SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Law Expert Says Trump 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors' Already Evident
Trump asking Comey if he was under investigation 'is language of bribery.. of the underworld... not the language of a president who is supposed to be enforcing the rule of law.'
May 12, 2017
As conflicting accounts of what led to James Comey's firing linger and questions remain as to which equally troubling account of the dinner President Donald Trump had with the then-FBI director are accurate, one constitutional law expert has declared the developments "staggering" and evidence of "a series of high crimes and misdemeanors."
Speaking Thursday to MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell, Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe said that Trump directly asking Comey if he was under investigation, as the president indicated to NBC's Lester Holt during a "kryptonite" interview, "is much worse than just a conflict of interest."
"You're essentially dangling in front of the person who's supposed to be investigating the chaos swirling around you, and perhaps you, you're basically saying, 'If you will assure me that I'm not going to be under investigation, then maybe I'll keep you on. We'll see what happens.' It's essentially the language of bribery. It's the language of the underworld, of racketeering, not the language of a president who is supposed to be enforcing the rule of law," he said.
"It's staggering--for all the bizarre things that have happened in these 112 or 113 days, this is really like the 13th chime of a clock," Tribe continued.
As for the New York Times reporting on presumably the same one-one-one event which indicates Trump asked Comey to pledge his loyalty to the president, Tribe again said, "It's staggering. That is clearly, on its face, obstruction of justice."
"In this case, what loyalty means [...] is 'Can I count on you to not to make me a target of this investigation?'" Tribe said. "That's clearly an impermissible question. So either Trump's own account of the discussion is true, in which case he's guilty of obstruction of justice in one respect. Or much more likely Comey's account is true [...] in which case again Trump is guilty again of attempting to suborn obstruction of justice. Either way, as with the first article of impeachment against Richard Nixon, this is a series of high crimes and misdemeanors regardless of whether Trump was or was not part of a collusive plot with Russia to steal an American election."
According to Tribe, "we are in a situation where the only way to avoid constitutional crisis is for members of Congress to basically get a spine or 'grow a pair' and really stand up to their responsibilities to the law. We need an independent counsel, but we also need an independent Congress."
Watch the segment below:
Tribe further outlined his views on Comey's firing in an op-ed published Thursday at USA Today.
Writing jointly with former White House ethics lawyers Richard Painter and Norman Eisen, the trio argues that the sudden firing of Comey--for which Trump gave "'laughably pretextual" excuses--is "a challenge to the very premises of our system of checks and balances precisely because it violated no mere letter of the law but its essential spirit."
They further write that "the most important task is to credibly track down the details of the global financial entanglements that have ensnared this administration from the outset, and that have led to litigation against Trump under the Emoluments Clauses of the Constitution. That is likely the key to unlocking the mystery of what underlying conduct is so terrible that the Trump administration is willing to tie itself into knots and disgrace itself on the world stage to conceal its conduct."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As conflicting accounts of what led to James Comey's firing linger and questions remain as to which equally troubling account of the dinner President Donald Trump had with the then-FBI director are accurate, one constitutional law expert has declared the developments "staggering" and evidence of "a series of high crimes and misdemeanors."
Speaking Thursday to MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell, Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe said that Trump directly asking Comey if he was under investigation, as the president indicated to NBC's Lester Holt during a "kryptonite" interview, "is much worse than just a conflict of interest."
"You're essentially dangling in front of the person who's supposed to be investigating the chaos swirling around you, and perhaps you, you're basically saying, 'If you will assure me that I'm not going to be under investigation, then maybe I'll keep you on. We'll see what happens.' It's essentially the language of bribery. It's the language of the underworld, of racketeering, not the language of a president who is supposed to be enforcing the rule of law," he said.
"It's staggering--for all the bizarre things that have happened in these 112 or 113 days, this is really like the 13th chime of a clock," Tribe continued.
As for the New York Times reporting on presumably the same one-one-one event which indicates Trump asked Comey to pledge his loyalty to the president, Tribe again said, "It's staggering. That is clearly, on its face, obstruction of justice."
"In this case, what loyalty means [...] is 'Can I count on you to not to make me a target of this investigation?'" Tribe said. "That's clearly an impermissible question. So either Trump's own account of the discussion is true, in which case he's guilty of obstruction of justice in one respect. Or much more likely Comey's account is true [...] in which case again Trump is guilty again of attempting to suborn obstruction of justice. Either way, as with the first article of impeachment against Richard Nixon, this is a series of high crimes and misdemeanors regardless of whether Trump was or was not part of a collusive plot with Russia to steal an American election."
According to Tribe, "we are in a situation where the only way to avoid constitutional crisis is for members of Congress to basically get a spine or 'grow a pair' and really stand up to their responsibilities to the law. We need an independent counsel, but we also need an independent Congress."
Watch the segment below:
Tribe further outlined his views on Comey's firing in an op-ed published Thursday at USA Today.
Writing jointly with former White House ethics lawyers Richard Painter and Norman Eisen, the trio argues that the sudden firing of Comey--for which Trump gave "'laughably pretextual" excuses--is "a challenge to the very premises of our system of checks and balances precisely because it violated no mere letter of the law but its essential spirit."
They further write that "the most important task is to credibly track down the details of the global financial entanglements that have ensnared this administration from the outset, and that have led to litigation against Trump under the Emoluments Clauses of the Constitution. That is likely the key to unlocking the mystery of what underlying conduct is so terrible that the Trump administration is willing to tie itself into knots and disgrace itself on the world stage to conceal its conduct."
As conflicting accounts of what led to James Comey's firing linger and questions remain as to which equally troubling account of the dinner President Donald Trump had with the then-FBI director are accurate, one constitutional law expert has declared the developments "staggering" and evidence of "a series of high crimes and misdemeanors."
Speaking Thursday to MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell, Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe said that Trump directly asking Comey if he was under investigation, as the president indicated to NBC's Lester Holt during a "kryptonite" interview, "is much worse than just a conflict of interest."
"You're essentially dangling in front of the person who's supposed to be investigating the chaos swirling around you, and perhaps you, you're basically saying, 'If you will assure me that I'm not going to be under investigation, then maybe I'll keep you on. We'll see what happens.' It's essentially the language of bribery. It's the language of the underworld, of racketeering, not the language of a president who is supposed to be enforcing the rule of law," he said.
"It's staggering--for all the bizarre things that have happened in these 112 or 113 days, this is really like the 13th chime of a clock," Tribe continued.
As for the New York Times reporting on presumably the same one-one-one event which indicates Trump asked Comey to pledge his loyalty to the president, Tribe again said, "It's staggering. That is clearly, on its face, obstruction of justice."
"In this case, what loyalty means [...] is 'Can I count on you to not to make me a target of this investigation?'" Tribe said. "That's clearly an impermissible question. So either Trump's own account of the discussion is true, in which case he's guilty of obstruction of justice in one respect. Or much more likely Comey's account is true [...] in which case again Trump is guilty again of attempting to suborn obstruction of justice. Either way, as with the first article of impeachment against Richard Nixon, this is a series of high crimes and misdemeanors regardless of whether Trump was or was not part of a collusive plot with Russia to steal an American election."
According to Tribe, "we are in a situation where the only way to avoid constitutional crisis is for members of Congress to basically get a spine or 'grow a pair' and really stand up to their responsibilities to the law. We need an independent counsel, but we also need an independent Congress."
Watch the segment below:
Tribe further outlined his views on Comey's firing in an op-ed published Thursday at USA Today.
Writing jointly with former White House ethics lawyers Richard Painter and Norman Eisen, the trio argues that the sudden firing of Comey--for which Trump gave "'laughably pretextual" excuses--is "a challenge to the very premises of our system of checks and balances precisely because it violated no mere letter of the law but its essential spirit."
They further write that "the most important task is to credibly track down the details of the global financial entanglements that have ensnared this administration from the outset, and that have led to litigation against Trump under the Emoluments Clauses of the Constitution. That is likely the key to unlocking the mystery of what underlying conduct is so terrible that the Trump administration is willing to tie itself into knots and disgrace itself on the world stage to conceal its conduct."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.