Update—Wednesday, 10am EDT:
U.S. pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and Ireland-based Allergan announced Wednesday morning that they are scrapping the proposed $160 billion merger that would have allowed Pfizer to dodge millions in U.S. taxes.
According to Reuters, "Pfizer said the decision was driven by new U.S. Treasury rules aimed at curbing such deals, called inversions."
Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders, who had called for the Treasury Department to crack down on such tax-evasion practices, heralded the news on Twitter:
Treasury’s new rules have put profitable corporations on notice that their greed will not be allowed to continue. https://t.co/5Q5o8WaLk4
— Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) April 5, 2016
Issuing what some called a death blow to the proposed $160 billion merger between pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Allergan, the U.S. Treasury Department late Monday proposed new tax regulations aimed at cracking down on so-called corporate inversions.
Corporate inversions allow U.S. businesses to avoid paying U.S. taxes by claiming foreign citizenship. The merger between Viagra-maker Pfizer Inc. and Allergan PLC, which manufactures Botox, would have been "the largest inversion ever," according to the Wall Street Journal, allowing Pfizer to profit from a lower corporate tax rate in Allergan's home country of Ireland.
"If our analysis is correct, this is a major victory for taxpayers who pay their fair share and who should expect no less from one of America’s biggest and most profitable corporations."
—Frank Clemente, Americans for Tax Fairness
But the rules proposed Monday by the Treasury Department "would negate the benefits of these inversions, putting Pfizer's acquisition of Allergan at risk," Reuters reported.
Indeed, the watchdog group Americans for Tax Fairness agreed, "it appears that the Treasury Department has issued a rule with respect to serial inverters, such as Allergan, that will wipe out the expected tax breaks Pfizer was counting on."
"If our analysis is correct, this is a major victory for taxpayers who pay their fair share and who should expect no less from one of America’s biggest and most profitable corporations," said the group's executive director, Frank Clemente.
As the Wall Street Journal explains, the new regulations seek to "make it harder for companies to make the arithmetic on inversions add up," while also hampering "the post-inversion maneuvers companies can use to lower their U.S. taxes."
To do so, the Journal explains:
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Never Miss a Beat.
Get our best delivered to your inbox.
First, they go after what they call “serial inverters,” companies that have engaged in multiple inversion transactions. The rules would disregard three years of past mergers with U.S. corporations in determining the size of the foreign company. By subtracting the value of U.S. assets a foreign company had acquired, the foreign company would become smaller in relation to the U.S. company.
Additionally, the Journal reports:
The government issued regulations against what’s known as earnings stripping, a kind of transaction that typically occurs after an inversion. Companies can lend money from their foreign headquarters to what is now the U.S. subsidiary in a transaction that has no effect on the consolidated company’s books. But it matters for tax purposes, because the U.S. subsidiary gets interest deductions against the world-high 35% U.S. corporate tax rate, effectively pushing income to a country with a lower tax rate. The rules would give the government more authority to treat those debt transactions as equity movements under the tax code.
Less than three weeks ago, presidential hopeful and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders decried deals such as the Pfizer-Allergan merger as "nothing less than a tax scam," and called on Treasury Sec. Jack Lew to crack down on earnings stripping as well as other tax-dodging practices.
On Tuesday, advocacy organization Citizens for Tax Justice (CTJ) noted "growing public outrage over lax tax laws" and said the "new regulations partly address that by reducing the tax payoff from convoluted transaction known as 'earnings stripping.'"
"While the regulations may not stop the pending Pfizer inversion, they may put a damper on the company's assumed plans to avoid taxes on $40 billion in untaxed profits that it has shifted into tax havens," said CTJ director Robert S. McIntyre.
"But the Treasury Department can and should take further action," McIntyre continued. "For example, it should use its authority [pdf] to further limit the ability of expatriating companies to use 'hopscotch loans' to get around the current, weak curbs on inversions."
"Sadly, rather than pass more targeted fixes to corporate inversion, a Republican-led Congress has decided to sit on its hands as multinational corporations avoid more and more taxes, eroding the corporate tax base, and shifting the burden of taxation onto domestic companies and American workers."
—Hunter Blair, Economic Policy Institute
Still, to really rein in corporate tax dodgers will require action by Congress.
"The Treasury’s regulatory actions continue to provide temporary fixes, which will help reduce the short-term erosion of the U.S. corporate tax base," Economic Policy Institute analyst Hunter Blair wrote in a blog post Tuesday. "But regulatory authority can only go so far, and legislative action is necessary to fully stop this type of corporate tax evasion."
As Lew himself said Monday on a conference call with reporters: "Only new anti-inversion legislation can stop these transactions. Until that time, creative accountants and lawyers will continue to seek new ways for companies to move their tax residences overseas and avoid paying taxes here at home."
However, Blair said, "Sadly, rather than pass more targeted fixes to corporate inversion, a Republican-led Congress has decided to sit on its hands as multinational corporations avoid more and more taxes, eroding the corporate tax base, and shifting the burden of taxation onto domestic companies and American workers."
CTJ's McIntyre concurred. "Even if Treasury further cracks down on U.S. companies that claim foreign residency for tax purposes, congressional action remains necessary to put a full stop to corporation inversions," he said. "Congressional leaders should stop coddling corporate deserters and enact anti-inversion reforms such as the Stop Corporate Inversions Act."
That legislation, CTJ explained in a blog post last month, would no longer allow a newly merged company to claim to be foreign if it continues to be managed and controlled in the United States or if the new parent company is more than 50 percent owned by the shareholders of the original American company.