SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Outcry as Trump Slashes Funding for World's Most Vulnerable Mothers and Newborns
Trump's State Department falsely claims that UN agency supports "a program of coerced abortion or involuntary sterilization"
Apr 04, 2017
President Donald Trump's State Department announced late Monday that it was cutting off millions of dollars in funding for a United Nations family planning agency that offers reproductive and maternal health services worldwide, serving tens of thousands of women.
Rights advocates and journalists expressed concern about the decision, citing the enormous positive impacts of the agency's work.
"The money the U.S. administration now wants to withdraw would have been spent on health care for some of the poorest and most vulnerable women and girls in the world," said International Planned Parenthood Federation director general Tewodros Melesse in a statement. "It will take away funding for contraception, maternal care, and the safe delivery of babies, as well as programs to counter gender-based violence."
The U.S. was the third-largest donor to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) last year, contributing $75 million.
As rationale for its decision, the State Department falsely claimed that the UN agency takes part in "a program of coerced abortion or forced sterilization" in China.
However, BuzzFeed notes that "[t]he State Department's determination contradicts its own 2001 inquiry into whether UNFPA funding supports coercive Chinese reproductive health policies."
UNFPA swiftly set the record straight in a statement, describing the United States' claim as "erroneous."
"UNFPA refutes this claim," the agency wrote, "as all of its work promotes the human rights of individuals and couples to make their own decisions, free of coercion or discrimination. Indeed, United Nations Member States have long described UNFPA's work in China as a force for good."
The BBC reports that the agency's work includes:
- Helping women and young people to access sexual and reproductive services, including family planning
- Preventing unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions
- Supporting maternal health
- Programs in the world's "most fragile" countries, including Iraq, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia
"The support we received over the years from the Government and people of the United States has saved tens of thousands of mothers from preventable deaths and disabilities, and especially now in the rapidly developing global humanitarian crises," UNFPA wrote.
The State Department's decision "has absolutely nothing to do with defending human rights in China or anywhere else," Brian Dixon, senior vice president at the Population Connection Action Fund, charged in a statement. "This administration has no concern for reproductive autonomy of Chinese women or women anywhere. Today's action is just another assault on their freedom, their autonomy, and their empowerment."
Indeed, the administration's latest attack on international women's healthcare programs follows its January reinstatement of the so-called global gag rule, which cuts off funding for reproductive healthcare nonprofits that allow doctors to discuss abortion with patients. Like the gag rule, the UNFPA has been a frequent target of Republican presidential administrations.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's State Department announced late Monday that it was cutting off millions of dollars in funding for a United Nations family planning agency that offers reproductive and maternal health services worldwide, serving tens of thousands of women.
Rights advocates and journalists expressed concern about the decision, citing the enormous positive impacts of the agency's work.
"The money the U.S. administration now wants to withdraw would have been spent on health care for some of the poorest and most vulnerable women and girls in the world," said International Planned Parenthood Federation director general Tewodros Melesse in a statement. "It will take away funding for contraception, maternal care, and the safe delivery of babies, as well as programs to counter gender-based violence."
The U.S. was the third-largest donor to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) last year, contributing $75 million.
As rationale for its decision, the State Department falsely claimed that the UN agency takes part in "a program of coerced abortion or forced sterilization" in China.
However, BuzzFeed notes that "[t]he State Department's determination contradicts its own 2001 inquiry into whether UNFPA funding supports coercive Chinese reproductive health policies."
UNFPA swiftly set the record straight in a statement, describing the United States' claim as "erroneous."
"UNFPA refutes this claim," the agency wrote, "as all of its work promotes the human rights of individuals and couples to make their own decisions, free of coercion or discrimination. Indeed, United Nations Member States have long described UNFPA's work in China as a force for good."
The BBC reports that the agency's work includes:
- Helping women and young people to access sexual and reproductive services, including family planning
- Preventing unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions
- Supporting maternal health
- Programs in the world's "most fragile" countries, including Iraq, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia
"The support we received over the years from the Government and people of the United States has saved tens of thousands of mothers from preventable deaths and disabilities, and especially now in the rapidly developing global humanitarian crises," UNFPA wrote.
The State Department's decision "has absolutely nothing to do with defending human rights in China or anywhere else," Brian Dixon, senior vice president at the Population Connection Action Fund, charged in a statement. "This administration has no concern for reproductive autonomy of Chinese women or women anywhere. Today's action is just another assault on their freedom, their autonomy, and their empowerment."
Indeed, the administration's latest attack on international women's healthcare programs follows its January reinstatement of the so-called global gag rule, which cuts off funding for reproductive healthcare nonprofits that allow doctors to discuss abortion with patients. Like the gag rule, the UNFPA has been a frequent target of Republican presidential administrations.
President Donald Trump's State Department announced late Monday that it was cutting off millions of dollars in funding for a United Nations family planning agency that offers reproductive and maternal health services worldwide, serving tens of thousands of women.
Rights advocates and journalists expressed concern about the decision, citing the enormous positive impacts of the agency's work.
"The money the U.S. administration now wants to withdraw would have been spent on health care for some of the poorest and most vulnerable women and girls in the world," said International Planned Parenthood Federation director general Tewodros Melesse in a statement. "It will take away funding for contraception, maternal care, and the safe delivery of babies, as well as programs to counter gender-based violence."
The U.S. was the third-largest donor to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) last year, contributing $75 million.
As rationale for its decision, the State Department falsely claimed that the UN agency takes part in "a program of coerced abortion or forced sterilization" in China.
However, BuzzFeed notes that "[t]he State Department's determination contradicts its own 2001 inquiry into whether UNFPA funding supports coercive Chinese reproductive health policies."
UNFPA swiftly set the record straight in a statement, describing the United States' claim as "erroneous."
"UNFPA refutes this claim," the agency wrote, "as all of its work promotes the human rights of individuals and couples to make their own decisions, free of coercion or discrimination. Indeed, United Nations Member States have long described UNFPA's work in China as a force for good."
The BBC reports that the agency's work includes:
- Helping women and young people to access sexual and reproductive services, including family planning
- Preventing unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions
- Supporting maternal health
- Programs in the world's "most fragile" countries, including Iraq, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia
"The support we received over the years from the Government and people of the United States has saved tens of thousands of mothers from preventable deaths and disabilities, and especially now in the rapidly developing global humanitarian crises," UNFPA wrote.
The State Department's decision "has absolutely nothing to do with defending human rights in China or anywhere else," Brian Dixon, senior vice president at the Population Connection Action Fund, charged in a statement. "This administration has no concern for reproductive autonomy of Chinese women or women anywhere. Today's action is just another assault on their freedom, their autonomy, and their empowerment."
Indeed, the administration's latest attack on international women's healthcare programs follows its January reinstatement of the so-called global gag rule, which cuts off funding for reproductive healthcare nonprofits that allow doctors to discuss abortion with patients. Like the gag rule, the UNFPA has been a frequent target of Republican presidential administrations.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.