SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Five Big Banks Flunk Key Test, Proving They're Still "Too Big To Fail"
'The goal to end too big to fail and protect the American taxpayer by ending bailouts remains just that: only a goal,' says federal regulator
Apr 13, 2016
Federal regulators Wednesday confirmed what watchdogs have been warning for years--the biggest banks in the United States are still "too big to fail."
The Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) found that five major U.S. banks failed to offer credible strategies for how they would enter bankruptcy in an "orderly fashion," without taking the whole economy down with them. The so-called "living wills" rejected by the banking agencies were submitted by Bank of America Corp., Bank of New York Mellon Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., State Street Corp., and Wells Fargo.
"The goal to end too big to fail and protect the American taxpayer by ending bailouts remains just that: only a goal," Thomas Hoenig, vice chairman of the FDIC, said (pdf) in a statement.
As Bloomberg explains:
The living-wills exercise was a key check on the biggest banks written into Dodd-Frank, the regulatory overhaul prompted by the 2008 financial crisis. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. demonstrated what could happen when huge, complex financial firms land in bankruptcy court, so this process was designed to make sure big banks in the U.S. are able to be wound down quickly without taking others with them.
The banks have until October 1 to resubmit their plans with serious "deficiencies" corrected, or face "more stringent" regulations, the agencies said.
Bloomberg writes: "The worst-case scenario for a bank that continually fails to make its case over the course of years is that regulators could eventually get authority to break them up, according to the law."
The New York Times notes that "[o]ther banks fared better," with Citigroup mostly satisfying both regulators and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley splitting the agencies. They, too, will have to submit revised plans, but not until July 2017.
Financial reform group Better Markets said the negative assessments represented a "major development" in terms of "protecting U.S. taxpayers" and praised the Federal Reserve and FDIC for "having the courage to do what is right & honestly grade & flunk Wall Street's biggest [too-big-to-fail] banks."
Earlier this year, former Goldman Sachs executive and current president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, Neel Kashkari--who is credited as an architect of the 2008 bailout--channeled Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren when he said the country's largest financial institutions are "still too big to fail and continue to pose a significant, ongoing risk to our economy."
Breaking up big banks has become a rallying cry of Sanders' presidential campaign.
"If a bank is too big to fail, it is too big to exist," he declared in downtown Manhattan in January. "When it comes to Wall Street reform, that must be our bottom line."
Last week, as Common Dreams reported, Sanders rolled out his plan to tackle the problem, saying that "Within the first 100 days of his administration, [he] will require the secretary of the Treasury Department to establish a 'Too-Big-to Fail' list of commercial banks, shadow banks and insurance companies whose failure would pose a catastrophic risk to the United States economy without a taxpayer bailout."
And on Wednesday, Sanders pointed out on Twitter:
The remedy, Robert Reich wrote on Tuesday, isn't more regulation. "The bottom line: Regulation won't end the Street's abuses," Reich argued. "The Street has too much firepower. And because it continues to be a major source of campaign funding, no set of regulations will be tough enough."
"So," he concluded, "the biggest banks must be busted up."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Federal regulators Wednesday confirmed what watchdogs have been warning for years--the biggest banks in the United States are still "too big to fail."
The Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) found that five major U.S. banks failed to offer credible strategies for how they would enter bankruptcy in an "orderly fashion," without taking the whole economy down with them. The so-called "living wills" rejected by the banking agencies were submitted by Bank of America Corp., Bank of New York Mellon Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., State Street Corp., and Wells Fargo.
"The goal to end too big to fail and protect the American taxpayer by ending bailouts remains just that: only a goal," Thomas Hoenig, vice chairman of the FDIC, said (pdf) in a statement.
As Bloomberg explains:
The living-wills exercise was a key check on the biggest banks written into Dodd-Frank, the regulatory overhaul prompted by the 2008 financial crisis. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. demonstrated what could happen when huge, complex financial firms land in bankruptcy court, so this process was designed to make sure big banks in the U.S. are able to be wound down quickly without taking others with them.
The banks have until October 1 to resubmit their plans with serious "deficiencies" corrected, or face "more stringent" regulations, the agencies said.
Bloomberg writes: "The worst-case scenario for a bank that continually fails to make its case over the course of years is that regulators could eventually get authority to break them up, according to the law."
