"Wall Street is making greater use of its vast resources than ever before to influence the outcome of the election," says Public Citizen. (Photo: the405media.com)
May 18, 2016
Unencumbered by much in the way of campaign finance regulation, Wall Street mega-donors are on pace to eclipse even their own "exorbitant precedents" during the 2016 election cycle, according to a new report from national watchdog group Public Citizen.
The analysis, which uses data from the Center for Responsive Politics and the Federal Election Commission, finds that employees and businesses in the finance, insurance, and real estate sector already had given more to outside groups--specifically, super PACs devoted to presidential candidates--by the end of March than during any entire election cycle in history.
On top of that, the securities and investment industry, a subset of the finance sector that includes hedge funds and private equity funds, also has given more to outside groups than in any full election cycle.
Further, the report reveals:
- A relative handful of donors--a mere 100 individuals and businesses--are providing an extraordinary amount of money--more than 60 percent of the$430.8 million given to presidential super PACs so far.
- Wall Street is providing far more than its share of this handful of donors--more than 50 percent.
Taylor Lincoln, research director for Public Citizen's Congress Watch division and author of the report, entitled Doubling Down (pdf), noted that "this pace of giving is particularly remarkable" in part because the donors "set these records without supporting two of the three remaining candidates." Democrat Bernie Sanders and Republican Donald Trump both eschewed super PAC support during the primaries.
However, Doubling Down points out that Trump "appears to be edging away from his disavowal of super PAC support." But Sanders rival Hillary Clinton "has countenanced super PAC support all along," the report reads, "even as Sanders has savaged her for doing so--especially for accepting support from Wall Street."
Public Citizen draws special attention to the role big-money donors can play in a presidential transition team, "which plays a key role in determining the trajectory of the new administration."
Indeed, said Heath Brown, assistant professor of public policy at the City University of New York and an expert on presidential transitions: "History has shown that donors make up a vastly disproportionate share of winning presidential candidates' transition teams."
And if Wall Street benefits from that historical precedent, "it likely will continue to push its agenda of weakening and blocking rules stemming from the Dodd-Frank Act, which was designed to reduce the size of big banks and curb the kind of reckless behavior of banks that led to the 2008 financial collapse," Public Citizen warned in a statement.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
bernie sanderscampaign financecitizens uniteddodd-frankelection 2016hillary clintonpublic citizentrumpismwall street
Unencumbered by much in the way of campaign finance regulation, Wall Street mega-donors are on pace to eclipse even their own "exorbitant precedents" during the 2016 election cycle, according to a new report from national watchdog group Public Citizen.
The analysis, which uses data from the Center for Responsive Politics and the Federal Election Commission, finds that employees and businesses in the finance, insurance, and real estate sector already had given more to outside groups--specifically, super PACs devoted to presidential candidates--by the end of March than during any entire election cycle in history.
On top of that, the securities and investment industry, a subset of the finance sector that includes hedge funds and private equity funds, also has given more to outside groups than in any full election cycle.
Further, the report reveals:
- A relative handful of donors--a mere 100 individuals and businesses--are providing an extraordinary amount of money--more than 60 percent of the$430.8 million given to presidential super PACs so far.
- Wall Street is providing far more than its share of this handful of donors--more than 50 percent.
Taylor Lincoln, research director for Public Citizen's Congress Watch division and author of the report, entitled Doubling Down (pdf), noted that "this pace of giving is particularly remarkable" in part because the donors "set these records without supporting two of the three remaining candidates." Democrat Bernie Sanders and Republican Donald Trump both eschewed super PAC support during the primaries.
However, Doubling Down points out that Trump "appears to be edging away from his disavowal of super PAC support." But Sanders rival Hillary Clinton "has countenanced super PAC support all along," the report reads, "even as Sanders has savaged her for doing so--especially for accepting support from Wall Street."
Public Citizen draws special attention to the role big-money donors can play in a presidential transition team, "which plays a key role in determining the trajectory of the new administration."
Indeed, said Heath Brown, assistant professor of public policy at the City University of New York and an expert on presidential transitions: "History has shown that donors make up a vastly disproportionate share of winning presidential candidates' transition teams."
And if Wall Street benefits from that historical precedent, "it likely will continue to push its agenda of weakening and blocking rules stemming from the Dodd-Frank Act, which was designed to reduce the size of big banks and curb the kind of reckless behavior of banks that led to the 2008 financial collapse," Public Citizen warned in a statement.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Unencumbered by much in the way of campaign finance regulation, Wall Street mega-donors are on pace to eclipse even their own "exorbitant precedents" during the 2016 election cycle, according to a new report from national watchdog group Public Citizen.
The analysis, which uses data from the Center for Responsive Politics and the Federal Election Commission, finds that employees and businesses in the finance, insurance, and real estate sector already had given more to outside groups--specifically, super PACs devoted to presidential candidates--by the end of March than during any entire election cycle in history.
On top of that, the securities and investment industry, a subset of the finance sector that includes hedge funds and private equity funds, also has given more to outside groups than in any full election cycle.
Further, the report reveals:
- A relative handful of donors--a mere 100 individuals and businesses--are providing an extraordinary amount of money--more than 60 percent of the$430.8 million given to presidential super PACs so far.
- Wall Street is providing far more than its share of this handful of donors--more than 50 percent.
Taylor Lincoln, research director for Public Citizen's Congress Watch division and author of the report, entitled Doubling Down (pdf), noted that "this pace of giving is particularly remarkable" in part because the donors "set these records without supporting two of the three remaining candidates." Democrat Bernie Sanders and Republican Donald Trump both eschewed super PAC support during the primaries.
However, Doubling Down points out that Trump "appears to be edging away from his disavowal of super PAC support." But Sanders rival Hillary Clinton "has countenanced super PAC support all along," the report reads, "even as Sanders has savaged her for doing so--especially for accepting support from Wall Street."
Public Citizen draws special attention to the role big-money donors can play in a presidential transition team, "which plays a key role in determining the trajectory of the new administration."
Indeed, said Heath Brown, assistant professor of public policy at the City University of New York and an expert on presidential transitions: "History has shown that donors make up a vastly disproportionate share of winning presidential candidates' transition teams."
And if Wall Street benefits from that historical precedent, "it likely will continue to push its agenda of weakening and blocking rules stemming from the Dodd-Frank Act, which was designed to reduce the size of big banks and curb the kind of reckless behavior of banks that led to the 2008 financial collapse," Public Citizen warned in a statement.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.