Drone Papers Aftermath: ACLU Demands Secret Program Data
The Freedom of Information Act was put into law to hold officials accountable in cases just like this, ACLU argues
The ACLU on Monday filed an appeal brief demanding that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hand over data on its secretive global drone program, including the identities of people killed by airstrikes carried out by the U.S. military in Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan.
No information on the program, including its legal justification, has been officially disclosed to the public.
The Intercept published The Drone Papers last week, a months-long investigation into the program that used a cache of intelligence documents leaked by an anonymous whistleblower to reveal the operation's internal structure and the chain of command underlying the military's aerial assassinations. In the aftermath of the report, the ACLU and several other human rights and civil liberties organizations demanded immediate accountability for the officials involved.
With Monday's appeal brief, the ACLU is renewing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in January 2010 to force the CIA to release the data.
The information "is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions," the brief states. The FOIA was enacted to "guarantee the public access to the kind of information the CIA is now withholding."
In addition to the CIA's program, the ACLU is also seeking information on a similar operation conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense. Together, the two programs are estimated to have killed thousands of civilians in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan, according to independent calculations by journalists, analysts, and other sources on the ground in those countries.
The case has been slow to move through federal courts. In 2013, a three-judge panel in Washington, D.C., rejected the CIA's argument that disclosing data on its drone program would jeopardize national security. However, in June of this year, Judge Rosemary Collyer of the D.C. district court ruled (pdf) in favor of the agency, allowing it to keep the information secret.
But Collyer got it wrong, says ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer. He writes in an op-ed published Tuesday:
According to credible, independent studies, the strikes have killed more than three thousand people, including hundreds of civilians. Although many Americans have raised questions about the effectiveness, morality, and lawfulness of the government's drone campaign, the government has exercised tight control over the information available to the public.
Jaffer wrote that the ACLU filed a FOIA request in the case "to compel the release of information that is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The ACLU on Monday filed an appeal brief demanding that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hand over data on its secretive global drone program, including the identities of people killed by airstrikes carried out by the U.S. military in Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan.
No information on the program, including its legal justification, has been officially disclosed to the public.
The Intercept published The Drone Papers last week, a months-long investigation into the program that used a cache of intelligence documents leaked by an anonymous whistleblower to reveal the operation's internal structure and the chain of command underlying the military's aerial assassinations. In the aftermath of the report, the ACLU and several other human rights and civil liberties organizations demanded immediate accountability for the officials involved.
With Monday's appeal brief, the ACLU is renewing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in January 2010 to force the CIA to release the data.
The information "is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions," the brief states. The FOIA was enacted to "guarantee the public access to the kind of information the CIA is now withholding."
In addition to the CIA's program, the ACLU is also seeking information on a similar operation conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense. Together, the two programs are estimated to have killed thousands of civilians in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan, according to independent calculations by journalists, analysts, and other sources on the ground in those countries.
The case has been slow to move through federal courts. In 2013, a three-judge panel in Washington, D.C., rejected the CIA's argument that disclosing data on its drone program would jeopardize national security. However, in June of this year, Judge Rosemary Collyer of the D.C. district court ruled (pdf) in favor of the agency, allowing it to keep the information secret.
But Collyer got it wrong, says ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer. He writes in an op-ed published Tuesday:
According to credible, independent studies, the strikes have killed more than three thousand people, including hundreds of civilians. Although many Americans have raised questions about the effectiveness, morality, and lawfulness of the government's drone campaign, the government has exercised tight control over the information available to the public.
Jaffer wrote that the ACLU filed a FOIA request in the case "to compel the release of information that is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions."
The ACLU on Monday filed an appeal brief demanding that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hand over data on its secretive global drone program, including the identities of people killed by airstrikes carried out by the U.S. military in Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan.
No information on the program, including its legal justification, has been officially disclosed to the public.
The Intercept published The Drone Papers last week, a months-long investigation into the program that used a cache of intelligence documents leaked by an anonymous whistleblower to reveal the operation's internal structure and the chain of command underlying the military's aerial assassinations. In the aftermath of the report, the ACLU and several other human rights and civil liberties organizations demanded immediate accountability for the officials involved.
With Monday's appeal brief, the ACLU is renewing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in January 2010 to force the CIA to release the data.
The information "is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions," the brief states. The FOIA was enacted to "guarantee the public access to the kind of information the CIA is now withholding."
In addition to the CIA's program, the ACLU is also seeking information on a similar operation conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense. Together, the two programs are estimated to have killed thousands of civilians in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan, according to independent calculations by journalists, analysts, and other sources on the ground in those countries.
The case has been slow to move through federal courts. In 2013, a three-judge panel in Washington, D.C., rejected the CIA's argument that disclosing data on its drone program would jeopardize national security. However, in June of this year, Judge Rosemary Collyer of the D.C. district court ruled (pdf) in favor of the agency, allowing it to keep the information secret.
But Collyer got it wrong, says ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer. He writes in an op-ed published Tuesday:
According to credible, independent studies, the strikes have killed more than three thousand people, including hundreds of civilians. Although many Americans have raised questions about the effectiveness, morality, and lawfulness of the government's drone campaign, the government has exercised tight control over the information available to the public.
Jaffer wrote that the ACLU filed a FOIA request in the case "to compel the release of information that is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions."