SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Umm... Err...': Brutally Long Silence by Top US Diplomat Speaks Volumes About Saudi Democracy
"How do you characterize Saudi Arabia's commitment to democracy?" A good question that is apparently hard for U.S. officials to answer.
May 31, 2017
Sometimes a nearly 20-second pause by a top U.S. official reveals much more than words could about the troubling lack of democracy in Saudi Arabia and the special relationship the United States retains with the repressive Gulf monarchy.
Recently returned from an overseas trip with President Donald Trump, Acting Assistant Secretary of State Stuart Jones was asked by a reporter on Tuesday about remarks made by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson when in Riyadh. But Jones' answer was more telling for what he couldn't say than what he ultimately managed to come up with.
Watch:
"While you were over there," Jones was asked, "the Secretary criticized the conduct of the Iranian elections and Iran's record on democracy. He did so standing next to Saudi officials. How do you characterize Saudi Arabia's commitment to democracy, and does the administration believe that democracy is a buffer or a barrier against extremism?"
Fumbling for words before entering into the prolonged pause, Jones seemed genuinely flummoxed by the request to square the Trump administration's rhetoric against Iran--which regularly holds nationwide elections and, in fact, had its most recent one while the president and his team were in the region--with its steadfast embrace of the Saudi regime, known for its anti-democratic posture and appalling human rights record.
As The Independent's Adam Lusher reports, the response by Jones
made no reference at all to attitudes to democracy in a kingdom where only three elections--all of them merely for local councils--have been allowed in 52 years.
The official State Department transcript seems to have tidied things up by removing the agonizing pause and the hesitations, but the video shows Mr Jones' full response to have been: "I think what we would say is that, uh, at this meeting, we were able to, err, make significant progress with Saudi and GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] partners in, uh, both making a strong statement against extremism and also, um, and also putting err...err, putting in place certain measures through this GCC mechanism where we can combat extremism.
"Clearly one source of extremism--one source--one err terrorism threat is coming from Iran. And that's coming from a part of the Iranian apparatus that is not at all responsive to its electorate."
The reporter who asked the question, Agence France-Presse's diplomatic correspondent Dave Clark, subsequently said his inquiry was not intended to embarrass Jones.
"I asked about Saudi democracy," Clark said with deference. "I found his pause eloquent."
But, he added, "It was pretty awkward being there."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sometimes a nearly 20-second pause by a top U.S. official reveals much more than words could about the troubling lack of democracy in Saudi Arabia and the special relationship the United States retains with the repressive Gulf monarchy.
Recently returned from an overseas trip with President Donald Trump, Acting Assistant Secretary of State Stuart Jones was asked by a reporter on Tuesday about remarks made by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson when in Riyadh. But Jones' answer was more telling for what he couldn't say than what he ultimately managed to come up with.
Watch:
"While you were over there," Jones was asked, "the Secretary criticized the conduct of the Iranian elections and Iran's record on democracy. He did so standing next to Saudi officials. How do you characterize Saudi Arabia's commitment to democracy, and does the administration believe that democracy is a buffer or a barrier against extremism?"
Fumbling for words before entering into the prolonged pause, Jones seemed genuinely flummoxed by the request to square the Trump administration's rhetoric against Iran--which regularly holds nationwide elections and, in fact, had its most recent one while the president and his team were in the region--with its steadfast embrace of the Saudi regime, known for its anti-democratic posture and appalling human rights record.
As The Independent's Adam Lusher reports, the response by Jones
made no reference at all to attitudes to democracy in a kingdom where only three elections--all of them merely for local councils--have been allowed in 52 years.
The official State Department transcript seems to have tidied things up by removing the agonizing pause and the hesitations, but the video shows Mr Jones' full response to have been: "I think what we would say is that, uh, at this meeting, we were able to, err, make significant progress with Saudi and GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] partners in, uh, both making a strong statement against extremism and also, um, and also putting err...err, putting in place certain measures through this GCC mechanism where we can combat extremism.
"Clearly one source of extremism--one source--one err terrorism threat is coming from Iran. And that's coming from a part of the Iranian apparatus that is not at all responsive to its electorate."
The reporter who asked the question, Agence France-Presse's diplomatic correspondent Dave Clark, subsequently said his inquiry was not intended to embarrass Jones.
"I asked about Saudi democracy," Clark said with deference. "I found his pause eloquent."
But, he added, "It was pretty awkward being there."
Sometimes a nearly 20-second pause by a top U.S. official reveals much more than words could about the troubling lack of democracy in Saudi Arabia and the special relationship the United States retains with the repressive Gulf monarchy.
Recently returned from an overseas trip with President Donald Trump, Acting Assistant Secretary of State Stuart Jones was asked by a reporter on Tuesday about remarks made by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson when in Riyadh. But Jones' answer was more telling for what he couldn't say than what he ultimately managed to come up with.
Watch:
"While you were over there," Jones was asked, "the Secretary criticized the conduct of the Iranian elections and Iran's record on democracy. He did so standing next to Saudi officials. How do you characterize Saudi Arabia's commitment to democracy, and does the administration believe that democracy is a buffer or a barrier against extremism?"
Fumbling for words before entering into the prolonged pause, Jones seemed genuinely flummoxed by the request to square the Trump administration's rhetoric against Iran--which regularly holds nationwide elections and, in fact, had its most recent one while the president and his team were in the region--with its steadfast embrace of the Saudi regime, known for its anti-democratic posture and appalling human rights record.
As The Independent's Adam Lusher reports, the response by Jones
made no reference at all to attitudes to democracy in a kingdom where only three elections--all of them merely for local councils--have been allowed in 52 years.
The official State Department transcript seems to have tidied things up by removing the agonizing pause and the hesitations, but the video shows Mr Jones' full response to have been: "I think what we would say is that, uh, at this meeting, we were able to, err, make significant progress with Saudi and GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] partners in, uh, both making a strong statement against extremism and also, um, and also putting err...err, putting in place certain measures through this GCC mechanism where we can combat extremism.
"Clearly one source of extremism--one source--one err terrorism threat is coming from Iran. And that's coming from a part of the Iranian apparatus that is not at all responsive to its electorate."
The reporter who asked the question, Agence France-Presse's diplomatic correspondent Dave Clark, subsequently said his inquiry was not intended to embarrass Jones.
"I asked about Saudi democracy," Clark said with deference. "I found his pause eloquent."
But, he added, "It was pretty awkward being there."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.