Closure of Diablo Nuclear Plant Signals Dawn of Renewable Energy Era
In landmark agreement, California's last remaining nuclear plant will be replaced by greenhouse-gas-free energy sources
A plan to shutter California's last remaining nuclear power plant and replace it with renewable energy is being heralded widely as "a clear blueprint for fighting climate change," which environmentalists hope will serve as "a model" for the nation.
The San Francisco Chronicle described the announcement made Tuesday by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), which operates the aging Diablo Canyon power plant on California's central coast, as "the end of an atomic era."
The joint proposal (pdf), drafted by the utility company along with several labor and environmental groups, states: "PG&E in consultation with the Parties, has concluded that the most effective and efficient path forward for achieving California's SB350 policy goal for deep reductions of [greenhouse gas (GHG)] emissions is to retire Diablo Canyon at the close of its current operating license period and replace it with a portfolio of GHG free resources."
The licenses expire in 2024 and 2025, and under the deal, the utility will replace that power source with renewable energy, energy efficiency, and energy storage. The agreement also contains provisions to protect the plant's workforce and the economy of the local San Luis Obispo community. PG&E further commits to derive 55 percent of the electricity produced across its entire fleet from clean, renewable sources by 2031.
"For years, some have claimed that we can't fight climate change without nuclear power because shutting down nuclear plants would mean burning more fossil fuels to generate replacement electricity. That's wrong, of course, and now we have the proof."
--Rhea Suh, NRDC
"This is an historic agreement," said Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth, which helped draft the plan, along with Natural Resources Defense Council, Environment California, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1245, Coalition of California Utility Employees, and Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility.
Pica continues, "It sets a date for the certain end of nuclear power in California and assures replacement with clean, safe, cost-competitive, renewable energy, energy efficiency, and energy storage. It lays out an effective roadmap for a nuclear phase-out in the world's sixth largest economy while assuring a green energy replacement plan to make California a global leader in fighting climate change."
Rhea Suh, president of NRDC, said the joint agreement is "a tribute to what can be accomplished when we rally together around a common goal."
"What's more," Suh added, "this plan is a model that can be replicated around the country, where nearly 100 nuclear reactors will retire in the coming decades, and around the world."
"For years," she continued, "some have claimed that we can't fight climate change without nuclear power because shutting down nuclear plants would mean burning more fossil fuels to generate replacement electricity. That's wrong, of course, and now we have the proof."
"Today's agreement is a good example of how we can replace dirty energy with clean when we set our minds to it," agreed Rob Sargent, Energy Program Director at Environment America. "It's this kind of commitment that will put us on a path to 100 percent renewable energy."
Tuesday's announcement follows years of public opposition to the plant, which sits in an earthquake-prone zone near four prominent fault lines—one of which runs just 2,000 feet from the two reactors. As anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman recently noted, "[m]ore protestors have been arrested at Diablo than at any other American nuke."
In addition to the risks posed by potential earthquake damage, Wasserman wrote, "Diablo dumps daily some 2.5 billion gallons of super-heated water into the ocean, killing vast quantities of marine life and worsening the global climate crisis. The project's chemical runoff infamously killed millions of abalone years before it operated."
The detailed phase-out proposal will now be submitted to the California Public Utility Commission and then to federal regulators for approval.
According to the Chronicle, the decommissioning process is estimated to cost $3.8 billion, $2.6 million of which PG&E has already collected in an earmarked fund. The utility reportedly seeks to raise monthly electricity rates by roughly 51 cents to make up the shortfall.
Voicing his support for the plan, California lieutenant governor Gavin Newsom, said: "The idea that the economics-- from PG&E's perspective--work for renewables is a pretty profound moment in energy policy. We've been asserting it for decades. And here you have a major utility acknowledging a low-carbon, green future."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A plan to shutter California's last remaining nuclear power plant and replace it with renewable energy is being heralded widely as "a clear blueprint for fighting climate change," which environmentalists hope will serve as "a model" for the nation.
The San Francisco Chronicle described the announcement made Tuesday by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), which operates the aging Diablo Canyon power plant on California's central coast, as "the end of an atomic era."
The joint proposal (pdf), drafted by the utility company along with several labor and environmental groups, states: "PG&E in consultation with the Parties, has concluded that the most effective and efficient path forward for achieving California's SB350 policy goal for deep reductions of [greenhouse gas (GHG)] emissions is to retire Diablo Canyon at the close of its current operating license period and replace it with a portfolio of GHG free resources."
The licenses expire in 2024 and 2025, and under the deal, the utility will replace that power source with renewable energy, energy efficiency, and energy storage. The agreement also contains provisions to protect the plant's workforce and the economy of the local San Luis Obispo community. PG&E further commits to derive 55 percent of the electricity produced across its entire fleet from clean, renewable sources by 2031.
"For years, some have claimed that we can't fight climate change without nuclear power because shutting down nuclear plants would mean burning more fossil fuels to generate replacement electricity. That's wrong, of course, and now we have the proof."
--Rhea Suh, NRDC
"This is an historic agreement," said Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth, which helped draft the plan, along with Natural Resources Defense Council, Environment California, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1245, Coalition of California Utility Employees, and Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility.
Pica continues, "It sets a date for the certain end of nuclear power in California and assures replacement with clean, safe, cost-competitive, renewable energy, energy efficiency, and energy storage. It lays out an effective roadmap for a nuclear phase-out in the world's sixth largest economy while assuring a green energy replacement plan to make California a global leader in fighting climate change."
