SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
New Analysis Shows 'Medicare for All' Can Cover Everyone While Cutting Costs
New financial analysis shows California's SB 562 would cut state spending on healthcare by almost 20 percent as new poll shows 7 in 10 voters support universal coverage plan
May 31, 2017
In addition to a new poll showing it would be extraordinarily popular, California's single-payer bill--the Healthy California Act--would also cut costs while providing coverage for all.
That is the conclusion of a new analysis (PDF) published on Wednesday by the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI).
"We estimate that, through implementation of Healthy California, overall costs of providing full health care coverage to all Californians could fall by about 18 percent relative to spending levels under the existing system," the authors of the report note.
They conclude:
In sum, the establishment of the Healthy California single-payer system will generate financial benefits for both families and businesses throughout the California economy. For families at most income levels and for businesses of most sizes, these financial benefits will be substantial. These benefits are in addition to those that the residents of California will achieve through having universal access to decent health care.
The analysis, which was commissioned by the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Association, adds fuel to an ongoing debate over the costs of insuring all Californians--a debate sure to reverberate nationally.
As the extremely unpopular American Health Care Act lingers in the Senate, polls increasingly show that most Americans view single-payer healthcare favorably. Last year, Gallup found that a majority of Americans would support replacing the Affordable Care Act with a Medicare-for-all style program. PERI's analysis attempts to show that such a program, if implemented correctly, is no utopian fantasy but rather fiscally sound public policy.
"What this new study proves is that we can finally achieve the dream of guaranteeing health care for all Californians, without the punishment of crippling out of pocket costs, at far less than what was predicted by those who make enormous profits off the pain and suffering of everyday Californians," said RoseAnn DeMoro, the executive director of National Nurses United.
According to a new survey published by Tulchin Research firm, Californians are strongly behind each of these objectives.
- 94 percent of respondents favor lower healthcare costs
- 82 percent "favor eliminating premiums, co-pays, deductibles, and all out of pocket expenses for covered services"
- 81 percent "support ensuring every Californian has healthcare"
- "70 percent of Californians favor establishing a public, Medicare for all type system"
Previous reporting suggested, contrary to PERI's findings, that the Healthy California Act would impose exorbitant and unsustainable costs on the state.
"Democrats' single-payer health-care dream just became a nightmare," CNBC ominously declared following the publication of a study conducted by the California State Senate, which found that the Healthy California Act would cost $400 billion annually.
Many, however, have questioned the extent to which the panic-stricken tones of major headlines align with the numbers. Matt Bruenig, writing for Jacobin, pointed out that, if the State Senate numbers are correct, California would ultimately spend "15 percent of the state's GDP" on healthcare--"three percentage points lower than the share of GDP the United States overall spends."
In conclusion, Bruenig noted that "if the plan would work like this report says it does and at the cost this report says it does, it is a no-brainer."
Some commentators have attempted to bolster the economic case for single-payer with a moral argument, as Sarah Jones did recently in The New Republic.
"It's a matter of policy, yes, but of morality too, and there is an unassailable moral logic for single-payer," Jones argued. "Opponents of single-payer must reckon with it, just as they ask advocates to reckon with political practicalities. Advocates must repeatedly ask: Is the status quo tolerable?"
Increasingly, judging by surveys of public opinion and town-hall confrontations, Americans are answering Jones's question with a resounding 'no.' In California, the goal for single-payer backers now is turning popular sentiment into political reality.
"Healthcare costs Californians billions and one-third of people with healthcare still don't have enough coverage," said California State Senator Ricardo Lara in a statement. "The good news is that California can get a lot more for our money and reduce the costs of healthcare for middle class families and businesses."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In addition to a new poll showing it would be extraordinarily popular, California's single-payer bill--the Healthy California Act--would also cut costs while providing coverage for all.
That is the conclusion of a new analysis (PDF) published on Wednesday by the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI).
"We estimate that, through implementation of Healthy California, overall costs of providing full health care coverage to all Californians could fall by about 18 percent relative to spending levels under the existing system," the authors of the report note.
They conclude:
In sum, the establishment of the Healthy California single-payer system will generate financial benefits for both families and businesses throughout the California economy. For families at most income levels and for businesses of most sizes, these financial benefits will be substantial. These benefits are in addition to those that the residents of California will achieve through having universal access to decent health care.
The analysis, which was commissioned by the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Association, adds fuel to an ongoing debate over the costs of insuring all Californians--a debate sure to reverberate nationally.
As the extremely unpopular American Health Care Act lingers in the Senate, polls increasingly show that most Americans view single-payer healthcare favorably. Last year, Gallup found that a majority of Americans would support replacing the Affordable Care Act with a Medicare-for-all style program. PERI's analysis attempts to show that such a program, if implemented correctly, is no utopian fantasy but rather fiscally sound public policy.
"What this new study proves is that we can finally achieve the dream of guaranteeing health care for all Californians, without the punishment of crippling out of pocket costs, at far less than what was predicted by those who make enormous profits off the pain and suffering of everyday Californians," said RoseAnn DeMoro, the executive director of National Nurses United.
According to a new survey published by Tulchin Research firm, Californians are strongly behind each of these objectives.
