Now's the time to take to the streets to stop President Obama from approving the northern portion of the Keystone XL pipeline.
That's the call of concerned people across the United States following the Friday release of the U.S. State Department's widely criticized environmental impact statement on the controversial pipeline.
Over 17 groups — including CREDO, Rainforest Action Network, and Forest Ethics — are urging nationwide vigils the night of Monday, February 3 to protest the pipeline.
"This is an all-hands-on-deck moment to send the message to President Obama that Keystone XL fails his climate test and he must reject it," reads a joint statement about the day of action.
Members of seven Lakota nation tribes, as well as indigenous communities in Idaho, Oklahoma, Montana, Nebraska and Oregon, are preparing to take action to stop Keystone XL, Aboriginal Peoples Television Network reports. This includes “moccasins on the ground” — a Lakota Nation program to train and support indigenous communities in taking action against the pipeline — as well as plans to set up spiritual camps along the proposed route.
“[The pipeline] poses a threat to our sacred water and the product is coming from the tar sands and our tribes oppose the tar sands mining,” said Deborah White Plume, of the Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Lakota Nation in South Dakota, in an interview with APTN. “All of our tribes have taken action to oppose the Keystone XL pipeline.”
The indigenous alliance follows previous blockades by the Nez Perce tribe of megaloads traveling Idaho's Highway 12 to the Alberta tar sands fields.
The Sierra Club is urging a mass emailing of President Obama to demand that he say "no" to the deal. "Big Oil won't give up, so we can't stop until we finish this," reads their announcement of the drive.
Meanwhile, over 75,000 people have pledged to commit civil disobedience to stop the Keystone XL pipeline from being built.
While the much-anticipated EIS is being widely reported as a green-light for President Obama to build the pipeline, environmental groups emphasize that it contains warnings against the massive carbon footprint of a potential pipeline, including the admission that tar sands oil produces approximately 17 percent more carbon than crude.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
If you think a better world is possible, support our people-powered media model today
The corporate media puts the interests of the 1% ahead of all of us. That's wrong. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
If you believe the survival of independent media is vital to a healthy democracy, please step forward with a donation to nonprofit Common Dreams today:
The report comes despite the failure of the State Department’s Inspector General to complete a conflict of interest investigation into the London-based Environmental Resource Management, the contractor hired to conduct the EIS. As Zoë Carpenter points out in The Nation, green groups are charging that ERM has ties to the oil industry, including TransCanada.
"The State Department's environmental review of the Keystone XL pipeline is a farce," said Friends of the Earth president Erich Pica in an interview with the National Journal, "Since the beginning of the assessment, the oil industry has had a direct pipeline into the agency."
President Obama claimed this summer that he would only approve the company TransCanada to build the northern portion of the pipeline if it was found the project would not worsen carbon pollution.
The proposed northern leg would stretch 1,179 miles, cutting from Alberta, through Montana, and to Steele City Nebraska, where it would link with other pipelines. While there are already 2.3 million miles of pipeline pumping oil and gas across the United States, the Keystone XL pipeline is part of Canada's plan to drastically boost prouction of high-polluting oil from Alberta's tar sands fields.
The lesser-known southern half of the pipeline — which originates in Cushing, Oklahoma, passes through communities in Oklahoma and East Texas, and arrives at coastal refineries and shipping ports — began pumping with tar sands last month, despite the fierce resistance of frontlines communities.
Groups are urging that numbers in the streets can still sway President Obama's final decision on the northern portion of the pipeline. "[T]he only time you can count on the President is when you have him completely surrounded," writes 350.org. "And so it’s up to us to mobilize again, and put the pressure on from all sides."
"The tar sands is already affecting the people (for Fort Chipewyan in Alberta), climate change is already obvious," said Gary Dorr, from the Nez Perce Tribe in Idaho, in an interview with APTN. "To facilitate that is not something the Native people of the U.S. are going to do. We are not going to sit idly by and let it happen.”