to Education Secretary DeVos requesting information on whether the administration would enforce the borrower defense rules and expressing their concern that blocking the rules would have harmful effects on students looking to escape loan traps set by for-profit schools.
"Delaying the borrower-defense rule would be a monumental dereliction of the duty you have to protect students and taxpayers, and would increase the risk of repeating the recent history of students left holding the bag while executives at collapsing institutions made away with millions in profits," the senators argued.
Now that the Trump administration seems set on halting the rules, student and consumer advocacy groups are joining lawmakers in pushing back.
Rohit Chopra, a senior fellow at the Consumer Federation of America, observed that the "current rules require schools that cheat their students to pony up funds for refunds. This helps to ensure that lawbreakers pay, not taxpayers."
The Education Department's decision to block the rules, Chopra concluded, "will lead to more students saddled with debt they cannot afford with taxpayers left on the hook."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Trump administration on Wednesday announced that rules designed to protect students from predatory for-profit schools will be delayed and possibly scrapped entirely.
"We need a Department of Education that will vigorously defend protections for vulnerable students, not enable the continued abuse and fraud we have fought against for years."
--Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey
"The new rules stood to benefit students from failed for-profit colleges already seeking to have their loans forgiven, as well as others who might be eligible to do so," the New York Times reported. "They also established tougher standards intended to check the flow of further federal funds to rogue for-profit operators."
The move was denounced by critics who characterized it as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to dismantle Obama-era regulations and give excessive leeway to institutions engaged in exploitative practices.
In response to the Department of Education's announcement, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey wrote that by working to delay borrower defense rules, Trump and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos "have betrayed students and families across the U.S."
"I'm going to sue them," she added.
On Tuesday, Healey and several other state attorneys general filed a motion to intervene in a California lawsuit--filed by an association of for-profit schools--challenging the same regulations the Trump administration is set to inhibit. As the Times noted, the Department of Education had previously cited the lawsuit as a reason to delay the rules.
"While Secretary DeVos and her advisors remain silent, a trade association backed by predatory, for-profit school executives is trying to dismantle one of our most important protections for students and taxpayers," Healey said in a statement. "We need a Department of Education that will vigorously defend protections for vulnerable students, not enable the continued abuse and fraud we have fought against for years."
Last week, Sens. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote a letter to Education Secretary DeVos requesting information on whether the administration would enforce the borrower defense rules and expressing their concern that blocking the rules would have harmful effects on students looking to escape loan traps set by for-profit schools.
"Delaying the borrower-defense rule would be a monumental dereliction of the duty you have to protect students and taxpayers, and would increase the risk of repeating the recent history of students left holding the bag while executives at collapsing institutions made away with millions in profits," the senators argued.
Now that the Trump administration seems set on halting the rules, student and consumer advocacy groups are joining lawmakers in pushing back.
Rohit Chopra, a senior fellow at the Consumer Federation of America, observed that the "current rules require schools that cheat their students to pony up funds for refunds. This helps to ensure that lawbreakers pay, not taxpayers."
The Education Department's decision to block the rules, Chopra concluded, "will lead to more students saddled with debt they cannot afford with taxpayers left on the hook."
The Trump administration on Wednesday announced that rules designed to protect students from predatory for-profit schools will be delayed and possibly scrapped entirely.
"We need a Department of Education that will vigorously defend protections for vulnerable students, not enable the continued abuse and fraud we have fought against for years."
--Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey
"The new rules stood to benefit students from failed for-profit colleges already seeking to have their loans forgiven, as well as others who might be eligible to do so," the New York Times reported. "They also established tougher standards intended to check the flow of further federal funds to rogue for-profit operators."
The move was denounced by critics who characterized it as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to dismantle Obama-era regulations and give excessive leeway to institutions engaged in exploitative practices.
In response to the Department of Education's announcement, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey wrote that by working to delay borrower defense rules, Trump and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos "have betrayed students and families across the U.S."
"I'm going to sue them," she added.
On Tuesday, Healey and several other state attorneys general filed a motion to intervene in a California lawsuit--filed by an association of for-profit schools--challenging the same regulations the Trump administration is set to inhibit. As the Times noted, the Department of Education had previously cited the lawsuit as a reason to delay the rules.
"While Secretary DeVos and her advisors remain silent, a trade association backed by predatory, for-profit school executives is trying to dismantle one of our most important protections for students and taxpayers," Healey said in a statement. "We need a Department of Education that will vigorously defend protections for vulnerable students, not enable the continued abuse and fraud we have fought against for years."
Last week, Sens. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote a letter to Education Secretary DeVos requesting information on whether the administration would enforce the borrower defense rules and expressing their concern that blocking the rules would have harmful effects on students looking to escape loan traps set by for-profit schools.
"Delaying the borrower-defense rule would be a monumental dereliction of the duty you have to protect students and taxpayers, and would increase the risk of repeating the recent history of students left holding the bag while executives at collapsing institutions made away with millions in profits," the senators argued.
Now that the Trump administration seems set on halting the rules, student and consumer advocacy groups are joining lawmakers in pushing back.
Rohit Chopra, a senior fellow at the Consumer Federation of America, observed that the "current rules require schools that cheat their students to pony up funds for refunds. This helps to ensure that lawbreakers pay, not taxpayers."
The Education Department's decision to block the rules, Chopra concluded, "will lead to more students saddled with debt they cannot afford with taxpayers left on the hook."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.