

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Inspired by Hungary's recent victorious protests to defeat an internet tax, "Internet Emergency" vigils to defend net neutrality are slated to sweep the United States Thursday evening.
In over a dozen cities across the United States, "demonstrators will hold their cell phones, laptops, and tablets above their heads as a symbol of protest, and shine light on the corruption unfolding in Washington, DC.," according to a statement from organizers, who include Fight for the Future, PopularResistance.org, Free Press, Demand Progress, reddit, and grassroots groups.
Under the leadership of chairman Tom Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the cable and telecommunications industry, the Federal Communications Commission is currently considering what the New York Times calls a "hybrid regulatory approach to net neutrality." Open internet campaigners warn that the new rules fall short of the strong net neutrality protections that are needed, because it would allow for internet fast and slow lanes.
"This so-called hybrid approach is not a compromise, it is a sham," Evan Greer of Fight for the Future told Common Dreams. "It allows companies to cut deals with content providers for access to better service. It's based on untested legal theories that are shaky and won't hold up in court. Given that the chair of the FCC is a former cable company lobbyist, it is hard not to assume it will fail on purpose."
Advocates of Net Neutrality are calling for the FCC to reclassify the internet under Title II of the Communications Act, which would treat the service as something to be protected in the public interest, like water and electricity.
Thursday's coordinated actions are just the latest in massive mobilizations to defend net neutrality, including an "Internet Slowdown" protest in September, during which supporters made more than 312,000 calls to Congress and submitted over 700,000 comments to the FCC.
Campaigners say the issue has attracted broad support because it is a matter of social justice and access to resources for the poor and marginalized, at a time of media consolidation and corporate power.
"The internet is an important avenue to freely express ourselves and communicate," Margaret Flowers of PopularResistance.org told Common Dreams. "If it is no longer an open platform, we will see corporate voices dominate.
"We are not going to roll over and let the FCC take our rights away," said Greer. "Those in power should expect rebellion over this if they don't listen to the public and do the right thing."
Reports and commentary on the vigils are being posted to Twitter:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Inspired by Hungary's recent victorious protests to defeat an internet tax, "Internet Emergency" vigils to defend net neutrality are slated to sweep the United States Thursday evening.
In over a dozen cities across the United States, "demonstrators will hold their cell phones, laptops, and tablets above their heads as a symbol of protest, and shine light on the corruption unfolding in Washington, DC.," according to a statement from organizers, who include Fight for the Future, PopularResistance.org, Free Press, Demand Progress, reddit, and grassroots groups.
Under the leadership of chairman Tom Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the cable and telecommunications industry, the Federal Communications Commission is currently considering what the New York Times calls a "hybrid regulatory approach to net neutrality." Open internet campaigners warn that the new rules fall short of the strong net neutrality protections that are needed, because it would allow for internet fast and slow lanes.
"This so-called hybrid approach is not a compromise, it is a sham," Evan Greer of Fight for the Future told Common Dreams. "It allows companies to cut deals with content providers for access to better service. It's based on untested legal theories that are shaky and won't hold up in court. Given that the chair of the FCC is a former cable company lobbyist, it is hard not to assume it will fail on purpose."
Advocates of Net Neutrality are calling for the FCC to reclassify the internet under Title II of the Communications Act, which would treat the service as something to be protected in the public interest, like water and electricity.
Thursday's coordinated actions are just the latest in massive mobilizations to defend net neutrality, including an "Internet Slowdown" protest in September, during which supporters made more than 312,000 calls to Congress and submitted over 700,000 comments to the FCC.
Campaigners say the issue has attracted broad support because it is a matter of social justice and access to resources for the poor and marginalized, at a time of media consolidation and corporate power.
"The internet is an important avenue to freely express ourselves and communicate," Margaret Flowers of PopularResistance.org told Common Dreams. "If it is no longer an open platform, we will see corporate voices dominate.
"We are not going to roll over and let the FCC take our rights away," said Greer. "Those in power should expect rebellion over this if they don't listen to the public and do the right thing."
Reports and commentary on the vigils are being posted to Twitter:
Inspired by Hungary's recent victorious protests to defeat an internet tax, "Internet Emergency" vigils to defend net neutrality are slated to sweep the United States Thursday evening.
In over a dozen cities across the United States, "demonstrators will hold their cell phones, laptops, and tablets above their heads as a symbol of protest, and shine light on the corruption unfolding in Washington, DC.," according to a statement from organizers, who include Fight for the Future, PopularResistance.org, Free Press, Demand Progress, reddit, and grassroots groups.
Under the leadership of chairman Tom Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the cable and telecommunications industry, the Federal Communications Commission is currently considering what the New York Times calls a "hybrid regulatory approach to net neutrality." Open internet campaigners warn that the new rules fall short of the strong net neutrality protections that are needed, because it would allow for internet fast and slow lanes.
"This so-called hybrid approach is not a compromise, it is a sham," Evan Greer of Fight for the Future told Common Dreams. "It allows companies to cut deals with content providers for access to better service. It's based on untested legal theories that are shaky and won't hold up in court. Given that the chair of the FCC is a former cable company lobbyist, it is hard not to assume it will fail on purpose."
Advocates of Net Neutrality are calling for the FCC to reclassify the internet under Title II of the Communications Act, which would treat the service as something to be protected in the public interest, like water and electricity.
Thursday's coordinated actions are just the latest in massive mobilizations to defend net neutrality, including an "Internet Slowdown" protest in September, during which supporters made more than 312,000 calls to Congress and submitted over 700,000 comments to the FCC.
Campaigners say the issue has attracted broad support because it is a matter of social justice and access to resources for the poor and marginalized, at a time of media consolidation and corporate power.
"The internet is an important avenue to freely express ourselves and communicate," Margaret Flowers of PopularResistance.org told Common Dreams. "If it is no longer an open platform, we will see corporate voices dominate.
"We are not going to roll over and let the FCC take our rights away," said Greer. "Those in power should expect rebellion over this if they don't listen to the public and do the right thing."
Reports and commentary on the vigils are being posted to Twitter: