SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Trump's "Reorganize Government" Order More Like Plan to Destroy It
"This 'reorganization' of the executive departments sounds very much like how a polar bear 'reorganizes' your innards prior to making a meal of you"
Mar 15, 2017
President Donald Trump's latest executive order, signed during the chaos of the GOP's healthcare scoring report this week, instructs department heads to recommend any "unnecessary" agencies or programs to be slashed as part of a plan for "reorganizing" the federal government--and could spell disaster for agencies like the Department of Education, critics warn.
The order, officially titled the Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch, instructs agencies to consider:
- Whether "some or all of the functions of an agency, a component, or a program are appropriate for the federal government or would be better left to state or local governments or to the private sector through free enterprise";
- Whether "some or all of the functions of an agency, a component, or a program are redundant, including with those of another agency, component, or program";
- Whether "certain administrative capabilities necessary for operating an agency, a component, or a program are redundant with those of another agency, component, or program";
- Whether the "costs of continuing to operate an agency, a component, or a program are justified by the public benefits it provides"; and
- "The costs of shutting down or merging agencies, components, or programs, including the costs of addressing the equities of affected agency staff."
Put simply, as Charles P. Pierce wrote for Esquire on Tuesday, the order gives Trump and his advisers the power to "eviscerate the federal agencies that might inconvenience them by actually acting like they're part of the government or something."
Trump's first proposed budget, announced last month, which follows a hard-line blueprint put forward by the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank, included massive cuts to discretionary spending. The official budget is expected to come this week. Pierce suggested Tuesday that the executive order could act as something of a backup in case those proposed cuts don't pass muster in Congress.
Noting chief strategist Steve Bannon's behind-the-scenes power in the White House, "it seems likely that this is the fundamental purpose behind the order," Pierce wrote.
"This 'reorganization' of the executive departments sounds very much like how a polar bear 'reorganizes' your innards prior to making a meal of you," he added.
And as Education Week reporter Andrew Ujifusa warned, one of the agencies almost certain to be on the biggest chopping block is the Department of Education.
"On the campaign trail, Trump talked about either shutting down the Education Department or significantly slashing its budget," he wrote. And while there hasn't been any word yet what his administration plans to do with the office, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has indicated her support for massive cuts.
"DeVos is essentially on the same page as Trump on this issue," Ujifusa continued. "Last month, she announced that she would look through the Education Department budget in order to identify unnecessary programs. DeVos is a long-time donor to GOP candidates and causes who has advocated for a limited federal government role."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
President Donald Trump's latest executive order, signed during the chaos of the GOP's healthcare scoring report this week, instructs department heads to recommend any "unnecessary" agencies or programs to be slashed as part of a plan for "reorganizing" the federal government--and could spell disaster for agencies like the Department of Education, critics warn.
The order, officially titled the Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch, instructs agencies to consider:
- Whether "some or all of the functions of an agency, a component, or a program are appropriate for the federal government or would be better left to state or local governments or to the private sector through free enterprise";
- Whether "some or all of the functions of an agency, a component, or a program are redundant, including with those of another agency, component, or program";
- Whether "certain administrative capabilities necessary for operating an agency, a component, or a program are redundant with those of another agency, component, or program";
- Whether the "costs of continuing to operate an agency, a component, or a program are justified by the public benefits it provides"; and
- "The costs of shutting down or merging agencies, components, or programs, including the costs of addressing the equities of affected agency staff."
Put simply, as Charles P. Pierce wrote for Esquire on Tuesday, the order gives Trump and his advisers the power to "eviscerate the federal agencies that might inconvenience them by actually acting like they're part of the government or something."
Trump's first proposed budget, announced last month, which follows a hard-line blueprint put forward by the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank, included massive cuts to discretionary spending. The official budget is expected to come this week. Pierce suggested Tuesday that the executive order could act as something of a backup in case those proposed cuts don't pass muster in Congress.
Noting chief strategist Steve Bannon's behind-the-scenes power in the White House, "it seems likely that this is the fundamental purpose behind the order," Pierce wrote.
"This 'reorganization' of the executive departments sounds very much like how a polar bear 'reorganizes' your innards prior to making a meal of you," he added.
And as Education Week reporter Andrew Ujifusa warned, one of the agencies almost certain to be on the biggest chopping block is the Department of Education.
"On the campaign trail, Trump talked about either shutting down the Education Department or significantly slashing its budget," he wrote. And while there hasn't been any word yet what his administration plans to do with the office, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has indicated her support for massive cuts.
"DeVos is essentially on the same page as Trump on this issue," Ujifusa continued. "Last month, she announced that she would look through the Education Department budget in order to identify unnecessary programs. DeVos is a long-time donor to GOP candidates and causes who has advocated for a limited federal government role."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
President Donald Trump's latest executive order, signed during the chaos of the GOP's healthcare scoring report this week, instructs department heads to recommend any "unnecessary" agencies or programs to be slashed as part of a plan for "reorganizing" the federal government--and could spell disaster for agencies like the Department of Education, critics warn.
The order, officially titled the Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch, instructs agencies to consider:
- Whether "some or all of the functions of an agency, a component, or a program are appropriate for the federal government or would be better left to state or local governments or to the private sector through free enterprise";
- Whether "some or all of the functions of an agency, a component, or a program are redundant, including with those of another agency, component, or program";
- Whether "certain administrative capabilities necessary for operating an agency, a component, or a program are redundant with those of another agency, component, or program";
- Whether the "costs of continuing to operate an agency, a component, or a program are justified by the public benefits it provides"; and
- "The costs of shutting down or merging agencies, components, or programs, including the costs of addressing the equities of affected agency staff."
Put simply, as Charles P. Pierce wrote for Esquire on Tuesday, the order gives Trump and his advisers the power to "eviscerate the federal agencies that might inconvenience them by actually acting like they're part of the government or something."
Trump's first proposed budget, announced last month, which follows a hard-line blueprint put forward by the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank, included massive cuts to discretionary spending. The official budget is expected to come this week. Pierce suggested Tuesday that the executive order could act as something of a backup in case those proposed cuts don't pass muster in Congress.
Noting chief strategist Steve Bannon's behind-the-scenes power in the White House, "it seems likely that this is the fundamental purpose behind the order," Pierce wrote.
"This 'reorganization' of the executive departments sounds very much like how a polar bear 'reorganizes' your innards prior to making a meal of you," he added.
And as Education Week reporter Andrew Ujifusa warned, one of the agencies almost certain to be on the biggest chopping block is the Department of Education.
"On the campaign trail, Trump talked about either shutting down the Education Department or significantly slashing its budget," he wrote. And while there hasn't been any word yet what his administration plans to do with the office, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has indicated her support for massive cuts.
"DeVos is essentially on the same page as Trump on this issue," Ujifusa continued. "Last month, she announced that she would look through the Education Department budget in order to identify unnecessary programs. DeVos is a long-time donor to GOP candidates and causes who has advocated for a limited federal government role."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.