With Monday's appeal brief, the ACLU is kick-starting a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in January 2010 to force the CIA to give up data on its secretive drone program.
(Photo: Steve Rhodes/flickr/cc)
Oct 20, 2015
The ACLU on Monday filed an appeal brief demanding that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hand over data on its secretive global drone program, including the identities of people killed by airstrikes carried out by the U.S. military in Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan.
No information on the program, including its legal justification, has been officially disclosed to the public.
The Intercept published The Drone Papers last week, a months-long investigation into the program that used a cache of intelligence documents leaked by an anonymous whistleblower to reveal the operation's internal structure and the chain of command underlying the military's aerial assassinations. In the aftermath of the report, the ACLU and several other human rights and civil liberties organizations demanded immediate accountability for the officials involved.
With Monday's appeal brief, the ACLU is renewing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in January 2010 to force the CIA to release the data.
The information "is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions," the brief states. The FOIA was enacted to "guarantee the public access to the kind of information the CIA is now withholding."
In addition to the CIA's program, the ACLU is also seeking information on a similar operation conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense. Together, the two programs are estimated to have killed thousands of civilians in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan, according to independent calculations by journalists, analysts, and other sources on the ground in those countries.
The case has been slow to move through federal courts. In 2013, a three-judge panel in Washington, D.C., rejected the CIA's argument that disclosing data on its drone program would jeopardize national security. However, in June of this year, Judge Rosemary Collyer of the D.C. district court ruled (pdf) in favor of the agency, allowing it to keep the information secret.
But Collyer got it wrong, says ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer. He writes in an op-ed published Tuesday:
According to credible, independent studies, the strikes have killed more than three thousand people, including hundreds of civilians. Although many Americans have raised questions about the effectiveness, morality, and lawfulness of the government's drone campaign, the government has exercised tight control over the information available to the public.
Jaffer wrote that the ACLU filed a FOIA request in the case "to compel the release of information that is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
acluafghanistancentral intelligence agencyciacivil libertiescriminal justice systemdepartment of defensedronesfreedom of information actnational securitythe interceptus militarywar on terrorwhistlebloweryemendrone strikes
The ACLU on Monday filed an appeal brief demanding that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hand over data on its secretive global drone program, including the identities of people killed by airstrikes carried out by the U.S. military in Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan.
No information on the program, including its legal justification, has been officially disclosed to the public.
The Intercept published The Drone Papers last week, a months-long investigation into the program that used a cache of intelligence documents leaked by an anonymous whistleblower to reveal the operation's internal structure and the chain of command underlying the military's aerial assassinations. In the aftermath of the report, the ACLU and several other human rights and civil liberties organizations demanded immediate accountability for the officials involved.
With Monday's appeal brief, the ACLU is renewing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in January 2010 to force the CIA to release the data.
The information "is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions," the brief states. The FOIA was enacted to "guarantee the public access to the kind of information the CIA is now withholding."
In addition to the CIA's program, the ACLU is also seeking information on a similar operation conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense. Together, the two programs are estimated to have killed thousands of civilians in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan, according to independent calculations by journalists, analysts, and other sources on the ground in those countries.
The case has been slow to move through federal courts. In 2013, a three-judge panel in Washington, D.C., rejected the CIA's argument that disclosing data on its drone program would jeopardize national security. However, in June of this year, Judge Rosemary Collyer of the D.C. district court ruled (pdf) in favor of the agency, allowing it to keep the information secret.
But Collyer got it wrong, says ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer. He writes in an op-ed published Tuesday:
According to credible, independent studies, the strikes have killed more than three thousand people, including hundreds of civilians. Although many Americans have raised questions about the effectiveness, morality, and lawfulness of the government's drone campaign, the government has exercised tight control over the information available to the public.
Jaffer wrote that the ACLU filed a FOIA request in the case "to compel the release of information that is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The ACLU on Monday filed an appeal brief demanding that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hand over data on its secretive global drone program, including the identities of people killed by airstrikes carried out by the U.S. military in Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan.
No information on the program, including its legal justification, has been officially disclosed to the public.
The Intercept published The Drone Papers last week, a months-long investigation into the program that used a cache of intelligence documents leaked by an anonymous whistleblower to reveal the operation's internal structure and the chain of command underlying the military's aerial assassinations. In the aftermath of the report, the ACLU and several other human rights and civil liberties organizations demanded immediate accountability for the officials involved.
With Monday's appeal brief, the ACLU is renewing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in January 2010 to force the CIA to release the data.
The information "is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions," the brief states. The FOIA was enacted to "guarantee the public access to the kind of information the CIA is now withholding."
In addition to the CIA's program, the ACLU is also seeking information on a similar operation conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense. Together, the two programs are estimated to have killed thousands of civilians in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan, according to independent calculations by journalists, analysts, and other sources on the ground in those countries.
The case has been slow to move through federal courts. In 2013, a three-judge panel in Washington, D.C., rejected the CIA's argument that disclosing data on its drone program would jeopardize national security. However, in June of this year, Judge Rosemary Collyer of the D.C. district court ruled (pdf) in favor of the agency, allowing it to keep the information secret.
But Collyer got it wrong, says ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer. He writes in an op-ed published Tuesday:
According to credible, independent studies, the strikes have killed more than three thousand people, including hundreds of civilians. Although many Americans have raised questions about the effectiveness, morality, and lawfulness of the government's drone campaign, the government has exercised tight control over the information available to the public.
Jaffer wrote that the ACLU filed a FOIA request in the case "to compel the release of information that is crucial to the public's ability to understand government policy and hold policymakers accountable for their decisions."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.