SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Because It's Time for 'New, Radical Ideas,' TED Talk on Universal Basic Income Gets Thunderous Applause
'Just imagine how much talent we would unleash if we got rid of poverty once and for all,' said historian Rutger Bregman during talk
Apr 26, 2017
The post will be updated to include video when the Bregman's TED Talk becomes available.
If the kind of reception the idea of a universal basic income received Tuesday is any gauge, political leaders should take note.
According to Business Insider, it "just got a standing ovation at this year's TED conference."
The cheers came during historian Rutger Bregman's talk at TED2017 in Vancouver, in which he touted the social welfare concept of providing people with income to pay for their basic needs as a means of tackling poverty.
The TEDBlog wrote:
According to Bregman, a basic income in the United States would cost $175 billion, just a quarter of the U.S.'s military budget. And universal basic income impacts the future of work itself--it's a complete rethink of what "work" actually is. Ultimately, Bregman believes in a "future where the value of your work is not determined by the size of your paycheck, but by the amount of happiness you spread and the amount of meaning you give."
Bregman also said in his talk: "Just imagine how much talent we would unleash if we got rid of poverty once and for all."
The concept the Utopia for Realists author is floating is far from new, and recent examples are easy to find. As Laura Williams, activism officer at the U.K.-based advocacy group Global Justice Now, noted recently: "In 2008-2009 Namibia experimented with the world-wide first Basic Income Grant pilot project in Otjivero - Omitara and found that the project led to reduction in poverty, increase in economic activity, and improvements in health. A similar series of trials in India produced similar results."
More evidence is set to come from the Canadian province of Ontario, where a pilot universal basic income program is set to launch in three cities.
"If we look at the evidence, we don't have to be worried at all about huge reductions in work hours, or that people will be lazy," Bregman said to Huffington Post Australia last month. "In fact, it's to the contrary, especially for people living in poverty. They will have the means to get up and do something and contribute to the common good, and a lot of people not in poverty but in so called 'bullshit jobs' will be able to quit those jobs and do something that they consider to be fulfilling and useful," he added.
Writing last month at the Guardian, Bregman likened universal basic income to "venture capital for the people":
While it won't solve all the world's ills--and ideas such as a rent cap and more social housing are necessary in places where housing is scarce--a basic income would work like venture capital for the people. We can't afford not to do it--poverty is hugely expensive. The costs of child poverty in the U.S. are estimated at $500bn (PS410bn) each year, in terms of higher healthcare spending, less education, and more crime. It's an incredible waste of potential. It would cost just $175bn, a quarter of the country's current military budget, to do what Dauphin [a city in Manitoba, Canada, which had a successful experiment in basic income] did long ago: eradicate poverty.
That should be our goal. The time for small thoughts and little nudges is past. The time has come for new, radical ideas. If this sounds utopian to you, then remember that every milestone of civilisation--the end of slavery, democracy, equal rights for men and women--was once a utopian fantasy too.
Bregman's new talk comes amidst increasing inequality and as automation (read: computers and robots) takes over some lower-wage jobs, thus setting the stage to "amplify economic disparities."
Looking at a possible "robot uprising," George Dvorsky, contributing editor at Gizmodo, wrote:
Advocates argue that a basic income is essential to a comprehensive strategy for reducing poverty because it offers extra income with no strings attached. But looking ahead to the future, we may have little choice but to implement it. Given the ever-increasing concentration of wealth and the frightening prospect of technological unemployment, it will be required to prevent complete social and economic collapse. It's not a question of if, but how soon.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The post will be updated to include video when the Bregman's TED Talk becomes available.
If the kind of reception the idea of a universal basic income received Tuesday is any gauge, political leaders should take note.
According to Business Insider, it "just got a standing ovation at this year's TED conference."
The cheers came during historian Rutger Bregman's talk at TED2017 in Vancouver, in which he touted the social welfare concept of providing people with income to pay for their basic needs as a means of tackling poverty.
The TEDBlog wrote:
According to Bregman, a basic income in the United States would cost $175 billion, just a quarter of the U.S.'s military budget. And universal basic income impacts the future of work itself--it's a complete rethink of what "work" actually is. Ultimately, Bregman believes in a "future where the value of your work is not determined by the size of your paycheck, but by the amount of happiness you spread and the amount of meaning you give."
Bregman also said in his talk: "Just imagine how much talent we would unleash if we got rid of poverty once and for all."
The concept the Utopia for Realists author is floating is far from new, and recent examples are easy to find. As Laura Williams, activism officer at the U.K.-based advocacy group Global Justice Now, noted recently: "In 2008-2009 Namibia experimented with the world-wide first Basic Income Grant pilot project in Otjivero - Omitara and found that the project led to reduction in poverty, increase in economic activity, and improvements in health. A similar series of trials in India produced similar results."
More evidence is set to come from the Canadian province of Ontario, where a pilot universal basic income program is set to launch in three cities.
