SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Pressed By Warren, Carson Can't Promise Trump Won't Benefit From HUD Contracts
"The problem is that you can't assure us that HUD money will not end up in the president-elect's pockets," says Sen. Elizabeth Warren
Jan 12, 2017
Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, Donald Trump's pick to lead the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), refused to say on Thursday that the Trump family would not benefit in any way from HUD incentives if he is confirmed as secretary.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) raised what she thought was a "simple yes or no question" during Carson's confirmation hearing before the Senate Banking Committee Thursday.
After noting that HUD is responsible for issuing billions of dollars in grants and loans to help develop housing nationwide--and that the president-elect and his family have "significant business interests" in the real estate realm--Warren asked: "Can you assure me that not a single taxpayer dollar you give out will financial benefit the president-elect or his family?"
"I can assure you that the things that I do are driven by a sense of morals and values," Carson responded. "And therefore I will absolutely not play favorites for anyone."
That wasn't good enough for Warren, who continued: "It's not about your good faith. My concern is whether or not, among the billions of dollars you will be responsible for handing out in grants and loans, can you just assure us that not $1 will go to benefit either the president-elect or his family?"
Carson still couldn't give a straight answer, saying, "It will not be my intention to do anything to benefit any American particularly. It's for all Americans, everything that we do."
Indeed, he continued, "If there happens to be an extraordinarily good program that's working for millions of people, and it turns out that someone that you're targeting is going to gain $10 from it, am I going to say, 'No, the rest of you Americans can't have it?' I think logic and common sense probably would be the best way."
Warren pounced on that, taking the opportunity to continue her ongoing critique of Trump's plan to address his myriad conflicts of interest:
The problem is that you can't assure us that HUD money--not of $10 varieties but of multimillion-dollar varieties--will not end up in the president-elect's pockets. And the reason you can't assure us of that is because the president-elect is hiding his family's business interests from you, from me, from the rest of America. And this just highlights the absurdity and the danger of the president-elect's refusal to put his assets in a true blind trust."
He knows, he the president-elect knows, what will benefit him and his family financially. But the public doesn't. Which means he can divert taxpayer money into his own pockets without anyone knowing about it.
Watch the exchange below:
Afterward, Warren continued her argument online:
The Huffington Post reported:
Later in the hearing, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) criticized Warren's line of questioning, saying it would start a "fake news cycle."
"I doubt seriously that scenario will ever come up," Tillis said.
Trump owns a stake in a 46-building affordable housing development in Brooklyn overseen by HUD.
Meanwhile, Carson also drew fire from outside groups during Thursday's hearing for his remarks about LGBT protections in the public housing sector. When asked by Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) about whether he would enforce such protections, Carson responded: "Of course, I would enforce all the laws of the land...What I have said before is I don't think anyone should get 'extra rights'."
The Human Rights Campaign said the statement should be "disqualifying," while the ACLU said it "strongly disagreed" with his stance.
Slate staff writer Henry Grabar also noted in his confirmation commentary that Carson "showed no signs of taking HUD's purpose seriously, and had nothing substantive to say about block grants, or the enforcement of the Fair Housing Act, or homelessness. He did not say the words Section 8, or mention the funding crisis of public housing in the nation's largest city (though he wasn't asked about that, either). At every opportunity he reverted to talking about education, health care, dependency, red tape, or fiscal responsibility. He definitely enjoyed talking about entrepreneurial opportunities in America."
"Housing and urban development?" Grabar wrote. "Not so much."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, Donald Trump's pick to lead the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), refused to say on Thursday that the Trump family would not benefit in any way from HUD incentives if he is confirmed as secretary.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) raised what she thought was a "simple yes or no question" during Carson's confirmation hearing before the Senate Banking Committee Thursday.
After noting that HUD is responsible for issuing billions of dollars in grants and loans to help develop housing nationwide--and that the president-elect and his family have "significant business interests" in the real estate realm--Warren asked: "Can you assure me that not a single taxpayer dollar you give out will financial benefit the president-elect or his family?"
"I can assure you that the things that I do are driven by a sense of morals and values," Carson responded. "And therefore I will absolutely not play favorites for anyone."
That wasn't good enough for Warren, who continued: "It's not about your good faith. My concern is whether or not, among the billions of dollars you will be responsible for handing out in grants and loans, can you just assure us that not $1 will go to benefit either the president-elect or his family?"
Carson still couldn't give a straight answer, saying, "It will not be my intention to do anything to benefit any American particularly. It's for all Americans, everything that we do."
Indeed, he continued, "If there happens to be an extraordinarily good program that's working for millions of people, and it turns out that someone that you're targeting is going to gain $10 from it, am I going to say, 'No, the rest of you Americans can't have it?' I think logic and common sense probably would be the best way."
Warren pounced on that, taking the opportunity to continue her ongoing critique of Trump's plan to address his myriad conflicts of interest:
The problem is that you can't assure us that HUD money--not of $10 varieties but of multimillion-dollar varieties--will not end up in the president-elect's pockets. And the reason you can't assure us of that is because the president-elect is hiding his family's business interests from you, from me, from the rest of America. And this just highlights the absurdity and the danger of the president-elect's refusal to put his assets in a true blind trust."
He knows, he the president-elect knows, what will benefit him and his family financially. But the public doesn't. Which means he can divert taxpayer money into his own pockets without anyone knowing about it.
Watch the exchange below:
Afterward, Warren continued her argument online:
The Huffington Post reported:
Later in the hearing, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) criticized Warren's line of questioning, saying it would start a "fake news cycle."
"I doubt seriously that scenario will ever come up," Tillis said.
Trump owns a stake in a 46-building affordable housing development in Brooklyn overseen by HUD.
Meanwhile, Carson also drew fire from outside groups during Thursday's hearing for his remarks about LGBT protections in the public housing sector. When asked by Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) about whether he would enforce such protections, Carson responded: "Of course, I would enforce all the laws of the land...What I have said before is I don't think anyone should get 'extra rights'."
The Human Rights Campaign said the statement should be "disqualifying," while the ACLU said it "strongly disagreed" with his stance.
Slate staff writer Henry Grabar also noted in his confirmation commentary that Carson "showed no signs of taking HUD's purpose seriously, and had nothing substantive to say about block grants, or the enforcement of the Fair Housing Act, or homelessness. He did not say the words Section 8, or mention the funding crisis of public housing in the nation's largest city (though he wasn't asked about that, either). At every opportunity he reverted to talking about education, health care, dependency, red tape, or fiscal responsibility. He definitely enjoyed talking about entrepreneurial opportunities in America."
"Housing and urban development?" Grabar wrote. "Not so much."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, Donald Trump's pick to lead the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), refused to say on Thursday that the Trump family would not benefit in any way from HUD incentives if he is confirmed as secretary.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) raised what she thought was a "simple yes or no question" during Carson's confirmation hearing before the Senate Banking Committee Thursday.
After noting that HUD is responsible for issuing billions of dollars in grants and loans to help develop housing nationwide--and that the president-elect and his family have "significant business interests" in the real estate realm--Warren asked: "Can you assure me that not a single taxpayer dollar you give out will financial benefit the president-elect or his family?"
"I can assure you that the things that I do are driven by a sense of morals and values," Carson responded. "And therefore I will absolutely not play favorites for anyone."
That wasn't good enough for Warren, who continued: "It's not about your good faith. My concern is whether or not, among the billions of dollars you will be responsible for handing out in grants and loans, can you just assure us that not $1 will go to benefit either the president-elect or his family?"
Carson still couldn't give a straight answer, saying, "It will not be my intention to do anything to benefit any American particularly. It's for all Americans, everything that we do."
Indeed, he continued, "If there happens to be an extraordinarily good program that's working for millions of people, and it turns out that someone that you're targeting is going to gain $10 from it, am I going to say, 'No, the rest of you Americans can't have it?' I think logic and common sense probably would be the best way."
Warren pounced on that, taking the opportunity to continue her ongoing critique of Trump's plan to address his myriad conflicts of interest:
The problem is that you can't assure us that HUD money--not of $10 varieties but of multimillion-dollar varieties--will not end up in the president-elect's pockets. And the reason you can't assure us of that is because the president-elect is hiding his family's business interests from you, from me, from the rest of America. And this just highlights the absurdity and the danger of the president-elect's refusal to put his assets in a true blind trust."
He knows, he the president-elect knows, what will benefit him and his family financially. But the public doesn't. Which means he can divert taxpayer money into his own pockets without anyone knowing about it.
Watch the exchange below:
Afterward, Warren continued her argument online:
The Huffington Post reported:
Later in the hearing, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) criticized Warren's line of questioning, saying it would start a "fake news cycle."
"I doubt seriously that scenario will ever come up," Tillis said.
Trump owns a stake in a 46-building affordable housing development in Brooklyn overseen by HUD.
Meanwhile, Carson also drew fire from outside groups during Thursday's hearing for his remarks about LGBT protections in the public housing sector. When asked by Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) about whether he would enforce such protections, Carson responded: "Of course, I would enforce all the laws of the land...What I have said before is I don't think anyone should get 'extra rights'."
The Human Rights Campaign said the statement should be "disqualifying," while the ACLU said it "strongly disagreed" with his stance.
Slate staff writer Henry Grabar also noted in his confirmation commentary that Carson "showed no signs of taking HUD's purpose seriously, and had nothing substantive to say about block grants, or the enforcement of the Fair Housing Act, or homelessness. He did not say the words Section 8, or mention the funding crisis of public housing in the nation's largest city (though he wasn't asked about that, either). At every opportunity he reverted to talking about education, health care, dependency, red tape, or fiscal responsibility. He definitely enjoyed talking about entrepreneurial opportunities in America."
"Housing and urban development?" Grabar wrote. "Not so much."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy