SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The new suit aims to block Kentucky's HB2, which forces doctors to perform an ultrasound on a women before she has an abortion. (Photo: Shane Conneely/flickr/cc)
ACLU Takes Aim at New Rights-Violating Anti-Choice Bill in Kentucky
Civil liberties group files suit same day as fast-tracked bill goes into effect
Jan 09, 2017
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Monday took swift legal against an anti-women bill fast-tracked by Kentucky lawmakers, decrying it as "an example of political interference operating in its most perverse form."
The bill in question is HB2, one of two anti-abortion measures passed during a special session on Saturday, which (pdf) forces a doctor to perform an ultrasound (which may have to be done trans-vaginally) before a woman has the procedure, make the woman hear the fetus' heartbeat if one is present, and display and describe the image to her--though the woman may "avert her eyes" and request the volume be turned down or off.
Because it included an emergency clause, the bill has already gone into effect.
The ACLU states that
HB2 violates the rights of Plaintiffs under the First Amendment, as applied through the Fourteenth Amendment, to the U.S. Constitution by forcing them to deliver unwanted, government-mandated speech; in particular, the Act compels physicians to convey to their abortion patients in a private medical setting unwanted government-mandated speech that falls outside accepted and ethical standards and practices for medical informed consent.
"A woman deserves to expect high quality compassionate care from her doctor," said Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project. "Instead, this law puts politicians in the exam room--squarely between a woman and her doctor."
A press statement announcing the legal action also notes that the "new Kentucky laws are just the latest in a torrent of restrictions passed by state legislatures over the last few years. In fact, states have passed 338 restrictions since 2010, excluding the new Kentucky laws, according to the Guttmacher Institute."
The case is EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Beshear.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Monday took swift legal against an anti-women bill fast-tracked by Kentucky lawmakers, decrying it as "an example of political interference operating in its most perverse form."
The bill in question is HB2, one of two anti-abortion measures passed during a special session on Saturday, which (pdf) forces a doctor to perform an ultrasound (which may have to be done trans-vaginally) before a woman has the procedure, make the woman hear the fetus' heartbeat if one is present, and display and describe the image to her--though the woman may "avert her eyes" and request the volume be turned down or off.
Because it included an emergency clause, the bill has already gone into effect.
The ACLU states that
HB2 violates the rights of Plaintiffs under the First Amendment, as applied through the Fourteenth Amendment, to the U.S. Constitution by forcing them to deliver unwanted, government-mandated speech; in particular, the Act compels physicians to convey to their abortion patients in a private medical setting unwanted government-mandated speech that falls outside accepted and ethical standards and practices for medical informed consent.
"A woman deserves to expect high quality compassionate care from her doctor," said Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project. "Instead, this law puts politicians in the exam room--squarely between a woman and her doctor."
A press statement announcing the legal action also notes that the "new Kentucky laws are just the latest in a torrent of restrictions passed by state legislatures over the last few years. In fact, states have passed 338 restrictions since 2010, excluding the new Kentucky laws, according to the Guttmacher Institute."
The case is EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Beshear.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Monday took swift legal against an anti-women bill fast-tracked by Kentucky lawmakers, decrying it as "an example of political interference operating in its most perverse form."
The bill in question is HB2, one of two anti-abortion measures passed during a special session on Saturday, which (pdf) forces a doctor to perform an ultrasound (which may have to be done trans-vaginally) before a woman has the procedure, make the woman hear the fetus' heartbeat if one is present, and display and describe the image to her--though the woman may "avert her eyes" and request the volume be turned down or off.
Because it included an emergency clause, the bill has already gone into effect.
The ACLU states that
HB2 violates the rights of Plaintiffs under the First Amendment, as applied through the Fourteenth Amendment, to the U.S. Constitution by forcing them to deliver unwanted, government-mandated speech; in particular, the Act compels physicians to convey to their abortion patients in a private medical setting unwanted government-mandated speech that falls outside accepted and ethical standards and practices for medical informed consent.
"A woman deserves to expect high quality compassionate care from her doctor," said Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project. "Instead, this law puts politicians in the exam room--squarely between a woman and her doctor."
A press statement announcing the legal action also notes that the "new Kentucky laws are just the latest in a torrent of restrictions passed by state legislatures over the last few years. In fact, states have passed 338 restrictions since 2010, excluding the new Kentucky laws, according to the Guttmacher Institute."
The case is EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Beshear.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.