'Strongest Words Yet,' But Clinton Still Refuses to Push Obama on TPP
Clinton comes out swinging against trade deal she once supported—but fails to explicitly lead against a lame duck vote on Trans Pacific Partnership
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton on Thursday offered her "strongest words yet against the TPP," according to one progressive organization--but whether it will be enough to convince skeptics remains to be seen.
In an economic policy speech delivered in Warren, Michigan, Clinton said her "message to every worker in Michigan and across America is this: I will stop any trade deal that kills jobs or holds down wages--including the Trans Pacific Partnership. I oppose it now, I'll oppose it after the election, and I'll oppose it as President."
Watch the clip below:
Ahead of the address, progressive groups and establishment insiders alike urged Clinton to come out forcefully against the 12-nation trade deal and "make a public statement urging the White House and Democratic congressional leadership to oppose any vote on the TPP, especially during the post-election lame duck session of Congress," as CREDO and Democracy for America (DFA) said on Wednesday.
She did not do that, nor did she--as Campaign for America's Future blogger Dave Johnson had suggested--"loudly call on President Obama to withdraw TPP now."
"I oppose it now, I'll oppose it after the election, and I'll oppose it as President."
--Hillary Clinton, on TPP Still, her remarks drew praise from Progressive Change Campaign Committee co-founder Adam Green, who said in a release on Thursday afternoon: "These were Hillary Clinton's strongest words yet against the TPP. For the first time, Clinton signaled she will personally work to kill the corporate-written TPP if it comes up after the election in an unaccountable lame-duck Congress. President Obama will hurt Democratic chances of success this November--and help Donald Trump's chance of winning blue collar voters--if he does not heed Clinton's signals and take the TPP off the table before the election."
But not everyone was convinced.
(Indeed, Obama, who ran on a pledge to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 2008, did Clinton and the Democratic Party no favors when he later dropped that promise and now acts as TPP promoter-in-chief.)
Meanwhile, the anti-TPP campaign--specifically the call to stop a lame duck vote on the corporate-friendly agreement--will go on.
DFA executive director Charles Chamberlain agreed that Clinton's stated opposition on Thursday was "the strongest we've heard from her to date and will undoubtedly help build the support necessary to kill this miserable trade deal once and for all."
"However," he added, "it's now more important than ever that the country and President Obama hear specifically from Secretary Clinton that a vote on the job-killing TPP during a lame duck session of Congress must not happen."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton on Thursday offered her "strongest words yet against the TPP," according to one progressive organization--but whether it will be enough to convince skeptics remains to be seen.
In an economic policy speech delivered in Warren, Michigan, Clinton said her "message to every worker in Michigan and across America is this: I will stop any trade deal that kills jobs or holds down wages--including the Trans Pacific Partnership. I oppose it now, I'll oppose it after the election, and I'll oppose it as President."
Watch the clip below:
Ahead of the address, progressive groups and establishment insiders alike urged Clinton to come out forcefully against the 12-nation trade deal and "make a public statement urging the White House and Democratic congressional leadership to oppose any vote on the TPP, especially during the post-election lame duck session of Congress," as CREDO and Democracy for America (DFA) said on Wednesday.
She did not do that, nor did she--as Campaign for America's Future blogger Dave Johnson had suggested--"loudly call on President Obama to withdraw TPP now."
"I oppose it now, I'll oppose it after the election, and I'll oppose it as President."
--Hillary Clinton, on TPP Still, her remarks drew praise from Progressive Change Campaign Committee co-founder Adam Green, who said in a release on Thursday afternoon: "These were Hillary Clinton's strongest words yet against the TPP. For the first time, Clinton signaled she will personally work to kill the corporate-written TPP if it comes up after the election in an unaccountable lame-duck Congress. President Obama will hurt Democratic chances of success this November--and help Donald Trump's chance of winning blue collar voters--if he does not heed Clinton's signals and take the TPP off the table before the election."
But not everyone was convinced.
(Indeed, Obama, who ran on a pledge to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 2008, did Clinton and the Democratic Party no favors when he later dropped that promise and now acts as TPP promoter-in-chief.)
Meanwhile, the anti-TPP campaign--specifically the call to stop a lame duck vote on the corporate-friendly agreement--will go on.
DFA executive director Charles Chamberlain agreed that Clinton's stated opposition on Thursday was "the strongest we've heard from her to date and will undoubtedly help build the support necessary to kill this miserable trade deal once and for all."
"However," he added, "it's now more important than ever that the country and President Obama hear specifically from Secretary Clinton that a vote on the job-killing TPP during a lame duck session of Congress must not happen."
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton on Thursday offered her "strongest words yet against the TPP," according to one progressive organization--but whether it will be enough to convince skeptics remains to be seen.
In an economic policy speech delivered in Warren, Michigan, Clinton said her "message to every worker in Michigan and across America is this: I will stop any trade deal that kills jobs or holds down wages--including the Trans Pacific Partnership. I oppose it now, I'll oppose it after the election, and I'll oppose it as President."
Watch the clip below:
Ahead of the address, progressive groups and establishment insiders alike urged Clinton to come out forcefully against the 12-nation trade deal and "make a public statement urging the White House and Democratic congressional leadership to oppose any vote on the TPP, especially during the post-election lame duck session of Congress," as CREDO and Democracy for America (DFA) said on Wednesday.
She did not do that, nor did she--as Campaign for America's Future blogger Dave Johnson had suggested--"loudly call on President Obama to withdraw TPP now."
"I oppose it now, I'll oppose it after the election, and I'll oppose it as President."
--Hillary Clinton, on TPP Still, her remarks drew praise from Progressive Change Campaign Committee co-founder Adam Green, who said in a release on Thursday afternoon: "These were Hillary Clinton's strongest words yet against the TPP. For the first time, Clinton signaled she will personally work to kill the corporate-written TPP if it comes up after the election in an unaccountable lame-duck Congress. President Obama will hurt Democratic chances of success this November--and help Donald Trump's chance of winning blue collar voters--if he does not heed Clinton's signals and take the TPP off the table before the election."
But not everyone was convinced.
(Indeed, Obama, who ran on a pledge to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 2008, did Clinton and the Democratic Party no favors when he later dropped that promise and now acts as TPP promoter-in-chief.)
Meanwhile, the anti-TPP campaign--specifically the call to stop a lame duck vote on the corporate-friendly agreement--will go on.
DFA executive director Charles Chamberlain agreed that Clinton's stated opposition on Thursday was "the strongest we've heard from her to date and will undoubtedly help build the support necessary to kill this miserable trade deal once and for all."
"However," he added, "it's now more important than ever that the country and President Obama hear specifically from Secretary Clinton that a vote on the job-killing TPP during a lame duck session of Congress must not happen."