The New York Times notes that "[o]ther banks fared better," with Citigroup mostly satisfying both regulators and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley splitting the agencies. They, too, will have to submit revised plans, but not until July 2017.
Financial reform group Better Markets said the negative assessments represented a "major development" in terms of "protecting U.S. taxpayers" and praised the Federal Reserve and FDIC for "having the courage to do what is right & honestly grade & flunk Wall Street's biggest [too-big-to-fail] banks."
Earlier this year, former Goldman Sachs executive and current president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, Neel Kashkari--who is credited as an architect of the 2008 bailout--channeled Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren when he said the country's largest financial institutions are "still too big to fail and continue to pose a significant, ongoing risk to our economy."
Breaking up big banks has become a rallying cry of Sanders' presidential campaign.
"If a bank is too big to fail, it is too big to exist," he declared in downtown Manhattan in January. "When it comes to Wall Street reform, that must be our bottom line."
Last week, as Common Dreams reported, Sanders rolled out his plan to tackle the problem, saying that "Within the first 100 days of his administration, [he] will require the secretary of the Treasury Department to establish a 'Too-Big-to Fail' list of commercial banks, shadow banks and insurance companies whose failure would pose a catastrophic risk to the United States economy without a taxpayer bailout."
And on Wednesday, Sanders pointed out on Twitter:
The remedy, Robert Reich wrote on Tuesday, isn't more regulation. "The bottom line: Regulation won't end the Street's abuses," Reich argued. "The Street has too much firepower. And because it continues to be a major source of campaign funding, no set of regulations will be tough enough."
"So," he concluded, "the biggest banks must be busted up."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Federal regulators Wednesday confirmed what watchdogs have been warning for years--the biggest banks in the United States are still "too big to fail."
The Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) found that five major U.S. banks failed to offer credible strategies for how they would enter bankruptcy in an "orderly fashion," without taking the whole economy down with them. The so-called "living wills" rejected by the banking agencies were submitted by Bank of America Corp., Bank of New York Mellon Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., State Street Corp., and Wells Fargo.
"The goal to end too big to fail and protect the American taxpayer by ending bailouts remains just that: only a goal," Thomas Hoenig, vice chairman of the FDIC, said (pdf) in a statement.
As Bloomberg explains:
The living-wills exercise was a key check on the biggest banks written into Dodd-Frank, the regulatory overhaul prompted by the 2008 financial crisis. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. demonstrated what could happen when huge, complex financial firms land in bankruptcy court, so this process was designed to make sure big banks in the U.S. are able to be wound down quickly without taking others with them.
The banks have until October 1 to resubmit their plans with serious "deficiencies" corrected, or face "more stringent" regulations, the agencies said.
Bloomberg writes: "The worst-case scenario for a bank that continually fails to make its case over the course of years is that regulators could eventually get authority to break them up, according to the law."
The New York Times notes that "[o]ther banks fared better," with Citigroup mostly satisfying both regulators and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley splitting the agencies. They, too, will have to submit revised plans, but not until July 2017.
Financial reform group Better Markets said the negative assessments represented a "major development" in terms of "protecting U.S. taxpayers" and praised the Federal Reserve and FDIC for "having the courage to do what is right & honestly grade & flunk Wall Street's biggest [too-big-to-fail] banks."
Earlier this year, former Goldman Sachs executive and current president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, Neel Kashkari--who is credited as an architect of the 2008 bailout--channeled Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren when he said the country's largest financial institutions are "still too big to fail and continue to pose a significant, ongoing risk to our economy."
Breaking up big banks has become a rallying cry of Sanders' presidential campaign.
"If a bank is too big to fail, it is too big to exist," he declared in downtown Manhattan in January. "When it comes to Wall Street reform, that must be our bottom line."
Last week, as Common Dreams reported, Sanders rolled out his plan to tackle the problem, saying that "Within the first 100 days of his administration, [he] will require the secretary of the Treasury Department to establish a 'Too-Big-to Fail' list of commercial banks, shadow banks and insurance companies whose failure would pose a catastrophic risk to the United States economy without a taxpayer bailout."
And on Wednesday, Sanders pointed out on Twitter:
The remedy, Robert Reich wrote on Tuesday, isn't more regulation. "The bottom line: Regulation won't end the Street's abuses," Reich argued. "The Street has too much firepower. And because it continues to be a major source of campaign funding, no set of regulations will be tough enough."
"So," he concluded, "the biggest banks must be busted up."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.