'Risky and Reckless': Environmental Groups Renew Fight Against Shell
'This is the largest, loudest, and dirtiest exploration plan ever proposed in the American Arctic Ocean,' conservation alliance says
On Monday, a coalition of environmental and conservation groups renewed their challenge of a federal lease that opened nearly 30 million acres of Arctic waters to offshore drilling and was recently upheld by the U.S. Department of the Interior.
The coalition, which includes the Sierra Club, Earthjustice, the World Wildlife Fund, and several other environmental organizations, filed a report with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Anchorage, Alaska, outlining its intent to challenge the 2008 lease, which it called "risky and reckless."
"Drilling in the Arctic is a recipe for disaster," said David Yarnold, president and CEO of the National Audubon Society, one of the groups in the coalition. "It's reckless and defies common sense. Oil and water don't mix."
"There's no worse place on earth to drill for oil than the Arctic Ocean, and no company with a worse recording trying than Shell," added Nathaniel Lawrence, Arctic director of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "And as reckless as it is to drill there, it could do even more harm by pumping all that carbon into the atmosphere since science tells us Arctic oil has no place in a world grappling with the challenge of climate change."
In May, the Interior Department's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management gave conditional approval for Shell to drill into the Arctic Ocean's Chukchi Sea after reviewing the company's environmental and safety plans. On Monday, the coalition called the review "rushed and cursory" and said it "inadequately assessed its threats and effects."
"There's no worse place on earth to drill for oil than the Arctic Ocean, and no company with a worse recording trying than Shell."
--Nathaniel Lawrence, Natural Resources Defense Council
In addition to the potential release of significant carbon emissions, activists have long warned that fossil fuel exploration in the Chukchi Sea would harm endangered species that rely on the Arctic's pristine ecosystems to survive and that an accident in those remote waters could be more devastating than the 2010 BP oil spill which killed 11 workers and poured millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
Moreover, offshore drilling in the Arctic--which could start as early as July--also puts a heavy burden on Indigenous populations in the area, particularly those that rely on whaling.
"The lease sale decision...is directly contrary to President Obama's commitment to take essential action to limit the worst effects of climate change for future generations," said Earthjustice.
A month before Shell's drilling plan was approved, one of its rigs failed a Coast Guard inspection, while another was held in port over pollution control problems. In 2012, the oil giant's Kulluk drilling rig was wrecked during an exploratory mission that was ultimately abandoned.
"Interior unlawfully approved Shell's problem-riddled Arctic drilling plan. In doing this, it has failed the communities and wildlife of this region," said Erik Grafe, Earthjustice staff attorney. "Allowing oil drilling in the Arctic Ocean takes us in the wrong direction on combating climate change and downplays the catastrophic consequences of an oil spill here. Shell proved itself unprepared in 2012, and it remains so today and should not be permitted to drill in our fragile Arctic Ocean."
Friends of the Earth climate campaigner Marissa Knodel added, "This is the largest, loudest, and dirtiest exploration plan ever proposed in the American Arctic Ocean. Shell's revised Exploration Plan sets us on the path toward climate catastrophe, as the latest science says Arctic oil must be kept in the ground to have a chance at keeping the planet safe. The only place for these dirty fossil fuels is in the ground."
"Shell Oil's planned exploration of the Chukchi Sea poses a heavy burden and risk on Inupiat cultural livelihood," said Faith Gemmill, executive director of Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands (REDOIL). "Moving forward with drilling in the Chukchi Sea without any concrete measures to address a large oil spill in broken ice conditions is a perilous venture that could have disastrous consequences for the Inupiat and their whaling way of life. No amount of profit is worth the potential loss of a culture's livelihood."
The lawsuit is the latest move in the fight against Shell's offshore drilling plans. In recent weeks, activists in Seattle have blockaded terminals holding one of the oil giant's rigs, organized a "flotilla rally" to oppose the company's operations, and protested from kayaks in an action they dubbed 'Paddle in Seattle.'
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On Monday, a coalition of environmental and conservation groups renewed their challenge of a federal lease that opened nearly 30 million acres of Arctic waters to offshore drilling and was recently upheld by the U.S. Department of the Interior.
The coalition, which includes the Sierra Club, Earthjustice, the World Wildlife Fund, and several other environmental organizations, filed a report with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Anchorage, Alaska, outlining its intent to challenge the 2008 lease, which it called "risky and reckless."
"Drilling in the Arctic is a recipe for disaster," said David Yarnold, president and CEO of the National Audubon Society, one of the groups in the coalition. "It's reckless and defies common sense. Oil and water don't mix."
"There's no worse place on earth to drill for oil than the Arctic Ocean, and no company with a worse recording trying than Shell," added Nathaniel Lawrence, Arctic director of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "And as reckless as it is to drill there, it could do even more harm by pumping all that carbon into the atmosphere since science tells us Arctic oil has no place in a world grappling with the challenge of climate change."
In May, the Interior Department's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management gave conditional approval for Shell to drill into the Arctic Ocean's Chukchi Sea after reviewing the company's environmental and safety plans. On Monday, the coalition called the review "rushed and cursory" and said it "inadequately assessed its threats and effects."
"There's no worse place on earth to drill for oil than the Arctic Ocean, and no company with a worse recording trying than Shell."
--Nathaniel Lawrence, Natural Resources Defense Council
In addition to the potential release of significant carbon emissions, activists have long warned that fossil fuel exploration in the Chukchi Sea would harm endangered species that rely on the Arctic's pristine ecosystems to survive and that an accident in those remote waters could be more devastating than the 2010 BP oil spill which killed 11 workers and poured millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
Moreover, offshore drilling in the Arctic--which could start as early as July--also puts a heavy burden on Indigenous populations in the area, particularly those that rely on whaling.
