SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'The Day the Senate Died': Republicans Go Nuclear Over Neil Gorsuch
'The Senate was supposed to be better than this'
Apr 06, 2017
This story may be updated.
Update:
Republicans in the U.S. Senate successfully rewrote the rules on Thursday, with a 52-48 party-line vote triggering the so-called "nuclear option" that lowers the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees.
NARAL Pro-Choice America called it "the day the Senate died."
Subsequently, the chamber voted 55-45 to end debate on Neil Gorsuch's nomination, with Democrats Joe Donnelly (Ind.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), and Joe Manchin (W.Va.) voting with Republicans. The three Democrats (along with Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado) bucked their party's filibuster earlier Thursday.
This sets up a vote on Gorsuch's confirmation for Friday.
Update:
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) cast the 41st vote against cloture on Thursday morning, teeing up the GOP's "nuclear option" that would change the rules of the U.S. Senate.
Four Democrats--Michael Bennet (Colo.), Joe Donnelly (Ind.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), and Joe Manchin (W.Va.)--voted to advance Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, but the 55-45 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to proceed.
Now, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is expected to move forward with votes to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees.
Even as that prospect loomed, advocacy groups pleaded with Republicans to change their nominee--not the rules.
"Today's failure by the Senate Republicans to secure 60 votes to move forward on President Trump's nominee to the Supreme Court speaks to the flaws of Judge Gorsuch, not the rules of the Senate," said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, following the vote. "Instead of selecting a consensus nominee, the president chose someone who was proposed by the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society and who has shown that he will not support the interests of everyday Americans. It's time for the Republican Party to change the nominee, not the rules."
Earlier:
All eyes on are on the U.S. Senate Thursday, as the showdown over President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, reaches its apex.
After Democrats mount their expected filibuster, denying a motion to end debate, Senate Republicans are set to "go nuclear" late Thursday morning, with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) ready to call for a vote on permanently changing chamber rules to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees. According to The Hill, "a 52-48 vote to change the rule is expected, with all Democrats and their Independent allies opposed."
Roll Call has a run-down of how Thursday could play out:
"It's a sad day," Jennifer Lawless, a government professor and director of the Women and Politics Institute at American University, told USA Today. "The Senate was supposed to be better than this."
McConnell has vowed that Gorsuch will be confirmed on Friday, before the Senate leaves for a two-week recess.
Watch the proceedings live on C-SPAN.
Meanwhile, advocacy groups and the grassroots resistance movement continue to protest Gorsuch as an extreme nominee with a troubling record on women's rights, worker protections, and big money in politics.
Eight people were reportedly arrested Thursday morning in the Hart Senate building during a sit-in demanding a no vote on Gorsuch:
Opponents also held a rally in the Capitol on Thursday, at which Democratic senators--including Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who held the Senate floor for more than 15 hours against Gorsuch this week--once again voiced their reservations about both the nominee and the prospect of going nuclear.
Follow the action online:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
This story may be updated.
Update:
Republicans in the U.S. Senate successfully rewrote the rules on Thursday, with a 52-48 party-line vote triggering the so-called "nuclear option" that lowers the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees.
NARAL Pro-Choice America called it "the day the Senate died."
Subsequently, the chamber voted 55-45 to end debate on Neil Gorsuch's nomination, with Democrats Joe Donnelly (Ind.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), and Joe Manchin (W.Va.) voting with Republicans. The three Democrats (along with Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado) bucked their party's filibuster earlier Thursday.
This sets up a vote on Gorsuch's confirmation for Friday.
Update:
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) cast the 41st vote against cloture on Thursday morning, teeing up the GOP's "nuclear option" that would change the rules of the U.S. Senate.
Four Democrats--Michael Bennet (Colo.), Joe Donnelly (Ind.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), and Joe Manchin (W.Va.)--voted to advance Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, but the 55-45 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to proceed.
Now, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is expected to move forward with votes to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees.
Even as that prospect loomed, advocacy groups pleaded with Republicans to change their nominee--not the rules.
"Today's failure by the Senate Republicans to secure 60 votes to move forward on President Trump's nominee to the Supreme Court speaks to the flaws of Judge Gorsuch, not the rules of the Senate," said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, following the vote. "Instead of selecting a consensus nominee, the president chose someone who was proposed by the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society and who has shown that he will not support the interests of everyday Americans. It's time for the Republican Party to change the nominee, not the rules."
Earlier:
All eyes on are on the U.S. Senate Thursday, as the showdown over President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, reaches its apex.
After Democrats mount their expected filibuster, denying a motion to end debate, Senate Republicans are set to "go nuclear" late Thursday morning, with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) ready to call for a vote on permanently changing chamber rules to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees. According to The Hill, "a 52-48 vote to change the rule is expected, with all Democrats and their Independent allies opposed."
Roll Call has a run-down of how Thursday could play out:
"It's a sad day," Jennifer Lawless, a government professor and director of the Women and Politics Institute at American University, told USA Today. "The Senate was supposed to be better than this."
McConnell has vowed that Gorsuch will be confirmed on Friday, before the Senate leaves for a two-week recess.
Watch the proceedings live on C-SPAN.
Meanwhile, advocacy groups and the grassroots resistance movement continue to protest Gorsuch as an extreme nominee with a troubling record on women's rights, worker protections, and big money in politics.
Eight people were reportedly arrested Thursday morning in the Hart Senate building during a sit-in demanding a no vote on Gorsuch:
Opponents also held a rally in the Capitol on Thursday, at which Democratic senators--including Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who held the Senate floor for more than 15 hours against Gorsuch this week--once again voiced their reservations about both the nominee and the prospect of going nuclear.
Follow the action online:
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
This story may be updated.
Update:
Republicans in the U.S. Senate successfully rewrote the rules on Thursday, with a 52-48 party-line vote triggering the so-called "nuclear option" that lowers the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees.
NARAL Pro-Choice America called it "the day the Senate died."
Subsequently, the chamber voted 55-45 to end debate on Neil Gorsuch's nomination, with Democrats Joe Donnelly (Ind.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), and Joe Manchin (W.Va.) voting with Republicans. The three Democrats (along with Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado) bucked their party's filibuster earlier Thursday.
This sets up a vote on Gorsuch's confirmation for Friday.
Update:
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) cast the 41st vote against cloture on Thursday morning, teeing up the GOP's "nuclear option" that would change the rules of the U.S. Senate.
Four Democrats--Michael Bennet (Colo.), Joe Donnelly (Ind.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), and Joe Manchin (W.Va.)--voted to advance Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, but the 55-45 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to proceed.
Now, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is expected to move forward with votes to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees.
Even as that prospect loomed, advocacy groups pleaded with Republicans to change their nominee--not the rules.
"Today's failure by the Senate Republicans to secure 60 votes to move forward on President Trump's nominee to the Supreme Court speaks to the flaws of Judge Gorsuch, not the rules of the Senate," said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, following the vote. "Instead of selecting a consensus nominee, the president chose someone who was proposed by the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society and who has shown that he will not support the interests of everyday Americans. It's time for the Republican Party to change the nominee, not the rules."
Earlier:
All eyes on are on the U.S. Senate Thursday, as the showdown over President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, reaches its apex.
After Democrats mount their expected filibuster, denying a motion to end debate, Senate Republicans are set to "go nuclear" late Thursday morning, with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) ready to call for a vote on permanently changing chamber rules to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees. According to The Hill, "a 52-48 vote to change the rule is expected, with all Democrats and their Independent allies opposed."
Roll Call has a run-down of how Thursday could play out:
"It's a sad day," Jennifer Lawless, a government professor and director of the Women and Politics Institute at American University, told USA Today. "The Senate was supposed to be better than this."
McConnell has vowed that Gorsuch will be confirmed on Friday, before the Senate leaves for a two-week recess.
Watch the proceedings live on C-SPAN.
Meanwhile, advocacy groups and the grassroots resistance movement continue to protest Gorsuch as an extreme nominee with a troubling record on women's rights, worker protections, and big money in politics.
Eight people were reportedly arrested Thursday morning in the Hart Senate building during a sit-in demanding a no vote on Gorsuch:
Opponents also held a rally in the Capitol on Thursday, at which Democratic senators--including Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who held the Senate floor for more than 15 hours against Gorsuch this week--once again voiced their reservations about both the nominee and the prospect of going nuclear.
Follow the action online:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.