US Must 'Come Clean' About Civilian Carnage in Syria: Amnesty International
Meanwhile, U.S.-led military coalition has "already begun laying the groundwork" for attack on Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa
As Defense Secretary Ash Carter announces that the U.S.-led military coalition has "already begun laying the groundwork" for an attack on the Syrian city of Raqqa, Amnesty International has warned that nearly a dozen attacks carried out by the forces may have killed as many as 300 civilians in the country in possible violation of international humanitarian law.
The coalition may be "significantly underestimating" damage it's caused to civilians and civilian infrastructure, Amnesty said in a press statement released Wednesday.
The human rights organization says the Defense Department has yet to respond to a memo it sent sent nearly one month ago that compiled information--based on local rights groups, eyewitnesses, and media accounts--about the attacks, and questioned whether coalition forces took the necessary steps to prevent civilian casualties.
Among those attacks was an August 11, 2015 strike targeting a building used by an armed group to produce mortars. A coalition airstrike hit that building, and satellite images obtained by the group show that two nearby homes were destroyed as well, killing eight civilians including six children. It is unclear whether any combatants were killed in the strike.
Talha al-Amouri was an eyewitness to that attack. His sister-in-law was mother to five of the children killed. She also suffered a stillbirth following the attack.
"How could they have known that there was an ammunitions factory but not that there were homes with civilians nearby?" he said to Amnesty.
Acording to Lynn Maalouf, deputy director for research at Amnesty International's Beirut regional office, "U.S. authorities should have taken steps to minimize that risk, including by issuing a warning, if feasible, or delaying the attack until civilians could be adequately protected, or canceling it if it was likely to be disproportionate."

In that event and the others analyzed by Amnesty, "Coalition forces failed to take adequate precautions to minimize harm to civilians and damage to civilian objects. Some of these attacks may constitute disproportionate or otherwise indiscriminate attacks," Maalouf said.
She added, "It's high time the U.S. authorities came clean about the full extent of the civilian damage caused by coalition attacks in Syria. Independent and impartial investigations must be carried out into any potential violations of international humanitarian law and the findings should be made public."
Amnesty also noted that research by other leading human rights organizations and monitoring groups has estimated that the total number of civilians killed in Syria by coalition forces may top 1,000, a stark contrast to statement last year by a U.S. military official that "Our coalition airstrikes are the most precise and disciplined in the history of aerial warfare."
Meanwhile, the U.S air war on Syria continues, and Iraqi and Kurdish forces, backed by U.S. airstrikes and special operations, are continuing an offensive to take back the Iraqi city of Mosul from Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) fighters, which human rights campaigners warned could worsen the humanitarian situation and lead to "bloodshed of civilians on a massive scale."
The "same sense of urgency and focus" used in the Mosul operation, Carter said Tuesday, will transfer over to an assault on the Islamic State's 'stronghold' in Syria.
Speaking alongside his French counterpart, Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, Carter said, "we've already begun laying the groundwork with our partners to commence the isolation of Raqqa," adding, "This is one of our campaign plan's core objectives; destroying ISIL's parent tumor in Iraq and Syria."
Transparency project Airwars estimates that over the last two years, coalition actions have killed over 1,700 civilians--and possibly over 2,500-- in Iraq and Syria.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As Defense Secretary Ash Carter announces that the U.S.-led military coalition has "already begun laying the groundwork" for an attack on the Syrian city of Raqqa, Amnesty International has warned that nearly a dozen attacks carried out by the forces may have killed as many as 300 civilians in the country in possible violation of international humanitarian law.
The coalition may be "significantly underestimating" damage it's caused to civilians and civilian infrastructure, Amnesty said in a press statement released Wednesday.
The human rights organization says the Defense Department has yet to respond to a memo it sent sent nearly one month ago that compiled information--based on local rights groups, eyewitnesses, and media accounts--about the attacks, and questioned whether coalition forces took the necessary steps to prevent civilian casualties.
Among those attacks was an August 11, 2015 strike targeting a building used by an armed group to produce mortars. A coalition airstrike hit that building, and satellite images obtained by the group show that two nearby homes were destroyed as well, killing eight civilians including six children. It is unclear whether any combatants were killed in the strike.
Talha al-Amouri was an eyewitness to that attack. His sister-in-law was mother to five of the children killed. She also suffered a stillbirth following the attack.
"How could they have known that there was an ammunitions factory but not that there were homes with civilians nearby?" he said to Amnesty.
Acording to Lynn Maalouf, deputy director for research at Amnesty International's Beirut regional office, "U.S. authorities should have taken steps to minimize that risk, including by issuing a warning, if feasible, or delaying the attack until civilians could be adequately protected, or canceling it if it was likely to be disproportionate."

In that event and the others analyzed by Amnesty, "Coalition forces failed to take adequate precautions to minimize harm to civilians and damage to civilian objects. Some of these attacks may constitute disproportionate or otherwise indiscriminate attacks," Maalouf said.
She added, "It's high time the U.S. authorities came clean about the full extent of the civilian damage caused by coalition attacks in Syria. Independent and impartial investigations must be carried out into any potential violations of international humanitarian law and the findings should be made public."
Amnesty also noted that research by other leading human rights organizations and monitoring groups has estimated that the total number of civilians killed in Syria by coalition forces may top 1,000, a stark contrast to statement last year by a U.S. military official that "Our coalition airstrikes are the most precise and disciplined in the history of aerial warfare."
Meanwhile, the U.S air war on Syria continues, and Iraqi and Kurdish forces, backed by U.S. airstrikes and special operations, are continuing an offensive to take back the Iraqi city of Mosul from Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) fighters, which human rights campaigners warned could worsen the humanitarian situation and lead to "bloodshed of civilians on a massive scale."
The "same sense of urgency and focus" used in the Mosul operation, Carter said Tuesday, will transfer over to an assault on the Islamic State's 'stronghold' in Syria.
Speaking alongside his French counterpart, Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, Carter said, "we've already begun laying the groundwork with our partners to commence the isolation of Raqqa," adding, "This is one of our campaign plan's core objectives; destroying ISIL's parent tumor in Iraq and Syria."
Transparency project Airwars estimates that over the last two years, coalition actions have killed over 1,700 civilians--and possibly over 2,500-- in Iraq and Syria.
As Defense Secretary Ash Carter announces that the U.S.-led military coalition has "already begun laying the groundwork" for an attack on the Syrian city of Raqqa, Amnesty International has warned that nearly a dozen attacks carried out by the forces may have killed as many as 300 civilians in the country in possible violation of international humanitarian law.
The coalition may be "significantly underestimating" damage it's caused to civilians and civilian infrastructure, Amnesty said in a press statement released Wednesday.
The human rights organization says the Defense Department has yet to respond to a memo it sent sent nearly one month ago that compiled information--based on local rights groups, eyewitnesses, and media accounts--about the attacks, and questioned whether coalition forces took the necessary steps to prevent civilian casualties.
Among those attacks was an August 11, 2015 strike targeting a building used by an armed group to produce mortars. A coalition airstrike hit that building, and satellite images obtained by the group show that two nearby homes were destroyed as well, killing eight civilians including six children. It is unclear whether any combatants were killed in the strike.
Talha al-Amouri was an eyewitness to that attack. His sister-in-law was mother to five of the children killed. She also suffered a stillbirth following the attack.
"How could they have known that there was an ammunitions factory but not that there were homes with civilians nearby?" he said to Amnesty.
Acording to Lynn Maalouf, deputy director for research at Amnesty International's Beirut regional office, "U.S. authorities should have taken steps to minimize that risk, including by issuing a warning, if feasible, or delaying the attack until civilians could be adequately protected, or canceling it if it was likely to be disproportionate."

In that event and the others analyzed by Amnesty, "Coalition forces failed to take adequate precautions to minimize harm to civilians and damage to civilian objects. Some of these attacks may constitute disproportionate or otherwise indiscriminate attacks," Maalouf said.
She added, "It's high time the U.S. authorities came clean about the full extent of the civilian damage caused by coalition attacks in Syria. Independent and impartial investigations must be carried out into any potential violations of international humanitarian law and the findings should be made public."
Amnesty also noted that research by other leading human rights organizations and monitoring groups has estimated that the total number of civilians killed in Syria by coalition forces may top 1,000, a stark contrast to statement last year by a U.S. military official that "Our coalition airstrikes are the most precise and disciplined in the history of aerial warfare."
Meanwhile, the U.S air war on Syria continues, and Iraqi and Kurdish forces, backed by U.S. airstrikes and special operations, are continuing an offensive to take back the Iraqi city of Mosul from Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) fighters, which human rights campaigners warned could worsen the humanitarian situation and lead to "bloodshed of civilians on a massive scale."
The "same sense of urgency and focus" used in the Mosul operation, Carter said Tuesday, will transfer over to an assault on the Islamic State's 'stronghold' in Syria.
Speaking alongside his French counterpart, Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, Carter said, "we've already begun laying the groundwork with our partners to commence the isolation of Raqqa," adding, "This is one of our campaign plan's core objectives; destroying ISIL's parent tumor in Iraq and Syria."
Transparency project Airwars estimates that over the last two years, coalition actions have killed over 1,700 civilians--and possibly over 2,500-- in Iraq and Syria.