"The lease sale decision...is directly contrary to President Obama's commitment to take essential action to limit the worst effects of climate change for future generations," said Earthjustice.
A month before Shell's drilling plan was approved, one of its rigs failed a Coast Guard inspection, while another was held in port over pollution control problems. In 2012, the oil giant's Kulluk drilling rig was wrecked during an exploratory mission that was ultimately abandoned.
"Interior unlawfully approved Shell's problem-riddled Arctic drilling plan. In doing this, it has failed the communities and wildlife of this region," said Erik Grafe, Earthjustice staff attorney. "Allowing oil drilling in the Arctic Ocean takes us in the wrong direction on combating climate change and downplays the catastrophic consequences of an oil spill here. Shell proved itself unprepared in 2012, and it remains so today and should not be permitted to drill in our fragile Arctic Ocean."
Friends of the Earth climate campaigner Marissa Knodel added, "This is the largest, loudest, and dirtiest exploration plan ever proposed in the American Arctic Ocean. Shell's revised Exploration Plan sets us on the path toward climate catastrophe, as the latest science says Arctic oil must be kept in the ground to have a chance at keeping the planet safe. The only place for these dirty fossil fuels is in the ground."
"Shell Oil's planned exploration of the Chukchi Sea poses a heavy burden and risk on Inupiat cultural livelihood," said Faith Gemmill, executive director of Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands (REDOIL). "Moving forward with drilling in the Chukchi Sea without any concrete measures to address a large oil spill in broken ice conditions is a perilous venture that could have disastrous consequences for the Inupiat and their whaling way of life. No amount of profit is worth the potential loss of a culture's livelihood."
The lawsuit is the latest move in the fight against Shell's offshore drilling plans. In recent weeks, activists in Seattle have blockaded terminals holding one of the oil giant's rigs, organized a "flotilla rally" to oppose the company's operations, and protested from kayaks in an action they dubbed 'Paddle in Seattle.'
On Monday, a coalition of environmental and conservation groups renewed their challenge of a federal lease that opened nearly 30 million acres of Arctic waters to offshore drilling and was recently upheld by the U.S. Department of the Interior.
The coalition, which includes the Sierra Club, Earthjustice, the World Wildlife Fund, and several other environmental organizations, filed a report with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Anchorage, Alaska, outlining its intent to challenge the 2008 lease, which it called "risky and reckless."
"Drilling in the Arctic is a recipe for disaster," said David Yarnold, president and CEO of the National Audubon Society, one of the groups in the coalition. "It's reckless and defies common sense. Oil and water don't mix."
"There's no worse place on earth to drill for oil than the Arctic Ocean, and no company with a worse recording trying than Shell," added Nathaniel Lawrence, Arctic director of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "And as reckless as it is to drill there, it could do even more harm by pumping all that carbon into the atmosphere since science tells us Arctic oil has no place in a world grappling with the challenge of climate change."
In May, the Interior Department's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management gave conditional approval for Shell to drill into the Arctic Ocean's Chukchi Sea after reviewing the company's environmental and safety plans. On Monday, the coalition called the review "rushed and cursory" and said it "inadequately assessed its threats and effects."
"There's no worse place on earth to drill for oil than the Arctic Ocean, and no company with a worse recording trying than Shell."
--Nathaniel Lawrence, Natural Resources Defense Council
In addition to the potential release of significant carbon emissions, activists have long warned that fossil fuel exploration in the Chukchi Sea would harm endangered species that rely on the Arctic's pristine ecosystems to survive and that an accident in those remote waters could be more devastating than the 2010 BP oil spill which killed 11 workers and poured millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
Moreover, offshore drilling in the Arctic--which could start as early as July--also puts a heavy burden on Indigenous populations in the area, particularly those that rely on whaling.
"The lease sale decision...is directly contrary to President Obama's commitment to take essential action to limit the worst effects of climate change for future generations," said Earthjustice.
A month before Shell's drilling plan was approved, one of its rigs failed a Coast Guard inspection, while another was held in port over pollution control problems. In 2012, the oil giant's Kulluk drilling rig was wrecked during an exploratory mission that was ultimately abandoned.
"Interior unlawfully approved Shell's problem-riddled Arctic drilling plan. In doing this, it has failed the communities and wildlife of this region," said Erik Grafe, Earthjustice staff attorney. "Allowing oil drilling in the Arctic Ocean takes us in the wrong direction on combating climate change and downplays the catastrophic consequences of an oil spill here. Shell proved itself unprepared in 2012, and it remains so today and should not be permitted to drill in our fragile Arctic Ocean."
Friends of the Earth climate campaigner Marissa Knodel added, "This is the largest, loudest, and dirtiest exploration plan ever proposed in the American Arctic Ocean. Shell's revised Exploration Plan sets us on the path toward climate catastrophe, as the latest science says Arctic oil must be kept in the ground to have a chance at keeping the planet safe. The only place for these dirty fossil fuels is in the ground."
"Shell Oil's planned exploration of the Chukchi Sea poses a heavy burden and risk on Inupiat cultural livelihood," said Faith Gemmill, executive director of Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands (REDOIL). "Moving forward with drilling in the Chukchi Sea without any concrete measures to address a large oil spill in broken ice conditions is a perilous venture that could have disastrous consequences for the Inupiat and their whaling way of life. No amount of profit is worth the potential loss of a culture's livelihood."
The lawsuit is the latest move in the fight against Shell's offshore drilling plans. In recent weeks, activists in Seattle have blockaded terminals holding one of the oil giant's rigs, organized a "flotilla rally" to oppose the company's operations, and protested from kayaks in an action they dubbed 'Paddle in Seattle.'