Rhea Suh, president of NRDC, said the joint agreement is "a tribute to what can be accomplished when we rally together around a common goal."
"What's more," Suh added, "this plan is a model that can be replicated around the country, where nearly 100 nuclear reactors will retire in the coming decades, and around the world."
"For years," she continued, "some have claimed that we can't fight climate change without nuclear power because shutting down nuclear plants would mean burning more fossil fuels to generate replacement electricity. That's wrong, of course, and now we have the proof."
"Today's agreement is a good example of how we can replace dirty energy with clean when we set our minds to it," agreed Rob Sargent, Energy Program Director at Environment America. "It's this kind of commitment that will put us on a path to 100 percent renewable energy."
Tuesday's announcement follows years of public opposition to the plant, which sits in an earthquake-prone zone near four prominent fault lines—one of which runs just 2,000 feet from the two reactors. As anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman recently noted, "[m]ore protestors have been arrested at Diablo than at any other American nuke."
In addition to the risks posed by potential earthquake damage, Wasserman wrote, "Diablo dumps daily some 2.5 billion gallons of super-heated water into the ocean, killing vast quantities of marine life and worsening the global climate crisis. The project's chemical runoff infamously killed millions of abalone years before it operated."
The detailed phase-out proposal will now be submitted to the California Public Utility Commission and then to federal regulators for approval.
According to the Chronicle, the decommissioning process is estimated to cost $3.8 billion, $2.6 million of which PG&E has already collected in an earmarked fund. The utility reportedly seeks to raise monthly electricity rates by roughly 51 cents to make up the shortfall.
Voicing his support for the plan, California lieutenant governor Gavin Newsom, said: "The idea that the economics-- from PG&E's perspective--work for renewables is a pretty profound moment in energy policy. We've been asserting it for decades. And here you have a major utility acknowledging a low-carbon, green future."
A plan to shutter California's last remaining nuclear power plant and replace it with renewable energy is being heralded widely as "a clear blueprint for fighting climate change," which environmentalists hope will serve as "a model" for the nation.
The San Francisco Chronicle described the announcement made Tuesday by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), which operates the aging Diablo Canyon power plant on California's central coast, as "the end of an atomic era."
The joint proposal (pdf), drafted by the utility company along with several labor and environmental groups, states: "PG&E in consultation with the Parties, has concluded that the most effective and efficient path forward for achieving California's SB350 policy goal for deep reductions of [greenhouse gas (GHG)] emissions is to retire Diablo Canyon at the close of its current operating license period and replace it with a portfolio of GHG free resources."
The licenses expire in 2024 and 2025, and under the deal, the utility will replace that power source with renewable energy, energy efficiency, and energy storage. The agreement also contains provisions to protect the plant's workforce and the economy of the local San Luis Obispo community. PG&E further commits to derive 55 percent of the electricity produced across its entire fleet from clean, renewable sources by 2031.
"For years, some have claimed that we can't fight climate change without nuclear power because shutting down nuclear plants would mean burning more fossil fuels to generate replacement electricity. That's wrong, of course, and now we have the proof."
--Rhea Suh, NRDC
"This is an historic agreement," said Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth, which helped draft the plan, along with Natural Resources Defense Council, Environment California, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1245, Coalition of California Utility Employees, and Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility.
Pica continues, "It sets a date for the certain end of nuclear power in California and assures replacement with clean, safe, cost-competitive, renewable energy, energy efficiency, and energy storage. It lays out an effective roadmap for a nuclear phase-out in the world's sixth largest economy while assuring a green energy replacement plan to make California a global leader in fighting climate change."
Rhea Suh, president of NRDC, said the joint agreement is "a tribute to what can be accomplished when we rally together around a common goal."
"What's more," Suh added, "this plan is a model that can be replicated around the country, where nearly 100 nuclear reactors will retire in the coming decades, and around the world."
"For years," she continued, "some have claimed that we can't fight climate change without nuclear power because shutting down nuclear plants would mean burning more fossil fuels to generate replacement electricity. That's wrong, of course, and now we have the proof."
"Today's agreement is a good example of how we can replace dirty energy with clean when we set our minds to it," agreed Rob Sargent, Energy Program Director at Environment America. "It's this kind of commitment that will put us on a path to 100 percent renewable energy."
Tuesday's announcement follows years of public opposition to the plant, which sits in an earthquake-prone zone near four prominent fault lines—one of which runs just 2,000 feet from the two reactors. As anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman recently noted, "[m]ore protestors have been arrested at Diablo than at any other American nuke."
In addition to the risks posed by potential earthquake damage, Wasserman wrote, "Diablo dumps daily some 2.5 billion gallons of super-heated water into the ocean, killing vast quantities of marine life and worsening the global climate crisis. The project's chemical runoff infamously killed millions of abalone years before it operated."
The detailed phase-out proposal will now be submitted to the California Public Utility Commission and then to federal regulators for approval.
According to the Chronicle, the decommissioning process is estimated to cost $3.8 billion, $2.6 million of which PG&E has already collected in an earmarked fund. The utility reportedly seeks to raise monthly electricity rates by roughly 51 cents to make up the shortfall.
Voicing his support for the plan, California lieutenant governor Gavin Newsom, said: "The idea that the economics-- from PG&E's perspective--work for renewables is a pretty profound moment in energy policy. We've been asserting it for decades. And here you have a major utility acknowledging a low-carbon, green future."