SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Secretary Kerry speaking to lawmakers Tuesday. (Photo: CSPAN video/screengrab)
Secretary of State John Kerry Pushes for Endless War Authorization
'We do not think an AUMF should include a geographic limitation,' Kerry told Senate committee
Dec 10, 2014
Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday urged lawmakers to act at their "bipartisan best" and authorize new power for the U.S. to wage, without geographical constraints, open-ended war on Islamic militants.
Kerry made the comments in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
His specific ask was for new authorization for use of military force (AUMF) "that provides a clear signal of support for our ongoing military operations against Daesh," referring to ISIL as it is regionally called.
The White House has faced criticism for using the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs as justification for its current war against militants in Iraq and Syria, and AUMF critic Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) has called the authorization "an overly broad, deeply concerning law that gives any president the authority to wage war at any time, in any place, for nearly any purpose."
In his opening remarks, Kerry said, "It will be years, not months, before [ISIL] is defeated."
"We're determined to work with you, first and foremost to develop an approach that can generate broad bipartisan support, while ensuring that the President has the flexibility to successfully prosecute this effort," he said.
"We do not think an AUMF should include a geographic limitation," he said, adding that "we would not want an AUMF to constrain our ability to use appropriate force against ISIL in those locations if necessary. In our view, it would be a mistake to advertise to ISIL that there are safe havens for them outside of Iraq or Syria."
Though he said the administration believes not deploying ground troops is "the soundest possible policy," he added that the option shouldn't be ruled out of a new authorization, saying that "it doesn't mean we should preemptively bind the hands of the Commander-in-Chief or our commanders in the field in responding to scenarios and contingencies that are impossible to foresee."
Reiterating claims by President Obama, Kerry said, "we can be sure that this confrontation is not going to be over quickly." Though he said that the administration supports the proposal put forth by Sen. Menendez (D-N.J.) to put a three-year limitation into the new AUMF, he urged flexibility with the addition of provision that would allow "for extension in the event that circumstances require it."
Such "flexibility" to wage war has critics sounding alarm.
"Coming from someone who began his political career fighting against an open ended, disastrous war, Sec. Kerry's remarks are deeply troubling," Stephen Miles of Win Without War told Common Dreams. "Hopefully, the President--who also owes his political success to his strong antiwar positions--will support clear, strong limits imposed by Congress on our latest war in the Middle East."
"History will remember Obama harshly if he squanders his legacy by enshrining endless, worldwide war into law," Miles said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday urged lawmakers to act at their "bipartisan best" and authorize new power for the U.S. to wage, without geographical constraints, open-ended war on Islamic militants.
Kerry made the comments in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
His specific ask was for new authorization for use of military force (AUMF) "that provides a clear signal of support for our ongoing military operations against Daesh," referring to ISIL as it is regionally called.
The White House has faced criticism for using the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs as justification for its current war against militants in Iraq and Syria, and AUMF critic Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) has called the authorization "an overly broad, deeply concerning law that gives any president the authority to wage war at any time, in any place, for nearly any purpose."
In his opening remarks, Kerry said, "It will be years, not months, before [ISIL] is defeated."
"We're determined to work with you, first and foremost to develop an approach that can generate broad bipartisan support, while ensuring that the President has the flexibility to successfully prosecute this effort," he said.
"We do not think an AUMF should include a geographic limitation," he said, adding that "we would not want an AUMF to constrain our ability to use appropriate force against ISIL in those locations if necessary. In our view, it would be a mistake to advertise to ISIL that there are safe havens for them outside of Iraq or Syria."
Though he said the administration believes not deploying ground troops is "the soundest possible policy," he added that the option shouldn't be ruled out of a new authorization, saying that "it doesn't mean we should preemptively bind the hands of the Commander-in-Chief or our commanders in the field in responding to scenarios and contingencies that are impossible to foresee."
Reiterating claims by President Obama, Kerry said, "we can be sure that this confrontation is not going to be over quickly." Though he said that the administration supports the proposal put forth by Sen. Menendez (D-N.J.) to put a three-year limitation into the new AUMF, he urged flexibility with the addition of provision that would allow "for extension in the event that circumstances require it."
Such "flexibility" to wage war has critics sounding alarm.
"Coming from someone who began his political career fighting against an open ended, disastrous war, Sec. Kerry's remarks are deeply troubling," Stephen Miles of Win Without War told Common Dreams. "Hopefully, the President--who also owes his political success to his strong antiwar positions--will support clear, strong limits imposed by Congress on our latest war in the Middle East."
"History will remember Obama harshly if he squanders his legacy by enshrining endless, worldwide war into law," Miles said.
Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday urged lawmakers to act at their "bipartisan best" and authorize new power for the U.S. to wage, without geographical constraints, open-ended war on Islamic militants.
Kerry made the comments in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
His specific ask was for new authorization for use of military force (AUMF) "that provides a clear signal of support for our ongoing military operations against Daesh," referring to ISIL as it is regionally called.
The White House has faced criticism for using the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs as justification for its current war against militants in Iraq and Syria, and AUMF critic Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) has called the authorization "an overly broad, deeply concerning law that gives any president the authority to wage war at any time, in any place, for nearly any purpose."
In his opening remarks, Kerry said, "It will be years, not months, before [ISIL] is defeated."
"We're determined to work with you, first and foremost to develop an approach that can generate broad bipartisan support, while ensuring that the President has the flexibility to successfully prosecute this effort," he said.
"We do not think an AUMF should include a geographic limitation," he said, adding that "we would not want an AUMF to constrain our ability to use appropriate force against ISIL in those locations if necessary. In our view, it would be a mistake to advertise to ISIL that there are safe havens for them outside of Iraq or Syria."
Though he said the administration believes not deploying ground troops is "the soundest possible policy," he added that the option shouldn't be ruled out of a new authorization, saying that "it doesn't mean we should preemptively bind the hands of the Commander-in-Chief or our commanders in the field in responding to scenarios and contingencies that are impossible to foresee."
Reiterating claims by President Obama, Kerry said, "we can be sure that this confrontation is not going to be over quickly." Though he said that the administration supports the proposal put forth by Sen. Menendez (D-N.J.) to put a three-year limitation into the new AUMF, he urged flexibility with the addition of provision that would allow "for extension in the event that circumstances require it."
Such "flexibility" to wage war has critics sounding alarm.
"Coming from someone who began his political career fighting against an open ended, disastrous war, Sec. Kerry's remarks are deeply troubling," Stephen Miles of Win Without War told Common Dreams. "Hopefully, the President--who also owes his political success to his strong antiwar positions--will support clear, strong limits imposed by Congress on our latest war in the Middle East."
"History will remember Obama harshly if he squanders his legacy by enshrining endless, worldwide war into law," Miles said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.