Demonstrators at a fracking protest in London on Jan. 26, 2015. (Photo: RonF/The Weekly Bull/flickr/cc)
Dec 16, 2015
British lawmakers on Wednesday voted to allow fracking under national parks and other protected areas.
"It is incredible that this decision comes just days after signing a ground-breaking climate change agreement in Paris," stated MEP Scott Cato.
The Guardianreports that
[m]inisters used a statutory instrument to push through the new rules, which means legislation can pass into law without a debate in the House of Commons. MPs voted in favour by 298 to 261.
As Liberal Democrat head Tim Farron described it, "Government used a parliamentary wheeze to pass the change with no parliamentary debate," while Shadow energy and climate secretary Lisa Nandy said the lack of debate was "frankly shabby."
The Independent adds:
The change will also allow the industrial process to be conducted below UNESCO World Heritage Sites like Stonehenge were shale gas ever found there. Regulations were also relaxed around drinking water aquifers.
The new regulations just require that the drilling begin from outside those protected areas.
Environmental campaigners issued scathing responses to the development, and said the government should instead be banning fracking.
Calling the decision "a complete U-turn on earlier promises," Rose Dickinson, energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said, "People will rightly be concerned that the government is not following through on its commitment to have strong regulation on fracking."
"The government's own draft report found contaminated water poses risks to human health. Yet these new rules will put our drinking water and national parks at risk of fracking," she said.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas said the decision was "deeply disappointing."
"If the government is to match its rhetoric on the climate deal struck in Paris, then ministers must urgently rethink their entire approach to energy policy. To have any realistic chance of keeping global warming to well under 2 degrees we need to ban fracking in the UK."
"Not only does fracking fly in the face of the climate science but mounting evidence suggests it won't lower bills," she said.
Farron said, "Government should hang its head in shame."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
British lawmakers on Wednesday voted to allow fracking under national parks and other protected areas.
"It is incredible that this decision comes just days after signing a ground-breaking climate change agreement in Paris," stated MEP Scott Cato.
The Guardianreports that
[m]inisters used a statutory instrument to push through the new rules, which means legislation can pass into law without a debate in the House of Commons. MPs voted in favour by 298 to 261.
As Liberal Democrat head Tim Farron described it, "Government used a parliamentary wheeze to pass the change with no parliamentary debate," while Shadow energy and climate secretary Lisa Nandy said the lack of debate was "frankly shabby."
The Independent adds:
The change will also allow the industrial process to be conducted below UNESCO World Heritage Sites like Stonehenge were shale gas ever found there. Regulations were also relaxed around drinking water aquifers.
The new regulations just require that the drilling begin from outside those protected areas.
Environmental campaigners issued scathing responses to the development, and said the government should instead be banning fracking.
Calling the decision "a complete U-turn on earlier promises," Rose Dickinson, energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said, "People will rightly be concerned that the government is not following through on its commitment to have strong regulation on fracking."
"The government's own draft report found contaminated water poses risks to human health. Yet these new rules will put our drinking water and national parks at risk of fracking," she said.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas said the decision was "deeply disappointing."
"If the government is to match its rhetoric on the climate deal struck in Paris, then ministers must urgently rethink their entire approach to energy policy. To have any realistic chance of keeping global warming to well under 2 degrees we need to ban fracking in the UK."
"Not only does fracking fly in the face of the climate science but mounting evidence suggests it won't lower bills," she said.
Farron said, "Government should hang its head in shame."
British lawmakers on Wednesday voted to allow fracking under national parks and other protected areas.
"It is incredible that this decision comes just days after signing a ground-breaking climate change agreement in Paris," stated MEP Scott Cato.
The Guardianreports that
[m]inisters used a statutory instrument to push through the new rules, which means legislation can pass into law without a debate in the House of Commons. MPs voted in favour by 298 to 261.
As Liberal Democrat head Tim Farron described it, "Government used a parliamentary wheeze to pass the change with no parliamentary debate," while Shadow energy and climate secretary Lisa Nandy said the lack of debate was "frankly shabby."
The Independent adds:
The change will also allow the industrial process to be conducted below UNESCO World Heritage Sites like Stonehenge were shale gas ever found there. Regulations were also relaxed around drinking water aquifers.
The new regulations just require that the drilling begin from outside those protected areas.
Environmental campaigners issued scathing responses to the development, and said the government should instead be banning fracking.
Calling the decision "a complete U-turn on earlier promises," Rose Dickinson, energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said, "People will rightly be concerned that the government is not following through on its commitment to have strong regulation on fracking."
"The government's own draft report found contaminated water poses risks to human health. Yet these new rules will put our drinking water and national parks at risk of fracking," she said.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas said the decision was "deeply disappointing."
"If the government is to match its rhetoric on the climate deal struck in Paris, then ministers must urgently rethink their entire approach to energy policy. To have any realistic chance of keeping global warming to well under 2 degrees we need to ban fracking in the UK."
"Not only does fracking fly in the face of the climate science but mounting evidence suggests it won't lower bills," she said.
Farron said, "Government should hang its head in shame."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.