Leading medical groups are speaking out in support of a U.S. Navy nurse who refused on ethical grounds to force-feed hunger strikers held captive at Guantanamo Bay.The American Nurses Association announced Wednesday that they have penned letters to U.S. government and military officials strongly urging against any punishment or retaliation for the act of refusal, which occurred in July. The military is planning to try the unidentified nurse, who is an officer, before a Board of Inquiry, which could result in a dishonorable discharge that strips him of his veterans benefits.\u0022The ANA Code of Ethics for Nurses clearly supports the ethical right of a professional nurse to make an independent judgment about whether he or she should participate in this or any other such activity,\u0022 reads an October 17 letter (pdf) to Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel from Pamela Cipriano, ANA president. \u0022The military setting does not change the nurse’s ethical commitments or standards.\u0022Doctor Vincent Iacopino, senior medical adviser for Physicians for Human Rights, told Common Dreams that his organization strongly supports the nurse\u0026#039;s refusal to take part in the force-feeding of competent adults, which is banned by the World Medical Association and the American Medical Association and has been condemned by the office of the United Nations high commissioner for human rights as torture and a violation of international law.\u0022Force feedings are being done without informed consent, against people\u0026#039;s wishes,\u0022 said Iacopino. \u0022We have codes of conduct that prohibit us from conducting therapeutic interventions or diagnostic procedures that people do not consent to.\u0022\u0022The government is claiming it is doing this to save people\u0026#039;s lives,\u0022 Iacopino continued. \u0022The reality is that people are on hunger strike, protesting something: indefinite detention, often without charges.\u0026nbsp; Any health professional under those circumstances has a duty to refuse. This is ill treatment with no respect for autonomy.\u0022This is not the first time medical professionals have called for non-participation in the Guantanamo Bay force-feedings.In op-ed published in the New England Journal of Medicine in July, a team of doctors writes, \u0022Force-feeding a competent person is not the practice of medicine; it is aggravated assault. Using a physician to assault prisoners no more changes the nature of the act than using physicians to \u0026#039;monitor\u0026#039; torture makes torture a medical procedure. Military physicians are no more entitled to betray medical ethics than military lawyers are to betray the Constitution or military chaplains are to betray their religion.\u0022Furthermore, the American Medical Association penned a letter to Hagel in April declaring, \u0022Every competent patient has the right to refuse medical intervention, including life-sustaining interventions.\u0022The nurse\u0026#039;s act of refusal was originally revealed by Abu Wa\u0026#039;el Dhiab, a Syrian father of four who remains detained in Guantanamo Bay despite being cleared for release since 2009. Dhiab told his lawyers at Reprieve that he heard the nurse, described as an approximately 40 year-old Latino man, state, \u0022I have come to the decision that I refuse to participate in this criminal act.\u0022\u0022Before we came here, we were told a different story,\u0022 the nurse reportedly added. \u0022The story we were told was completely the opposite of what I saw.\u0022The U.S. military has been broadly criticized for its treatment of hunger strikers. In response, the U.S. has imposed secrecy on its procedures and practices, including a media blackout on the number of people participating in the protest.One hundred forty eight men remain incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay without charges or fair trial.