"If we look at the evidence, we don't have to be worried at all about huge reductions in work hours, or that people will be lazy," Bregman said to Huffington Post Australia last month. "In fact, it's to the contrary, especially for people living in poverty. They will have the means to get up and do something and contribute to the common good, and a lot of people not in poverty but in so called 'bullshit jobs' will be able to quit those jobs and do something that they consider to be fulfilling and useful," he added.
Writing last month at the Guardian, Bregman likened universal basic income to "venture capital for the people":
While it won't solve all the world's ills--and ideas such as a rent cap and more social housing are necessary in places where housing is scarce--a basic income would work like venture capital for the people. We can't afford not to do it--poverty is hugely expensive. The costs of child poverty in the U.S. are estimated at $500bn (PS410bn) each year, in terms of higher healthcare spending, less education, and more crime. It's an incredible waste of potential. It would cost just $175bn, a quarter of the country's current military budget, to do what Dauphin [a city in Manitoba, Canada, which had a successful experiment in basic income] did long ago: eradicate poverty.
That should be our goal. The time for small thoughts and little nudges is past. The time has come for new, radical ideas. If this sounds utopian to you, then remember that every milestone of civilisation--the end of slavery, democracy, equal rights for men and women--was once a utopian fantasy too.
Bregman's new talk comes amidst increasing inequality and as automation (read: computers and robots) takes over some lower-wage jobs, thus setting the stage to "amplify economic disparities."
Looking at a possible "robot uprising," George Dvorsky, contributing editor at Gizmodo, wrote:
Advocates argue that a basic income is essential to a comprehensive strategy for reducing poverty because it offers extra income with no strings attached. But looking ahead to the future, we may have little choice but to implement it. Given the ever-increasing concentration of wealth and the frightening prospect of technological unemployment, it will be required to prevent complete social and economic collapse. It's not a question of if, but how soon.
The post will be updated to include video when the Bregman's TED Talk becomes available.
If the kind of reception the idea of a universal basic income received Tuesday is any gauge, political leaders should take note.
According to Business Insider, it "just got a standing ovation at this year's TED conference."
The cheers came during historian Rutger Bregman's talk at TED2017 in Vancouver, in which he touted the social welfare concept of providing people with income to pay for their basic needs as a means of tackling poverty.
The TEDBlog wrote:
According to Bregman, a basic income in the United States would cost $175 billion, just a quarter of the U.S.'s military budget. And universal basic income impacts the future of work itself--it's a complete rethink of what "work" actually is. Ultimately, Bregman believes in a "future where the value of your work is not determined by the size of your paycheck, but by the amount of happiness you spread and the amount of meaning you give."
Bregman also said in his talk: "Just imagine how much talent we would unleash if we got rid of poverty once and for all."
The concept the Utopia for Realists author is floating is far from new, and recent examples are easy to find. As Laura Williams, activism officer at the U.K.-based advocacy group Global Justice Now, noted recently: "In 2008-2009 Namibia experimented with the world-wide first Basic Income Grant pilot project in Otjivero - Omitara and found that the project led to reduction in poverty, increase in economic activity, and improvements in health. A similar series of trials in India produced similar results."
More evidence is set to come from the Canadian province of Ontario, where a pilot universal basic income program is set to launch in three cities.
"If we look at the evidence, we don't have to be worried at all about huge reductions in work hours, or that people will be lazy," Bregman said to Huffington Post Australia last month. "In fact, it's to the contrary, especially for people living in poverty. They will have the means to get up and do something and contribute to the common good, and a lot of people not in poverty but in so called 'bullshit jobs' will be able to quit those jobs and do something that they consider to be fulfilling and useful," he added.
Writing last month at the Guardian, Bregman likened universal basic income to "venture capital for the people":
While it won't solve all the world's ills--and ideas such as a rent cap and more social housing are necessary in places where housing is scarce--a basic income would work like venture capital for the people. We can't afford not to do it--poverty is hugely expensive. The costs of child poverty in the U.S. are estimated at $500bn (PS410bn) each year, in terms of higher healthcare spending, less education, and more crime. It's an incredible waste of potential. It would cost just $175bn, a quarter of the country's current military budget, to do what Dauphin [a city in Manitoba, Canada, which had a successful experiment in basic income] did long ago: eradicate poverty.
That should be our goal. The time for small thoughts and little nudges is past. The time has come for new, radical ideas. If this sounds utopian to you, then remember that every milestone of civilisation--the end of slavery, democracy, equal rights for men and women--was once a utopian fantasy too.
Bregman's new talk comes amidst increasing inequality and as automation (read: computers and robots) takes over some lower-wage jobs, thus setting the stage to "amplify economic disparities."
Looking at a possible "robot uprising," George Dvorsky, contributing editor at Gizmodo, wrote:
Advocates argue that a basic income is essential to a comprehensive strategy for reducing poverty because it offers extra income with no strings attached. But looking ahead to the future, we may have little choice but to implement it. Given the ever-increasing concentration of wealth and the frightening prospect of technological unemployment, it will be required to prevent complete social and economic collapse. It's not a question of if, but how soon.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.