Secretary of State John Kerry Pushes for Endless War Authorization
'We do not think an AUMF should include a geographic limitation,' Kerry told Senate committee
Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday urged lawmakers to act at their "bipartisan best" and authorize new power for the U.S. to wage, without geographical constraints, open-ended war on Islamic militants.
Kerry made the comments in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
His specific ask was for new authorization for use of military force (AUMF) "that provides a clear signal of support for our ongoing military operations against Daesh," referring to ISIL as it is regionally called.
The White House has faced criticism for using the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs as justification for its current war against militants in Iraq and Syria, and AUMF critic Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) has called the authorization "an overly broad, deeply concerning law that gives any president the authority to wage war at any time, in any place, for nearly any purpose."
In his opening remarks, Kerry said, "It will be years, not months, before [ISIL] is defeated."
"We're determined to work with you, first and foremost to develop an approach that can generate broad bipartisan support, while ensuring that the President has the flexibility to successfully prosecute this effort," he said.
"We do not think an AUMF should include a geographic limitation," he said, adding that "we would not want an AUMF to constrain our ability to use appropriate force against ISIL in those locations if necessary. In our view, it would be a mistake to advertise to ISIL that there are safe havens for them outside of Iraq or Syria."
Though he said the administration believes not deploying ground troops is "the soundest possible policy," he added that the option shouldn't be ruled out of a new authorization, saying that "it doesn't mean we should preemptively bind the hands of the Commander-in-Chief or our commanders in the field in responding to scenarios and contingencies that are impossible to foresee."
Reiterating claims by President Obama, Kerry said, "we can be sure that this confrontation is not going to be over quickly." Though he said that the administration supports the proposal put forth by Sen. Menendez (D-N.J.) to put a three-year limitation into the new AUMF, he urged flexibility with the addition of provision that would allow "for extension in the event that circumstances require it."
Such "flexibility" to wage war has critics sounding alarm.
"Coming from someone who began his political career fighting against an open ended, disastrous war, Sec. Kerry's remarks are deeply troubling," Stephen Miles of Win Without War told Common Dreams. "Hopefully, the President--who also owes his political success to his strong antiwar positions--will support clear, strong limits imposed by Congress on our latest war in the Middle East."
"History will remember Obama harshly if he squanders his legacy by enshrining endless, worldwide war into law," Miles said.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday urged lawmakers to act at their "bipartisan best" and authorize new power for the U.S. to wage, without geographical constraints, open-ended war on Islamic militants.
Kerry made the comments in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
His specific ask was for new authorization for use of military force (AUMF) "that provides a clear signal of support for our ongoing military operations against Daesh," referring to ISIL as it is regionally called.
The White House has faced criticism for using the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs as justification for its current war against militants in Iraq and Syria, and AUMF critic Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) has called the authorization "an overly broad, deeply concerning law that gives any president the authority to wage war at any time, in any place, for nearly any purpose."
In his opening remarks, Kerry said, "It will be years, not months, before [ISIL] is defeated."
"We're determined to work with you, first and foremost to develop an approach that can generate broad bipartisan support, while ensuring that the President has the flexibility to successfully prosecute this effort," he said.
"We do not think an AUMF should include a geographic limitation," he said, adding that "we would not want an AUMF to constrain our ability to use appropriate force against ISIL in those locations if necessary. In our view, it would be a mistake to advertise to ISIL that there are safe havens for them outside of Iraq or Syria."
Though he said the administration believes not deploying ground troops is "the soundest possible policy," he added that the option shouldn't be ruled out of a new authorization, saying that "it doesn't mean we should preemptively bind the hands of the Commander-in-Chief or our commanders in the field in responding to scenarios and contingencies that are impossible to foresee."
Reiterating claims by President Obama, Kerry said, "we can be sure that this confrontation is not going to be over quickly." Though he said that the administration supports the proposal put forth by Sen. Menendez (D-N.J.) to put a three-year limitation into the new AUMF, he urged flexibility with the addition of provision that would allow "for extension in the event that circumstances require it."
Such "flexibility" to wage war has critics sounding alarm.
"Coming from someone who began his political career fighting against an open ended, disastrous war, Sec. Kerry's remarks are deeply troubling," Stephen Miles of Win Without War told Common Dreams. "Hopefully, the President--who also owes his political success to his strong antiwar positions--will support clear, strong limits imposed by Congress on our latest war in the Middle East."
"History will remember Obama harshly if he squanders his legacy by enshrining endless, worldwide war into law," Miles said.
Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday urged lawmakers to act at their "bipartisan best" and authorize new power for the U.S. to wage, without geographical constraints, open-ended war on Islamic militants.
Kerry made the comments in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
His specific ask was for new authorization for use of military force (AUMF) "that provides a clear signal of support for our ongoing military operations against Daesh," referring to ISIL as it is regionally called.
The White House has faced criticism for using the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs as justification for its current war against militants in Iraq and Syria, and AUMF critic Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) has called the authorization "an overly broad, deeply concerning law that gives any president the authority to wage war at any time, in any place, for nearly any purpose."
In his opening remarks, Kerry said, "It will be years, not months, before [ISIL] is defeated."
"We're determined to work with you, first and foremost to develop an approach that can generate broad bipartisan support, while ensuring that the President has the flexibility to successfully prosecute this effort," he said.
"We do not think an AUMF should include a geographic limitation," he said, adding that "we would not want an AUMF to constrain our ability to use appropriate force against ISIL in those locations if necessary. In our view, it would be a mistake to advertise to ISIL that there are safe havens for them outside of Iraq or Syria."
Though he said the administration believes not deploying ground troops is "the soundest possible policy," he added that the option shouldn't be ruled out of a new authorization, saying that "it doesn't mean we should preemptively bind the hands of the Commander-in-Chief or our commanders in the field in responding to scenarios and contingencies that are impossible to foresee."
Reiterating claims by President Obama, Kerry said, "we can be sure that this confrontation is not going to be over quickly." Though he said that the administration supports the proposal put forth by Sen. Menendez (D-N.J.) to put a three-year limitation into the new AUMF, he urged flexibility with the addition of provision that would allow "for extension in the event that circumstances require it."
Such "flexibility" to wage war has critics sounding alarm.
"Coming from someone who began his political career fighting against an open ended, disastrous war, Sec. Kerry's remarks are deeply troubling," Stephen Miles of Win Without War told Common Dreams. "Hopefully, the President--who also owes his political success to his strong antiwar positions--will support clear, strong limits imposed by Congress on our latest war in the Middle East."
"History will remember Obama harshly if he squanders his legacy by enshrining endless, worldwide war into law," Miles said.