- 94 percent of respondents favor lower healthcare costs
- 82 percent "favor eliminating premiums, co-pays, deductibles, and all out of pocket expenses for covered services"
- 81 percent "support ensuring every Californian has healthcare"
- "70 percent of Californians favor establishing a public, Medicare for all type system"
Previous reporting suggested, contrary to PERI's findings, that the Healthy California Act would impose exorbitant and unsustainable costs on the state.
"Democrats' single-payer health-care dream just became a nightmare," CNBC ominously declared following the publication of a study conducted by the California State Senate, which found that the Healthy California Act would cost $400 billion annually.
Many, however, have questioned the extent to which the panic-stricken tones of major headlines align with the numbers. Matt Bruenig, writing for Jacobin, pointed out that, if the State Senate numbers are correct, California would ultimately spend "15 percent of the state's GDP" on healthcare--"three percentage points lower than the share of GDP the United States overall spends."
In conclusion, Bruenig noted that "if the plan would work like this report says it does and at the cost this report says it does, it is a no-brainer."
Some commentators have attempted to bolster the economic case for single-payer with a moral argument, as Sarah Jones did recently in The New Republic.
"It's a matter of policy, yes, but of morality too, and there is an unassailable moral logic for single-payer," Jones argued. "Opponents of single-payer must reckon with it, just as they ask advocates to reckon with political practicalities. Advocates must repeatedly ask: Is the status quo tolerable?"
Increasingly, judging by surveys of public opinion and town-hall confrontations, Americans are answering Jones's question with a resounding 'no.' In California, the goal for single-payer backers now is turning popular sentiment into political reality.
"Healthcare costs Californians billions and one-third of people with healthcare still don't have enough coverage," said California State Senator Ricardo Lara in a statement. "The good news is that California can get a lot more for our money and reduce the costs of healthcare for middle class families and businesses."
In addition to a new poll showing it would be extraordinarily popular, California's single-payer bill--the Healthy California Act--would also cut costs while providing coverage for all.
That is the conclusion of a new analysis (PDF) published on Wednesday by the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI).
"We estimate that, through implementation of Healthy California, overall costs of providing full health care coverage to all Californians could fall by about 18 percent relative to spending levels under the existing system," the authors of the report note.
They conclude:
In sum, the establishment of the Healthy California single-payer system will generate financial benefits for both families and businesses throughout the California economy. For families at most income levels and for businesses of most sizes, these financial benefits will be substantial. These benefits are in addition to those that the residents of California will achieve through having universal access to decent health care.
The analysis, which was commissioned by the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Association, adds fuel to an ongoing debate over the costs of insuring all Californians--a debate sure to reverberate nationally.
As the extremely unpopular American Health Care Act lingers in the Senate, polls increasingly show that most Americans view single-payer healthcare favorably. Last year, Gallup found that a majority of Americans would support replacing the Affordable Care Act with a Medicare-for-all style program. PERI's analysis attempts to show that such a program, if implemented correctly, is no utopian fantasy but rather fiscally sound public policy.
"What this new study proves is that we can finally achieve the dream of guaranteeing health care for all Californians, without the punishment of crippling out of pocket costs, at far less than what was predicted by those who make enormous profits off the pain and suffering of everyday Californians," said RoseAnn DeMoro, the executive director of National Nurses United.
According to a new survey published by Tulchin Research firm, Californians are strongly behind each of these objectives.
- 94 percent of respondents favor lower healthcare costs
- 82 percent "favor eliminating premiums, co-pays, deductibles, and all out of pocket expenses for covered services"
- 81 percent "support ensuring every Californian has healthcare"
- "70 percent of Californians favor establishing a public, Medicare for all type system"
Previous reporting suggested, contrary to PERI's findings, that the Healthy California Act would impose exorbitant and unsustainable costs on the state.
"Democrats' single-payer health-care dream just became a nightmare," CNBC ominously declared following the publication of a study conducted by the California State Senate, which found that the Healthy California Act would cost $400 billion annually.
Many, however, have questioned the extent to which the panic-stricken tones of major headlines align with the numbers. Matt Bruenig, writing for Jacobin, pointed out that, if the State Senate numbers are correct, California would ultimately spend "15 percent of the state's GDP" on healthcare--"three percentage points lower than the share of GDP the United States overall spends."
In conclusion, Bruenig noted that "if the plan would work like this report says it does and at the cost this report says it does, it is a no-brainer."
Some commentators have attempted to bolster the economic case for single-payer with a moral argument, as Sarah Jones did recently in The New Republic.
"It's a matter of policy, yes, but of morality too, and there is an unassailable moral logic for single-payer," Jones argued. "Opponents of single-payer must reckon with it, just as they ask advocates to reckon with political practicalities. Advocates must repeatedly ask: Is the status quo tolerable?"
Increasingly, judging by surveys of public opinion and town-hall confrontations, Americans are answering Jones's question with a resounding 'no.' In California, the goal for single-payer backers now is turning popular sentiment into political reality.
"Healthcare costs Californians billions and one-third of people with healthcare still don't have enough coverage," said California State Senator Ricardo Lara in a statement. "The good news is that California can get a lot more for our money and reduce the costs of healthcare for middle class families and businesses."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.